HBP, hepatobiliary phase

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: The histopathological subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are associated with distinct clinical features and prognoses. This study aims to report Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS)-defined imaging features of different HCC subtypes in a cohort of resected tumours and to assess the influence of HCC subtypes on computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) LI-RADS categorisation in the subgroup of high-risk patients.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective institutional review board-approved study included patients with resected HCCs and available histopathological classification. Three radiologists independently reviewed preoperative CT and MRI exams. The readers evaluated the presence of imaging features according to LI-RADS v2018 definitions and provided a LI-RADS category in patients at high risk of HCC. Differences in LI-RADS features and categorisations were assessed for not otherwise specified (NOS-HCC), steatohepatitic (SH-HCC), and macrotrabecular-massive (MTM-HCC) types of HCCs.
    UNASSIGNED: Two hundred and seventy-seven patients (median age 64.0 years, 215 [77.6%] men) were analysed, which involved 295 HCCs. There were 197 (66.7%) NOS-HCCs, 62 (21.0%) SH-HCCs, 23 (7.8%) MTM-HCCs, and 13 (4.5%) other rare subtypes. The following features were more frequent in MTM-HCC: elevated α-foetoprotein serum levels (p <0.001), tumour-in-vein (p <0.001 on CT, p ≤0.052 on MRI), presence of at least 1 LR-M feature (p ≤0.010 on CT), infiltrative appearance (p ≤0.032 on CT), necrosis or severe ischaemia (p ≤0.038 on CT), and larger size (p ≤0.006 on CT, p ≤0.011 on MRI). SH-HCC was associated with fat in mass (p <0.001 on CT, p ≤0.002 on MRI). The distribution of the LI-RADS major features and categories in high-risk patients did not significantly differ among the 3 main HCC subtypes.
    UNASSIGNED: The distribution of LI-RADS major features and categories is not different among the HCC subtypes. Nevertheless, careful analysis of tumour-in-vein, LR-M, and ancillary features as well as clinico-biological data can provide information for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC subtypes.
    UNASSIGNED: In high-risk patients, the overall distribution of LI-RADS major features and categories is not different among the histological subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma, but tumour-in-vein, presence of LR-M features, and ancillary features can provide information for the non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma subtypes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: To determine the usefulness of T1 values measured using a phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) sequence for the diagnosis of focal liver lesions.
    UNASSIGNED: The study enrolled 87 patients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessment of 38 hepatocellular carcinomas, 33 hepatic hemangiomas, 30 metastatic liver tumors, and 14 hepatic cysts. PSIR was performed before and 15 min after contrast agent administration, and then the respective T1 values were measured and the T1 reduction rate was calculated. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test was used to compare T1 values pre- and post-contrast administration in each tumor. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn\'s post-hoc test were used to compare T1 values among all tumors pre- and post-contrast administration and the T1 reduction rate among all tumors.
    UNASSIGNED: The T1 values measured before and after contrast enhancement were 1056 ± 292 ms and 724 ± 199 ms for hepatocellular carcinoma, 1757 ± 723 ms and 1033 ± 406 ms for metastatic liver tumor, 2524 ± 908 ms and 1071 ± 390 ms for hepatic hemangioma, and 3793 ± 207 ms and 3671 ± 241 ms for liver cysts, respectively. The T1 values obtained before and after contrast administration showed significant differences for all tumors except liver cysts (P <  0.0001). T1 reduction rate was not significantly different between hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic liver tumor, but was significantly different among other tumors (P <  0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: T1 mapping using the PSIR sequence is useful to differentiate focal liver lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    SORAMIC是肝细胞癌(HCC)的一项前瞻性II期随机对照试验。它由3部分组成:一项诊断研究和2项治疗研究,包括治愈性消融或姑息性钇90放射栓塞联合索拉非尼。我们报告了一项诊断队列研究,旨在确定gadoxetic酸增强磁共振成像(MRI)的准确性,包括与对比增强计算机断层扫描(CT)相比的肝胆期(HBP)成像特征。主要目标是治疗决策的准确性,将患者分层以进行治愈性或姑息性(非消融)治疗。
    临床疑似HCC的患者接受了gadoxetic酸增强MRI(HBPMRI,包括动态MRI)和对比增强CT。由2个读取器组(放射科医生,R1和R2)。可以访问所有临床数据和随访成像的事实面板作为参考。治愈性消融的成像标准定义为多达4个<5cm的病变和没有大血管侵犯。主要终点是HBPMRI的非劣效性与第一步是CT,第二步是优势。
    意向治疗人群包括538名患者。HBPMRI(R1和R2)的治疗决策与事实小组评估相符,分别为83.3%和81.2%,CT为73.4%和70.8%。HBPMRI的非劣效性和优越性(第二步)与CT显示(比值比1.14[1.09-1.19])。HBPMRI识别>4个病灶的患者的频率明显高于CT。
    在HCC中,HBPMRI提供了比CT更准确的治疗决策姑息治疗策略。
    肝细胞癌患者根据其疾病阶段进行治愈性或姑息性治疗。使用gadoxetic酸增强的MRI进行肝胆成像比CT更准确地进行治疗决策。
    UNASSIGNED: SORAMIC is a prospective phase II randomised controlled trial in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It consists of 3 parts: a diagnostic study and 2 therapeutic studies with either curative ablation or palliative Yttrium-90 radioembolisation combined with sorafenib. We report the diagnostic cohort study aimed to determine the accuracy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including hepatobiliary phase (HBP) imaging features compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). The primary objective was the accuracy of treatment decisions stratifying patients for curative or palliative (non-ablation) treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with clinically suspected HCC underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (HBP MRI, including dynamic MRI) and contrast-enhanced CT. Blinded read of the image data was performed by 2 reader groups (radiologists, R1 and R2). A truth panel with access to all clinical data and follow-up imaging served as reference. Imaging criteria for curative ablation were defined as up to 4 lesions <5 cm and absence of macrovascular invasion. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of HBP MRI vs. CT in a first step and superiority in a second step.
    UNASSIGNED: The intent-to-treat population comprised 538 patients. Treatment decisions matched the truth panel assessment in 83.3% and 81.2% for HBP MRI (R1 and R2), and 73.4% and 70.8% for CT. Non-inferiority and superiority (second step) of HBP MRI vs. CT were demonstrated (odds ratio 1.14 [1.09-1.19]). HBP MRI identified patients with >4 lesions significantly more frequently than CT.
    UNASSIGNED: In HCC, HBP MRI provided a more accurate decision than CT for a curative vs. palliative treatment strategy.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma are allocated to curative or palliative treatment according to the stage of their disease. Hepatobiliary imaging using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is more accurate than CT for treatment decision-making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:肝胆阶段(HBP)图像可以区分良性和恶性肝脏病变,但目前尚不清楚这种方法是否可用于Budd-Chiari综合征(BCS)患者。因此,我们旨在评估HBP图像在BCS患者中的诊断效用.
    方法:这项回顾性研究包括2000年至2019年在肝胆造影剂增强MR成像(HBCA-MRI)上诊断为BCS和局灶性肝脏病变的所有患者。MR图像由2名对病变诊断不知情的放射科医生进行了审查。记录患者和病变特征,HBP成像特点。
    结果:分析了26例患者(平均35±11岁[13-65];21例女性[81%]35±12岁[13-65];5例男性[19%]36±10岁[19-44]),其中99例良性肝脏病变和12例肝细胞癌(HCC)。HCC患者的年龄明显高于良性病变患者(平均50±10vs.33±9岁,p=0.003),甲胎蛋白(AFP)水平较高(3/4[75%]vs.1/22[5%]AFP>15ng/ml,p<0.001)。在14个病变的HBP上发现了均匀的低信号,包括12/12(100%)HCC,和2/99(2%)良性病变(p<0.001)。大多数良性肝脏病变在HBP上显示为外周(n=52/99[53%])或均匀的高强度(n=23/99[23%])。在AFP血清水平>15ng/ml的患者中,HBP信号下降的病变均为HCC。
    结论:大多数良性病变在HBP图像上表现为均匀或周围高强度,而所有HCC均为均匀低信号。HBP图像有助于区分良性病变和HCC,优于其他序列。应系统地获取它们以表征BCS患者的局灶性病变。
    背景:肝胆相位成像是一种最近被证明可以区分肝脏良性和恶性病变的方法。然而,尚不清楚这种成像方法能否有效用于Budd-Chiari综合征患者.在这里,我们已经证明,肝胆期相成像似乎可用于区分Budd-Chiari综合征患者的良性和恶性肝脏病变.
    OBJECTIVE: Hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images can discriminate between benign and malignant liver lesions, but it is unclear if this approach can be used in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS). Thus, we aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of HBP images in patients with BCS.
    METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients admitted to our institution with a diagnosis of BCS and focal liver lesions on hepatobiliary contrast agent-enhanced MR imaging (HBCA-MRI) from 2000 to 2019. MR images were reviewed by 2 radiologists blinded to the diagnosis of the lesions. Patient and lesion characteristics were recorded, focusing on HBP imaging features.
    RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (mean 35 ± 11 years old [13-65]; 21 women [81%] 35 ± 12 years old [13-65]; 5 men [19%] 36 ± 10 years old [19-44]) with 99 benign liver lesions and 12 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) were analyzed. Patients with HCC were significantly older than those with benign lesions (mean 50 ± 10 vs. 33 ± 9 years old, p = 0.003), with higher alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels (3/4 [75%] vs. 1/22 [5%] with AFP >15 ng/ml, p <0.001). Homogeneous hypointense signals were identified on HBP in 14 lesions, including 12/12 (100%) HCCs, and 2/99 (2%) benign lesions (p <0.001). Most benign liver lesions showed either peripheral (n = 52/99 [53%]) or homogeneous hyperintensity (n = 23/99 [23%]) on HBP. Lesions with signal hypointensity on HBP in patients with AFP serum levels >15 ng/ml were all HCCs.
    CONCLUSIONS: Most benign lesions showed homogeneous or peripheral hyperintensity on HBP images while all HCCs were homogeneously hypointense. HBP images are helpful to differentiate between benign lesions and HCCs and outperform other sequences. They should be systematically acquired for the characterization of focal lesions in patients with BCS.
    BACKGROUND: Hepatobiliary phase imaging is an approach that has recently been shown to discriminate between benign and malignant lesions in the liver. However, it was not known whether this imaging approach could be used effectively in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome. Herein, we have shown that hepatobiliary phase imaging appears to be useful for differentiating between benign and malignant liver lesions in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号