OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of modified radical mastectomy (MRM) with the use of a harmonic scalpel versus electrocautery in patients with breast carcinoma.
METHODS: A prospective, non-randomized comparative study conducted from August 2022 to June 2024 on 40 female patients with stage II breast carcinoma undergoing MRM with electrocautery and harmonic scalpel.
RESULTS: Patients with MRM by harmonic scalpel exhibited significantly lower intraoperative blood loss (92.50 ± 9.67 mL) than by electrocautery (172.50 ± 30.76 mL) (p-value <.0001). The average operative time was significantly shorter for the harmonic scalpel (111.00 ± 10.71 minutes) than for the electrocautery (169.50 ± 19.32 minutes) (p-value <.0001). Postoperative pain was lower for the harmonic scalpel (visual analog scale (VAS) score 3.75 ± 0.79) than for the electrocautery (VAS score 6.10 ± 0.85) (p-value <.0001). The incidence of flap necrosis was not substantially different between the categories; seroma formation was significantly lower with the use of a harmonic scalpel (p-value <.0001). Subjects in the group of harmonic scalpels also had shorter hospital stays (8.35 ± 0.93 days) compared with the electrocautery group (12.20 ± 1.06 days) (p-value <.0001).

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies in women. Hence, its treatment has become our utmost priority in developing countries like India. Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) has traditionally been used as the standard of care for early-stage invasive breast carcinoma and still is the most commonly used surgical treatment for carcinoma breast.
OBJECTIVE: The study compared the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes with skin flaps raised using a harmonic scalpel versus those raised using electrocautery.
METHODS: Sixty women with biopsy-proven breast cancer who had to undergo MRM were randomly assigned to undergo skin flap raising during mastectomy by using electrocautery or harmonic scalpel. Thirty patients had surgery with electrocautery (Group 1) and 30 with a harmonic scalpel (Group 2) by the same surgical team.
RESULTS: The mean operative time was significantly longer with harmonic scalpel when compared to that with electrocautery (140.67 ± 28.55 vs. 122.00 ± 19.16 mins, P =0.004). The amount of intraoperative blood loss (178.33 ± 21.06 vs 138.50 ± 28.53 mL P = 0.001) was less in the group operated with the harmonic scalpel, which was statistically significant. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding total drainage content (310.83 ± 88.93 vs 298.20 ± 127.87 mL, P = 0.659), drain duration (6.83 ± 0.75 vs 7.43 ± 2.27 days, p=0.174), seroma (3.3% vs. 0%) wound infection (3.3% vs 0%), flap necrosis (16.7% vs. 3.3%, P = 0.195), duration of hospital stays (8.57 ± 0.77 vs 8.43 ± 1.61 days, p=0.684).
CONCLUSIONS: Harmonic scalpels have a few advantages over electrocautery, but are not cost-effective.

UNASSIGNED: The internal mammary artery (IMA) is the most commonly used graft in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) because of its superior long-term patency rate. However, its small diameter poses challenges in handling, and any vascular damage that may occur during harvesting can significantly affect surgical outcomes. The primary focus during IMA harvesting is to ensure safe and effective hemostasis without direct vascular injury, while ensuring secure and reliable ligation of the vascular branches. Various methods using multiple surgical instruments have been used for this purpose. Unlike traditional instruments, the shear-tip Harmonic scalpel offers more precise vessel branching control, while minimizing damage to surrounding tissues. In this study, we assessed the utility of the shear-tip Harmonic scalpel in patients undergoing minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICABG).
UNASSIGNED: From April 2019 to May 2023, a total of 40 patients underwent MICABG. The IMA was harvested using the shear-tip Harmonic scalpel with a clipless skeletonized technique. In this cohort, 5 patients underwent complete endoscopic harvesting, while 34 patients underwent direct visualization harvesting through minimal thoracotomy. Graft patency was assessed by measuring a Doppler flowmeter in the bypass conduit.
UNASSIGNED: Successful graft patency was achieved in all patients. The mean duration of IMA harvesting was 87 min. In total, 38 of the 40 patients underwent MICABG without the need for cardiopulmonary bypass, ensuring a stable procedure. There were no graft-related events or complications observed in any of the patients, and all were discharged without any issues. During a median follow-up period of 15.2 months, only one patient experienced graft occlusion necessitating intervention.
UNASSIGNED: The utilization of shear-tip Harmonic scalpel for IMA harvesting in MICABG is feasible and yields stable early results.

A constant search for methods to limit blood loss, especially the vascular lesions of the tongue, has led to the acceptance of ultrasonic harmonic scalpels.The harmonic scalpel\'s reliability exists in its ability for lasting hemostasis with minimal heat dispersion to the surrounding structures.Surgical removal of the vascular pathology in a restricted area of the oral cavity and oropharynx dictates a bloodless surgical field, further allowing increased visibility of the lesion and the surrounding anatomical structures, subsequently narrowing the surgical time frame.We report a rare case of haemangioma of the lateral border of the tongue managed with complete resection of the tumor achieved using the harmonic scalpel with reduced intraoperative blood loss, increased visibility, evidently reduced post-operative necrosis and highly preserved tissue for the histopathological examination.

UNASSIGNED: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
UNASSIGNED: The clinical decision to pursue harmonic scalpel (HS) method vs conventional hemostasis to treat head and neck cancers has been arguably predicated on the clinical outcomes observed. This study aims to evaluate the surgical outcomes of neck dissection between both techniques and perform an updated meta-analysis using the available literature.
UNASSIGNED: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library through 31st December 2021, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Outcome metrics included operative time and intraoperative blood loss. Secondary outcomes consisted of length of hospital stay, length of drain stay, total drain output, and postoperative complications. A meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager Version 5.3 (RevMan) software employing the Random Effects Model.
UNASSIGNED: We identified 114 articles, out of which 10 randomized control trials (RCTs) analyzing a combined total of 558 patients met the inclusion criteria after title and full-text screening. Meta-analysis shows the group treated with HS had a significantly shorter operative time. [MD = -23.21, 95% CI (-34.30, -12.12) P value <.0001 I2 = 92%] but an insignificant lesser intraoperative blood loss [MD = -61.53, 95% CI (-88.61, -34.45) P < .00001 I2 = 79%].
UNASSIGNED: This study confirms that that HS use in neck dissection yields a reduced operative time and intra operative blood loss relative to conventional hemostasis. Furthermore, our paper shows no superiority of HS method over conventional hemostasis where length of hospital stays, length of drain stays, and postoperative complications are concerned. Future RCTs with high-level evidence may further elucidate the relative effectiveness of HS method over conventional hemostasis in treating head and neck cancers.

Thyroidectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgeries. Conventional techniques using electrocautery carry the risk of tissue injury. Recently, there has been increased use of harmonic scalpels in thyroid surgery. The harmonic scalpel utilizes ultrasonic shears for cutting and coagulation, thus minimizing thermal injury. The objective of our study was to determine differences in operative duration, hypocalcemia, and RLN palsy. This single-center retrospective comparative study included consecutive patients undergoing hemithyroidectomies using the harmonic scalpel and conventional technique in the past one year (n = 64, harmonic group = 28 and conventional group = 36). The mean operative duration for the harmonic scalpel group was 70.4 min, vs. 81.31 min for the conventional technique group, and the difference in mean duration was found to be 10.84 min (p = 0.027). There was no statistically significant difference in the rates of hypocalcemia (p = 0.751) or RLN palsy (p = 0.121). None of the patients in either group developed permanent hypocalcemia or RLN palsy. The use of a harmonic scalpel during thyroidectomy is safe. The overall surgical duration was reduced when the harmonic scalpel was used, and the complication rates were comparable to those of the conventional technique, making it a non-inferior technique for surgical intervention in thyroidectomy and warranting harmonic scalpel consideration as a valuable addition to the armamentarium of thyroid surgeons.

UNASSIGNED: This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of coblation versus harmonic scalpel methods among patients undergoing tonsillectomy.
UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were systematically screened from inception until October 2022. The outcomes were summarized as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference/standardized mean difference (MD/SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) in a random-effects model.
UNASSIGNED: Six RCTs were analyzed, encompassing a sum of 461 patients (harmonic scalpel = 233 patients and coblation = 228 patients). The overall quality assessment was low risk of bias in two RCTs, some concerns of bias in three RCTs, and high risk of bias in one RCT. There was no significant difference between harmonic scalpel and coblation groups regarding the mean operative time (n = 6 RCTs, MD=-7.45 min, 95% CI [-15.26, 0.01], p = 0.06) mean intraoperative blood loss (n = 5 RCTs, MD=-36.03 ml, 95% CI [-77.46, 5.41], p = 0.09), and rate of postoperative hemorrhage (n = 5 RCTs, RR = 0.59, 95% CI [0.25, 1.39], p = 0.23). The overall postoperative pain score was significantly reduced in favor of the coblation group compared with the harmonic scalpel group (n = 5 RCTs, MD = 0.40, 95% CI [0.10, 0.69], p = 0.009)\".
UNASSIGNED: The harmonic scalpel and coblation techniques share equal efficacy among patients undergoing tonsillectomy. The reduction in postoperative pain score provided by the coblation method is not clinically meaningful in clinical practice. Additional RCTs are needed to consolidate the power and quality of the presented evidence.
UNASSIGNED: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-04022-7.

To present our technique using the harmonic scalpel for scrotal, extensive hydrocelectomy in adolescents and its advantages, compared with the historical techniques. Scrotal hydrocelectomy is an old-timer procedure in-which the Lord plication, the Jaboulay and the bottleneck techniques are the standard of care, up to date. A cumbersome, unpleasant scrotal dressing is commonly used to try to mitigate postoperative edema and hematoma.1 The harmonic scalpel denaturates proteins by ultrasonic vibrations, and provides advantages over conventional electrocautery with respect to bleeding, drain volume, postoperative pain, and the return to normal activity.2-5 MATERIALS: Adolescents with a large hydrocele, and no inguinal hernia were selected for this operation. All tissue layers except the skin were divided by harmonic scalpel Focus (Eticon).
Between 2017 and 2023, 43 adolescents at a median age of 14.3years (range 12-18years), were operated with this technique, using the harmonic scalpel, by a single surgeon. Median operative time was 23 minutes (range 18-35 minutes). No scrotal dressing was used. One patient had a postoperative seroma that was drained spontaneously.
The described technique is simple and time-saving, with no postoperative major edema nor hematoma in this series. The only disadvantage is the higher cost of the harmonic scalpel, that may be offset by a short time of recovery. Following our experience, we no longer use other techniques for this surgery.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial bridge is defined as epicardial coronary arteries that course through the myocardium. While frequently asymptomatic, it can present on a spectrum from stable to life threatening angina. Medical management is often successful, but failure requires stenting or bypass, both of which are inferior to myotomy in appropriate surgical candidates, the former due to morbidity and the later theoretically due to competitive flow.
METHODS: We present an otherwise healthy 50 year old gentleman with myocardial bridge refractory to medical management who was effectively managed via myotomy performed with the harmonic scalpel, enjoying complete relief of previous exertional chest pain.
CONCLUSIONS: Historically, myotomy has been described sharply and with electrocautery. Compared to the harmonic scalpel, these techniques risk poor hemostasis and damage to the underlying left anterior descending artery, not to mention their inefficiency in terms of operative speed.
CONCLUSIONS: In appropriately diagnosed patients, who are also suitable surgical candidates, myotomy, specifically with the harmonic scalpel, has short-term, intra-operative benefits of better hemostasis, protection of underlying left anterior descending artery and heart cavity, and improved operative efficiency. Given the lack of long-term symptomatic data on different myotomy techniques it is difficult to make comparisons of this nature.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical procedures for vaginal hydroceles have been varied with the aims of preventing recurrence, hematoma and edema formation and providing a better cosmetic outcome. The Jaboulay\'s procedure remains a preferred procedure owing to its simplicity and good long term outcome. However, sac eversion during the procedure leads to scrotal edema and mass sensation due to remnant sac in cases of large or secondary hydrocele sacs. Sac excision in these cases may provide better outcomes by removing the excess tissue. We aimed to compare the postoperative outcome after Jaboulay\'s procedure and harmonic scalpel excision of the sac in terms of scrotal edema, hematoma formation and the final cosmetic appearance.
METHODS: 72 adult patients with vaginal hydrocele were randomized into two groups, who underwent harmonic scalpel sac excision and Jaboulay\'s procedure respectively, performed by a single surgeon. Preoperatively, patient demographics were noted. Postoperatively, data was recorded on the 1st day, 3rd day & 10th day about postoperative complications, and outcomes. Satisfaction on final cosmetic outcome was compared between the groups at the 3rd month.
RESULTS: Post operative edema and sensation of mass in the scrotum were more (but not significant) in the Jaboulay\'s procedure group. Seroma and wound infection rates were similar in both groups. Patient satisfaction on cosmesis was better in the sac excision group.
CONCLUSIONS: Hydrocelectomy with excision of the sac using a harmonic scalpel results in a lower incidence of postoperative oedema and better patient satisfaction in terms of cosmetic outcome compared to Jaboulay\'s procedure in the treatment of adult hydroceles.