BACKGROUND: Accurate determination of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is important for choosing optimal HER2 targeting treatment strategies. HER2-low is currently considered HER2-negative, but patients may be eligible to receive new anti-HER2 drug conjugates.
OBJECTIVE: To use breast MRI BI-RADS features for classifying three HER2 levels, first to distinguish HER2-zero from HER2-low/positive (Task-1), and then to distinguish HER2-low from HER2-positive (Task-2).
METHODS: Retrospective.
METHODS: 621 invasive ductal cancer, 245 HER2-zero, 191 HER2-low, and 185 HER2-positive. For Task-1, 488 cases for training and 133 for testing. For Task-2, 294 cases for training and 82 for testing.
UNASSIGNED: 3.0 T; 3D T1-weighted DCE, short time inversion recovery T2, and single-shot EPI DWI.
RESULTS: Pathological information and BI-RADS features were compared. Random Forest was used to select MRI features, and then four machine learning (ML) algorithms: decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), and artificial neural nets (ANN), were applied to build models.
METHODS: Chi-square test, one-way analysis of variance, and Kruskal-Wallis test were performed. The P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. For ML models, the generated probability was used to construct the ROC curves.
RESULTS: Peritumoral edema, the presence of multiple lesions and non-mass enhancement (NME) showed significant differences. For distinguishing HER2-zero from non-zero (low + positive), multiple lesions, edema, margin, and tumor size were selected, and the k-NN model achieved the highest AUC of 0.86 in the training set and 0.79 in the testing set. For differentiating HER2-low from HER2-positive, multiple lesions, edema, and margin were selected, and the DT model achieved the highest AUC of 0.79 in the training set and 0.69 in the testing set.
CONCLUSIONS: BI-RADS features read by radiologists from preoperative MRI can be analyzed using more sophisticated feature selection and ML algorithms to build models for the classification of HER2 status and identify HER2-low.
METHODS:
UNASSIGNED: Stage 2.

UNASSIGNED: The introduction of HER2-targeting antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) offers new treatment options for female breast cancer patients (FBC) expressing low levels of HER2 (HER2 low). No evidence was found that HER2 low describes a new FBC subtype. There is a lack of studies determining the impact of HER2 low in male breast cancer (MBC). In this study, we evaluate the prevalence of HER2 low in primary MBC and correlate the results with patient characteristics.
UNASSIGNED: In this study, histological specimens were obtained from 120 male patients diagnosed and treated for primary invasive breast cancer from 1995 to 2022 at Breast Cancer Units in Bergisch Gladbach, Chemnitz, and Zwickau, Germany. HER2 immunostaining and in situ hybridization were performed by central pathology and evaluated based on the ASCO/CAP guidelines. The correlation of expression of HER2 low with tumor biological characteristics and patient outcomes was investigated.
UNASSIGNED: Out of all cases, four patients (3.3%) showed HER2 positivity (3+), 39 (32.5%) patients were classified as HER2 low, 7 (5.8%) were HER2 2+ (no amplification), 32 (26.7%) were HER2 1+, and 77 (64.2%) were classified as HER2 zero. Out of 77 HER2 zero cases, 47 tumors (61.0%) showed incomplete staining, with <10% of tumor cells classified as HER2 ultralow. No statistical correlation between HER2 low and tumor biological characteristics and patients\' survival was found.
UNASSIGNED: Our findings show a notable, albeit lower, prevalence of HER2 low expression in primary MBC. However, tumors expressing HER2 low do not show specific tumor biological features to define a new breast cancer subtype in MBC. Our results suggest that a significant number of MBC patients could benefit from ADCs, as shown in FBC. Further studies are required to better understand HER2 low breast cancer, both generally and in MBC.

BACKGROUND: The CPS+EG scoring system was initially described in unselected early breast cancer (eBC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), leading to refined prognostic stratification, and thus helping to select patients for additional post-NAC treatments. It remains unknown whether the performance is the same in new biological breast cancer entities such as the HER2-low subtype.
METHODS: Outcomes (disease-free (DFS) and overall survival OS)) of 608 patients with HER2-non amplified eBC and treated with NAC were retrospectively analyzed according to CPS-EG score. We compared the prognostic stratification abilities of the CPS+EG in HER2-low and HER2-0 eBC, analyzing ER+ and ER- tumors separately.
RESULTS: In ER+ eBC, the CPS+EG scoring system seems to retain a prognostic value, both in HER2-low and HER2-0 tumors, by distinguishing populations with significantly different outcomes (good: score 0-1, poor: score 2-3, and very poor: score 4-5). Using C-indices for DFS and OS, CPS+EG provided the highest prognostic information in ER+ eBC, especially in HER2-0 tumors. In contrast, in ER- eBC, the CPS+EG does not appear to be able to distinguish different outcome groups, either in HER2-low or HER2-0 tumors. In ER- eBC, C-indices for DFS and OS were highest for pathological stage, reflecting the predominant prognostic importance of residual disease in this subtype.
CONCLUSIONS: HER2-low status does not influence the prognostic performance of the CPS+EG score. Our results confirm the usefulness of the CPS+EG score in stratifying the prognosis of ER+ eBC after NAC, for both HER2-0 and HER2-low tumors. For ER- eBC, HER2-low status does not influence the performance of the CPS+EG score, which was lower than that of the pathological stage alone.

BACKGROUND: The Affibody molecule, ABY-025, has demonstrated utility to detect human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in vivo, either radiolabelled with indium-111 (111In) or gallium-68 (68Ga). Using the latter, 68Ga, is preferred due to its use in positron emission tomography with superior resolution and quantifying capabilities in the clinical setting compared to 111In. For an ongoing phase II study (NCT05619016) evaluating ABY-025 for detecting HER2-low lesions and selection of patients for HER2-targeted treatment, the aim was to optimize an automated and cGMP-compliant radiosynthesis of [68Ga]Ga-ABY-025. [68Ga]Ga-ABY-025 was produced on a synthesis module, Modular-Lab PharmTracer (Eckert & Ziegler), commonly used for 68Ga-labelings. The radiotracer has previously been radiolabeled on this module, but to streamline the production, the method was optimized. Steps requiring manual interactions to the radiolabeling procedure were minimized including a convenient and automated pre-concentration of the 68Ga-eluate and a simplified automated final formulation procedure. Every part of the radiopharmaceutical production was carefully developed to gain robustness and to avoid any operator bound variations to the manufacturing. The optimized production method was successfully applied for 68Ga-labeling of another radiotracer, verifying its versatility as a universal and robust method for radiosynthesis of Affibody-based peptides.
RESULTS: A simplified and optimized automated cGMP-compliant radiosynthesis method of [68Ga]Ga-ABY-025 was developed. With a decay corrected radiochemical yield of 44 ± 2%, a radiochemical purity (RCP) of 98 ± 1%, and with an RCP stability of 98 ± 1% at 2 h after production, the method was found highly reproducible. The production method also showed comparable results when implemented for radiolabeling another similar peptide.
CONCLUSIONS: The improvements made for the radiosynthesis of [68Ga]Ga-ABY-025, including introducing a pre-concentration of the 68Ga-eluate, aimed to utilize the full potential of the 68Ge/68Ga generator radioactivity output, thereby reducing radioactivity wastage. Furthermore, reducing the number of manually performed preparative steps prior to the radiosynthesis, not only minimized the risk of potential human/operator errors but also enhanced the process\' robustness. The successful application of this optimized radiosynthesis method to another similar peptide underscores its versatility, suggesting that our method can be adopted for 68Ga-labeling radiotracers based on Affibody molecules in general.
BACKGROUND: NCT, NCT05619016, Registered 7 November 2022, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05619016?term=HER2&cond=ABY025&rank=1.

Considering the recent advancements in the treatment of breast cancer with low expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), we aimed to examine inter-laboratory variability in the assessment of HER2-low breast cancer across all Danish pathology departments.
From the Danish Breast Cancer Group, we obtained data on all women diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer in 2007-2019 who were subsequently assigned for curatively intended treatment.
Of 50,714 patients, HER2 score and status were recorded for 48,382, among whom 59.2% belonged to the HER2-low group (score 1+ or 2+ without gene amplification), 26.8% had a HER2 score of 0, and 14.0% were HER2 positive. The proportion of HER2-low cases ranged from 46.3 to 71.8% among pathology departments (P < 0.0001) and from 49.3 to 65.6% over the years (P < 0.0001). In comparison, HER2 positivity rates ranged from 11.8 to 17.2% among departments (P < 0.0001) and from 12.6 to 15.7% over the years (P = 0.005). In the eight departments with the highest number of patients, variability in HER2-low cases increased from 2011 to 2019, although the same immunohistochemical assay was used. By multivariable logistic regression, the examining department was significantly related to both HER2 score 0 and HER2 positivity (P < 0.0001) but showed greater dispersion in odds ratios in the former case (range 0.25-1.41 vs. 0.84-1.27).
Our data showed high inter-laboratory variability in the assessment of HER2-low breast cancer. The findings cast doubt on whether the current test method for HER2 is robust and reliable enough to select HER2-low patients for HER2-targeted treatment in daily clinical practice.

Breast cancer (BC) expressing low levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2 Low) is an emerging category that needs further refining. This study aims to provide a comprehensive clinico-pathological and molecular profile of HER2 Low BC including response to therapy and patient outcome in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings.
Two different independent and well-characterised BC cohorts were included. Nottingham cohort (A) (n = 5744) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) BC cohort (B) (n = 854). The clinical, molecular, biological and immunological profile of HER2 Low BC was investigated. Transcriptomic and pathway enrichment analyses were performed on the TCGA BC cohort and validated through next-generation sequencing in a subset of Nottingham cases.
Ninety percent of HER2 Low tumours were hormone receptor (HR) positive (HR+), enriched with luminal intrinsic molecular subtype, lacking significant expression of HER2 oncogenic signalling genes and of favourable clinical behaviour compared to HER2 negative (HER2-) BC. In HR+ BC, no significant prognostic differences were detected between HER2 Low and HER2- tumours. However, in HR- BC, HER2 Low tumours were less aggressive with longer patient survival. Transcriptomic data showed that the majority of HR- /HER2 Low tumours were of luminal androgen receptor (LAR) intrinsic subtype, enriched with T-helper lymphocytes, activated dendritic cells and tumour associated neutrophils, while most HR-/HER2- tumours were basal-like, enriched with tumour associated macrophages.
HER2 Low BC is mainly driven by HR signalling in HR+ tumours. HR-/HER2 Low tumours tend to be enriched with LAR genes with a unique immune profile.

OBJECTIVE: One-half of hormone receptor-positive (HR +) breast cancer (BC) patients have low expression of HER2 (HER2-low) and may benefit from trastuzumab deruxtecan (TDXd). This study aimed to identify parameters associated with HER2-low levels in primary and metastatic tumors. We specifically sought to determine whether OncotypeDX and HER2 mRNA levels could identify patients who would otherwise be considered HER2-negative by immunohistochemistry (IHC).
METHODS: This retrospective analysis of all consecutive HR + patients who underwent OncotypeDX from January 2004 to December 2020 was conducted in a single medical center (n = 1429). We divided HER2-negative cases into HER2-low (IHC = 1 + or 2 + and non-amplified fluorescent situ hybridization) and HER2-0 (IHC = 0). HER2 RT-PCR was evaluated from the OncotypeDX results.
RESULTS: HER2-low cases exhibited significantly higher HER2 RT-PCR scores (p = 2.1e-9), elevated estrogen receptor (ER) levels (p = 0.0114), and larger tumor sizes compared to HER2-0 cases (> 2 cm; 36.6% vs. 22.1%, respectively, p < 0.00001). Primary tumors > 2 cm were more likely to be HER2-low (OR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.6317 to 2.6475, p < 0.0001). Metastatic BCs expressed higher HER2 IHC scores compared with primary BCs (Wilcoxon signed-rank, p = 0.046). HER2 IHC scores were higher for low-risk vs. medium-risk OncotypeDX (p = 0.0067). No other clinical or pathological parameters were associated with the increase in HER2 levels in the metastatic samples.
CONCLUSIONS: It might be beneficial to use clinical data from the primary tumor, including the HER2 RT-PCR score, to determine a HER2-low status.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinicopathological features and prognostic significance of HER2 low, fibrotic focus (FF), and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 293 patients with HER2-negative, stage I-II, invasive breast cancer of non-specific types. The HER2-negative cases were classified into HER2 low and HER2 0. Digital analysis of hematoxylin-eosin stained whole slide images was used to evaluate the FF expression. TILs were also evaluated using the Whole Slide Image. Furthermore, the association between HER2 low, FF, and TILs as well as their prognostic significance were analyzed.
RESULTS: The study cohort included 178 cases (60.8%) with HER2 low and 115 cases (39.2%) with HER2 0. Older age, lower Nottingham histological grade (NHG), estrogen receptor (ER) positivity, progesterone receptor (PR) positivity, and hormone receptor (HR) positivity were all associated with HER2 low. FF was correlated with older age, intermediate and low NHG, vascular invasion, HR positivity, HER2 low status, high Ki67 expression, and low TILs. Univariate survival analysis showed that FF was significantly associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS). Stratified analysis indicated that in the HR-negative and HR-positive groups, HER2 status and TILs did not affect PFS. DFS was longer in patients without FF compared to those with FF in the HR-positive (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.313) and HER2 low (HR = 0.272) groups. DFS was also significantly longer in patients without FF compared to those with FF in the HR-negative (HR = 0.069) and HER2 0 groups (HR = 0.129).
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that the HER2 low status and the TILs expression did not impact prognosis. However, patients with FF exhibited distinct biological characteristics and prognostic significance, particularly in the HR-negative and HER2 0 groups. This provides a rationale for accurate diagnosis and treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancers without HER2 amplification but still expressing this membrane protein constitute a new entity called HER2-low tumors. It is important to characterize them in terms of sensitivity to treatment and prognosis.
METHODS: To investigate chemosensitivity and long-term prognosis of HER2-low early breast cancer (eBC), compared to HER2-0 tumors, we retrospectively retrieved clinicopathological characteristics, response to treatment, and survival data from 511 patients treated for eBC with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in a French cancer center between 2007 and 2018. Factors associated with the achievement of pathologic complete response (pCR) and survival were studied among hormone receptor positive (HR+) and negative (HR-) eBC.
RESULTS: A total of 280 HR+ (61% HER2-low), and 231 HR- (28% HER2-low) eBC were included. We found classical clinicopathological factors usually associated with chemosensitivity and prognosis, in both HR+ and HR- eBC. By uni- and multivariable analysis, HER2 status (low vs 0) was not independently associated with pCR, either in HR+ or HR- eBC. Relapse free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were not significantly different between HER2-low and HER2-0 among HR+ tumors. In contrast, among HR- negative tumors, RFS and OS were slightly better in HER2-0 eBC by univariable but not by multivariable analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: In eBC patients treated with NAC, taking into account HR expression subtype and other current clinicopathological features, HER2-low tumors did not appear to have different chemosensitivity or prognosis, compared to their HER2-0 counterparts.

Updated 2023 guidelines from the College of American Pathologists (CAP) on immunohistochemical detection of human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2), receptors of estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR), and the cell proliferation marker Ki-67 in breast cancer are presented. Attention is drawn to the emergence of two new terms «ER Low Positive» and «HER2 Low» to characterize tumors with low expression of estrogen receptors and HER2.
Представлены обновленные рекомендации 2023 г. Колледжа американских патологов (CAP), посвященные иммуногистохимическому определению рецептора эпидермального фактора роста человека 2-го типа (HER2), рецепторов эстрогена (ER) и прогестерона (PgR), а также белка-маркера клеточной пролиферации Ki-67 при раке молочной железы. Обращено внимание на появление двух новых терминов: ER Low Positive и HER2 Low для характеристики опухолей с низкой экспрессией рецепторов эстрогенов и HER2.