There is no accepted grading system classifying the severity of immediate reactions to drugs.
The purpose of this article is to present a proposed grading system developed through the consensus of drug allergy experts from the United States Drug Allergy Registry (USDAR) Consortium.
The USDAR investigators sought to develop a consensus severity grading system for immediate drug reactions that is applicable to clinical care and research.
The USDAR grading scale scores severity levels on a scale of 0 to 4. A grade of no reaction (NR) is used for patients who undergo challenge without any symptoms or signs, and it would confirm a negative challenge result. A grade 0 reaction is indicative of primarily subjective complaints that are commonly seen with both historical drug reactions and during drug challenges, and it would suggest a low likelihood of a true drug allergic reaction. Grades 1 to 4 meet the criteria for a positive challenge result and may be considered indicative of a drug allergy. Grade 1 reactions are suggestive of a potential immediate drug reaction with mild symptoms. Grade 2 reactions are more likely to be immediate drug reactions of moderate severity. Grade 3 reactions have features suggestive of a severe allergic reaction, whereas grade 4 reactions are life-threatening reactions such as anaphylactic shock and fatal anaphylaxis.
This proposed grading schema for immediate drug reactions improves on prior schemata by being developed specifically for immediate drug reactions and being easy to implement in clinical and research practice.

UNASSIGNED: The Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) at Nebraska Medicine collaborated with a board-certified allergist to develop a penicillin allergy guidance document for treating inpatients with self-reported allergy. This guidance contains an algorithm for evaluating and safely challenging penicillin-allergic patients with beta-lactams without inpatient allergy consults being available.
UNASSIGNED: Following multi-disciplinary review, an order set for beta-lactam graded challenges (GC) was implemented in 2018. This contains recommended monitoring and detailed medication orders to challenge patients with various beta-lactam agents. Inpatient orders for GC from 3/2018-6/2022 were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate ordering characteristics, outcomes of the challenge, and whether documentation of the allergy history was updated. All beta-lactam challenges administered to inpatients were included, and descriptive statistics were performed.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, 157 GC were administered; 13 with oral amoxicillin and 144 with intravenous (IV) beta-lactams. Ceftriaxone accounted for the most challenges (43%). All oral challenges were recommended by an Infectious Diseases consult service, as were a majority of IV challenges (60%). Less than one in five were administered in an ICU (19%). Almost all (n = 150, 96%) were tolerated without any adverse event. There was one reaction (1%) of hives and six (4%) involving a rash, none of which had persistent effects. Allergy information was updated in the electronic health record after 92% of the challenges.
UNASSIGNED: Both intravenous and oral beta-lactam graded challenges were implemented successfully in a hospital without a regular inpatient allergy consult service. They were well-tolerated, administered primarily in non-ICU settings, and were often ordered by non-specialist services. In patients with a self-reported penicillin allergy, these results demonstrate the utility and safety of a broadly adopted beta-lactam GC process.

A guideline identifying when inpatients with penicillin or cephalosporin antibiotic allergy labels (PCAAL) can receive β-lactam antibiotics increased β-lactam receipt at a large northeastern US health care system.
To report outcomes of implementing a similar guideline and electronic order set (OS) at an independent academic health care system.
Penicillin/cephalosporin receipt (percentage of inpatients receiving full doses) and alternative antibiotic use (days of therapy per 1000 patient-days [DOT/1000PD]) were compared over 3 periods before (February 1, 2017, to January 31, 2018) and after guideline implementation (February 1, 2018, to January 31, 2019), and after OS implementation (February 1, 2019, to January 31, 2020) among inpatients with PCAAL admitted on medical services with access to guideline/OS and education (Medical-PCAAL, n = 8721), surgical services with access to guideline/OS without education (Surgical-PCAAL, n = 5069), and obstetrics/gynecology services without interventions (Ob/Gyn-PCAAL, n = 798) and inpatients without PCAAL admitted on the same services (Medical-No-PCAAL, n = 50,840; Surgical-No-PCAAL, n = 29,845; Ob/Gyn-No-PCAAL, n = 6109). χ2 tests were used to compare categorical variables, and analysis of variance was used to compare continuous and interrupted time series analyses (ITSA) to investigate the guideline/OS implementation effect on penicillin/cephalosporin receipt.
In the Medical-PCAAL group, penicillin/cephalosporin receipt increased (58%-68%, P < .001), specifically for cefazolin (8%-11%, P = .02) and third- to fifth-generation cephalosporins (43%-48%, P = .04), and aztreonam use decreased (12 DOT/1000PD, P = .03). In the Medical-No-PCAAL group, penicillin/cephalosporin receipt increased (88%-90%, P = .004), specifically for penicillin (40%-44%, P < .001), without changes in aztreonam use. Significant changes were not observed in these outcomes on surgical or obstetrics/gynecology services. Per ITSA, guideline/OS implementation was associated with increased penicillin/cephalosporin receipt in the Medical-PCAAL group only.
Guideline and OS implementation was associated with improved antibiotic stewardship on inpatient services that also received allergy education.

Antibiotic allergies are frequently encountered in clinical practice, and delabeling of these allergies has individual and public health benefits. This review focuses on the evidence supporting graded challenges without preceding skin testing in adult and pediatric patients to the major groups of antibiotics including penicillins, cephalosporins, sulfamethoxazole, fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, macrolides, metronidazole, carbapenems, and aztreonam. The cost savings, time savings, and evidence for performing graded challenges outside of an allergy/immunology office are also reviewed for graded challenges to penicillins.

UNASSIGNED: Adverse antibiotic reactions caused by an immunological mechanism are known as allergic reactions. The percentage of reported antibiotic allergies is likely to differ from the one validated after a drug provocation test (DPT) with the culprit antibiotic. This study aimed to compare the percentage of children who were thought to be allergic to a certain antibiotic with those who have a true allergy, as confirmed by DPTs. We also validated Skin Prick Tests (SPTs) and Intradermal Tests (IDTs) by assessing their sensitivity and specificity, in diagnosing antibiotic allergies using DPT as the gold standard. Furthermore, we investigated epidemiological risk factors such as personal and family history of atopic disease and eosinophilia.
UNASSIGNED: Children with a history of possible allergic reaction to an antibiotic underwent a diagnostic procedure that included: (1) Eosinophil blood count, (2) SPTs, (3) IDTs and (4) DPTs. The parameters were compared with Pearson\'s Chi-Square and Fisher\'s Exact Test. Several risk factors that were found significant in univariate analysis, such as personal and family history of atopic disease, and positive SPTs and IDTs were examined with multiple logistic regression analysis to see if they were related to a higher risk for a positive DPT.
UNASSIGNED: Semi-synthetic penicillin was the most common group of antibiotics thought to cause allergic reactions in this study. Overall, 123 children with a personal history of an adverse reaction to a certain antibiotic, were evaluated. In 87.8% of the cases, the symptoms had occurred several hours after administration of the culprit antibiotic. Both SPTs and IDTs had low sensitivity but high specificity. Moreover, they had a high positive predictive value (PPV). In contrast, eosinophilia was not recognized as a risk factor. Seventeen patients (13.8%) had a true antibiotic allergy, as confirmed by a positive DPT. A positive IDT was a strong predictor of a positive DPT, along with a positive personal and family history of atopy.
UNASSIGNED: SPTs and IDTs are very reliable in confirming antibiotic allergy when found positive. A negative result of a SPT highly predicts a negative DPT. A positive IDT and a positive personal and family history of atopy were recognized as significant risk factors for antibiotic allergy.

The aim of this study was to report the success of a clindamycin graded challenge. The patient was a 39-year-old human immunodeficiency virus-infected male with toxoplasmic encephalitis (TE) with a history of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) and clindamycin allergy. He developed a reaction during TMP/SMX desensitization. Following the reaction, a graded challenge with clindamycin was performed in this study, and he became tolerant to clindamycin. No adverse drug reactions developed during the graded challenge. He successfully continued suppressive therapy with no further reactions or recurrences.

UNASSIGNED: About 10% of children are declared as allergic to antibiotics, with beta(β)-lactams being the most common perpetrators. However, few of these are confirmed by allergy tests. This characteristic of being allergic follows a child well into adulthood, leading to alternative, usually more expensive broad-spectrum antibiotics, contributing to antibiotic resistance and increasing healthcare expenses.
UNASSIGNED: This review presents a practical approach to managing pediatric patients with antibiotic hypersensitivity reactions.
UNASSIGNED: We updated the guidelines on antibiotic allergy in children by conducting systematic literature research using the best available evidence from PubMed search by entering the keywords \"antibiotic allergy\" and \"children.\" The search output yielded 5165 citations.
UNASSIGNED: Management of antibiotic allergy depends on the culprit antibiotic, and it includes confirmation of the diagnosis and finding a safe alternative to the culprit antibiotic. In particular patients with a history indicative of penicillin allergy can be treated with cephalosporins as an alternative to penicillin, especially with third-generation cephalosporins, except for those with similar R1 side chains. In patients with a history of immediate-type reactions to cephalosporins who require treatment with cephalosporins or penicillin, skin tests with cephalosporin or penicillin with different side chains should be performed. If allergy to macrolides is suspected, challenge tests are currently the only reliable diagnostic tool. The best strategy for managing patients with sulfonamide hypersensitivity is an alternative antibiotic. The skin prick tests and intradermal tests are not recommended for diagnosis of quinolone allergy, as they can activate dermal mast cells leading to false-positive results. Quinolone challenge test is the most appropriate test for diagnosing quinolone hypersensitivity.
UNASSIGNED: Although adverse drug reactions to antibiotics are frequently documented, immunologically mediated hypersensitivity is unusual. In the event of an reaction, an appropriate diagnostic workup is required to identify the drug\'s causal role. It is critical to avoid \"labeling\" a child as allergic without first conducting a proper diagnostic workup.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the role of skin tests (ST) in the diagnosis of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) with platinum salts (PS) and taxane (TX) groups drugs and their reliability in patient management.
METHODS: Patients\' data who developed immediate HSR with PS and TX were recorded and ST was performed. The gradual challenge was applied to all patients with ST negative and grade 1-2 with the suspect drug.
RESULTS: In total, the data of 104 patients (74 with PS, 30 with TX) who developed HSR against PS and TX were shared. The gradual challenge was applied to 72 ST negative and grade 1-2 patients (46 PS group, 26 TX group). The gradual challenge was negative in 39 patients in the PS group and 23 patients in the Tx group. The negative predictive value (NPV) for PS was 83% and NPV for TX was 88%. We found significantly higher skin test positivity in patients with PS and TX and grade 3 HSR (p = 0.007, p = 0.001). A significant correlation was found between skin test positivity and early onset of symptoms (p = 0.001 for PS, p = 0.015 for TX). In terms of symptoms witnessed in HSR, we observed the itching, urticaria, hypotension, syncope, and abdominal pain symptoms significantly more in the group with a positive skin test (p < 0.024, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.002, and p < 0.025, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: We found very high NPV values for PS and TX. We found that the gradual challenge applied to patients with negative skin tests is reliable if Grade 3 HSR is not observed and with this approach, unnecessary desensitization processes and/or drug alterations can be avoided.

Addressing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy and minimizing potential vaccine contraindications are critical to combatting the pandemic. We describe a practical approach to immediate adverse events after the first dose of messenger RNA vaccines for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, focusing on diagnosis and management of allergic reactions.

暂无摘要。