■旨在保护女童曲棍球运动员的头饰广泛可用,并允许自愿使用;但是,目前还不清楚强制使用头饰的政策如何改变这项运动,特别是关于游戏过程中的影响。因此,这项研究比较了佛罗里达州要求使用头饰(HM)的女孩高中曲棍球的影响率和游戏特征,各州没有头饰授权(NHM)。
■分析了来自189个随机选择的游戏(HM:64,NHM:125)的视频。描述性统计,影响率(IR),影响比率(IRR),影响比例(IPR),计算95%置信区间(CI)。排除1.00的相应CI的IRR和IPR被认为具有统计学意义。
■16,340影响(HM:5,821NHM:10,519;86.6影响/游戏,CI:88.6-93.3)使用曲棍球事件分析仪(LIAI)进行鉴定。大多数撞击直接撞击身体(n=16,010,98%)。少数影响直接击中玩家的头部(n=330,2%)。HM队列的头部撞击率明显高于NHM队列(IRR=2.1;95%CI=1.7-2.6)。两组中大多数头部撞击(n=271,82%)是由棍棒接触引起的。HM和NHM队列之间因棍棒接触引起的头部撞击的处罚比例没有差异(IPRIRRHM/NHM=0.98;CI=0.79-1.16)。然而,在HM队列中,由玩家接触导致处罚的头部撞击比例明显更高(IPR=1.44CI=1.17~1.54).
■这些发现表明,与NHM状态相比,强制使用头饰与在游戏过程中维持头部撞击的可能性高出两倍。HM和NHM州的大多数头部撞击都是由非法的棍棒接触引起的,不会导致罚款。
参加具有头饰授权的州的高中女子曲棍球运动员承受头部撞击的可能性是参加没有头饰授权的州的运动员的两倍。棍棒接触仍然是女孩曲棍球中最常见的头部撞击机制,不管强制要求头饰。不管头饰是否被强制要求,大多数由棍子接触引起的头部撞击不会导致处罚。
UNASSIGNED: Headgear designed to protect girls\' lacrosse athletes is widely available and permitted for voluntary use; however, it remains unknown how policies mandating headgear use may change the sport and, particularly regarding impacts during game-play. Therefore, this study compares the impact rates and game play characteristics of girls\' high school lacrosse in Florida which mandates headgear use (HM), with states having no headgear mandate (NHM).
UNASSIGNED: Video from 189 randomly-selected games (HM: 64, NHM: 125) were analyzed. Descriptive statistics, Impact Rates (IR), Impact Rate Ratios (IRR), Impact Proportion Ratios (IPR), and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were calculated. IRRs and IPRs with corresponding CIs that excluded 1.00 were deemed statistically significant.
UNASSIGNED: 16,340 impacts (HM:5,821 NHM: 10,519; 86.6 impacts/game, CI: 88.6-93.3) were identified using the Lacrosse Incident Analysis Instrument (LIAI). Most impacts directly struck the body (n = 16,010, 98%). A minority of impacts directly struck a player\'s head (n = 330, 2%). The rate of head impacts was significantly higher in the HM cohort than NHM cohort (IRR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.7-2.6). Most head impacts (n = 271, 82%) were caused by stick contact in both groups. There was no difference in the proportion of penalties administered for head impacts caused by stick contact between the HM and NHM cohorts (IPR IRRHM/NHM = 0.98; CI = 0.79-1.16). However, there was a significantly greater proportion of head impacts caused by player contact that resulted in a penalty administered in the HM cohort (IPR = 1.44 CI = 1.17-1.54).
UNASSIGNED: These findings demonstrate that mandating headgear use was associated with a two-fold greater likelihood of sustaining a head impact during game play compared to NHM states. A majority of head impacts in both HM and NHM states were caused by illegal stick contact that did not result in penalty.
High school girls’ lacrosse athletes participating in a state with a headgear mandate was twice as likely to sustain a head impact than those participating in states without headgear mandates.Stick contact remains the most common mechanism of head impacts in girls’ lacrosse, regardless of mandating headgear.Regardless of whether headgear was or was not mandated, most head impacts caused by stick contact did not result in a penalty.