BACKGROUND: Skeletal dimensions vary between sexes. Men typically have broader shoulders and women a wider pelvis. If gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) with or without prior puberty suppression (PS) alters these dimensions in transgender individuals remains unclear.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate impact of PS and GAHT on skeletal dimensions.
METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Gender identity clinic.
METHODS: Transgender individuals assigned male at birth (AMAB) and assigned female at birth (AFAB) who underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning between ages 18 and 28 years were divided into four groups: Early PS (Tanner G/B2-3)+GAHT, Late PS (Tanner G/B4-5)+GAHT, GAHT only, and Untreated.
METHODS: Shoulder and pelvis dimensions measured by DXA scan were compared between groups, with adjustment for height.
RESULTS: A total of 121 individuals AMAB and 122 AFAB were included. Only in individuals AMAB who underwent early PS had smaller shoulders compared to untreated individuals AMAB (-1.3 cm; 95%CI -2.1; -0.5). In individuals AMAB from both the early and late PS group, pelvic inlet, pubic symphysis width and interischial distance were greater compared to untreated individuals AMAB resulting in dimensions comparable to untreated individuals AFAB. Only in early PS AFAB pelvic inlet width was smaller compared to untreated individuals AFAB (-1.0 cm; 95%CI -1.5; -0.6), and comparable to untreated individuals AMAB.
CONCLUSIONS: The study results suggest that skeletal dimensions are only altered by GAHT if endogenous puberty has not yet been completed at start of PS. These findings enhance our understanding of hormonal effects on the skeleton and may hold clinical relevance for body image as well as for forensic anthropology. Future research should evaluate clinical implications for surgical or obstetrical outcomes in transgender individuals.

UNASSIGNED: To investigate the effects of combining gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) downregulation with hormone replacement therapy (HRT, GnRHa-HRT) on the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET).
UNASSIGNED: In this retrospective study, we included patients who had FET between January 2018 and December 2022. They were categorized into HRT and GnRHa-HRT groups based on the endometrial preparation protocol. The study compared the clinical outcomes of patients in two groups. Possible factors affecting clinical outcomes were analyzed using univariate analysis. To analyze the impact of two endometrial preparation methods on clinical outcomes, multifactorial logistic regression was performed.
UNASSIGNED: The rates of clinical pregnancy (47.31% vs. 59.60%), embryo implantation (37.58% vs. 49.65%), biochemical pregnancy (52.36% vs. 64.31%), and early abortion (7.07% vs. 10.77%) were statistically different between the two groups (p < 0.05). Analysis using multifactorial logistic regression showed that there was a 1.65-fold increase in clinical pregnancy rates (OR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.29-2.12, p < 0.001) and a 1.55-fold increase in embryo implantation rates (OR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.27-1.90, p < 0.001) in the GnRHa-HRT group when compared to the HRT group. For blastocyst transfer, the clinical pregnancy and implantation rates of the GnRHa-HRT group were significantly higher than those of the HRT group (OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.30-2.37, p < 0.001; OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.35-2.21, p < 0.001).
UNASSIGNED: In FET cycles, leuprorelin (as a GnRHa) downregulation combined with HRT may improve the clinical outcome of patients compared to the HRT cycle, especially for the clinical pregnancy and embryo implantation rates of patients with blastocyst transfer.

Breast cancer diagnosed in premenopausal women tends to be more aggressive and the benefit of ovarian function suppression (OFS), at least in certain groups of patients, is well known. There is hesitancy in using OFS in some groups of patients who may otherwise benefit from the treatment. For instance, it is clear that in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), high-risk, early-stage breast cancer, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) should be given in the adjuvant setting; however, confusion remains whether premenopausal patients with intermediate-risk disease benefit from GnRHa, given the lack of consensus on its definition in guidelines and clinical practice. Most recent evidence on the long-term efficacy of GnRHa, with up to 20-years of follow-up, reinforced its benefits in premenopausal patients with early-stage breast cancer. In this comprehensive review, we reviewed the long-term efficacy in terms of improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for early-stage HR+ breast cancer and examined evidence from multiple randomized clinical studies to identify the clinicopathological characteristics that correlated with improved DFS and OS with the addition of OFS to adjuvant endocrine therapy. Other aspects of GnRHa, including its efficacy in advanced breast cancer, safety profile, evidence in ovarian function preservation, and the advantages of long-acting formulations were also discussed. By addressing the existing gaps and grey areas regarding the inclusion of OFS as a crucial treatment component for premenopausal breast cancer patients, physicians are more aware of who to administer and the potential impact on survival outcomes.

This is a retrospective, multicentric study, aimed to describe the real-life application of fertility preservation methods during treatment in female lymphoma patients, aged 18-40 years old, diagnosed between Oct 1st/2010 and May 31st/2018. Among 414 women included, median age was 28 years old, histologies were: HL 74%, PMBCL 13%, DLBCL 10%, others 3%. First line treatments were: ABVD in 295 (71%), R-CHOP like in 102 (25%), higher intensity regimens in 17 (4%) cases. Fertility preservation strategies were: GnRHa in 315 (78%), Oral Contraceptive in 41 (10%), oocytes and ovarian tissue cryopreservation in 55 and 42 patients, respectively. After therapy, we observed a restored regular period in 293 (70%) and premature ovarian failure (POF) in 33 (8%), Furthermore we recorded 43 pregnancies, all spontaneous with 5 years median follow-up. Median age at diagnosis and number of lines of treatment correlate with higher rate of amenorrhea, risk of POF and menopause (p < 0.001).

UNASSIGNED: Treatment for transmasculine youth (TMY) can involve testosterone treatment and is sometimes preceded by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) treatment for puberty blockade. GnRHas can increase final height in birth-assigned females with central precocious puberty. Maximizing final adult height (FAH) is an important outcome for many TMY.
UNASSIGNED: Our objective was to determine how GnRHa treatment before testosterone impacts FAH.
UNASSIGNED: Retrospective cohort study at 5 US transgender health clinics. Participants were 32 TMY treated with GnRHas in early to midpuberty before testosterone (GnRHa + T group) and 62 late/postpubertal TMY treated with testosterone only (T-only group).
UNASSIGNED: The difference between FAH minus midparental target height (MPTH) was +2.3 ± 5.7 cm and -2.2 ± 5.6 cm in the GnRHa + T and T-only groups, respectively (P < .01). In the GnRHa + T group, FAH was 1.8 ± 3.4 cm greater than predicted adult height (PAH) (P < .05) and FAH vs initial height (IH) z-score was 0.5 ± 1.2 vs 0.16 ± 1.0 (P < .05). After adjusting for patient characteristics, each additional month of GnRHa monotherapy increased FAH by 0.59 cm (95% CI 0.31, 0.9 cm), stage 3 breast development at start of GnRHa was associated with 6.5 cm lower FAH compared with stage 2 (95% CI -10.43, -2.55), and FAH was 7.95 cm greater in the GnRHa + T group than in T-only group (95% CI -10.85, -5.06).
UNASSIGNED: Treatment with GnRHa in TMY in early puberty before testosterone increases FAH compared with MPTH, PAH, IH, and TMY who only received testosterone in late/postpuberty. TMY considering GnRHas should be counseled that GnRHas may mildly increase their FAH if started early.

UNASSIGNED: Recent studies suggest a link between the Klotho protein, sex hormones, and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), indicating that α-Klotho levels may rise during puberty, including in central precocious puberty (CPP) cases. This study aimed to explore α-Klotho levels in girls with CPP to assess its potential as a diagnostic and monitoring tool for this condition.
UNASSIGNED: In total, 139 girls, comprising 82 patients diagnosed with CPP and 57 healthy prepubertal controls, were enrolled in this study. From March 2020 to May 2023, we assessed both α-Klotho levels and clinical parameters. α-Klotho concentrations were measured using an α-Klotho ELISA kit. For the girls with CPP, we additionally analyzed samples taken 6 months after GnRH agonist treatment.
UNASSIGNED: α-Klotho levels were higher in the CPP group compared with the control (CPP group: 2529 ± 999 ng/mL; control group: 1802 ± 675 pg/mL) (P < 0.001), and its level modest decreased after 6 months of GnRH agonist treatment (2147± 789 pg/mL) (P < 0.001). The association between α-Klotho and IGF-1 SDS, follicular stimulating hormone and baseline luteinizing hormone was assessed by partial correlation after adjusting for age, BMI SDS (r= 0.416, p= <0.001; r= 0.261, p= 0.005; r= 0.278, p= 0.002), respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified an α-Klotho cut-off differentiating CPP from controls, with a cut-off of 1914 pg/mL distinguishing girls with CPP from controls with a sensitivity of 69.5% and specificity of 70.2%; the area under the curve was 0.723.
UNASSIGNED: The findings of our study are the first step towards deciphering the role of α-Klotho in puberty induction. With additional data and further research, α-Klotho could potentially be utilized as a significant diagnostic and monitoring tool for CPP.

BACKGROUND: Craniopharyngioma is a common intracranial tumour in children. Clinical manifestations are related to hypothalamic/pituitary deficiencies, visual impairment, and increased intracranial pressure. Defects in pituitary function cause shortages of growth hormone, gonadotropin, corticotropin, thyrotropin, and vasopressin, resulting in short stature, delayed puberty, feebleness, lethargy, polyuria, etc. However, manifestations involving precocious puberty (PP) are rare.
METHODS: In both patients, surgical resection was performed after the diagnosis of craniopharyngioma, and breast development occurred postoperatively at one month in one patient and at one year and three months in the other patient. Central precocious puberty (CPP) was diagnosed via relevant examinations. Leuprorelin was injected subcutaneously every 28 days, and changes in height, weight, bone age, gonadal ultrasound and sex hormones were recorded. During the follow-up of the two children, the sex hormone levels were significantly reduced, and significant acceleration in bone age was not observed.
CONCLUSIONS: CPP was induced by craniopharyngioma surgery, and treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa) inhibited sexual development and bone age progression. More attention should be given to monitoring for CPP during long-term follow-up of craniopharyngiomas in the clinic.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge regarding the effects and side effects of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) in adults is rapidly growing, partly through international research networks such as the European Network for the Investigation of Gender Incongruence (ENIGI). However, data on the effects of puberty suppression (PS) and GAHT in transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth are limited, although these data are of crucial importance, given the controversies surrounding this treatment.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to present a detailed overview of the design of the ENIGI Adolescents study protocol, including the first baseline data.
METHODS: The ENIGI Adolescents study is an ongoing multicenter prospective cohort study. This study protocol was developed by 3 European centers that provide endocrine care for TGD adolescents and were already part of the ENIGI collaboration: Amsterdam, Ghent, and Florence.
RESULTS: Study outcomes include physical effects and side effects, laboratory parameters, bone mineral density, anthropometric characteristics, attitudes toward fertility and fertility preservation, and psychological well-being, which are measured in the study participants during PS and GAHT, up to 3 years after the start of GAHT.
RESULTS: Between November 2021 and May 2023, 172 TGD adolescents were included in the ENIGI Adolescents protocol, of whom 51 were assigned male at birth (AMAB) and 121 were assigned female at birth (AFAB); 3 AFAB participants reported a nonbinary gender identification. A total of 76 participants were included at the start of PS, at a median (IQR) age of 13.7 (12.9-16.5) years in AMAB and 13.5 (12.4-16.1) years in AFAB individuals. The remaining 96 participants were included at start of GAHT, at a median (IQR) age of 15.9 (15.1-17.4) years in AFAB and 16.0 (15.1-16.8) years in AMAB individuals. At the time of this report the study was open for inclusion and follow-up measurements were ongoing.
CONCLUSIONS: In response to the rising demand for gender-affirming treatment among TGD youth, this ongoing study is fulfilling the need for prospective data on the effects and safety of PS and GAHT, thus providing a foundation for evidence-based healthcare decisions.
UNASSIGNED: This study has a strong multicenter, prospective design that allows for systematic data collection. The use of clinical and self-reported data offers a broad range of outcomes to evaluate. Nevertheless, the burden of additional measurements and questionnaires may lead to withdrawal or lower response rates. Few participants with a non-binary gender identity have been included.
CONCLUSIONS: With the ENIGI Adolescents study we aim to create a comprehensive dataset that we can use for a wide range of studies to address current controversies and uncertainties and to improve healthcare for TGD adolescents.

UNASSIGNED: Worldwide, an increasing number of women with cancer are receiving Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone agonist (GnRHa) co-treatment during chemotherapy aiming at ovarian protection. There is divergence among guidelines, and some have recommended GnRHa co-treatment for women with breast cancer, however, the effect of GnRHa on future fertility is uncertain.
UNASSIGNED: In this population-based cohort study we included all women diagnosed with cancer at ages 15-45 between July 2005 and March 2017 in Sweden, identified in the Swedish Cancer Register. Exposure to GnRHa co-treatment was captured using the Prescribed Drug Register. Post-cancer childbirth, extracted from the Medical Birth Register, was the main outcome. Secondary outcomes included childbirths achieved through natural conception (NC), infertility diagnosis and cancer mortality. For each outcome, adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using delayed-entry Cox models, stratified by age and cancer site.
UNASSIGNED: Among 24,922 women diagnosed with cancer, 1.5% had GnRHa co-treatment. Breast cancer diagnoses were found in 80.2% of GnRHa exposed women and the GnRHa exposure was not associated with higher rates of childbirth (aHR 1.23, 95% CI 0.80-1.89), or NC childbirth (aHR 1.02, 95% CI 0.62-1.67), whereas the rate of infertility was significantly higher (aHR 2.42, 95% CI 1.44-4.08). In women with lymphoma and other cancers, GnRHa exposure was not associated with higher rates of childbirth, NC childbirth or infertility. GnRHa exposure was not associated with higher cancer mortality for any cancer type.
UNASSIGNED: We did not find evidence of improved or maintained fertility, estimated as childbirth rates post-cancer, in women who received GnRHa during cancer treatment.
UNASSIGNED: This study was financed by research grants from The Swedish Cancer Society (CAN 2017/704; 190249Pj, 200170F), The Swedish Research Council (Dnr 2019-00446), the Nordic Cancer Union NCU (Grant 2017), The Swedish Childhood Cancer Fund (KP2016-0031), Radiumhemmets Forskningsfonder (Dnr: 201313), Stockholm County Council (FoUI-953912) and Karolinska Institutet (Dnr 2020-01963).

OBJECTIVE: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRHa) is the first choice for the treatment of patients with central precocious puberty (CPP). However, the effects of GnRHa on the endocrine system of CPP patients, including insulin sensitivity, lipid level, thyroid function, bone mineral density (BMD), and testosterone (T) level, are currently contradictory. Therefore, the long-term safety of GnRHa therapy remains controversial.
BACKGROUND: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI databases. The changes in HOMA-IR, TG, LDL-C, HDL-C, TSH, FT3, FT4, T, and BMD in CPP patients before and after GnRHa treatment were compared by meta-analysis. As the heterogeneity between studies, we estimated standard deviation mean differences (SMDs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model. Egger\'s test was used to assess publication bias.
CONCLUSIONS: A total of 22 studies were included in our meta-analysis. Compared with before GnRHa treatment, there were no statistically significant differences in endocrine indicators including HOMA-IR, TG, LDL-C, HDL-C, TSH, FT4, FT3, T, and BMD of CPP patients treated with GnRHa.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with GnRHa for central precocious puberty will not increase the adverse effect on the endocrine system.