BACKGROUND: Comprehensive investigations of the prognosis factors and treatment strategies with adjustment of competing causes of death for patients with malignant meningioma (MM) is still lacking.
METHODS: The surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were used to include adult patients with this rare disease between 2004 and 2018. The probability of MM-caused mortality (MMCM) and non-MM-caused mortality (non-MMCM) were presented by cumulative incidence function curves. Then, the association between variates with non-MMCM was evaluated by the cox proportional hazard model, and the prognostic factors of MMCM were identified by Fine-Gray competing risk regression model. Furthermore, a nomogram was developed to predict the 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year MMCM and the performance was tested by a time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration.
RESULTS: 577 patients were included, with a median age of 62 (18-100) years old and a median overall survival time of 36 (0-176) months. The percentage of non-MMCM was 15.4% (n = 89) in the entire population and 21.7% (n = 54) in elderly patients. The multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model revealed that older age and other tumor(s) before or after MM had an independently significant association with higher non-MMCM. After adjustment of competing causes of death, the multivariable Fine-gray regression model identified age group ≥ 65 year, tumor size > 5.3 cm, recurrent MM, and histologic type 9530/3 (Meningioma, malignant) had an independently significant association with higher MMCM. Compared with gross total (GTR) of tumor, subtotal resection of tumor (HR 1.66, 95%CI 1.08-2.56, P = 0.02), partial resection of lobe (HR 2.26, 95%CI 1.32-3.87, P = 0.003), and gross total resection of lobe (HR 1.69, 95%CI 1.12-2.51, P = 0.01) had an independently significant association with higher MMCM.
CONCLUSIONS: The competing risk nomogram including age group, tumor size, initial status, histologic type, and extent of resection is discriminative and clinically useful. This study emphasized the importance of the GTR of tumor in the treatment of MM patients, which had a significantly lower incidence of MMCM compared with biopsy, STR of tumor, partial resection of lobe, and GTR of lobe.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial epidermoid tumors (ETs) are rare, benign lesions that present significant challenges in neurosurgical management due to their propensity to encase vital neurovascular structures.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of clinical, demographic, and tumor-specific factors on surgical decisions (gross total resection [GTR] vs. subtotal resection [STR]) and outcomes and identify patient clusters with distinct profiles and outcomes post-resection.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 72 epidermoid brain tumor patients treated from 1998 to 2022, employing multivariable logistic regression for GTR vs. STR predictors and Kaplan-Meier curves for progression-free survival (PFS). K-prototype clustering classified patients based on clinical data.
RESULTS: The mean age of our cohort was 39.8±20.1 years. 13.9% of patients had a recurrence, with a median PFS of 108 months (IQR 57-206). Seizures significantly predicted GTR (p<0.05), whereas adherence to critical structures reduced GTR likelihood (p<0.05). Initial surgeries more often achieved GTR, correlating with longer PFS (p<0.0001) and reduced recurrence (p<0.01). History of previous ET surgery was predictive of increased recurrent tumor size (p<0.05) and reduced overall PFS (p<0.05). Clustering analysis revealed three clusters with significant differences in recurrence rates (p<0.0001), long term neurological deficits (p<0.05), PFS greater than 10 years (p<0.0001), and significant differences in median PFS between clusters 1 and 3 (p<0.0001) as well as 2 and three (p<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: This study emphasizes the importance of tailored surgical strategies in managing intracranial ETs, advocating for GTR to optimize long-term outcomes where possible. Future prospective studies are essential to further refine treatment approaches, enhancing survival for ET patients.

UNASSIGNED: Pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs) are the second most common type of intracranial tumour. Several studies have explored the prognostic factors for PitNETs. However, prognostic factors for postoperative PitNET recurrence remain not fully understood. This study aimed to explore potential prognostic factors for PitNET recurrence, such as surrounding tissue invasion and the extent of surgical resection in patients with postoperative PitNETs.
UNASSIGNED: We included 106 patients who underwent PitNET surgery between 2013 and 2018, dividing them into two groups: those with recurrence and those without recurrence. Tumours were classified based on demographics, neuroradiological, and immunohistological characteristics. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine factors predicting recurrence. Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank tests were used to analyse each independent factor based on the cumulative 5-year recurrence rate.
UNASSIGNED: During the 5-year follow-up period, 29.2% of the patients (n = 31) had disease recurrence. Univariate analysis showed that predictors of recurrence included cavernous and sphenoid sinus invasions, optic chiasm compression, larger tumour volume, giant adenoma >4 cm, and gross total resection (GTR). Multivariate analysis showed that lactotroph tumour type, sphenoid sinus invasion, and GTR were independent predictors. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant differences in the 5-year recurrence rate among the three independent predictors, with significantly lower recurrence rate in patients with lactotroph tumours and GTR, and a significantly higher recurrence risk in patients with sphenoid sinus invasion.
UNASSIGNED: Lactotroph tumour type, sphenoid sinus invasion, and GTR are independent predictors of postoperative PitNET recurrence. This study provides insights into the factors affecting postoperative PitNET recurrence.
PitNETs are the second most common intracranial tumour typePrognostic factors for postoperative PitNET recurrence remain not fully understoodWe explored potential prognostic factors in patients with postoperative PitNETsProlactin secretion and GTR failure were independent recurrence predictorsProliferative factors did not correlate with recurrence.

OBJECTIVE: How maximal safe resection (MSR) of glioblastoma is implemented in the clinical setting remains understudied. Here, we utilized a survey-based approach to understand physician perspectives on this matter.
METHODS: Scenarios involving glioblastomas were presented to physicians who were asked to select from planned sub-total resection (STR), gross total resection (GTR), medical therapy only, or palliative care. Demographic, experience, and Likert scales of value assessment were collected.
RESULTS: In the scenario involving a corpus callosum glioblastoma, 2.33% opted for GTR. For a right frontal glioblastoma, 91.7% opted for GTR. In contrast, only 30.8% chose GTR of a right motor strip glioblastoma (p< 0.001). When presented with a left motor strip glioblastoma, fewer respondents (12.7%,p < 0.001) opted for GTR. Physicians who placed a high value on preserving physical independence were more likely to forgo GTR for right motor glioblastomas (HR=0.068,95% CI:0.47-0.97,p=0.035), and physicians who placed a high value on their faith were more likely to opt for surgical treatments that differ from the general consensus, for instance opting for GTR of the corpus callosum glioblastoma (HR=4.18,95%CI:1.63-10.74,p=0.003). No other associations were found between the choice for GTR and other variables collected.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that while maximal safe resection remains a guiding principle for glioblastoma resection, physician preference in terms of the extent of resection varies significantly as a function of tumor location and personal values.

BACKGROUND: Pineal tumors are rare, and the pineal region is a challenging surgical location for neurosurgeons. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of microsurgical management in patients with pineal region tumors and explore probable factors associated with preoperative hydrocephalus, postoperative hydrocephalus remission, and prolonged hospital length of stay (LoS).
METHODS: A retrospective study of patients with pineal region tumors who underwent microsurgical management at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Jiangsu, China) between 1 January 2010 and 31 October 2022 was conducted.
RESULTS: Data from 36 patients were included in this study. The top 5 common symptoms included headache (58%), dizziness (44%), double vision (22%), vomiting (19%), and nausea (14%). Patients with a lower Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS), younger age, and larger maximum tumor diameters were more vulnerable to preoperative hydrocephalus. Preoperative hydrocephalus also led to a prolonged postoperative LoS (P = 0.021). Patients with a lower KPS score (P = 0.020) or larger maximum tumor diameters (P = 0.045) were more likely to achieve postoperative remission of hydrocephalus. Most postoperative complications led to increased hospital LoS.
CONCLUSIONS: Microsurgical resection of pineal tumors yielded favorable long-term outcomes. Patients with a lower KPS score, younger age, and larger maximum tumor diameters were more vulnerable to preoperative hydrocephalus and prolonged LoS. Patients with a lower KPS score or larger tumor diameter were likely to achieve significant remission of hydrocephalus after tumor resection.

Maximal resection with the preservation of neurological function are the mainstays of the surgical management of high-grade meningiomas. Surgical morbidity is strongly associated with tumor size, location, and invasiveness, whereas patient survival is strongly associated with the extent of resection, tumor biology, and patient health. A versatile microsurgical skill set combined with a cogent multimodality treatment plan is critical in order to achieve optimal patient outcomes. Continued refinement in surgical techniques in conjunction with directed radiotherapeutic and medical therapies will define future treatment.

UNASSIGNED: Postoperative nonfunctioning pituitary tumor (NFPT) regrowth is a significant concern, but its predictive factors are not well established. This study aimed to elucidate the pathological characteristics of NFPTs indicated for reoperation for tumor regrowth.
UNASSIGNED: Pathological, radiological, and clinical data were collected from patients who underwent repeat operation for NFPT at Moriyama Memorial Hospital (MMH) between April 2018 and September 2023. For comparison, we also gathered data from patients who underwent initial surgery for NFPT during the same period at MMH.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, 61 and 244 NFPT patients who respectively underwent reoperation and initial operation were evaluated. The mean period between the previous operation and reoperation was 113 months. Immunonegativity for any adenohypophyseal hormone was significantly more frequent in the reoperation group than in the initial operation group. In addition, the rate of hormone-negative but transcription factor-positive (H-/TF+) tumors among silent gonadotroph tumors was significantly higher in the reoperation group than in the initial operation group. Furthermore, seven silent corticotroph tumors (SCTs) in the reoperation group were ACTH-negative but TPIT-positive. Because most of the previous surgeries were performed in other hospitals a long time ago, we could procure the previous pathological results with immunohistochemistry (IHC) only from 21 patients. IHC for TF had not been performed in all the previous specimens. IHC for adenohypophyseal hormone was almost the same as the current results, and many H-/TF+ tumors were previously diagnosed as NCT. In addition, the reoperated patients were classified into 3 groups on the basis of the condition of the previous operation: gross total resection (GTR), 12 patients; subtotal resection (STR), 17 patients; and partial resection (PR), 32 patients. The mean Ki-67 LI in the GTR, STR, and PR subgroups were 1.82, 1.37, and 0.84, respectively, with the value being significantly higher in the GTR subgroup than in the PR subgroup (P < 0.05).
UNASSIGNED: The ratio of H-/TF+ tumors is significantly higher in symptomatically regrown tumors than in the initial cases, which used to be diagnosed as NCT. PR cases tend to grow symptomatically in a shorter period, even with lower Ki-67 LI than GTR cases.

UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of different surgical and postoperative treatment options on the long-term overall survival (OS) in patients with primary single intracranial atypical meningioma.
UNASSIGNED: In this retrospective study, participants were drawn from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Inclusion criteria comprised patients who underwent either gross total resection (GTR) or subtotal resection (STR). The inverse probability weighting (IPW) method using generalized boosted models was used to achieve balance in variables across various treatment groups. Subsequent to IPW, multivariate Cox analysis and Kaplan-Meier analysis were conducted, with OS as the endpoint.
UNASSIGNED: GTR was conducted on 1650 patients, while STR was conducted on 1109 patients. Among these, 432 patients who underwent GTR and 401 patients who underwent STR received postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). In the case of patients who were under 60 years old, PORT emerged as a significant protective factor for OS in those who underwent STR (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.23-0.84; p = 0.013). Survival curves demonstrated that patients who underwent STR with PORT exhibited comparable OS to those who underwent GTR without PORT (p = 0.546). Conversely, for patients aged 60 years or older, PORT emerged as an independent risk factor for both GTR (HR 1.42; 95% CI 1.00-2.00; p = 0.048) and STR (HR 1.81; 95% CI 1.26-2.60; p = 0.001).
UNASSIGNED: PORT may contribute to improving OS in primary single atypical meningioma patients under 60 years old who receive STR. However, in older patients who underwent either GTR or STR, the administration of PORT may be associated with a potential risk of OS. Therefore, age should be taken into account in applying PORT therapy, and the optimal treatment strategy for PORT in patients with atypical meningiomas needs to be further explored and validated.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the growing acceptance of neuronavigation in the field of neurosurgery, there is limited comparative research with contradictory results. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness (tumor resection rate and survival) and safety (frequency of neurological complications) of surgery for brain gliomas with or without neuronavigation.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated data obtained from electronic records of patients who underwent surgery for gliomas at Dr. Alejandro Dávila Bolaños Military Hospital and the Clinic Hospital of Barcelona between July 2016 and September 2022. The preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiologic characteristics were analyzed and compared according to the use of neuronavigation.
RESULTS: This study included 110 patients, of whom 79 underwent surgery with neuronavigation. Neuronavigation increased gross total resection by 57% in patients in whom it was used; gross total resection was performed in 56% of patients who underwent surgery with neuronavigation as compared with 35.5% in those who underwent surgery without neuronavigation (risk ratio [RR], 1.57; P=0.056). The incidence of postoperative neurologic deficits (transient and permanent) decreased by 79% with the use of neuronavigation, (12% vs. 33.3%; RR, 0.21; P=0.0003). Neuronavigation improved survival in patients with grade IV gliomas (15 months vs. 13.8 months), but it was not statistically significant (odds ratio (OR), 0.19; P=0.13).
CONCLUSIONS: Neuronavigation improved the effectiveness (greater gross total resection of tumors) and safety (fewer neurological deficits) of brain glioma surgery. However, neuronavigation does not significantly influence the survival of patients with grade IV gliomas.

Low-grade gliomas are the most common brain tumor of childhood, and complete resection offers a high likelihood of cure. However, in many instances, tumors may not be surgically accessible without substantial morbidity, particularly in regard to gliomas arising from the optic or hypothalamic regions, as well as the brainstem. When gross total resection is not feasible, alternative treatment strategies must be considered. While conventional chemotherapy and radiation therapy have long been the backbone of adjuvant therapy for low-grade glioma, emerging techniques and technologies are rapidly changing the landscape of care for patients with this disease. This article seeks to review the current and emerging modalities of treatment for pediatric low-grade glioma.