BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is approved for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and HER2-low advanced breast cancer (ABC). T-DXd has shown encouraging intracranial activity in HER2-positive ABC patients with stable or active brain metastases (BMs); however, its efficacy in patients with HER2-low ABC with BMs is not well established yet.
METHODS: DEBBRAH is a single-arm, five-cohort, phase II study evaluating T-DXd in patients with central nervous system involvement from HER2-positive and HER2-low ABC. Here, we report results from patients with heavily pretreated HER2-low ABC and active BMs, enrolled in cohorts 2 (n = 6, asymptomatic untreated BMs) and 4 (n = 6, progressing BMs after local therapy). Patients received 5.4 mg/kg T-DXd intravenously once every 21 days. The primary endpoint was intracranial objective response rate per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) for both cohorts.
RESULTS: Intracranial objective response rate per RANO-BM was 50.0% [3/6 patients; 95% confidence interval (CI) 11.8% to 88.2%] and 33.3% [2/6 patients; 95% CI 4.3% to 77.7%; P = 0.033 (one-sided)] in cohorts 2 and 4, respectively. All responders had partial responses. Median time to intracranial response was 2.3 months (range, 1.5-4.0 months) and median duration of intracranial response was 7.2 months (range, 2.8-16.8 months). Median progression-free survival per RECIST v.1.1. was 5.4 months (95% CI 4.1-10.0 months). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in all patients included (16.7% grade 3). Three patients (25.0%) had grade 1 interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis.
CONCLUSIONS: T-DXd demonstrated promising intracranial activity in pretreated HER2-low ABC patients with active BMs. Further studies are needed to validate these results in larger cohorts. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04420598.

OBJECTIVE: With the wide application of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), the survival of HER2-low breast cancer patients is dramatically improved. However, resistance to T-DXd still exists in a subset of patients, and the molecular mechanism remains unclear.
METHODS: An in vivo shRNA lentiviral library functional screening was performed to identify potential circular RNA (crRNA) that mediates T-DXd resistance. RNA pull-down, mass spectrometry, RNA immunoprecipitation, and co-immunoprecipitation assays were conducted to investigate the molecular mechanism. Ferroptosis was detected using C11-BODIPY, Liperfluo, FerroOrange staining, glutathione quantification, malondialdehyde quantification, and transmission electron microscopy. Molecular docking, virtual screening, and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models were used to validate therapeutic agents.
RESULTS: VDAC3-derived crRNA (crVDAC3) ranked first in functional shRNA library screening. Knockdown of crVDAC3 increased the sensitivity of HER2-low breast cancer cells to T-DXd treatment. Further mechanistic research revealed that crVDAC3 specifically binds to HSPB1 protein and inhibits its ubiquitination degradation, leading to intracellular accumulation and increased levels of HSPB1 protein. Notably, suppression of crVDAC3 dramatically increases excessive ROS levels and labile iron pool accumulation. Inhibition of crVDAC3 induces ferroptosis in breast cancer cells by reducing HSPB1 expression, thereby mediating T-DXd resistance. Through virtual screening and experimental validation, we identified that paritaprevir could effectively bind to crVDAC3 and prevent its interaction with HSPB1 protein, thereby increasing ubiquitination degradation of HSPB1 protein to overcome T-DXd resistance. Finally, we validated the enhanced therapeutic efficacy of T-DXd by paritaprevir in a HER2-low PDX model.
CONCLUSIONS: This finding reveals the molecular mechanisms underlying T-DXd resistance in HER2-low breast cancer. Our study provides a new strategy to overcome T-DXd resistance by inhibiting the interaction between crVDAC3 and HSPB1 protein.

UNASSIGNED: \"HER2-low\" is an emerging subtype of breast cancer, with a documented role in predicting response to treatment with novel antibody-drug conjugates. It is defined based on immunohistochemistry, but increasing evidence is challenging this approach as appropriate for identifying the HER2-low subgroup, due to both interobserver variability and limitations of the method itself.
UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively analyzed data from 430 patients from our departmental databases who had been subjected to an Oncotype-DX score and assessed the correlation of the Oncotype-DX HER2 single-gene score with the HER2 expression on immunohistochemistry. The Oncotype-DX Recurrence Score was also evaluated in the HER2-0 versus HER2-low subgroups.
UNASSIGNED: The HER2 single-gene score was found to accurately correlate with the HER2 result on immunohistochemistry, with a statistically significant difference both between HER2-0 and HER2 +1 tumors (p<0.0001), as well as between HER2 +1 and +2 tumors (p<0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in the recurrence score between the HER2-0 and the HER2-low subgroups.
UNASSIGNED: Oncotype-DX single-gene scores for HER2 are a potential surrogate marker for assessing the precise HER2 status, with better reproducibility and less interobserver variance compared to immunohistochemistry. The use of rt-PCR emerges as an alternative method of assessment of the HER2-low subgroup.

UNASSIGNED: This study aims to evaluate the utility of radiomic features from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in distinguishing HER2-low from HER2-zero breast cancer.
UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively analyzed 118 MRI cases, including 78 HER2-low and 40 HER2-zero patients confirmed by immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in situ hybridization. From each DCE-MRI case, 960 radiomic features were extracted. These features were screened and reduced using intraclass correlation coefficient, Mann-Whitney U test, and least absolute shrinkage to establish rad-scores. Logistic regression (LR) assessed the model\'s effectiveness in distinguishing HER2-low from HER2-zero. A clinicopathological MRI characteristic model was constructed using univariate and multivariate analysis, and a nomogram was developed combining rad-scores with significant MRI characteristics. Model performance was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and clinical benefit was assessed with decision curve analysis.
UNASSIGNED: The radiomics model, clinical model, and nomogram successfully distinguished between HER2-low and HER2-zero. The radiomics model showed excellent performance, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.875 in the training set and 0.845 in the test set, outperforming the clinical model (AUC = 0.691 and 0.672, respectively). HER2 status correlated with increased rad-score and Time Intensity Curve (TIC). The nomogram outperformed both models, with AUC, sensitivity, and specificity values of 0.892, 79.6%, and 82.8% in the training set, and 0.886, 83.3%, and 90.9% in the test set.
UNASSIGNED: The DCE-MRI-based nomogram shows promising potential in differentiating HER2-low from HER2-zero status in breast cancer patients.

HER2-Low is defined as low levels of HER2 expression, based on a score of 1+ on immunohistochemical (IHC) assay or as an IHC score of 2+ and negative results on in situ hybridization (ISH or FISH). They are a heterogeneous population of breast cancers that vary in prognosis and sensitivity to systemic treatments. The frequency and clinical characteristics of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in HER2-Low breast cancer (BC) patients is not defined. We analyzed results from patients with BC who underwent multi-gene panel testing (MGPT) (maximum 145 genes) between 2018-2019. We reclassified HER-2 status accordingly. Relationships between the variables of interest were assessed by adopting the proportional regression Cox models. Of a total of 167 BC patients who underwent MGPT, half were hormone-receptor-positive. The median age was 45 years. About two thirds of the patients were in the earlier stage of BC. A total of 57% of the cases were reclassified as HER-2-negative or -Low. PGVs were found in 19% of the patients overall, as follows: seven BRCA1, four BRCA2, two ATM, one ATR, two CFTR, three CHEK2, one FANCA, one MERTK, one MLH1, three MUTYH, one RAD50, three RAD51C, one RECQL4, and two TP53 mutations. In HER2-Low, 26.5% of the patients had PGVs, and in the overall cohort, this was 19.8%. In conclusion, differences in the prevalence of deleterious germline mutations in HER2-Low BC patients compared to non-HER2-Low BC patients were identified. Similar alterations in BRCA were observed in this group of patients compared to the overall cohort. Germline genetic tests should be evaluated in larger cohorts of patients with HER2-Low status to better address the findings.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of different HER2 categories among patients with advanced breast cancer (aBC) and describe treatment patterns and outcomes of those with HER2-low disease.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted via chart review at the Huntsman Cancer Institute, including patients diagnosed with aBC (stages IIIB, IIIC and IV) between 2010 and 2019. All patients with IHC1+ were considered HER2-low unless FISH was positive. Patients with IHC2+ were only classified as HER2-low if a negative FISH was documented. The prevalence and characteristics of each HER2 category were reported. Treatment patterns and survival outcomes of HER2-low patients who received first line treatment in 2017 or later were presented.
RESULTS: A total of 240 of 414 patients (58%) with aBC were HER2-low, with the majority of patients (83%) classified as hormone receptor (HR)-positive. In first line, most HR-positive patients received endocrine therapy with chemotherapy for stage IIIB/IIIC (47%) and with CDK4/6 inhibitors for stage IV breast cancer (50%) Most HR-negative patients received chemotherapy alone (92% for stage IIIB/IIIC, 60% for stage IV). In second line, chemotherapy alone was the most common modality (21.4% for HR-positive; 45.5% for HR-negative). Median overall survival was 37.7 months while median progression-free survival from first line was 18.0 months, decreasing to 8.0 months in second line.
CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of patients previously classified as HER2-negative have low but detectable HER2 expression and may benefit from novel HER2-directed agents, which have demonstrated clinical benefit in this population post-chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: HER2-low populations constitute a heterogeneous group, and the cytotoxic anticancer agent efficacy based on HER2 status remains unclear. This study evaluated the clinicopathological features and outcomes of patients with advanced breast cancer showing HER2-low expression treated with eribulin or capecitabine, two treatment options after anthracycline and taxane treatment.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients who were treated with eribulin or capecitabine between 2011 and 2015. HER2 status was evaluated according to the ASCO/CAP guidelines.
RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in overall survival (OS; eribulin: hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI 0.40-1.10; capecitabine: HR, 0.76; 95% CI 0.45-1.30) or progression-free survival (PFS; eribulin: HR, 1.13; 95% CI 0.72-1.78; capecitabine: HR, 0.90; 95% CI 0.56-1.44) between patients receiving eribulin (HER2-null: 35, HER2-low: 44) and those receiving capecitabine (HER2-null: 41, HER2-low: 33). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences in OS between the two groups in the hormone-positive and -negative populations for eribulin and capecitabine. HER2-null and HER2-low patients showed objective response rates (ORRs) of 22.5% and 9.1% (p = 0.09) overall, and 32.0% and 10.5% (p = 0.03), respectively, in hormone-positive cases among eribulin-treated patients. No response was observed in hormone-negative patients. Capecitabine treatment in HER2-null and HER2-low patients had overall ORRs of 26.8% and 15.2% (p = 0.23), respectively, with 27.3% and 16.1% (p = 0.28) for hormone-positive cases; and 25.0% and 0% (p = 1.0), respectively, for hormone-negative cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Eribulin and capecitabine sensitivity may vary based on HER2 expression in patients with HER2-low and HER2-null breast cancer. Prognosis was similar between the HER2-low and the HER2-null groups.

OBJECTIVE: The discovery of novel human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed antibody‒drug conjugates has accelerated the identification of the HER2-low subtype. However, the biological significance of low HER2 expression in breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) is unclear.
METHODS: Patients with HER2-negative BC and brain metastasis were retrospectively screened between February 2012 and November 2023. Brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS) and survival after brain metastasis (SABM) were analyzed according to HER2 expression.
RESULTS: A total of 201 female patients, 84 of whom were HER2-low and 117 of whom were HER2-zero, were evaluated. The median BMFS in the entire cohort was 35.6 months (95% CI 29.8-41.4). Although HER2-low patients had numerically longer median BMFS than HER2-zero patients (43.7 m vs. 30.1 m, p = 0.025), multivariate analysis revealed that the difference was not significant (p = 0.167). BMFS between the HER2-low and HER2-zero groups was similar in the hormone receptor (HR)-positive (52.8 m vs. 47.6 m, p = 0.276) and HR-negative (15.3 m vs. 19.7 m, p = 0.930) cohorts. The median SABM in the entire cohort was 6.0 months (95% CI 3.8-8.1). HER2-low and HER2-zero patients had similar median SAMB (5.4 m vs. 6.1 m, p = 0.816). The SABM between the HER2-low and HER2-zero groups was similar in the HR-positive (6.3 m vs. 8.7 m, p = 0.375) and HR-negative (3.3 m vs. 4.2 m, p = 0.783) cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: Low HER2 expression does not affect BMFS or SAMB in brain metastatic breast cancer patients in this real-world population.

TNBC is noted for its aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. Recently developed HER2 target agents have shown potential benefit even in HER2-low expressing breast cancers. This study retrospectively analyzed 2542 non-metastatic TNBC patients from 2008 to 2020, revealing that 26.0% were HER2-low. Data on demographics, tumor characteristics, pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were analyzed. The HER2-low group, compared to the HER2-0 group, showed significantly better DFS, DMFS, OS, BCSS (p = 0.0072, p = 0.0096, p = 0.0180, and p = 0.0001, respectively) with older age and higher rates of postmenopausal status (p < 0.0001). No significant differences in pCR rates were observed. Multivariate analyses identified HER2 status as a significant prognostic factor for DFS (p = 0.048), DMFS (p = 0.018), OS (p = 0.049), and BCSS (p = 0.008). Subgroup analysis revealed that these effects varied with menopausal status, showing more pronounced benefits in postmenopausal women. Our findings suggest that HER2-low TNBC patients exhibit a distinct clinical profile and improved survival compared to HER2-0 TNBC patients, especially in postmenopausal patients. Further research on estrogen and HER2 interaction is needed.

Mounting evidence showed that HER2-Low breast cancer patients could benefit from the novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) treatment, which pointed the way towards better therapy for HER2-Low patients. The purpose of this study was to describe the clinicopathological features, along with chemotherapeutic effects and survival outcomes of HER2-Low and HER2-Zero in TNBC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We retrospectively evaluated 638 triple-negative breast cancer patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy between August 2014 and August 2022. Pathologic complete response (pCR) and survival outcomes were analyzed in HER2-Low cohort, HER2-Zero cohort and the overall patients, respectively. In the entire cohort, 342 (53.6%) patients were HER2-Low and 296 (46.4%) patients were HER2-Zero. No significant difference was found between HER2-Low and HER2-Zero patients based on all the clinical-pathological characteristics. 143 cases (22.4%) achieved pCR after NACT in the overall TNBC patients. The pCR rate of the HER2-Low patients and the HER2-Zero patients was 21.3% and 23.6%, respectively, exhibiting no statistical difference (p = 0.487). The survival of pCR group after NACT significantly improved compared to non-pCR group either in HER2-Low patients or in HER2-Zero patients. Although we found that patients with HER2-Low had longer DFS than patients with HER2-Zero, there was no considerable difference (p = 0.068). However, HER2-Low patients had a dramatically longer OS than HER2-Zero patients (p = 0.012). The data from present study confirmed the clinical importance of HER2-Low expression in TNBC. Further effort is needed to determine whether HER2-Low could be a more favorable prognostic marker for individual treatment.