HHS

hhs
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    高磷血症家族性肿瘤钙质沉着症(HFTC)和高磷血症增生综合征(HHS)是由多肽N-乙酰氨基半乳糖转移酶3(GALNT3)突变引起的罕见常染色体隐性遗传疾病,成纤维细胞生长因子23(FGF23),或klotho(KL)基因。它们的特征是高磷酸盐血症和骨增生和/或软组织钙质沉着的骨病变的反复发作。管理选择包括降磷酸盐疗法,抗炎药,在严重残疾的病例中,对钙化肿块进行手术切除。我们描述了一个近亲家庭的三例病例,这些病例被发现具有相同的基因突变,该基因突变是由GALNT3c.15241G>A(IVS81)的内含子8中的纯合突变引起的。第一个病例的表现类似于慢性骨髓炎,而第二个在她的臀区出现钙化块。第三个病例表现为左腿疼痛。作为一种罕见的疾病,肿瘤钙质沉着/骨异常的发现,随着磷酸盐水平的升高,应该提高这个实体的可能性。家族史和生化检查有助于达到诊断。
    Hyperphosphatemia familial tumoral calcinosis (HFTC) and hyperphosphatemia hyperostosis syndrome (HHS) are rare autosomal recessive disorders caused by mutations in the polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 3 (GALNT3), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), or klotho (KL) genes. They are characterized by hyperphosphatemia and recurrent episodes of bone lesions with hyperostosis and/or soft tissue calcinosis. Management options include phosphate-lowering therapies, anti-inflammatory medications, and surgical excision of the calcified masses in significantly disabled cases. We describe three cases from a consanguineous family who were found to have the same genetic mutation caused by a homozygous mutation in intron eight of GALNT3 c.1524+1 G>A (IVS8+1). The first case had a presentation similar to chronic osteomyelitis, while the second one presented with a calcified mass in her gluteal area. The third case presented with left leg pain. Being a rare disease, the findings of tumoral calcinosis/ bony abnormalities, along with elevated phosphate levels, should raise the possibility of this entity. Family history and biochemical findings can help reach the diagnosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)和高渗性高血糖状态(HHS)是危及生命的疾病,每年将近18万名患者送入ICU,死亡率高达5-10%。关于并发精神疾病对特定DKA/HHS结局的影响知之甚少。识别这些关系提供了改善临床管理的机会,治疗计划,并减轻相关的发病率和死亡率。
    方法:我们进行了回顾性研究,包括2010年至2019年马萨诸塞州一家大型医院系统内的成人DKA/HHS入院。我们确定了因DKA或HHS住院的患者,然后通过ICD-9-CM过滤,ICD-10-CM编码了在此观察期内任何时间点EMR患者中存在的精神病诊断。结果包括DKA/HHS住院人数,死亡年龄,任何住院患者的医疗建议(AMA)出院率,和ESRD/透析状态。使用R软件进行多变量回归,以控制患者之间的变量,并评估结果与并发精神疾病之间的关系。显著性设定为p<0.05。
    结果:7756例患者因DKA或HHS入院,其中66.9%患有并发精神障碍。这些患者中54.5%为男性,70.4%白色,平均年龄为61.6岁。相比之下,一般糖尿病人群中并发精神病的比例为26.1%,其中52.1%为男性,72.1%白色,平均68.2年。并发精神障碍与再住院几率增加相关(aOR=1.6295%Cl1.35-1.95,p<0.001),被诊断为终末期肾病和透析(aOR=1.0295%Cl1.002-1.035,p=0.02),和离开AMA(aOR=6.4495%Cl4.46-9.63,p<0.001)。与没有精神疾病的人相比,患有并发精神疾病的人的平均死亡年龄在-7.5年(95%Cl-9.35.8)的调整后平均差。
    结论:66.9%的DKA/HHS患者并发精神障碍。因DKA/HHS入院的并发精神疾病患者更有可能多次入院,离开AMA,接受肾透析,并且死亡率较低。
    OBJECTIVE: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state (HHS) are life-threatening conditions that send nearly 180,000 patients to the intensive care unit each year, with mortality rates up to 5-10%. Little is known about the impact of concurrent psychiatric disorders on specific DKA/HHS outcomes. Identifying these relationships offers opportunities to improve clinical management, treatment planning, and mitigate associated morbidity and mortality.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review including adult DKA/HHS admissions within a large Massachusetts hospital system from 2010 to 2019. We identified patients admitted inpatient for DKA or HHS, then filtered by International Classification of Disease-9-CM and International Classification of Disease-10-CM codes for psychiatric diagnoses that were present in patients electronic medical record at any point in this observational period. Outcomes included the number of inpatient admissions for DKA/HHS, age of death, rates of discharging against medical advice (AMA) from any inpatient admission, and end-stage renal disease/dialysis status. Multivariate regression was conducted using R software to control for variables across patients and evaluate relationships between outcomes and concurrent psychiatric disorders. Significance was set at P < 0.05.
    RESULTS: Seven thousand seven hundred fifty-six patients were admitted for DKA or HHS, 66.9% of whom had a concurrent psychiatric disorder. Of these patients, 54.5% were male, 70.4% were White, and they had an average age of 61.6 years. This compares with 26.1% with concurrent psychiatric condition within the general diabetes population, 52.1% of whom were male, 72.1% were White, and an average age of 68.2 years. A concurrent psychiatric disorder was associated with increased odds of rehospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.62 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-1.95, P < 0.001), of being diagnosed with end-stage renal disease and on dialysis (aOR = 1.02 95% CI 1.002-1.035, P = 0.02), and of leaving AMA (aOR = 6.44 95% CI 4.46-9.63, P < 0.001). The average age of death for those with a concurrent psychiatric disorder had an adjusted mean difference in years of -7.5 years (95% CI -9.3 to 5.8) compared to those without a psychiatric disorder.
    CONCLUSIONS: Of patients with DKA/HHS, 66.9% have a concurrent psychiatric disorder. Patients with a concurrent psychiatric disorder admitted for DKA/HHS were more likely to have multiple admissions, to leave AMA, to be on renal dialysis, and to have a lower age of mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:糖尿病与COVID-19感染的关系已得到广泛研究;然而,在禁闭期间,成人糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)或高血糖/高渗状态(HHS)的发生尚未得到很好的表征.在这项研究中,我们旨在确定封锁对DKA/HHS入院和血糖控制的发生和严重程度的影响。
    方法:对从2019年4月至9月(锁定前)和从2020年4月至9月(锁定)纳入汉密尔顿健康科学诊断为DKA或HHS的患者进行了回顾性图表回顾。纳入研究期间单次入院的成年(≥18岁)非妊娠患者。
    结果:有229例与糖尿病有关的入院,其中171例符合纳入标准(n=92,n=79锁定)。在封锁组,51.8%的患者患有2型糖尿病,96.2%的接诊是DKA中学的。当比较这两个时期时,封锁组的死亡率更高(5.4%对10.1%,p=0.247)和正常血糖DKA(17.6%vs24.4%,p=0.403)。与封锁前相比,封锁组中1型糖尿病的新诊断更多(7.3%vs16.7%,p=0.230)。与锁定前相比,锁定组的平均糖化血红蛋白较低(11.8%vs10.4%,p=0.032)。
    结论:总体而言,这项研究是加拿大第一个评估COVID-19封锁对DKA和HHS入院影响的研究之一。虽然入院的严重程度没有显著差异,在禁闭期间,DKA有出现更多T1DM新诊断的趋势.
    OBJECTIVE: The association of diabetes, and COVID-19 infection has been studied extensively; however, the occurrence of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) or hyperglycemic/hyperosmolar states (HHS) in adults during the lockdown has not been well characterized. In this study, we aimed to identify the impact of the lockdown on occurrence and severity of DKA/HHS admissions and glycemic management.
    METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients admitted to Hamilton Health Sciences with a diagnosis of DKA or HHS from April to September 2019 (pre-lockdown) and from April to September 2020 (lockdown). Adult (≥18 years old) nonpregnant patients with a single admission in the study period were included for study.
    RESULTS: There were 229 admissions related to diabetes, with 171 admissions meeting the inclusion criteria (n=92 pre-lockdown, n=79 lockdown). In the lockdown group, 51.8% of the patients had type 2 diabetes mellitus, with 96.2% of admissions secondary to DKA. When comparing the 2 periods, the lockdown group trended toward higher rates of death (5.4% vs 10.1%, p=0.247) and euglycemic DKA (17.6% vs 24.4%, p=0.403). There were more new diagnoses of type 1 diabetes mellitus in the lockdown group compared with the pre-lockdown group (7.3% vs 16.7%, p=0.230). The average glycated hemoglobin was lower in the lockdown group compared with the pre-lockdown group (11.8% vs 10.4%, p=0.032).
    CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study is among the first in Canada to assess the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on admissions due to DKA and HHS. Although no significant differences were noted in severity of admissions, there was a trend toward more new diagnoses of type 1 diabetes mellitus presenting in DKA during the lockdown period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是评估BDSF方法与常规CC螺钉固定的比较生物力学固定,用于使用三个平行空心螺钉治疗股骨颈骨折。
    这是一项前瞻性队列研究。有两个外科医生团队,其中一个团队使用BDSF技术对患者进行手术,第二个团队使用传统的CC螺钉固定技术进行手术;因此,将患者随机分为两组。根据以下纳入和排除标准将患者纳入研究。
    在通过常规CC螺钉技术管理的15名(83.33%)患者中实现了Union,而在本研究中,通过BDSF技术管理的11例患者(91.67%)实现了愈合。在本研究中,通过BDSF技术管理的患者的平均Harris髋关节评分为90分,而本研究中通过BDSF技术管理的患者的平均Harris髋关节评分为80分。
    BDSF和常规CC螺钉固定都是股骨颈骨折的良好固定方法。但是BDSF技术的功能结局和骨折愈合率更好。虽然,BDSF技术中注意到一些小问题,例如梁螺钉入口处的外皮质骨折和斜向骨折类型的前皮质开放。因此,BDSF方法提供了可靠的固定,其中可以允许患者的早期活动和部分负重。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study is to evaluate comparative biomechanical fixation provided with the BDSF method with the conventional CC screw fixation for treatment of femoral neck fractures with three parallel cannulated screws.
    UNASSIGNED: This is a prospective cohort study. There were two teams of surgeons out of which one team operated the patients with BDSF technique and second with conventional CC screw fixation technique; thus, the patients were randomly distributed into two groups. Patients were included in the study as per the following inclusion and exclusion criteria.
    UNASSIGNED: Union was achieved in 15 (83.33%) patients managed by conventional CC screw technique, while union was achieved in 11 (91.67%) patients managed by BDSF technique in the present study. The average Harris hip score in present study was 90 score in patients managed by BDSF technique, while the average Harris hip score in present study was 80 score in patients managed by BDSF technique.
    UNASSIGNED: Both BDSF and conventional CC screw fixation are good fixation methods for fracture neck of femur. But functional outcome and fracture union rates are better with BDSF Technique. Although, there are some minor problems noted in BDSF technique such as outer cortical fracture at the entry point of beam screw and opening up of anterior cortex of oblique fracture patterns. Thus, BDSF method provides reliable fixation in which early mobilization and partial weight bearing of the patient may be allowed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:股骨头缺血性坏死是一种常见于中年人的疾病。尽管许多病因被指责,仍然有病因因素尚未完全阐明。尽管治疗选择范围广泛,早期和适当的治疗对保留髋关节非常重要。在我们的研究中,我们比较了髓芯减压和髓芯减压联合骨髓间充质干细胞植入治疗股骨头缺血性坏死的结果。
    方法:在这项回顾性研究中,分析了2018年至2023年接受股骨头缺血性坏死手术的Steinberg1-2期患者。分别由接受孤立核减压和核减压+骨髓间充质干细胞植入的患者组成。年龄,性别,斯坦伯格分期,病因学的疾病,随访期,进展为髋关节置换术,Vas分数,哈里斯髋关节评分(HHS),并对并发症进行了评估。术前和2年随访期间Harris髋关节评分;术前VAS评分,3个月,6个月,1年,和2年的随访期进行了分析。
    结果:在研究中,对44例患者进行了分析。而25例患者仅接受核心减压(第1组),19例患者行核心减压和骨髓间充质干细胞植入(第2组)。第1组患者的平均年龄为39.3±6.5岁,第2组患者的平均年龄为38.4±6.7岁。第1组的平均随访时间为31.85±4.4个月,第2组的平均随访时间为32.2±4.1个月。第1组中的2例患者进行了全髋关节置换术(其中一名患者在第28个月接受了全髋关节置换术,另一名在第33个月接受了全髋关节置换术)。
    结论:股骨头缺血性坏死的治疗方法因分期方法而异。疾病的早期诊断和正确的治疗对患者今后的生活质量非常重要。在我们的研究中,我们发现接受髓芯减压和干细胞植入治疗早期股骨头缺血性坏死的患者在6个月时疼痛减轻,1年,和2年的随访检查。此外,根据HHS评估,他们的髋关节功能在24个月时有所改善。
    OBJECTIVE: Avascular necrosis of the femoral head is a disease usually seen in middle-aged individuals. Although many aetiological factors have been blamed, there are still aetiological factors that have not been fully elucidated. Although treatment options show a wide range, early and appropriate treatment is of great importance to preserve the hip joint. In our study, we compared the results of core decompression and core decompression combined with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell implantation in patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head.
    METHODS: In this retrospective study, Steinberg stage 1-2 patients operated on for avascular necrosis of the femoral head between 2018 and 2023 were analysed. Separate groups were formed from patients who underwent isolated core decompression and core decompression + bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell implantation. Age, gender, Steinberg staging, aetiology of the disease, follow-up period, progression to hip arthroplasty, Vas scores, Harris hip scores (HHS), and complications were evaluated. Harris hip scores at preoperative and 2-year follow-up periods; VAS scores at preoperative, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up periods were analysed.
    RESULTS: In the study, 44 patients were analysed. While 25 patients underwent core decompression only (group 1), 19 patients underwent core decompression and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell implantation (group 2). The mean age of the patients in group 1 was 39.3 ± 6.5 years, and the mean age of the patients in group 2 was 38.4 ± 6.7 years. The mean follow-up was 31.85 ± 4.4 months in group 1 and 32.2 ± 4.1 months in group 2. Total hip arthroplasty was performed in 2 of the patients in group 1 (one of the patients underwent total hip arthroplasty at month 28 and the other at month 33).
    CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head varies according to various staging methods. Early diagnosis of the disease and correct treatment are very important for the patient\'s quality of life in the future. In our research, we found that patients who received both core decompression and stem cell implantation for early-stage avascular necrosis of the femoral head exhibited decreased pain at the 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up examinations. Additionally, their hip function improved at the 24-month mark according to the HHS evaluation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在患有骨质疏松症的老年患者的情况下,解决粉碎性股骨粗隆间骨折的主要目标是恢复患者的骨折前活动水平,迅速提高全部承重能力,以及进一步手术干预的可能性最小化。采用半髋关节置换术作为粉碎性股骨转子间骨折的方法被证明是加快康复过程的一种手段,使早期负重和减轻与延长卧床休息相关的问题。作为本研究目标的一部分,将对应用该技术产生的结果进行评估和分析。方法在印度北部的一家三级保健医院进行了为期一年的前瞻性研究。该研究共包括30个人;然而,不幸的是,无法找到其中一名患者进行进一步分析.纳入年龄在60岁以上的不稳定骨质疏松性股骨转子间骨折患者(AO基金会/骨科创伤协会31-A2.2,A2.3或31-A3组)。患者被观察到在一个,三,手术后六个月。Harris髋关节评分(HHS)用于功能结局评估。结果在我们的分析过程中,我们看到整体HHS的增加具有统计学意义.HHS在出院期间的平均值为34.33,范围为32到39。随访一个月后,它增加到55.34(范围=52-59),经过三个月的随访,它继续上升到85.03(范围=63-89)。重要的是要注意,到随访的第六个月,平均HHS达到95.24(范围=63-98)。该研究显示,在所有时间段内,HHS评分均呈统计学上显著的上升趋势(p<0.001)。结论使用骨水泥假体可以实现术后早期下床活动。这有助于患者功能结果的整体改善。胶结性初次双极半髋关节置换术已成为治疗不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折的有希望的替代方法。HHS测量的增强的功能结果提供了这一点的证据。经转子技术在保留外部旋转器的解剖完整性方面显示出优势,尽量减少切除的必要性,减少坐骨神经损伤的危险。这些优势是通过经转子方法显示的。此外,由于布线技术的实现,可以保留较大的转子,从而增强术后恢复并加快恢复到术前状况。与其他内固定技术相比,骨水泥双极半髋关节置换术的使用率大大降低了并发症的发生率,例如需要进一步的手术和植入失败。
    Background In the case of elderly patients suffering from osteoporosis, the primary objectives of addressing comminuted intertrochanteric fractures are centered upon the recuperation of the patients\' pre-fracture levels of activity, the expeditious promotion of full weight-bearing capacity, and the minimization of the likelihood of further surgical interventions. The adoption of hemiarthroplasty as a method for comminuted intertrochanteric fractures is proven as a means of hastening the recovery process, enabling early weight-bearing and mitigating the problems associated with extended bed rest. The outcomes that resulted from the application of this technique will be evaluated and analyzed as part of this study\'s objectives. Methodology A prospective study was conducted over the course of one year at a tertiary care hospital in the northern part of India. The study comprised a total of 30 individuals; however, unfortunately, one of the patients could not be located for further analysis. Patients of either gender in the age group of over 60 years old and with unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures were included (AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 31-A2.2, A2.3, or 31-A3 group). Patients were observed at one, three, and six months after the surgical operation. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used for the functional outcome evaluation. Results Throughout the course of our analysis, we saw an increase in the overall HHS that was statistically significant. The HHS exhibited a mean value of 34.33 during the period of discharge, with a range of 32 to 39. It increased to 55.34 (range = 52-59) after one month of follow-up, and it continued to rise to 85.03 (range = 63-89) after three months of follow-up. It is important to note that the mean HHS reached 95.24 (range = 63-98) by the sixth month of follow-up. The study showed a statistically significant upward trend in HHS scores across all time periods (p < 0.001). Conclusions Early postoperative ambulation was made possible with the use of cemented prostheses, which contributed to patients\' overall improvements in their functional results. Cemented primary bipolar hemiarthroplasty has emerged as a promising alternative for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. The enhanced functional outcomes measured by the HHS provide evidence of this. The transtrochanteric technique has shown advantages in retaining the anatomical integrity of external rotators, minimizing the necessity for their resection, and reducing the danger of sciatic nerve injury. These advantages were displayed by the transtrochanteric approach. Moreover, owing to the implementation of wiring techniques, the larger trochanter could be conserved, resulting in enhanced postoperative recovery and expediting the return to the preoperative condition. When compared with other techniques of internal fixation, the utilization of cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty demonstrated much-reduced rates of complications, such as the need for further surgery and implant failure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在患有髋部骨折的老年人群中,低身体功能与不良预后相关。本研究旨在评估预测髋部骨折后患者康复的预后工具,并研究骨折前运动和功能状态之间的相关性。进行了一项前瞻性研究,包括80名髋部骨折患者。患者病史,以前的瀑布,评估骨折类型和总生存期.患者报告的结局指标(SF-36,EQ-5D/VAS,Charlson合并症指数(CCI),短物理性能电池(SPPB),在出院前6周监测定时起跑(TUG)和Harris髋关节评分(HHS),术后3、6和12个月。总的来说,55%的患者至少有一次跌倒。46%的人在骨折前使用拐杖。平均CCI评分为6.9。SPPB评分从1.4±1.3(1周)提高到4.4±2.1(48周)。一年的年龄增长,女性性别,先前的下跌历史导致0.1-,0.92-,SPPB得分降低0.56倍,分别,在12个月。HHS在6到12周之间记录到最大的改善(52.1±14.6),而TUG评分从139.1±52.6s(6周)持续显著改善至66.4±54s(48周)。SPPB和性能测试可以常规用作预后工具。
    Low physical function is associated with poor outcomes in the elderly population suffering from hip fractures. The present study aims to evaluate the prognostic tools for predicting patient recovery after hip fractures and investigate the correlation between the pre-fracture motor and functional statuses. A prospective study was performed, including 80 patients suffering from hip fractures. Patient history, previous falls, the type of fracture and overall survival were evaluated. Patient-reported outcome measures (SF-36, EQ-5D/VAS, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Harris Hip Score (HHS)) were monitored before hospital discharge at 6 weeks, and 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Overall, 55% of patients experienced at least one fall, and 46% of them used crutches before the fracture. The average CCI score was 6.9. The SPPB score improved from 1.4 ± 1.3 (1 week) to 4.4 ± 2.1 (48 weeks). A one-year age increase, female sex, and prior history of falls lead to 0.1-, 0.92-, 0.56-fold lower SPPB scores, respectively, at 12 months. The HHS recorded the greatest improvement between 6 and 12 weeks (52.1 ± 14.6), whereas the TUG score continued to improve significantly from 139.1 ± 52.6 s (6 weeks) to 66.4 ± 54 s (48 weeks). The SPPB and performance test can be routinely used as a prognostic tool.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着人口老龄化,老年人髋部骨折已成为主要的公共卫生问题。术后康复与改善的结果和更大的恢复到术前功能能力的可能性相关。已经进行了几项研究来研究各种术后恢复途径。然而,对于哪些髋部骨折术后康复途径在改善患者预后方面最有效,我们知之甚少.目前尚无针对患者的标准动员方案的明确循证指南。这篇综述旨在研究术后恢复途径,以帮助髋部骨折患者恢复骨折前状态,并量化术前和术后评分以进行客观康复评估。测量术前活动并将其与术后随访值进行比较可以帮助预测术后康复功能结果。
    Hip fractures in the elderly have become a major public health concern as the population ages. Post-operative rehabilitation is associated with improved outcomes and a greater likelihood of returning to pre-operative functional capacity. Several studies have been conducted to investigate various post-operative recovery pathways. However, little is known about which post-operative rehabilitation pathways for hip fractures are most effective in improving patient outcomes. No clear evidence-based guidelines for a standard mobilization protocol for patients are currently available. This review aims to investigate post-operative recovery pathways to help patients suffering from hip fracture return to pre-fracture condition and to quantify pre-operative and post-operative scores for objective rehabilitation evaluation. Measuring pre-operative activity and comparing it to post-operative follow-up values can help predict post-operative rehabilitation functional outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    半髋关节置换术和全髋关节置换术是常规的手术。可以基于并发症和功能结果对肿瘤患者中的这些程序进行比较。为了权衡两种程序的优缺点,确实需要进行比较研究,以确定哪种手术对原发性骨肿瘤患者更有利。股骨近端肿瘤切除患者的结果来自PubMed的研究报告,MEDLINE,EMBASE,科克伦,和谷歌学者,直到2022年12月30日。根据脱位分析两种手术方法在原发性骨肿瘤患者中的差异,感染,局部复发,MSTS,和HHS。根据选择标准纳入6篇文章,共360例患者。我们的结果表明,我们的主要结局存在显着差异,因为半髋关节置换术的参与者比全髋关节置换术的参与者遇到的脱位更少。此外,我们研究的次要结局相似.股骨近端骨肿瘤,切除后,由于广泛的肿瘤扩展和软组织受累,往往会产生更多的并发症并降低功能。半髋关节置换术参与者的较低脱位率强调了在半髋关节置换术中保留髋臼头作为预防脱位的关键的重要性。
    Hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty are routinely performed procedures. A comparison of these procedures in tumor patients can be performed based on complications and functional outcomes. To weigh the advantages and disadvantages of both procedures, a comparative study is indeed required to decide which procedure is more beneficial for primary bone tumor patients. The outcomes of proximal femur tumor-resected patients were collected from research reports from PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Google Scholar until 30 December 2022. Differences between these two operative procedures in primary bone tumors patients were analyzed based on dislocation, infection, local recurrence, MSTS, and HHS. Six articles were included according to the selection criteria with a total of 360 patients. Our results showed that there was a significant difference in our primary outcome as hemiarthroplasty participants encountered less dislocation than those with total hip arthroplasty. Moreover, the secondary outcomes of our study were similar. Proximal femur bone tumors, when resected, tend to produce more complications and decrease functional ability due to extensive tumor extension and soft tissue involvement. The lower dislocation rate in hemiarthroplasty participants emphasizes the importance of preserving the acetabular head in hemiarthroplasty as a key to preventing dislocation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    高渗性高血糖状态(HHS)是与高死亡率相关的医疗紧急情况。它的发生频率低于糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA),影响已存在/新的2型糖尿病患者,并越来越多地影响儿童/年轻人。混合DKA/HHS可能发生。JBDSHHS护理路径包括3个主题(临床评估和监测,干预措施,评估和预防伤害)和5个阶段的治疗(0-60分钟,1-6、6-12、12-24和24-72小时)。HHS的临床特征包括明显的低血容量,渗透压≥320mOsm/kg,使用[(2×Na+)+葡萄糖+尿素],显著高血糖≥30mmol/L,无显著酮症(≤3.0mmol/L),无明显酸中毒(pH>7.3)和碳酸氢盐≥15mmol/L治疗的目的是改善临床状态/24小时替换液体损失,渗透压逐渐下降(3.0-8.0mOsm/kg/h,以最大程度地减少神经系统并发症的风险),前24小时血糖10-15mmol/L,预防低血糖/低钾血症并预防伤害(VTE,渗透性脱髓鞘,流体过载,足部溃疡)。必须识别和处理潜在的沉淀物。干预措施包括:(1)静脉注射(IV)0.9%的氯化钠以恢复循环量(液体损失100-220ml/kg,老年人的谨慎),(2)一旦渗透压随着补液而停止下降,应开始固定速率静脉内胰岛素输注(FRIII),除非有酮症(FRIII应与IV液体同时开始)。(3)一旦葡萄糖<14mmol/L,应开始葡萄糖输注(5%或10%);(4)根据钾水平进行钾替代。HHS分辨率标准为:渗透压<300mOsm/kg,纠正低血容量(尿量≥0.5ml/kg/h),认知状态恢复至病前状态,血糖<15mmol/L。
    Hyperosmolar Hyperglycaemic State (HHS) is a medical emergency associated with high mortality. It occurs less frequently than diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), affects those with pre-existing/new type 2 diabetes mellitus and increasingly affecting children/younger adults. Mixed DKA/HHS may occur. The JBDS HHS care pathway consists of 3 themes (clinical assessment and monitoring, interventions, assessments and prevention of harm) and 5 phases of therapy (0-60 min, 1-6, 6-12, 12-24 and 24-72 h). Clinical features of HHS include marked hypovolaemia, osmolality ≥320 mOsm/kg using [(2×Na+ ) + glucose+urea], marked hyperglycaemia ≥30 mmol/L, without significant ketonaemia (≤3.0 mmol/L), without significant acidosis (pH >7.3) and bicarbonate ≥15 mmol/L. Aims of the therapy are to improve clinical status/replace fluid losses by 24 h, gradual decline in osmolality (3.0-8.0 mOsm/kg/h to minimise the risk of neurological complications), blood glucose 10-15 mmol/L in the first 24 h, prevent hypoglycaemia/hypokalaemia and prevent harm (VTE, osmotic demyelination, fluid overload, foot ulceration). Underlying precipitants must be identified and treated. Interventions include: (1) intravenous (IV) 0.9% sodium chloride to restore circulating volume (fluid losses 100-220 ml/kg, caution in elderly), (2) fixed rate intravenous insulin infusion (FRIII) should be commenced once osmolality stops falling with fluid replacement unless there is ketonaemia (FRIII should be commenced at the same time as IV fluids). (3) glucose infusion (5% or 10%) should be started once glucose <14 mmol/L and (4) potassium replacement according to potassium levels. HHS resolution criteria are: osmolality <300 mOsm/kg, hypovolaemia corrected (urine output ≥0.5 ml/kg/h), cognitive status returned to pre-morbid state and blood glucose <15 mmol/L.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号