HIPEC

HIPEC
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:细胞减灭术(CRS)和腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)可能与显着的发病率和延长的住院时间有关。术后感染是这些并发症的高负担。本研究旨在评估术后C反应蛋白(CRP)水平对整体感染并发症和吻合口瘘的预测价值。
    方法:这是一项针对2018年至2020年在蒙特利尔Maisonneuve-Rosemont医院接受CRS和HIPEC治疗腹膜转移的患者的单中心前瞻性研究,QC,加拿大。术后10天每天测量CRP水平。比较了有感染并发症的患者和没有感染并发症的患者。
    结果:纳入了99例患者。30例患者出现感染性并发症(30.3%),4例患者出现吻合口漏(4%)。术后2-10天(PODs)感染并发症患者的CRP水平明显升高。每日临界值最准确地预测第8天的感染并发症(94.3mg/L;曲线下面积[AUC]0.85,灵敏度[SE]76.2%,特异性[SP]94.7%,阳性预测值[PPV]88.9%,阴性预测值[NPV]87.8%;p<0.0001)和第9天(72.7mg/L;AUC0.89,SE95.2%,SP81.8%,PPV76.9%,净现值96.4%;p<0.0001)。感染并发症患者手术时间较长,较高的腹膜癌指数,和更多的肠吻合,而它们的基线特征具有可比性.
    结论:CRP的测量有助于预测CRS和HIPEC后的感染性并发症,特别是在POD8和9上。截断值在术后第一周后更准确,尤其是排除感染性并发症.
    BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can be associated with significant morbidity and prolonged hospital stay. Postoperative infections account for a high burden of these complications. This study aimed to assess the predictive value of postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) levels for overall infectious complications and anastomotic leaks.
    METHODS: This was a single-center prospective study of patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal metastases between 2018 and 2020 at Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital in Montreal, QC, Canada. CRP levels were measured daily for 10 days following surgery. A comparison was made between patients with infectious complications and those without.
    RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were included. Thirty patients had infectious complications (30.3%) and four patients presented an anastomotic leak (4%). CRP levels were significantly higher in patients with infectious complications from postoperative days (PODs) 2-10. Daily cut-off values most accurately predicted infectious complications on day 8 (94.3 mg/L; area under the curve [AUC] 0.85, sensitivity [SE] 76.2%, specificity [SP] 94.7%, positive predictive value [PPV] 88.9%, negative predictive value [NPV] 87.8%; p < 0.0001) and day 9 (72.7 mg/L; AUC 0.89, SE 95.2%, SP 81.8%, PPV 76.9%, NPV 96.4%; p < 0.0001). Patients with infectious complications had longer operative time, higher peritoneal cancer index, and a higher number of intestinal anastomoses, while their baseline characteristics were comparable.
    CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of CRP helps predict infectious complications following CRS and HIPEC, particularly on PODs 8 and 9. Cut-off values are more accurate after the first postoperative week, especially in ruling out infectious complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:诊断时的存在,或发展,结直肠腹膜转移(CPM)在结直肠癌中很常见。细胞减灭术(CRS)和腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)在选定的CPM患者中显示出可喜的结果。当前的研究旨在描述CPM患者的肿瘤学结果,重点关注不良事件的复发模式和危险因素。
    方法:我们对2000年至2021年在单一机构接受CRS和HIPEC治疗的CPM患者进行了回顾性审查。
    结果:共纳入555例患者,其中480人(86.5%)细胞完全减少,中位年龄为59岁,中位腹膜癌指数(PCI)为6。在完全细胞减少后,5年总生存率(OS)和无病生存率(DFS)分别为51%和31%,分别。在多变量Cox回归中,PCI>6(危险比[HR]2.25),病理淋巴结阳性(pN+;HR1.94),神经周浸润(HR1.85)与OS降低有关,而PCI>6,pN+,和先前的全身转移导致DFS降低。总的来说,284例(62%)患者复发,其中97(34%)有局部复发(LR),100例(35%)有全身复发(SR),87例(31%)合并复发(5年OS:49.3%,46%,和37.4%,分别)。与野生型KRAS相比,突变的KRAS(mKRAS)与较低的5年OS(55.8%)和DFS(27.9%)相关(wtKRAS;70.7%和37.6%,分别)。在多变量分析中,mKRAS与OS下降有关(HR1.82),DFS(HR1.55),和SR(OS1.89),但不是LR。
    结论:完全细胞减灭术可导致CPM患者良好的生存结果。腹膜疾病的负担和肿瘤生物学是生存的主要预测因素。mKRAS患者是高危人群,SR的可能性增加,生存率降低。
    BACKGROUND: The presence at diagnosis, or development of, colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM) is common in colorectal cancer. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) show promising results in selected patients with CPM. The current study aimed to describe oncologic outcomes of patients with CPM, focusing on recurrence patterns and risk factors for adverse events.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with CPM treated by CRS and HIPEC at a single institution between 2000 and 2021.
    RESULTS: A total of 555 patients were included, of whom 480 (86.5%) had complete cytoreduction, with a median age of 59 years and median Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) of 6. Following complete cytoreduction, 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 51% and 31%, respectively. In multivariable Cox regression, PCI >6 (hazard ratio [HR] 2.25), pathological node positivity (pN+; HR 1.94), and perineural invasion (HR 1.85) were associated with decreased OS, while PCI >6, pN+, and previous systemic metastases resulted in reduced DFS. Overall, 284 (62%) patients developed recurrence, of whom 97 (34%) had local recurrence (LR), 100 (35%) had systemic recurrence (SR), and 87 (31%) had combined recurrence (5-year OS: 49.3%, 46%, and 37.4%, respectively). Mutated KRAS (mKRAS) was associated with lower 5-year OS (55.8%) and DFS (27.9%) compared with wild-type KRAS (wtKRAS; 70.7% and 37.6%, respectively). In multivariable analyses, mKRAS was related to decreased OS (HR 1.82), DFS (HR 1.55), and SR (OS 1.89), but not to LR.
    CONCLUSIONS: Complete cytoreduction results in good survival outcomes for patients with CPM. Burden of peritoneal disease and tumor biology are the main predictors of survival. Patients with mKRAS are a high-risk cohort, with increased probability of SR and reduced survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    预防腹膜内扩散在晚期卵巢癌(OC)的治疗中至关重要,因此需要探索创新的治疗技术。OC扩散到腹膜的倾向突出了局部治疗作为一种有希望的方法的潜力。到目前为止,建议的治疗方法包括几种局部腹膜内治疗,腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)就是其中之一。HIPEC的应用可能会提高OC患者的生存率,正如最近发表的高质量前瞻性数据所表明的那样。HIPEC与原发性细胞减灭术(CRS)的结合对总生存期(OS)或无病生存期(DFS)没有显着影响。然而,将HIPEC与区间CRS合并,其次是全身化疗(CTH),显著增强了OS和DFS。最新数据还证实了HIPEC在复发性卵巢癌(ROC)中的有效性,导致生存结果的改善。更多的研究将有助于HIPEC方案和技术的改进,以及精确识别将从这种治疗方法中获得最大优势的患者。建议讨论和更新(国际)国家临床指南,以管理晚期OC和腹膜受累的患者。
    The prevention of intraperitoneal spread is of utmost importance in the management of advanced ovarian cancer (OC), thus demanding the exploration of innovative treatment techniques. The propensity of OC to spread to the peritoneum has highlighted the potential of local therapy as a promising approach. Among the proposed treatments thus far are several local intraperitoneal therapies, with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) being one of them. The application of HIPEC may potentially enhance the survival rates of patients with OC, as indicated by a recent publication of high-quality prospective data. The incorporation of HIPEC in conjunction with primary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) does not have a significant impact on either overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS). However, the incorporation of HIPEC alongside interval CRS, followed by systemic chemotherapy (CTH), markedly enhances both OS and DFS. The most recent data also substantiates the effectiveness of HIPEC in recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), resulting in an improvement of survival outcomes. Additional research will contribute to the improvement of the HIPEC regimen and technique, as well as the precise identification of patients who will gain the most advantage from this treatment approach. It is recommended to discuss and update (inter)national clinical guidelines for managing patients with advanced OC and peritoneal involvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    伴有腹膜转移的结直肠癌(CRC)是一种复杂的疾病,其治疗提出了重大的临床挑战。在经验丰富的中心精心挑选的患者中,CRS/高温腹膜内化疗(HIPEC)可以以可接受的发病率进行,并与延长的生存期相关。根据近期随机对照试验的结果,不再建议在CRS后使用奥沙利铂的HIPEC,灌注期缩短(30分钟)。有一种趋势是利用丝裂霉素C作为延长灌注时间(90-120分钟)的一线腹膜内药物;然而,目前几乎没有潜在证据支持其广泛使用。
    Colorectal cancer (CRC) with peritoneal metastases is a complex disease and its management presents significant clinical challenges. In well-selected patients at experienced centers, CRS/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can be performed with acceptable morbidity and is associated with prolonged survival. Based on the results of recent randomized controlled trials, HIPEC using oxaliplatin after CRS with shortened perfusion periods (30 minutes) is no longer recommended. There is a movement toward utilizing mitomycin C as a first-line intraperitoneal agent with extended perfusion times (90-120 minutes); however, there is currently little prospective evidence to support its widespread use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在细胞减灭术(CRS)和术中高温腹膜内化疗(HIPEC)期间进行的一些程序是基于经验数据。这些程序之一是系统胆囊切除术。本研究旨在使用长期随访数据对腹膜癌患者在CRSHIPEC期间进行系统性胆囊切除术的必要性进行严格分析。
    方法:分析2008年1月至2022年12月期间接受CRS+HIPEC手术的腹膜表面恶性肿瘤患者。对于由于疾病引起的胆囊受累的患者或术前研究显示存在胆石症的患者,胆囊切除术是手术的一部分,其余患者都避免了这种情况。记录前90天发生的所有术后不良事件,并研究了随访期间胆道病理发展的临床记录。
    结果:分析了连续的443例腹膜表面恶性肿瘤患者在2008年1月至2022年12月期间接受手术的结果。该队列的平均年龄为50岁。该队列的中位随访期为41个月(范围,12-180个月),无病生存期为17个月。对于373名患者来说,CRS+HIPEC在没有相关胆囊切除术的情况下完成,其中16个,在随访期间发现胆石症的出现。该系列中只有两名患者表现出胆结石引起的并发症,需要延迟进行胆囊切除术。
    结论:尽管在CRS+HIPEC的情况下胆囊切除术是安全的,这不是无风险的,它的常规性能可能是不必要的。
    BACKGROUND: Some procedures performed during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are based on empirical data. One of these procedures is systematic cholecystectomy. This study aimed to perform a critical analysis of the need for systematic cholecystectomy during CRS+HIPEC of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis using long-term follow-up data.
    METHODS: Patients with peritoneal surface malignancies who were candidates for CRS+HIPEC and underwent surgery between January 2008 and December 2022 were analyzed. For patients with gallbladder involvement due to the disease or for patients whose preoperative study showed the presence of cholelithiasis, cholecystectomy was performed as part of the surgery, which was avoided for the remaining patients. All postoperative adverse events that occurred in the first 90 days were recorded, and clinical records focused on the development of biliary pathology during the follow-up period were studied.
    RESULTS: The results from a consecutive series of 443 patients with peritoneal surface malignancies who underwent surgery between January 2008 and December 2022 were analyzed. The average age of the cohort was 50 years. The median follow-up period for the cohort was 41 months (range, 12-180 months), with a disease-free survival of 17 months. For 373 of the patients, CRS+HIPEC was completed without an associated cholecystectomy, and in 16 of them, the appearance of cholelithiasis was detected during the follow-up period. Only two patients in the series showed complications derived from gallstones and required a delayed cholecystectomy.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although cholecystectomy is a safe procedure in the context of CRS+HIPEC, it is not risk free, and its routine performance may be unnecessary.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:细胞减灭术(CRS)联合腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)是结直肠腹膜癌(CPC)的主要治疗方法。目的是确定接受CRS-HIPEC治疗的CPC患者的无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS)以及与长期生存率(LTS)相关的因素。
    方法:纳入2007年至2021年在HIPEC中心接受CRS-HIPEC的连续CPC患者。计算了实际生存率,和Cox比例风险模型用于识别与OS相关的因素,DFS和LTS。
    结果:有125例CPC患者接受了原发性CRS-HIPEC,平均年龄54.5岁。中位随访时间为31个月。术中平均PCI为11,完全细胞减灭术(CC-0)达到96.8%。中位OS为41.6个月(6-196)。2年和5年OS分别为68%和24.8%,分别,两年DFS为28.8%。与OS较差相关的因素包括HIPEC系统治疗前,同步腹膜外转移,PCI≥20(p<0.05)。CRS-HIPEC之前的进展与更差的DFS相关(p<0.05)。更低的PCI,更少的并发症,较低的复发和较长的DFS与LTS相关(p<0.05).
    结论:CRS和HIPEC可改善CPC患者的OS,但其疾病复发率较高。结果取决于术前治疗反应,腹膜外转移,和腹膜疾病负担。
    BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a major treatment of colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CPC). The aim was to determine the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC for CPC and factors associated with long-term survival (LTS).
    METHODS: consecutive CPC patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC at a HIPEC center between 2007 and 2021 were included. Actual survival was calculated, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify factors associated with OS, DFS and LTS.
    RESULTS: there were 125 patients with CPC who underwent primary CRS-HIPEC, with mean age of 54.5 years. Median follow-up was 31 months. Average intraoperative PCI was 11, and complete cytoreduction (CC-0) was achieved in 96.8%. Median OS was 41.6 months (6-196). The 2-year and 5-year OS were 68% and 24.8%, respectively, and the 2-year DFS was 28.8%. Factors associated with worse OS included pre-HIPEC systemic therapy, synchronous extraperitoneal metastasis, and PCI ≥ 20 (p < 0.05). Progression prior to CRS-HIPEC was associated with worse DFS (p < 0.05). Lower PCI, fewer complications, lower recurrence and longer DFS were associated with LTS (p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: CRS and HIPEC improve OS in CPC patients but they have high disease recurrence. Outcomes depend on preoperative therapy response, extraperitoneal metastasis, and peritoneal disease burden.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:细胞减灭术(CRS)和腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)的组合构成了腹膜假性黏液瘤患者的既定护理标准。然而,HIPEC的作用缺乏通过随机试验的验证,导致不同的治疗方案。这一共识旨在使HIPEC方案标准化,并确定研究重点,以提高清晰度。
    方法:指导委员会将患者,干预,比较器,和结果方法来制定关键的临床问题。对证据的评估遵循建议的分级,评估,发展,和评价体系。通过有国际专家参与的两轮德尔菲进程,寻求就HIPEC方案和研究优先事项达成共识。
    结果:在90名合格的小组成员中,71人(79%)参加了德尔福两轮比赛,在与HIPEC方案相关的7个问题中的6个问题上达成共识。压倒性的84%积极共识赞成将HIPEC与CRS结合使用,而在CRS不完整后,70%的微弱积极共识支持HIPEC。具体的HIPEC方案也获得了共识,53%支持奥沙利铂200mg/m2,51%支持顺铂(CDDP)与丝裂霉素-C(MMC)联合使用。高剂量MMC方案获得了89%的阳性推荐。在研究重点方面,61%的小组成员强调了比较CRS后HIPEC方案的研究的重要性。此类研究的优选方案是CDDP/MMC和高剂量MMC的组合。
    结论:根据现有证据,共识建议在CRS之后应用HIPEC。CDDP/MMC和大剂量MMC方案的组合在当前的临床实践和未来的研究工作中得到认可。
    BACKGROUND: The combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) constitutes the established standard of care for pseudomyxoma peritonei patients. However, the role of HIPEC lacks validation through randomized trials, leading to diverse proposed treatment protocols. This consensus seeks to standardize HIPEC regimens and identify research priorities for enhanced clarity.
    METHODS: The steering committee applied the patient, intervention, comparator, and outcome method to formulate crucial clinical questions. Evaluation of evidence followed the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. Consensus on HIPEC regimens and research priorities was sought through a two-round Delphi process involving international experts.
    RESULTS: Out of 90 eligible panelists, 71 (79%) participated in both Delphi rounds, resulting in a consensus on six out of seven questions related to HIPEC regimens. An overwhelming 84% positive consensus favored combining HIPEC with CRS, while a 70% weak positive consensus supported HIPEC after incomplete CRS. Specific HIPEC regimens also gained consensus, with 53% supporting Oxaliplatin 200 mg/m2 and 51% favoring the combination of cisplatin (CDDP) associated with mitomycin-C (MMC). High-dose MMC regimens received an 89% positive recommendation. In terms of research priorities, 61% of panelists highlighted the importance of studies comparing HIPEC regimens post CRS. The preferred regimens for such studies were the combination of CDDP/MMC and high-dose MMC.
    CONCLUSIONS: The consensus recommends the application of HIPEC following CRS based on the available evidence. The combination of CDDP/MMC and high-dose MMC regimens are endorsed for both current clinical practice and future research efforts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹膜假粘液瘤是一种罕见的病理状况,其特征是在腹膜表面植入粘液性肿瘤组织。尽管腹膜假粘液瘤的病因已被广泛研究,普遍的共识是,它源于卵巢或阑尾中发生的粘液性肿瘤。肿瘤组织通常保持定位于腹膜并且不表现出腹膜外扩散。腹膜假粘液瘤患者可能出现腹痛等症状,腹胀,食欲不振,呼吸急促.计算机断层扫描通常用于诊断目的。腹膜假粘液瘤的治疗通常包括手术清除肿瘤组织,其次是细胞减灭术和腹腔热化疗。虽然有有效的治疗选择,一些患者可能需要长时间重复手术。本文报道了一例有腹膜假性粘液瘤复发病史的患者的病例研究,需要在十年内进行多次手术干预。本文最后对相关文献进行了回顾。
    Pseudomyxoma peritonei is a rare pathological condition characterized by mucinous tumor tissue implants on the peritoneal surface. Although the cause of Pseudomyxoma peritonei has been extensively studied, the prevailing agreement is that it stems from mucinous tumors that occur in the ovaries or appendix. The tumor tissue typically remains localized to the peritoneum and does not exhibit extraperitoneal spread. Patients with Pseudomyxoma peritonei may present with symptoms such as abdominal pain, bloating, loss of appetite, and shortness of breath. Computerized Tomography is commonly used for diagnostic purposes. The treatment of Pseudomyxoma peritonei typically involves surgical evacuation of the tumoral tissue, followed by cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. While effective treatment options are available, some patients may require repeated surgeries over an extended period. This paper reports on a case study of a patient with a history of recurrent Pseudomyxoma peritonei, necessitating multiple surgical interventions over a decade. The paper concludes with a review of the relevant literature.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:通过细胞减灭术(CRS)和腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)治疗腹膜癌(PC)。术后需要及时营养以降低营养不良和其他并发症的风险;因此,本研究旨在评估CRS/HIPEC治疗后可能影响饮食进展的因素。
    方法:在2019年4月至2020年8月期间,对在三级医院接受CRS/HIPEC的42例患者进行了审计。患者分为两组:快速饮食进展(FDP)和缓慢饮食进展(SDP),基于术后7天内或术后7天开始全流体饮食(FF)。患者特征的组间差异,手术因素和术后并发症的评估具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
    结果:FDP和SDP组包括22例(52%)和20例(40%)患者,分别。FF饮食的中位数为7(4.25-9.75)天,但不是在第二天之前。接受肠外营养(PN)的31例患者中有19例(61.3%)属于SDP组(p=0.009)。SDP组手术时间较长(p=0.05),更多的胃肠道吻合(GIA)(p=0.02),更多的肠切开术(p=0.008),长期肠梗阻的发生率较高(p=0.007),第一次排便的持续时间更长(p=0.002),更多的回报到剧院(p=0.03),更高的ClavienDindo评分≥IIIb(p=0.01)和更长的术后住院时间(p=0.001),与FDP组相比。
    结论:在接受CRS/HIPEC的PC患者中,术后并发症与SDP相关。旨在通过及时开始营养来限制SDP的战略,包括PN,对于改善该患者组的术后结局很重要。
    OBJECTIVE: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is treated by cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Timely postoperative nutrition is required to reduce the risk of malnutrition and other complications; thus the present study aims to evaluate factors that may impact dietary progression following CRS/HIPEC treatment.
    METHODS: Forty-two patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC at a tertiary hospital were audited between April 2019 and August 2020. Patients were classified into two groups: fast dietary progression (FDP) and slow dietary progression (SDP), based on commencement of a full fluid diet (FF) within 7 days or after 7 days postoperatively. Between-group differences in patient characteristics, surgical factors and postoperative complications were evaluated statistically (significant at p < 0.05).
    RESULTS: FDP and SDP groups comprised of 22 (52%) and 20 (40%) patients, respectively. A FF diet was established on a median of 7 (4.25-9.75) days, but not before day 2. Nineteen of the 31 (61.3%) patients receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) were in the SDP group (p = 0.009). The SDP group had longer surgery duration (p = 0.05), more gastrointestinal anastomoses (GIAs) (p = 0.02), more enterotomies (p = 0.008), higher rates of prolonged ileus (p = 0.007), longer duration to first bowel motion (p = 0.002), more returns to theatre (p = 0.03), higher Clavien Dindo scores ≥ IIIb (p = 0.01) and longer postoperative length-of-stay (p = 0.001), compared to the FDP group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative complications were associated with SDP in PC patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC. Strategies that aim to limit SDP through timely commencement of nutrition, including PN, are important to improve postoperative outcomes in this patient group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在细胞减灭术(CRS)期间常规切除大网膜,但是很少有研究分析这背后的理由。这项研究旨在评估网膜转移(OM)的患病率以及宏观怀疑和微观证实的OM之间的相关性。腹膜假性黏液瘤(PMP)或结直肠腹膜转移(PM)患者。
    所有未进行过网膜切除术的患者,用初始CRS和腹腔热化疗治疗PMP或结直肠PM,2013-2021年在乌普萨拉大学医院,包括在内。将手术报告中的宏观OM与组织病理学分析进行了比较。
    总之,276名患者被纳入。在那些有PMP的人中,112(98%)接受了网膜切除术,67(59%)对OM有宏观怀疑。在5名(4%)患者中,外科医生不确定。组织病理学证实OM为81例(72%)。在有宏观怀疑的患者中,96%确认OM(阳性预测值,PPV)。在没有怀疑的患者中,24%有隐匿性OM(阴性预测值,净现值=76%)。在结直肠PM患者中,156(96%)进行了网膜切除术,97(60%)进行了宏观怀疑。对于5名(3%)患者,外科医生不确定。在显微镜下确认了90例(58%)的OM。PPV为85%,NPV为89%。OM的存在是PMP(HR3.62,95CI1.08-12.1)和结直肠PM(HR1.67,95CI1.07-2.60)死亡的单变量危险因素,但不是在多变量分析中。
    OM是常见的,并且在PMP和结直肠PM中均存在丢失隐匿性OM的高风险。这些结果支持CRS期间常规网膜切除术的实践。
    UNASSIGNED: The greater omentum is routinely resected during cytoreductive surgery (CRS), but few studies have analyzed the rationale behind this. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of omental metastases (OM) and the correlation between macroscopically suspected and microscopically confirmed OM, in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) or colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM).
    UNASSIGNED: All patients without previous omentectomy, treated with initial CRS and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for PMP or colorectal PM, at Uppsala University Hospital in 2013-2021, were included. Macroscopic OM in surgical reports was compared with histopathological analyses.
    UNASSIGNED: In all, 276 patients were included. In those with PMP, 112 (98%) underwent omentectomy and 67 (59%) had macroscopic suspicion of OM. In 5 (4%) patients, the surgeon was uncertain. Histopathology confirmed OM in 81 (72%). In patients with macroscopic suspicion, 96% had confirmed OM (positive predictive value, PPV). In patients with no suspicion, 24% had occult OM (negative predictive value, NPV = 76%). In patients with colorectal PM, 156 (96%) underwent omentectomy and 97 (60%) had macroscopic suspicion. For 5 (3%) patients, the surgeon was uncertain. OM was microscopically confirmed in 90 (58%). PPV was 85% and NPV was 89%. The presence of OM was a univariate risk factor for death in PMP (HR 3.62, 95%CI 1.08-12.1) and colorectal PM (HR 1.67, 95%CI 1.07-2.60), but not in multivariate analyses.
    UNASSIGNED: OM was common and there was a high risk of missing occult OM in both PMP and colorectal PM. These results support the practice of routine omentectomy during CRS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号