BACKGROUND: Great saphenous vein insufficiency (GSVI) adversely affects the quality of life of affected individuals. Minimally invasive endo-venous ablation techniques have emerged as effective and safe treatments, despite the longstanding use of surgical interventions. We aim in our study to evaluate all the available interventions in the literature, either endo-venous or conventional approaches for the treatment of GSVI.
METHODS: A thorough search was performed across four electronic databases to identify relevant studies. A frequentist network meta-analysis (NWM) was executed on the combined data to derive network estimates pertaining to the outcomes of concern. Risk ratios (RRs) were employed as the effect size metric for binary outcomes, while mean differences (MDs) were utilized for continuous outcomes, each reported with a 95% confidence interval. The qualitative review was conducted employing the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool 1.
RESULTS: Our NWM included 75 studies encompassing 12,196 patients. Regarding technical success rate within the first 5 years after treatment, Endo-venous Laser Ablation (EVLA) with High Ligation and Stripping (HL/S), EVLA alone, Cyanoacrylate Adhesive Injection, cryostripping, HL/S and Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) were significantly better than Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy and F-care. Also, invagination stripping was inferior to all interventions. Conservative Hemodynamic Cure for Venous Insufficiency and Varicose Veins (CHIVA) demonstrated a significantly lower recurrence rate with a RR of 0.35 [0.15; 0.79] compared to RFA, but RFA was more effective in recurrence prevention than HL/S and Mechanochemical Ablation (MOCA), with a RR of 0.63 [0.41; 0.97] and 0.18 [0.03; 0.95], respectively. Endo-venous Steam Ablation (EVSA) emerged as the most effective in reducing post-intervention pain, showing a MD of -2.73 [-3.72; -1.74] compared to HL/S. In Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire outcome, our analysis favored MOCA over most studied interventions, with an MD of -6.88 [-12.43; -1.32] compared to HL/S. Safety outcomes did not significantly differ among interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings revealed significant variations in the technical success rates, recurrence rates, and post-intervention pain levels among different interventions. CHIVA exhibited enhanced performance in terms of lower recurrence rates, while EVSA emerged as a promising choice for mitigating post-intervention pain. Additionally, our analysis underscored the significance of patient-reported outcomes, with MOCA consistently yielding favorable results in terms of enhancing quality of life and expediting the return to regular activities.

OBJECTIVE: Reversed great saphenous vein (GSV) graft is widely used for revascularization in limb-sparing surgery for sarcoma invading great vessels. However, a mismatch in caliber between the reverse graft and cut end of the artery can threaten graft patency. Recently, we introduced the use of a venous valvulotome to allow nonreversed GSV graft. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and versatility of this technique.
METHODS: We retrospectively compared long-term patency and limb salvage rates between nonreversed GSV and reversed GSV in patients undergoing limb-sparing surgery for sarcoma.
METHODS: Thirty-seven patients were included, with 21 in the nonreversed GSV group and 16 in the reversed GSV group. Patient characteristics, surgical details, and complications were reviewed from the hospital records. The patency of the reconstructed vessels was assessed using contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. Statistical analyses, including Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, were employed for comparisons.
RESULTS: The median follow-up was 38 months. Overall graft patency was 90.4% (19 of 21 patients) in the nonreversed GSV group and 81.2% (13 of 16) in the reverse GSV (RGSV) group. In the nonreversed GSV group, there was 1 case of graft occlusion each in the acute and chronic phases, but limb circulation remained intact and all limbs were spared.
CONCLUSIONS: Nonreversed GSV grafting with valvulotome offers a safe and versatile alternative to reversed GSV grafts in limb-sparing sarcoma surgery. It eliminates the need for vein reversal and minimizes diameter mismatch, potentially expanding the indication for autologous revascularization to previously ineligible cases.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the application effect of head-mounted virtual reality display immersive experience in improving the perioperative satisfaction of patients undergoing great saphenous vein surgery.
METHODS: A total of 158 patients undergoing saphenous vein surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University from January 2020 to January 2023 were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group in a 1:1 ratio, with 79 cases in each group. The observation group received head-mounted display virtual reality immersive experience, whereas the control group received midazolam. The study compared the perioperative satisfaction, changes in preoperative and postoperative anxiety and depression scores, intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting between the two groups. Additionally, the satisfaction of patients, anesthesiologists, and chief surgeons was compared.
RESULTS: All surgeries were completed successfully. Patients in the observation group exhibited higher perioperative satisfaction compared to those in the control group (P<0.001). There were no significant differences in anxiety or depression scores between the two groups before surgery (P>0.05). However, both groups showed a reduction in anxiety and depression scores postoperatively, with the observation group demonstrating lower scores than the control group (both P<0.05). The observation group also had lower intraoperative blood pressure, heart rate, postoperative VAS scores, and incidence of nausea and vomiting compared to the control group (all P<0.05). Furthermore, the satisfaction levels of the anesthesiologists and chief surgeons were higher in the observation group than in the control group (P=0.043, 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS: Head-mounted display virtual reality immersive experience can enhance perioperative satisfaction among patients undergoing great saphenous vein surgery, reduce anxiety and depression scores, and contribute to the stabilization of hemodynamics during surgery, thereby decreasing postoperative nausea and vomiting.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the sex prevalence of lower limb varicose networks fed by reflux of the great saphenous vein (GSV), anterior accessory saphenous vein (AASV), and small saphenous vein singularly or in combination.
METHODS: We scanned by the means of the same color Doppler ultrasound protocol 3000 lower limbs in 1500 consecutive patients, affected by symptomatic chronic venous insufficiency from 2013 to 2023. Limbs with normal venous function, incomplete scans, or that were affected by post-thrombotic syndrome, pelvic reflux, isolated perforator reflux, venous malformation, phlebolymphedema and Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, Pathophysiological clinical class C5 and C6 were excluded from the final analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, 1072 patients-252 (23.5%) males and 820 (76.5%) females (P < .0001) matched for age (P = .692)-were included in the study for a total of 1956 limbs affected by primary chronic venous insufficiency, clinical class C2 to C4. The main finding was the significant prevalence of varicose networks fed by reflux of the AASV alone (odds ratio [OR], 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-3.06; P = .001) or combined with GSV (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.34-2.52; P = .0002) in females. In contrast, GSV insufficiency alone was significantly prevalent in males (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.43-0.68; P < .0001). No significant sex differences regarding SSV reflux were detected. Moreover, we considered the presence of competent terminal valve (TV+) at the level of the saphenofemoral junction, which resulted more significantly present in female (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.12-2.19; P = .0083); to the contrary incompetent terminal valve (TV-) was more common in males (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46-0.89; P = .0083). Finally, considering reflux in the AASV territory in the presence of a TV+, a strong prevalence in females was detected (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.48-3.52; P = .0002), whereas males developed reflux along the GSV when a concomitant TV- was present (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41-0.94; P = .0244).
CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of the lower limb varicose networks highlights that reflux along the AASV alone, in presence of a TV+ at the junction or coupled with GSV insufficiency, is more prevalent in females. In contrast, GSV resulted the main trunk feeding varicose veins in males, in particular when a TV- was detected. Our findings suggest that females could be more prone to developing varicose veins with an ascending mechanism, whereas in males the descending one seems to be more common.

Objective: By incorporating an endovascular component into Great Saphenous Vein stripping, EndoVenous-assisted Invaginated Stripping (EVIS) aims to make the procedure minimally invasive. A study was conducted to investigate the surgical intervention. Methods: Sketches and videos were used to illustrate the technical aspects of EVIS. A prospective cohort study included 20 patients with chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). Results: EVIS is performed as a day-surgery. Technical success was 100%, and no complications were recorded. The mean operative time was 45 minutes, intraoperative pain score was 4.8, post-operative pain was 2.5, 1.8, 1.2, 0.5 at 48 hours, 1, 4, and 12 weeks, respectively. The mean blood loss was 15 mL, and the mean length of the GSV strapped was 19 cm. The follow-up duplex showed a reduction in the diameter of the residual GSV stump. Conclusions: EVIS is a combination of standard techniques that may prove valuable in managing CVI.

BACKGROUND: The SYNCHRONOUS-study investigates simultaneous ASV-ablation with great saphenous vein (GSV) treatment in endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) for preventing varicose vein recurrence. This sub-study examines complication rates associated with prophylactic ASV-ablation.
METHODS: Among 1173 patients with refluxing GSV, 604 underwent GSV-ablation only, and 569 received additional ASV-ablation. Complication rates were compared over 6 months.
RESULTS: Approximately 80% of patients were complication-free with minor bruising and dysesthesia being most common complications. After 6 months, additional prophylactic ASV-ablation did not increase the rate of complications compared to GSV-only treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The 6-months follow-up data suggests that prophylactic ASV-closure, alongside GSV-treatment, is safe, with similar complication rates to GSV-only EVLA.

暂无摘要。

Venous disorders encompass a diverse range of manifestations and diseases, impacting a significant portion of the population. While life-threatening conditions are uncommon in non-thrombotic disorders, like telangiectasias or uncomplicated varicose veins (VVs), these conditions still have a substantial impact on affected individuals. Ensuring that patients are well informed about their venous disorder is a crucial step in their treatment journey. Providing them with valuable information regarding the disease\'s natural progression and available therapeutic options plays a pivotal role in optimizing their care. When patients are diagnosed with venous disorders, they often have numerous questions and concerns they want to discuss with their healthcare providers. Addressing these inquiries not only improves patients\' knowledge and understanding but also influences their treatment compliance and overall outcomes. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to provide comprehensive explanations that address any doubts, uncertainties, and areas of confusion that patients may have. This report aims to present a concise, practical, and informative guide to venous disorders, focusing specifically on the common questions frequently raised by patients in everyday clinical practice. By serving as a valuable resource for healthcare professionals working in the field of venous diseases, this guide equips them with the necessary tools to effectively address patients\' concerns and provide optimal care. By bridging the gap between patients\' inquiries and medical expertise, this guide strives to enhance therapeutic outcomes and improve the overall management of venous disorders, ultimately empowering patients in their treatment journey.

OBJECTIVE: The recent Best Endovascular vs Best Surgical Therapy in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI) study showed that bypass was superior to endovascular therapy (ET) in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) deemed suitable for either approach who had an available single-segment great saphenous vein (GSV). However, the superiority of bypass among those lacking GSV was not established. We aimed to examine comparative treatment outcomes from a real-world CLTI population using the Vascular Quality Initiative-Medicare-linked database.
METHODS: We queried the Vascular Quality Initiative-Medicare-linked database for patients with CLTI who underwent first-time lower extremity revascularization (2010-2019). We performed two one-to-one propensity score matchings (PSMs): ET vs bypass with GSV (BWGSV) and ET vs bypass with a prosthetic graft (BWPG). The primary outcome was amputation-free survival. Secondary outcomes were freedom from amputation and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: Three cohorts were queried: BWGSV (N = 5279, 14.7%), BWPG (N = 2778, 7.7%), and ET (N = 27,977, 77.6%). PSM produced two sets of well-matched cohorts: 4705 pairs of ET vs BWGSV and 2583 pairs of ET vs BWPG. In the matched cohorts of ET vs BWGSV, ET was associated with greater hazards of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-1.43; P < .001), amputation (HR = 1.30, 95% CI, 1.17-1.44; P < .001), and amputation/death (HR = 1.32, 95% CI, 1.24-1.40; P < .001) up to 4 years. In the matched cohorts of ET vs BWPG, ET was associated with greater hazards of death up to 2 years (HR = 1.11, 95% CI, 1.00-1.22; P = .042) but not amputation or amputation/death.
CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world multi-institutional Medicare-linked PSM analysis, we found that BWGSV is superior to ET in terms of OS, freedom from amputation, and amputation-free survival up to 4 years. Moreover, BWPG was superior to ET in terms of OS up to 2 years. Our study confirms the superiority of BWGSV to ET as observed in the BEST-CLI trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the impact of post-interventional compression therapy on clinical outcomes after endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of incompetent saphenous veins.
METHODS: This prospective, controlled, multicenter study in Germany involved 493 varicose vein patients followed-up for 6 months.
RESULTS: Compression therapy significantly reduced symptoms compared to no compression (VCSS: 1.4 ± 1.6 vs 2.2 ± 2.2; p = .007). Post-interventional therapy duration of up to 14 days was found to be most effective for improving patient-reported disease severity (p < .001) and higher quality of life (p = .001). Patient compliance was high (82%), and non-compliance was linked to worse disease severity (VCSS 1.4 ± 1.5 vs 2.1 ± 2.3, p = .009).
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, post-interventional compression therapy is beneficial by reducing symptoms and improving quality of life. High patient compliance with the therapy is observed, and non-compliance is associated with worse disease severity.