Hamstring extensibility

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    拉伸程序旨在通过尝试机械地增加目标组织的长度来提高腿筋的柔韧性。然而,其他手动治疗方法,如TotalMotionRelease(TMR®)中使用的方法,通过识别身体不对称性来评估和治疗导致延展性降低的软组织损伤可能是有益的。
    这项研究的目的是确定TMR®Fab6评估和治疗的有效性,以增加健康参与者在一次TMR®治疗后的腿筋灵活性。
    观察性队列研究。
    20名健康参与者(10名男性,从三个机构招募了10名女性)。在收集人口统计信息和简短的病史之后,每位参与者在固定自行车上以中等强度(80-90RPM)进行了5分钟的热身,随后立即进行了主动膝关节伸展测试(AKET)和被动直腿抬高(PSLR)的双侧表现,以评估腿筋肌肉长度.参与者被随机置于TMR®或对照组。TMR®小组完成了“Fab6”评估和治疗,而对照组每30秒重复一次站立主动屈髋,持续15分钟,双膝完全伸展。治疗完成后,对照组和TMR®组按照与基线测试相同的顺序和方式立即在AKET和PSLR上重新评估.要求参与者在24小时内返回以进行与先前所述相同的客观测量。
    在AKET和PSLR的所有变量(p≤0.001)中,发现了从治疗后到24小时随访的PSLR首选腿的显着时间。当与对照组(7.15°±1.56)相比时,在基线和非优选腿的治疗后(12.15°±2.94)之间,在TMR®组中AKET的最显著增加。
    研究结果表明,与对照组相比,实施像TMR®这样的区域相互依赖的治疗方法可以显着改善腿筋的可扩展性和髋关节ROM。
    3.
    UNASSIGNED: Stretching programs are designed to improve hamstring flexibility by attempting to mechanically increase the length of the target tissue. However, other manual treatment approaches such as those utilized in Total Motion Release (TMR®), could be beneficial by identifying body asymmetries to assess and treat soft tissue impairments leading to diminished extensibility.
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the TMR® Fab 6 assessment and treatment to increase hamstring flexibility in healthy participants following one session of TMR®.
    UNASSIGNED: Observational Cohort study.
    UNASSIGNED: A convenience sample of 20 healthy participants (10 males, 10 females) were recruited from three institutions. Following collection of demographic information and a brief medical history, each participant performed a five minute warm-up on the stationary bike at a moderate intensity (80-90 RPMs) followed immediately by the bilateral performance of the Active Knee Extension Test (AKET) and Passive Straight Leg Raise (PSLR) to assess hamstring muscle length. Participants were randomly placed in the TMR® or control group. The TMR® group completed the \"Fab 6\" evaluation and treatment, while the control group performed one repetition of standing active hip flexion every 30-seconds for 15-minutes with both knees in full extension. Upon completion of treatment, control and TMR® groups were immediately re-evaluated on the AKET and the PSLR in the same order and fashion as baseline testing. Participants were asked to return in 24-hours for the same objective measurements as previously described.
    UNASSIGNED: A significant time by group interaction was identified across all variables (p ≤ 0.001) for AKET and PSLR except the PSLR preferred leg from post-treatment to 24hr follow-up. The most significant increase in the AKET occurred in the TMR® group between baseline and post-treatment of the non-preferred leg (12.15°±2.94) when compared to the control group (7.15°±1.56).
    UNASSIGNED: The results of the study suggest that implementing a regionally interdependent treatment approach like TMR® results in significant improvements in hamstring extensibility and hip ROM compared to the control group.
    UNASSIGNED: 3.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在腿筋肌肉损伤(HMI)后,Askling的H检验被认为是有用的比赛恢复标准。然而,它仅评估大腿后部肌肉的主动和被动灵活性。这可能导致从业者低估补偿或异常移动模式。这项研究的目的是分析这些运动学方面及其可靠性,并评估腿筋(HM)和臀大肌(GM)的活动。在三个被动和主动测试的三个试验的两个阶段中,对十二名健康男性志愿者进行了测试。动态柔性(97.2±6.0°)明显大于被动柔性(70.5±14.7°)(p<0.001),并且观察到大多数运动学特征的良好个体内再现性。股二头肌长头,半腱肌和GM平均活动(20.1±11.2%;14.3±7.3%和25.2±22.1%,分别)被发现是低到中等,表明只有一个中等水平的活动发生在积极的H测试,与其他运动相比,如冲刺本身。此外,在主动H测试期间,大腿后部肌肉的活动在志愿者中似乎是可变的。这些发现表明,H检验应该在个体基础上进行解释,而不是依赖于一般特征,并被认为是一个中间的工具之前,更多的艰苦的活动,如返回冲刺。通过这种全面的方法,临床医生可以更准确地了解患者的进展,并就患者重返赛场的准备情况做出更明智的决定。
    The Askling\'s H-test is considered a useful return to play criterion after a hamstring muscle injury (HMI). However, it assesses only the active and passive flexibility of posterior thigh muscles. This may lead the practitioner to underestimate a compensation or abnormal movement pattern. The aim of this study was to analyze these kinematic aspects and their reliability, and evaluate the hamstring (HM) and gluteus maximus (GM) muscles\' activities. Twelve healthy male volunteers were tested during two session of three trials for passive and active tests. Dynamic flexibility (97.2 ± 6.0°) was significantly greater than the passive one (70.5 ± 14.7°) (p < 0.001), and good intra-individual reproductibility for most kinematic characteristics was observed. Biceps Femoris long head, semitendinosus and GM mean activities (20.1 ± 11.2%; 14.3 ± 7.3% and 25.2 ± 22.1%, respectively) were found to be low to moderate, indicating that only a moderate level of activity occurred during the active H-test, in comparison to other movements such as sprinting itself. In addition, the activity of the posterior thigh muscles during the active H-test appeared to be variable among the volunteers. These findings suggest that the H-test should be interpreted on an individual basis rather than relying on general characteristics, and be considered as an intermediate tool before more strenuous activities such as returning to sprint. With this comprehensive approach, clinicians can gain a more accurate understanding of their patients\' progress and make more informed decisions about their readiness to return to play.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:Kinesio胶带已被提议用于改善肌肉的延展性。然而,文献中存在矛盾的结果。
    UNASSIGNED:研究Kinesio胶带对腿筋肌紧绷的大学生腿筋肌延长以及腿筋和股四头肌加强的影响。
    UNASSIGNED:在这个前后实验研究中,从伊玛目阿卜杜勒拉赫曼·本·费萨尔大学招募了96名腿筋肌肉紧绷的女学生,达曼,沙特阿拉伯,随机分配给Kinesio磁带,假磁带,或对照组(每组32个)。抑制技术用于Kinesio胶带应用,从肌肉插入到原点的胶带。在干预前和干预后15分钟进行测量。结果测量包括主动膝盖伸展测试,以测量腿筋肌肉长度,以及使用手持式测力计测量腿筋和股四头肌的等距力量。
    UNASSIGNED:在Kinesio(P=0.001)和假(P=0.004)胶带组中,腿筋肌的直接长度显着增加,而对照组无差异(P=0.066)。Kinesio胶带组的肌肉延长明显大于假胶带组(P=0.001)和对照组(P=0.001)。在所有三组中,股四头肌和腿筋肌肉强度的前后测量没有差异。
    UNASSIGNED:这些结果表明,应用Kinesio胶带对腿筋肌肉的延伸性有立竿见影的效果,但对股四头肌和腿筋肌肉强度没有影响。
    未经评估:NCT03076840。
    UNASSIGNED: Kinesio tape has been proposed to improve the muscle extensibility. However, there are contradictory results in the literature.
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the effect of Kinesio tape on hamstring muscle lengthening and on hamstring and quadriceps muscle strengthening in university students with hamstring muscle tightness.
    UNASSIGNED: In this pre-post experimental study, 96 female students with hamstring muscle tightness were recruited from Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia, and randomly assigned to Kinesio tape, sham tape, or control groups (32 in each group). The inhibition technique was used for the Kinesio tape application, with the tape being applied from the muscle insertion to the origin. Measurements were taken before and 15 min after the intervention. Outcome measurements included active knee extension test to measure the hamstring muscle length, and isometric strength measurements of hamstring and quadriceps muscles using a handheld dynamometer.
    UNASSIGNED: A significant increase in the immediate hamstring muscle length was found in both the Kinesio (P = 0.001) and sham (P = 0.004) tape groups, while no difference was noted in the control group (P = 0.066). The muscle lengthening was significantly greater in the Kinesio tape group than the sham tape (P = 0.001) and control (P = 0.001) groups. There was no difference in the pre- and post-measurements in the quadriceps and hamstring muscle strengths in all three groups.
    UNASSIGNED: These results demonstrate that applying Kinesio tape has an immediate effect on hamstring muscle extensibility, but has no effect on the quadriceps and hamstring muscle strengths.
    UNASSIGNED: NCT03076840.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:静态拉伸(SS)时,本体感受神经肌肉促进(PNF)和振荡生理动员技术被证明对运动范围(ROM)有积极影响,没有关于动态振荡拉伸(DOS)影响的报道,一种结合了这三种技术的技术,关于腿筋的可扩展性。
    目的:确定在无症状的年轻参与者中,DOS是否比SS更大程度地改善了腿筋延伸性和拉伸耐受性。
    方法:随机对照试验。
    方法:60名参与者(47名女性,13名男性,平均年龄22±1岁,身高166±6厘米,体重67.6±9.7kg)完成了被动直腿(SLR),以建立参与者感知的腿筋延展性和拉伸耐受性,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)。参与者被随机分配到两个治疗组(SS或DOS)之一或安慰剂对照(每组20个)。每次干预后立即和一小时后重复测试。使用双向重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey的事后检验评估数据。
    结果:立即干预后,SS和DOS组的SLR测量的腿筋可扩展性均有显着改善,DOS组比SS组显着增加(对照73±12°,SS86±8°,DOS94±11°,p<0.001)。干预后一小时,DOS组的腿筋可扩展性仍然很高,而SS组与对照组不再不同(对照73±12°,SS80±8°,DOS89±12°,p=0.001)。此外,SS组的拉伸耐受性仍然显着提高,但是对照组和DOS组之间没有差异,(控制4.6±1.3,SS5.9±0.8,DOS4.3±1.0AU,p<0.001)。
    结论:DOS比SS更有效地实现了腿筋可扩展性的立即增加,和DOS表现出增加的拉伸耐量一小时后干预。
    方法:2C。
    BACKGROUND: While static stretch (SS), proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) and oscillatory physiological mobilization techniques are documented to have positive effects on a range of motion (ROM), there are no reports on the effect of dynamic oscillatory stretching (DOS), a technique that combines these three techniques, on hamstring extensibility.
    OBJECTIVE: To determine whether DOS improves hamstring extensibility and stretch tolerance to a greater degree than SS in asymptomatic young participants.
    METHODS: Randomized Controlled Trial.
    METHODS: Sixty participants (47 females, 13 males, mean age 22 ± 1 years, height 166 ± 6 centimeters, body mass 67.6 ± 9.7 kg) completed a passive straight leg (SLR) to establish hamstring extensibility and stretch tolerance as perceived by participants, using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Participants were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups (SS or DOS) or a placebo control (20 per group). Tests were repeated immediately following and one hour after each intervention. Data were assessed using a two-way repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey\'s post hoc test.
    RESULTS: Immediately post-intervention, there was a significant improvement in the hamstring extensibility as measured by the SLR in both the SS and DOS groups, with the DOS group exhibiting a significantly greater increase than the SS group (Control 73 ± 12°, SS 86 ± 8°, DOS 94 ± 11°, p < 0.001). One hour post-intervention, hamstring extensibility in the DOS group remained elevated, while the SS group no longer differed from the control group (Control 73 ± 12°, SS 80 ± 8°, DOS 89 ± 12°, p = 0.001). Furthermore, the stretch tolerance remained significantly elevated for the SS group, but there was no difference between the control and DOS groups, (Control 4.6 ± 1.3, SS 5.9 ± 0.8, DOS 4.3 ± 1.0 AU, p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: DOS was more effective than SS at achieving an immediate increase in hamstring extensibility, and DOS demonstrated an increased stretch tolerance one-hour post-intervention.
    METHODS: 2C.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项研究的目的是检查在肌肌腱交界处长期自我按摩对腿筋伸展性的影响,刚度,拉伸公差,和结构指数。
    方法:单盲,随机化,对照试验。
    方法:实验室。
    方法:37名健康男性。
    方法:将每位参与者的右腿或左腿随机分配到按摩组,另一条腿被分配到对照组。参与者每天在肌肉肌腱交界处进行自我按摩3分钟,每周五次,12周。
    方法:Hamstring可扩展性,刚度,拉伸公差,在按摩干预之前以及干预6周和12周后,由盲法检查者测量结构指数。
    结果:按摩组干预6周和12周后的最大髋关节屈曲角度(HFA)和最大被动压力均明显高于干预前。最大HFA时的视觉模拟量表(用于疼痛感知),腿筋的僵硬,在12周内,两组的结构指数都没有差异。
    结论:我们的结果表明,在肌肌腱连接处进行长期自我按摩可通过改善拉伸耐受性来增加腿筋的伸展性。然而,这种干预不会改变腿筋刚度。
    背景:大学医院医疗信息网络登记号UMIN000011233。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of long-term self-massage at the musculotendinous junction on hamstring extensibility, stiffness, stretch tolerance, and structural indices.
    METHODS: Single-blind, randomized, controlled trial.
    METHODS: Laboratory.
    METHODS: Thirty-seven healthy men.
    METHODS: The right or left leg of each participant was randomly assigned to the massage group, and the other leg was assigned to the control group. The participants conducted self-massage at the musculotendinous junction for 3 min daily, five times per week, for 12 weeks.
    METHODS: Hamstring extensibility, stiffness, stretch tolerance, and structural indices were measured by a blinded examiner prior to the massage intervention and after 6 and 12 weeks of intervention.
    RESULTS: The maximum hip flexion angle (HFA) and the maximum passive pressure after 6 and 12 weeks of intervention in the massage group were significantly higher than prior to intervention. The visual analog scale (for pain perception) at maximum HFA, the stiffness of the hamstring, and the structural indices did not differ in either group over the 12 week period.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that long-term self-massage at the musculotendinous junction increases hamstring extensibility by improving stretch tolerance. However, this intervention does not change hamstring stiffness.
    BACKGROUND: University Hospital Medical Information Network registration number UMIN000011233.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号