背景:在过去的十年中,基于技术的性健康教育的使用有所增加。多项研究表明,基于技术的干预措施是可行的,而一个子集也显示出改善青少年性健康结果的功效,例如增加避孕套的使用和知识。然而,对健康教育者在整合技术以扩大性健康课程方面的经验知之甚少。
目的:这项研究的目的是评估健康教育者对将技术纳入弗雷斯诺县服务不足的年轻人的性健康教育计划的看法和经验。加州,并确定将技术纳入亲自课程的促进者和挑战。
方法:本实施研究使用作为整群随机对照试验的一部分收集的数据来评估IntheKnow(ITK),包括以技术为基础的内容的性健康教育课程,例如资源定位器,视频,和游戏,可以通过移动应用程序或网站访问。分析了来自每个队列的实施日志(n=51)和与健康教育者的年度访谈(n=8)的数据,以评估健康教育者使用技术的经验和实施过程中的适应。
结果:健康教育者报告说,技术问题在某种程度上影响了实施:第一年有87%的时间,随着健康教育者对该应用程序的熟悉程度增加和功能改善,第三年下降到47%。技术问题在非学校环境中也更常见。在三个领域出现了成功和挑战:管理技术,ITK应用程序的可用性,青年参与健康教育工作者普遍对应用程序和青年参与基于技术的内容和活动有积极的评价;然而,他们还注意到青少年使用移动应用程序的某些障碍,包括有限的数据存储和手机的电池寿命。
结论:健康教育者需要培训和支持,以优化技术作为与青年接触和提供敏感信息的资源。尽管技术通常被认为是解决服务不足人群的解决方案,教育计划应考虑参与者的技术需求和局限性,教育工作者,和设置。
UNASSIGNED:RR2-10.2196/18060。
BACKGROUND: In the last decade, the use of technology-based sexual health education has increased. Multiple studies have shown the feasibility of technology-based interventions, while a subset has also shown efficacy in improving youths\' sexual health outcomes such as increased condom use and knowledge. However, little is known about health educators\' experiences in integrating technology to augment sexual health curricula.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the perceptions and experiences of health educators regarding the incorporation of technology into a sexual health education program designed for underserved youth in Fresno County, California, and to identify facilitators and challenges to incorporating technology into the in-person curriculum.
METHODS: This implementation study used data collected as part of a cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate In the Know (ITK), an in-person sexual health education curriculum that includes technology-based content, such as a resource locator, videos, and games, which can be accessed through a mobile app or website. Data from implementation logs from each cohort (n=51) and annual interviews (n=8) with health educators were analyzed to assess the health educators\' experiences using the technology and adaptations made during the implementation.
RESULTS: The health educators reported that technological issues affected implementation to some degree: 87% of the time in the first year, which decreased to 47% in the third year as health educators\' familiarity with the app increased and functionality improved. Technology issues were also more common in non-school settings. Successes and challenges in 3 domains emerged: managing technology, usability of the ITK app, and youth engagement. The health educators generally had positive comments about the app and youth engagement with the technology-based content and activities; however, they also noted certain barriers to adolescents\' use of the mobile app including limited data storage and battery life on mobile phones.
CONCLUSIONS: Health educators require training and support to optimize technology as a resource for engaging with youth and providing sensitive information. Although technology is often presented as a solution to reach underserved populations, educational programs should consider the technological needs and limitations of the participants, educators, and settings.
UNASSIGNED: RR2-10.2196/18060.