BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of the non-vascularized bone graft by Matti and Russe, followed by vascularized grafts and more recently by free vascularized bone grafts, the choice of technique in scaphoid non-union has been controversial. The purpose of the present study was to address the following questions in an umbrella review: Do union rates differ between techniques? Are there any indications for superiority of one technique over another?
METHODS: An umbrella review conducted during September 2023 month included systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The primary criterion was mean union rate according to technique. The secondary criterion was indication according to type of non-union. The PubMed, Cochrane, and MEDLINE databases were searched using a predefined methodology according to the criteria of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA version 2020). The quality of the systematic reviews included was evaluated by the \"Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews\" instrument (AMSTAR 2).
RESULTS: Nine studies (systematic reviews or meta-analyses) were included. Quality ranged between low and high. A Table was constructed to summarize the qualitative findings of each article. There was no significant difference in union rates between vascularized and non-vascularized bone grafts in 8 of the 9 studies: vascularized bone graft, 84-92%; non-vascularized bone graft, 80-88%. One study found higher union rates with vascularized bone graft (RR 1.1; 95% CI 1.0-1.2; P = 0.02), but no significant difference in functional results. However, vascularized bone graft was more effective in case of avascular necrosis of the proximal pole (74-88% union for vascularized bone graft vs. 47 - 62 % for non-vascularized bone graft) and in revision cases, while non-vascularized bone graft showed fewer failures in case of humpback deformity and/or dorsal intercalated segment instability (IRR 0.7 ± 0.09; P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: This umbrella review provides an overview for management of scaphoid non-union. There were no significant global differences between techniques. Thus, various factors need to be considered when selecting the appropriate technique.

BACKGROUND: The regional hand trauma service in Greater Manchester, United Kingdom, underwent significant reorganisation early in the COVID-19 pandemic, with a shift from predominantly general anaesthesia (GA) procedures to the adoption of a Wide-Awake Local Anaesthetic No Tourniquet (WALANT) technique. We implemented strategies targeted towards optimising patient experience, largely applicable to most healthcare settings.
METHODS: Four domains were explored: (i) compliance in timing to nationally agreed treatment guidelines, (ii) the role of patient information leaflets, (iii) the introduction of a post-operative analgesia protocol, and (iv) broadly evaluating the environmental impact following the implementation of a same-day \'see and treat\' service.
RESULTS: Following reorganisation to a predominantly WALANT service, we observed an increase in compliance with nationally agreed standards for the treatment of common hand injuries. Patient education and peri-operative counselling reduced anxiety, whereas post-operative pain was better managed with the introduction of an analgesic protocol. Using a travel carbon calculator, it can be inferred that there are significant reductions in carbon emissions generated when patients are evaluated and treated on the same day as their clinical presentation.
CONCLUSIONS: It is widely acknowledged that WALANT benefits patients and the healthcare system. We contemplated whether further incremental changes in clinical practice could further improve patient experience. Given our findings, we advocate a multi-modal approach with a greater focus on patient outcomes (trials are currently underway, e.g., WAFER) supplemented by universally accepted validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Hand injuries typically present with localized symptoms. However, we report an unusual case of a 32-year-old female who experienced a transient complete loss of sensation and motor function in her entire left nondominant hand after sustaining a minor 1 cm stab wound between the third and fourth metacarpals. Wound exploration under local anesthesia revealed no tendon, vascular, neural, or bony injury. Remarkably, she spontaneously regained full hand sensation and function within 120 minutes of the injury. Extensive neurological evaluation, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electromyography (EMG), nerve conduction studies (NCS), and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), ruled out organic pathology and supported a diagnosis of functional neurological disorder (FND), specifically functional movement disorder (FMD). Close collaboration between hand surgeons, neurologists, and occupational therapists is essential for accurate diagnosis and appropriate multidisciplinary management. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying FND and optimize evidence-based treatment for FND in the context of hand trauma. The increased awareness of this condition across specialties involved in hand injury management is crucial to facilitate timely diagnosis and avoid unnecessary interventions.

BACKGROUND: Hand injuries constitute up to 30% of the total cases treated in emergency departments. Over time, demographic changes, especially an aging population, and shifts in workplace safety regulations and healthcare policies have significantly impacted the landscape of hand trauma. This study aims to identify and analyze these evolving trends over nearly two decades.
METHODS: In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, we investigated patients who were admitted to the high-volume regional hand trauma center of a university hospital between January 2007 and December 2022. We analyzed trends in patients\' demographics and annual alterations of injuries. For the comparative analysis, patients were divided into two groups based on the time of presentation: the early cohort (2007-2014) and the current cohort (2015-2022).
RESULTS: A total of 14,414 patients were admitted to our emergency department within the study period. A significant annual increase in patient age was identified (R2 = 0.254, p = 0.047). The number of presentations increased annually by an average of 2% (p < 0.001). The incidence of the following hand injuries significantly increased: sprains/strains (+ 70.51%, p = 0.004), superficial lacerations (+ 53.99%, p < 0.001), joint dislocations (+ 51.28%, p < 0.001), fractures (carpal: + 49.25%, p = 0.003; noncarpal: + 39.18%, p < 0.001), deep lacerations (+ 37.16%, p < 0.001) and burns and corrosions (+ 29.45%, p < 0.001). However, rates of amputations decreased significantly (- 22.09%, p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: A consistent and significant annual increase in both the total number of injuries and the average age of patients was identified. An aging population may increase injury rates and comorbidities, stressing healthcare resources. Our study underscores the need to adapt healthcare structures and reimbursement policies, especially for outpatient hand injury care.

UNASSIGNED: Complex proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) fractures are challenging injuries to treat. There are multiple established treatment methods available for these injuries, including dynamic external fixation. This study reports the outcomes of complex PIPJ fractures treated with a hand-specific external fixation device.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty-five fingers in 25 patients were treated with the DigiFix external fixator device for treatment of a PIPJ dorsal fracture dislocation (n = 16) or pilon fracture (n = 9). There were 16 males and 9 females with a mean age of 40 years (range: 14-75 years) at the time of injury. The median time from injury to surgery was 10 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 5; range: 3-49). Chart and radiographic data were reviewed retrospectively.
UNASSIGNED: The average duration of external fixation was 41 days (range: 26-62 days). At a mean follow-up of 28 weeks (range: 12-105 weeks), the mean PIPJ flexion was 82 (range: 30-105 degrees), extension was -10° (range: -30 to 0 degrees), and flexion/extension arc of motion was 72 degrees (range: 30-95 degrees). Final mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score was 21.5 (range: 0-65.8). There were zero major complications and six (24%) minor complications, including superficial cellulitis (4) and stiffness (2).
UNASSIGNED: Dynamic external fixation for the treatment of complex PIPJ injuries allows for early range of motion and leads to favorable outcomes. This hand-specific external fixator has a reproducible technique which results in predictable and reliable PIPJ distraction.

Background: OpenAI\'s ChatGPT (San Francisco, CA, USA) and Google\'s Gemini (Mountain View, CA, USA) are two large language models that show promise in improving and expediting medical decision making in hand surgery. Evaluating the applications of these models within the field of hand surgery is warranted. This study aims to evaluate ChatGPT-4 and Gemini in classifying hand injuries and recommending treatment. Methods: Gemini and ChatGPT were given 68 fictionalized clinical vignettes of hand injuries twice. The models were asked to use a specific classification system and recommend surgical or nonsurgical treatment. Classifications were scored based on correctness. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics, a paired two-tailed t-test, and sensitivity testing. Results: Gemini, correctly classifying 70.6% hand injuries, demonstrated superior classification ability over ChatGPT (mean score 1.46 vs. 0.87, p-value < 0.001). For management, ChatGPT demonstrated higher sensitivity in recommending surgical intervention compared to Gemini (98.0% vs. 88.8%), but lower specificity (68.4% vs. 94.7%). When compared to ChatGPT, Gemini demonstrated greater response replicability. Conclusions: Large language models like ChatGPT and Gemini show promise in assisting medical decision making, particularly in hand surgery, with Gemini generally outperforming ChatGPT. These findings emphasize the importance of considering the strengths and limitations of different models when integrating them into clinical practice.

UNASSIGNED: Replantation represents a treatment option for patients with severed finger pulps. However, in some cases, replantation is a challenging task.
UNASSIGNED: We report a successful case of finger pulp reconstruction of the ring finger using free flaps from a nonreplantable index finger in a spare-parts procedure. A 43-year-old worker accidentally injured the index, middle and ring fingers of his left hand on a machine turntable. The severed index and middle fingers and the distal pulp of the ring finger could not be replanted in situ due to extensive contusion of blood vessels and soft tissues. After vascular and nerve anastomosis, a free skin flap isolated from the nonreplantable index finger was transplanted to the wound of the distal pulpal defect of the ring finger. The flap survived completely postoperatively. Six months after the operation, only a slight deformity of the ring finger was observed. Moreover, sensation of the digit recovered well.
UNASSIGNED: Spare-part surgery is a surgical approach that effectively saves and utilizes tissue that would otherwise be discarded in cases of severe limb trauma. This idea may be applied to treatment of severe injuries to multiple fingers. Additionally, in the process of tissue transplantation and repair, attention should be given to protecting the tissue in the recipient area to avoid damage to the original undamaged tissue structure, which can adversely affect healing and recovery of the tissue.

Nail gun injuries to the hand are an increasingly common encounter amongst those in the construction injury and a frequent presentation to the emergency department. Despite their frequency, nail gun injuries rarely involve significant structural injury. We present a rare case of severe injury by a barbed nail to the median nerve requiring surgical exploration. At our latest follow up 14 months post-operatively, the patient had ongoing sensory and motor deficits, cold intolerance and reduced proprioception and range of motion at the index finger. Continued hand therapy resulted in improved range of motion and desensitization. A systematic literature search has revealed no other reported cases of median nerve injury by nail gun.

Adhesions following hand surgery are common, leading to stiffness, which compromises the functional outcomes for the patient. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review to analyze the role of antiadhesive barriers in surgery for hand trauma. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The inclusion criteria included both randomized and non-randomized control studies in patients aged 18 or over, with the intervention of an anti-adhesive barrier compared against traditional repair without a barrier in patients with hand trauma, including nerve, fracture, and tendon injury. The primary outcome measure of interest was range of movement (ROM) after operative surgery. Secondary outcomes of interest included further surgery, reported stiffness, complications, quality of life, and time to return to work. A total of 8450 records were identified; 7 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included. Seven anti-adhesive barriers were included in the review. Three agents (amnion, MASTBiosurgery Surgiwrap antiadhesive film, and acellular dermal matrix [ADM]) demonstrated statistically significant improvements in ROM postoperatively; however, all 3 studies demonstrated a risk of bias. This review highlights the paucity of high-quality studies demonstrating any clear advantage of using anti-adhesive barriers in hand surgery; however, there is some evidence to suggest that amnion, the MAST adhesion barrier film and ADM may have favorable results as an antiadhesive barrier in hand surgery, but further high-quality research is required to quantify this effect.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate any changes to hand trauma in the past three decades and through the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized that improved consumer safety regulations, changes in access to care, and the impact of a global pandemic, among other variables, have significantly influenced the mechanisms and treatment of hand injuries between the 1980s, 2010s (pre-COVID-19), and 2020s (post-COVID-19).
METHODS: A retrospective single-center review was performed at the only level I trauma center in Mississippi, identifying all hand trauma consultations between 2012-2019 and 2020-2021, compared to aggregated data from 1989.
RESULTS: Car accidents, gunshots, saw injuries, door injuries, and falls increased in 2012-2019 and 2020-2021 compared to 1989, whereas knife injuries, glass injuries, industrial injuries, and burns decreased. Crush injuries, de-gloving injuries, and lacerations with irregular edges were increased in recent cohorts, corresponding with increased amputations and tissue loss. Skin and subcutaneous injuries decreased in modern cohorts, corresponding with a decreased ability for primary skin repair and the need for more flaps. Additionally, while hospitalizations have increased, patients have improved follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: The nature of hand trauma has changed significantly over the past three decades. Increased numbers of cars and greater access to firearms might have led to increased rates of high-energy trauma, whereas burn and industrial injuries have decreased, potentially secondary to improved safety efforts. Despite increased overall hand trauma, time to treatment and follow-up have improved. Through this study, we can be more cognizant of the evolution of hand trauma in the modern era. This can allow improved access to care and further refine management to optimize functionality for hand injuries.