Glossopharyngeal neuralgia

舌咽神经痛
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:神经血管压迫综合征(NVCS),包括三叉神经痛等疾病,面肌痉挛,和舌咽神经痛,通过Obersteiner-Redlich区的颅神经异常血管压迫和血管微脉动,显着损害患者的生活质量。通过血管内支架调节脉动流动力学为缓解这些综合征提供了新的研究前沿。
    目的:这项研究的主要目的是描述各种血管内支架对血管体外模型内脉动流的影响,从而阐明其在NVCS治疗管理中的潜在适用性。
    方法:开发了后循环动脉的简单体外类似物,使用静脉泵复制心脏诱导的血流。在这个模型中,在引入三种完全不同的血管内支架后,对脉动血流的改变进行了定量评估。大小不同。通过采用微多普勒和多普勒超声方法来促进这种评估。
    结果:管道5x35毫米支架(美敦力,明尼阿波利斯,MN)表现出最显着的收缩期峰值速度(Vmax)和搏动指数(PI)的降低,PI尤其是在支架上,表明它有可能大幅改变血流动力学.同样,NeuroformAtlas4.5x30mm和NeuroformAtlas4x24mm支架(Stryker,卡拉马祖,MI)也显示血液动力学参数显著下降,尽管程度不同。统计分析证实,这些变化与对照组有显著差异(PI和VmaxP<0.0001;支架间比较P<0.05),除了近端PI意味着,与对照组无显著差异(P=0.2777)。
    结论:这些发现肯定了血管内支架显著调节动脉搏动的潜力。观察到的血管内支架应用导致的脉动血流减少有可能减弱异位神经兴奋,NVCS的标志。因此,这项研究强调了血管内支架在开发NVCS微创治疗方法中的前瞻性应用。
    BACKGROUND: Neurovascular compression syndromes (NVCS), encompassing conditions such as trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm, and glossopharyngeal neuralgia, significantly impair patient quality of life through abnormal vascular compression and micro-pulsation of vasculature on cranial nerves at the Obersteiner-Redlich zone. The modulation of pulsatile flow dynamics via endovascular stents presents a novel research frontier for alleviating these syndromes.
    OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this investigation was to delineate the impact of various endovascular stents on pulsatile flow within an in vitro model of a blood vessel, thereby elucidating their potential applicability in the therapeutic management of NVCS.
    METHODS: A simple in vitro analog of a posterior circulation artery was developed, employing an intravenous pump to replicate cardiac-induced blood flow. Within this model, alterations in pulsatile flow were quantitatively assessed following the introduction of three categorically distinct endovascular stents, varying in size. This assessment was facilitated through the employment of both micro-Doppler and Doppler ultrasound methodologies.
    RESULTS: The Pipeline 5x35 mm stent (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) demonstrated the most significant reductions in peak systolic velocity (Vmax) and pulsatility index (PI), PI especially over the stent, suggesting its potential for drastically altering blood flow dynamics. Similarly, Neuroform Atlas 4.5x30 mm and Neuroform Atlas 4x24 mm stents (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI) also showed notable decreases in hemodynamic parameters, albeit to different extents. Statistical analysis confirmed that these changes were significantly different from the control (P < 0.0001 for PI and Vmax; P < 0.05 for inter-stent comparisons), except for proximal PI means, which did not significantly differ from the control (P = 0.2777).
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings affirm the potential of endovascular stents to substantially modulate arterial pulsatility. The observed decrease in pulsatile flow resultant from endovascular stent application has the potential to attenuate ectopic nerve excitation, a hallmark of NVCS. Consequently, this research highlights the prospective utility of endovascular stents in developing minimally invasive therapeutic approaches for NVCS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:舌咽神经痛(GPN)是同时引起头痛和面部疼痛的病症。GPN的治疗与三叉神经痛的治疗相似。如果口服药物保守治疗失败,则需要开颅手术微血管减压(MVD)或射频(RF)治疗。因此,治疗GPN时,射频治疗靶点的选择至关重要.然而,简单地通过茎突定位找到舌咽神经是具有挑战性的。
    方法:前瞻性,临床研究。
    方法:麻醉科和疼痛医疗中心,嘉兴,中国。
    目的:比较CT(CT)引导下射频治疗对GPN的临床效果,地图集的横向过程,茎突过程用于仅由茎突过程指导的治疗。
    方法:2016年8月至2019年12月,19例GPN神经痛患者在单纯茎突CT引导下进行射频治疗。(这些患者包括茎突组的单定位(SL),其中射频治疗的目标是茎突一半的后内侧)。2020年1月至2022年12月,16例GPN患者在宫颈CTA(CT血管造影)的CT引导下进行RF治疗。地图集的横向过程,和茎突。(这些患者被置于TL组,其中RF治疗的目标是颈内动脉和颈内静脉之间的间隙,该间隙位于Atlas横突下边缘的水平茎突后面)。在针头插入部位皮下注射2%的利多卡因,和带有21号钝射频针的探针(型号:240100,制造商:EnglanderMedicalTechnologyCo.,Ltd.)慢慢向目标前进。之后,引入了射频探头,然后应用射频仪器(型号:PMG-230,加拿大Baylis公司)的低频(2Hz)和高频(50Hz)电流进行刺激。成功的测试被定义为0.5-1.0mA电流刺激,可以引起咽部的原始疼痛区域,内耳,或者两者兼而有之,对迷走神经或副神经没有任何异常刺激。如果第一次测试不成功,然后在SL组中,针尖的位置被调整到茎突的远端,在三重定位(TL)组中,针尖深度经过微调。测试成功后给予连续射频治疗。RF温度为95ºC,持续180秒。第一次穿刺到达目标的时间,穿刺路径,第一次测试的成功率,舌咽神经被发现的时间,调整射频针头位置的频率,术中和术后并发症的发生率,并记录治疗效果。
    结果:人口统计学数据没有显着差异,例如年龄,病史,横向分类,两组之间的疼痛评分,但TL组女性比例高于SL组.术前根据设计的穿刺路径确定所有患者的穿刺目标。两组在第一次穿刺到目标的时间上没有差异(5.05±1.22vs.5.82±1.51,P=0.18),和设计穿刺深度(3.65±0.39vs.4.04±0.44)。穿刺角度的差异(13.48±3.56与17.84±3.98,P<0.01)有统计学意义,在SL组中有8例,经过60分钟的测试,舌咽神经无法找到,因此射频治疗终止.同时,此问题仅发生在TL组中的2例病例中。SL组有3例宫颈血肿,2例出现一过性声音嘶哑和咳嗽,而TL组,分别,0和这些问题的一个案例。两组都没有死亡。
    结论:在未来的研究中应该收集更多的临床数据。
    结论:当使用RF治疗GPN时,使用颈部CTA的三重定位更容易发现舌咽神经,以寰椎横突和茎突为目标,在寰椎横突下边缘水平确定茎突后颈内动脉的前内侧边缘。当仅针对茎突的后内侧边缘时,舌咽神经更难定位。90ºC下对GPN进行180秒射频消融的单次有效率可达到87.5%(14/16),这表明该治疗具有临床应用的潜力。
    BACKGROUND: Glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN) is a condition that causes simultaneous headache and facial pain. The treatment for GPN is similar to the treatment for trigeminal neuralgia. Craniotomy microvascular decompression (MVD) or radiofrequency (RF) therapy is needed if conservative treatment with oral drugs fails. Therefore, the choice of radiofrequency therapy target is essential when treating GPN. However, finding the glossopharyngeal nerve simply by styloid process positioning is challenging.
    METHODS: Prospective, clinical research study.
    METHODS: Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medical Center, Jiaxing, China.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effects of computed tomography (CT)-guided RF treatments on GPN when the triple localization of cervical CT, the transverse process of the atlas, and the styloid process is used to those achieved when the treatments are guided by the styloid process alone.
    METHODS: From August 2016 to December 2019, 19 cases of GPN neuralgia were treated by radiofrequency under the guidance of CT guided by the styloid process only. (These patients comprised the single localization (SL) of styloid process group, in whom the target of the RF treatments was the posterior medial side of half of the styloid process). From January 2020 to December 2022, 16 cases of GPN were treated by RF under the guidance of CT with cervical CTA (CT angiography), the transverse process of the atlas, and the styloid process. (These patients were placed in the TL group, in whom the target of RF therapy was the gap between the internal carotid artery and the internal jugular vein behind the horizontal styloid process at the lower edge of the transverse process of the atlas). Two percent lidocaine was injected subcutaneously at the needle insertion site, and a stylet with a 21-gauge blunt RF needle (model: 240100, manufacturer: Englander Medical Technology Co., Ltd.) was slowly advanced toward the target. After that, an RF probe was introduced, then low (2 Hz)- and high (50 Hz)-frequency currents of the RF instrument (model: PMG-230, Canada Baylis company) were applied to stimulate. A successful test was defined as a 0.5-1.0 mA current stimulation that could induce the original pain area in the pharynx, the inner ear, or both, without any abnormal irritation of the vagus or accessory nerves. If the first test was unsuccessful, then in the SL group, the needle tip\'s position was adjusted to the distal end of the styloid process, and in the triple localization (TL) group, the needle tip depth\'s was fine-tuned. A continuous RF treatment was given after a successful test. The RF temperature was 95ºC for 180 seconds. The time that the first puncture reached the target, the puncture paths, the success rate of the first test, the time that the glossopharyngeal nerve was found, the frequency of adjustments to the position of the RF needle, the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, and the therapeutic effects were recorded.
    RESULTS: There were no significant differences in demographic data such as age, medical history, lateral classification, and pain score between the groups, but the TL group had a higher proportion of women than did the SL group. All patients\' puncture targets were identified according to the designed puncture path before the operation. There was no difference between the 2 groups in the time of the first puncture to the target (5.05 ± 1.22 vs. 5.82 ± 1.51, P = 0.18), and the designed puncture depth (3.65 ± 0.39 vs. 4.04 ± 0.44). The difference in puncture angles (13.48 ± 3.56 vs. 17.84 ± 3.98, P < 0.01) was statistically significant, and in 8 cases in the SL group, the glossopharyngeal nerve could not be found after 60 minutes of testing, so the RF treatment was terminated. Meanwhile, this problem occurred in only 2 cases in the TL group. There were 3 cervical hematoma cases and 2 cases of transient hoarseness and cough in the SL group, whereas the TL group had, respectively, 0 and one cases of those issues. There was no death in either group.
    CONCLUSIONS: More clinical data should be collected in future studies.
    CONCLUSIONS: When using RF as a treatment for GPN, the glossopharyngeal nerve is easier to find by using the triple positioning of the cervical CTA, the transverse process of the atlas and the styloid process as the target to determine the anterior medial edge of the internal carotid artery behind the styloid process at the level of the lower edge of the atlas transverse process. The glossopharyngeal nerve is more difficult to locate when only the posterior medial edge of the styloid process is targeted. The single-time effective rate of 180 seconds of RF ablation at 90ºC for GPN can reach 87.5% (14/16), suggesting the treatment\'s potential for clinical application.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    三叉神经痛和舌咽神经痛是颅面疼痛综合征,其特征是在各自的颅神经分布中反复出现短暂的休克样疼痛。在这篇文章中,作者旨在总结每个条件的特点,病理生理学,以及目前可用于管理和治疗这些疾病的药物治疗和手术干预措施。
    Trigeminal neuralgia and glossopharyngeal neuralgia are craniofacial pain syndromes characterized by recurrent brief shock-like pains in the distributions of their respective cranial nerves. In this article, the authors aim to summarize each condition\'s characteristics, pathophysiology, and current pharmacotherapeutic and surgical interventions available for managing and treating these conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:舌咽神经痛(GPN)是面部疼痛的一种罕见原因,发病率低于每100,000人中的1人。GPN患者经历的剧烈刺痛可能使人衰弱,导致日常生活活动困难,比如吃饭和说话。因此,最近,有关射频消融(RFA)治疗GPN有效性的研究有所增加.
    目的:我们研究的目的是评估(RFA治疗GPN的有效性,同时检查其对患者生活质量的影响,并评估任何相关的副作用。
    方法:采用系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)模型对来自2个综合医学数据库的文章进行鉴定。对来自每篇文章的患者结果和数字进行汇总和计算,以确定RFA治疗与GPN相关的疼痛的疗效百分比。
    方法:在这篇系统综述中,PRISMA审查模型用于搜索PubMed和EMBASE数据库.进行了全面的文献综述。在最初确定的1,580篇文章中,共纳入18篇文章进行分析。本系统综述中包括的研究包括特发性病例和继发性原因,例如细长的茎突,口咽癌,和术后/创伤性疼痛。
    结果:在接受RFA治疗的288例患者中,231经历了疼痛的缓解或完全缓解,有效率为80.2%。大多数患者在RFA后立即缓解疼痛;然而,一些患者报告麻木,吞咽困难,和味道的变化。我们的研究探讨了RFA作为GPN的微创和有效治疗的潜在用途。
    结论:我们研究的局限性包括缺乏不同类型之间的比较,模式,以及RFA程序的设置。仅使用2个医疗数据库是另一个限制。最后,我们的系统评价不包括任何随机对照试验.
    结论:RFA治疗GPN有效,超过80%的患者术后疼痛缓解。然而,需要以临床和对照试验的形式进行进一步研究,以有助于更好地了解RFA对GPN患者的长期结局.
    BACKGROUND: Glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN) is a rare cause of facial pain that has an incidence of less than one per 100,000 people. The excruciating stabbing pain experienced by patients with GPN can be debilitating, leading to difficulties in activities of daily living, such as eating and speaking. As a result, there has been a recent increase in research on the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treating GPN.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of (RFA for treating GPN while examining its impact on patients\' quality of life and assesses for any associated side effects.
    METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) model was employed to identify articles from 2 comprehensive medical databases. The patient outcomes and numbers from each article were aggregated and calculated in order to determine the percent efficacy of RFA for treating pain associated with GPN.
    METHODS: In this systematic review, the PRISMA review model was utilized to search through the PubMed and EMBASE databases. A comprehensive literature review was conducted. Of the initial 1,580 articles identified, 18 articles were included for analysis. Studies included in this systematic review encompassed idiopathic cases and secondary causes, such as an elongated styloid process, oropharyngeal cancers, and postsurgical/traumatic pain.
    RESULTS: Of the 288 patients treated with RFA, 231 experienced relief or complete resolution of pain, yielding an efficacy rate of 80.2%. Most of the patients experienced immediate pain relief after RFA; however, some patients reported numbness, dysphagia, and changes in taste. Our study examines the potential use of RFA as a minimally invasive and effective treatment for GPN.
    CONCLUSIONS: Limitations of our study include the absence of comparisons between different types, modes, and settings of RFA procedures. The use of only 2 medical databases is another limitation. Finally, our systematic review does not include any randomized controlled trials.
    CONCLUSIONS: RFA is efficacious in treating GPN with over 80% of patients experiencing postprocedure pain relief. However, further research in the form of clinical and controlled trials is needed to contribute to a better understanding of RFA\'s long-term outcomes for patients with GPN.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    舌咽神经痛(GPN)是一种罕见的慢性神经性疼痛障碍,显著影响生活质量。超声引导的舌咽神经阻滞(UGPNB)由于其各种优点而受到欢迎。然而,尚无研究报告在更大的GPN患者队列中UGPNB的长期结局.
    本研究旨在评估UGPNB在GPN患者中的疗效和安全性。
    我们回顾了在第一医学中心疼痛医学部接受UGPNB治疗的GPN患者的电子病历,解放军总医院2011年6月1日至2022年6月1日。使用巴罗神经研究所(BNI)量表评估UGPNB的效果。改善定义为通过比较治疗前后的疼痛类别而减少疼痛类别。恢复定义为治疗后达到BNII。对治疗有反应但随后在治疗前回到该类别的患者被认为经历了疼痛复发。
    共有43例接受UGPNB的GPN患者纳入分析。出院时,35例(81.4%)患者治疗后疼痛改善,其中,13例(30.2%)患者实现康复。放电后,35名有效患者中有13名患者(37.1%)在不同的时间间隔出现疼痛复发:0.5、0.7、1、1、3、3、4、12、15、36、45、63和96个月。第1个月的累积无复发生存率为88.85%,第3个月为82.83%,第12个月为77.04%,第36个月为70.31%,第120个月为54.66%。在经历复发的13名患者中,四名患者接受了第二次UGPNB治疗,2例患者疼痛改善(50%)。无严重不良反应记录。
    UGPNB是一种有效的,可重复,安全,以及GPN患者的微创治疗。在进行侵入性颅内手术或神经破坏性方法之前,最好考虑UGPNB。
    UNASSIGNED: Glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN) is a rare chronic neuropathic pain disorder that significantly impacts quality of life. Ultrasound-guided glossopharyngeal nerve blocks (UGPNB) have gained popularity due to their various advantages. However, there have been no studies reporting the long-term outcomes of UGPNB in a larger cohort of GPN patients.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of UGPNB in patients with GPN.
    UNASSIGNED: We reviewed the electronic medical records of patients with GPN who received UGPNB at the Department of Pain Medicine of the First Medical Center, PLA General Hospital between June 1, 2011, and June 1, 2022. The effect of UGPNB was evaluated using the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) scale. Improvement was defined as a reduction in pain category by comparing pain categories before and after therapy. Recovery was defined as achieving BNI I after treatment. Patients who responded to treatment but then regressed to the category before therapy were considered to have experienced pain relapse.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 43 patients with GPN who received UGPNB were included in the analysis. At discharge, 35 (81.4%) patients experienced pain improvement after treatment, and among them, 13 (30.2%) patients achieved recovery. After discharge, 13 patients (37.1%) out of the 35 effective patients experienced pain relapse at different time intervals: 0.5, 0.7, 1, 1, 3, 3, 4, 12, 15, 36, 45, 63, and 96 months. The cumulative recurrence-free survival rates were 88.85% at month 1, 82.83% at month 3, 77.04% at month 12, 70.31% at month 36, and 54.66% at month 120. Among the 13 patients who experienced relapse, four patients received a second UGPNB treatment, and pain improved in two patients (50%). No severe adverse reactions were documented.
    UNASSIGNED: UGPNB is an effective, repeatable, safe, and minimally invasive treatment for patients with GPN. It may be preferable to consider UGPNB before undergoing invasive intracranial surgery or neurodestructive methods.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    立体定向放射外科(SRS)最近已成为一种公认的非侵入性治疗耐药舌咽神经痛(GPN)的替代治疗选择。本系统评价的目的是概述GPN患者SRS治疗的结果。
    进行了直到2023年3月的文献综述。有关患者人口统计数据,并发症和复发率,我们收集了术后额外治疗以及短期和长期疼痛结局.没有报告疼痛结果的研究被排除。
    共进行了16项研究,共有97名诊断为GPN的患者接受了SRS。平均报告的最大辐射剂量范围为70至88.7Gy,舌咽道(GPM)是12/16研究中最常见的目标。从SRS到疼痛反应的中位时间在2到120天之间。在手术后2至36个月的时间范围内,SRS后需要进一步治疗的患者的平均比例为11.1%至57.14%。短期和长期SRS(BNI-IIIb)后的良好疼痛反应率分别为60%至100%和57.1%-100%。
    用于GPN的SRS仍然是一种安全的替代手术,在短期和长期并发症发生率低,疼痛效果良好。
    UNASSIGNED: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has recently gained space as an accepted non-invasive alternative treatment option for drug resistant Glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN). The purpose of this systematic review was to provide an overview of the outcomes of SRS treatment in patients with GPN.
    UNASSIGNED: A literature review until March 2023 was performed. Data about patient\'s demographics, complications and recurrence rates, additional treatment post procedure as well as pain outcomes in the short and long term were collected. Studies without reported pain outcomes were excluded.
    UNASSIGNED: Sixteen studies with a total of 97 patients diagnosed with GPN who had undergone SRS were identified. The mean reported maximal radiation dose ranged from 70 to 88.7 Gy with the glossopharyngeal meatus (GPM) being the most common target in 12/16 studies. The median time from SRS till pain response was between 2 and 120 days. The mean proportion of patients requiring further treatment after SRS ranged from 11.1 to 57.14% in a time frame between 2 and 36 months post procedure. Favourable pain response rates after SRS (BNI-IIIb) ranged from 60% to 100% and 57.1%-100% in short and long term respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: SRS for GPN remains a safe alternative to surgery with low complication rates and favourable pain outcomes in both short and long term.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:由椎基底动脉扩张引起的舌咽神经痛是一种罕见的神经性疼痛,存在诊断和治疗挑战。
    方法:一名67岁的男子在左侧口腔出现严重灼痛,在牙科和耳鼻喉科评估期间没有解释性发现。TMJ检查显示压痛,全景X线照片显示非贡献性根尖周射线不透性。MRI/MRA显示异常弯曲的椎动脉压迫舌咽神经和脑干。局部用利多卡因减轻疼痛,确认舌咽神经痛(GPN)。卡马西平最初无效,但是在视觉模拟量表上,200毫克的疼痛从90减少到20。患者要求并接受了微血管减压术(MVD)手术,消除了他的痛苦。
    结论:当椎动脉压迫舌咽神经时,疼痛更加强烈,归因于其较厚的血管结构。局部麻醉测试有助于识别GPN。牙医必须熟练诊断,并具备准确评估和转诊咽喉和耳痛的解剖学知识。
    Glossopharyngeal neuralgia due to vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia is a rare form of neuropathic pain, and presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Clinical presentation: A 67-year-old man presented with severe burning pain in the left oral cavity, with no explanatory findings during dental and ear, nose, and throat evaluations. Temporomandibular joint examination revealed tenderness, and panoramic radiographs showed a noncontributory periapical radiolucency. Magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance angiography revealed abnormally tortuous vertebral arteries compressing the glossopharyngeal nerves and the brainstem. Topical lidocaine reduced pain, confirming glossopharyngeal neuralgia. Carbamazepine was initially ineffective, but at 200 mg pain reduced from 90 to 20 on the visual analog scale. The patient requested and underwent microvascular decompression surgery, which eliminated his pain. Conclusion: When the vertebral artery compresses the glossopharyngeal nerve, the pain is more intense, attributed to its thicker vascular structure. Local anesthetic testing aids in identifying glossopharyngeal neuralgia. Dental practitioners must be skilled in diagnostics and possess anatomical knowledge for accurate evaluation and referral of throat and ear pain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    舌咽神经痛(GPN)是一种不寻常的疾病,舌咽神经供应区域的短暂疼痛发作。初始治疗包括卡马西平等药物,但是如果这些无效或引起副作用,可以考虑介入疼痛管理技术或手术。伽玛刀放射外科在治疗GPN方面越来越受欢迎,因为它的并发症风险低于微血管减压术或根管切断术等手术干预措施。在这个回顾性案例系列中,我们检查了8例GPN患者的伽玛刀放射外科治疗结果.使用伽玛刀放射外科的决定是根据特定标准做出的,包括失败的外科手术,患者对手术的偏好,或手术禁忌症。患者接受了80至90Gy范围内的辐射剂量,瞄准颈静脉孔的舌咽神经或舌咽道。在伽玛刀放射外科手术之前进行评估;在伽玛刀放射外科手术后3、6和12个月;此后每年进行评估。使用改良的BarrowNeurologicalInstitute量表评分评估疼痛严重程度,达到I-IIIa级的患者被认为具有良好的治疗结果,而达到IV-V级的患者被认为具有较差的治疗结果。疼痛控制和无放射外科相关并发症是主要终点。患者的中位年龄为46.5岁,从8到72岁不等。疼痛的中位持续时间为32个月(范围,12-120个月)。所有患者,除了一个,正在接受多药物治疗。所有病例均表现为术前V级疼痛。伽玛刀治疗后的中位随访时间为54.5个月,从14到90个月不等。总体临床评估显示神经系统逐渐改善,特别是在前8.5周内(范围,1-12周)。3个月时的即时结果显示,所有患者(8/8,100%)都缓解了疼痛,25%(2/8)达到无药物状态(I级)。3例患者(37%)在随访期间复发,并接受了重复伽玛刀放射外科(n=2)和射频切开术(n=1)的治疗。在最后一次随访中,88%(7/8)的患者疼痛缓解(I-IIIa级),其中三人(37%)达到无药物状态(I级)。无不良事件或神经系统并发症发生。尽管接受药物治疗,但接受射频神经根切断术的患者继续经历疼痛控制不足(IV级)。伽玛刀放射外科是非侵入性的,特发性GPN的有效治疗选择,提供无永久性并发症的短期和长期缓解。
    Glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN) is an unusual disorder causing severe, brief pain episodes in the areas supplied by the glossopharyngeal nerve. Initial treatment involves medications like carbamazepine, but if these are ineffective or cause side effects, interventional pain management techniques or surgery may be considered. Gamma Knife radiosurgery is becoming popular in managing GPN due to its lower risk of complications than surgical interventions like microvascular decompression or rhizotomy. In this retrospective case series, we examined the outcomes of Gamma Knife radiosurgery in eight patients with GPN. The decision to utilize Gamma Knife radiosurgery was made following specific criteria, including failed surgical interventions, patient preference against surgery, or contraindications to surgical procedures. Patients were administered radiation doses within the range of 80 to 90 Gy, targeting either the cisternal glossopharyngeal nerve or glossopharyngeal meatus of the jugular foramen. Evaluations were conducted before the Gamma Knife radiosurgery; at 3, 6, and 12 months after Gamma Knife radiosurgery; and annually thereafter. Pain severity was assessed using the modified Barrow Neurological Institute scale grades, with patients achieving grade I-IIIa considered to have a good treatment outcome and grade IV-V to have a poor treatment outcome. Pain control and absence of radiosurgery-related complications were primary endpoints. The median age of the patients was 46.5 years, varying from 8 to 72 years. The median duration of pain was 32 months (range, 12-120 months). All patients, except one, were on polydrug therapy. All cases exhibited preoperative grade V pain. The median follow-up duration after Gamma Knife radiosurgery was 54.5 months, varying from 14 to 90 months. The overall clinical assessments revealed a gradual neurological improvement, particularly within the first 8.5 weeks (range, 1-12 weeks). The immediate outcomes at 3 months revealed that all patients (8/8, 100%) experienced pain relief, with 25% (2/8) achieving a medication-free status (Grade I). Three patients (37%) experienced a recurrence during the follow-up and were managed with repeat Gamma Knife radiosurgery (n = 2) and radiofrequency rhizotomy (n = 1). At the last follow-up, 88% (7/8) of patients had pain relief (Grades I-IIIa), with three (37%) achieving a medication-free status (Grade I). No adverse events or neurological complications occurred. The patient who underwent radiofrequency rhizotomy continued to experience inadequately controlled pain despite medication (Grade IV). Gamma Knife radiosurgery is a non-invasive, efficacious treatment option for idiopathic GPN, offering short- and long-term relief without permanent complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    菱形唇(RL)是一层神经组织,延伸到第四脑室的外侧,并连接到第四脑室的外侧凹陷。尽管这种解剖结构已经过严格的研究,在微血管减压术(MVD)中常常被忽视。在这份报告中,我们提出了两个案例,一种是面肌痉挛(HFS),一种是舌咽神经痛(GPN),其中在手术过程中观察到较大的RL。我们发现大的RL很容易与蛛网膜囊肿混淆,准确的识别和解剖对保护下颅神经很重要。
    The rhomboid lip (RL) is a layer of neural tissue that extends outside the fourth ventricle and is connected to the lateral recess of the fourth ventricle. Although this anatomical structure has been rigorously studied, it is often overlooked in microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery. In this report, we present two cases, one of hemifacial spasm (HFS) and one of glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN), in which a large RL was observed during surgery. We found that a large RL is easily confused with arachnoid cysts, and accurate identification and dissection are important to protect the lower cranial nerves.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:微血管减压术(MVD)已经成为诸如面肌痉挛(HFS)等药物难治性神经血管压迫综合征(NVC)的首选手术治疗方法,三叉神经痛(TN),和舌咽神经痛(GPN)。内窥镜具有显著先进的手术,并提供增强的MVD可视化。本研究的目的是分析完全内镜下微血管减压术(E-MVD)治疗HFS的疗效和安全性,TN,和GPN,以及介绍我们的初步经验。
    方法:本回顾性病例系列研究了248例患者(123例HFS患者,115例TN患者,和10名GPN患者)从2008年12月至2021年10月在一个机构。操作持续时间,临床结果,负责任的船只,术中和术后并发症,并记录复发。术前和术后即刻进行磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机断层扫描(CT)进行影像学评估。使用Shorr分级和BarrowNeurologicalInstitute(BNI)疼痛评分来评估临床结果。功效,安全,并对手术复发的相关危险因素进行回顾性分析,总结了全E-MVD的手术技术。
    结果:共有248例患者(103例男性)符合纳入标准并接受了完全E-MVD的回顾性研究。123例HFS患者的有效率为99.1%,其中113例完全缓解,9例明显缓解。115例TN患者的有效率为98.9%,其中105例手术后疼痛完全缓解,5例疼痛明显缓解,4例部分疼痛缓解,但仍需药物控制。10例GPN患者的有效率为100%,10例GPN术后完全缓解。至于并发症,4例出现暂时性面部麻木,5例暂时性听力损失,头晕伴频繁恶心呕吐8例,头痛12例,没有脑出血,颅内感染,和其他并发症发生。随访3~42个月,平均18.6±3.3个月。HFS复发4例,TN复发11例。其他有效患者术后症状无复发或恶化。小脑桥脑角(CPA)面积比(健康/患侧),疾病持续时间的长度,负责血管的类型是与HFS复发相关的危险因素,TN,和GPN完全E-MVD处理。
    结论:在这项回顾性研究中,我们的结果表明,完全E-MVD用于治疗NVC如HFS,TN,和GPN,是一种安全有效的手术方法。完全E-MVD用于治疗NVC具有显微MVD不可用的优点和技术,降低手术并发症的发生率,同时提高疗效,降低复发率。
    BACKGROUND: Microvascular decompression (MVD) is already the preferred surgical treatment for medically refractory neurovascular compression syndromes (NVC) such as hemifacial spasm (HFS), trigeminal neuralgia (TN), and glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN). Endoscopy has significantly advanced surgery and provides enhanced visualization of MVD. The aim of this study is to analyze the efficacy and safety of fully endoscopic microvascular decompression (E-MVD) for the treatment of HFS, TN, and GPN, as well as to present our initial experience.
    METHODS: This retrospective case series investigated fully E-MVD performed in 248 patients (123 patients with HFS, 115 patients with TN, and 10 patients with GPN ) from December 2008 to October 2021 at a single institution. The operation duration, clinical outcomes, responsible vessels, intra- and postoperative complications, and recurrences were recorded. Preoperative and immediate postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computerized tomography (CT) were performed for imageological evaluation. The Shorr grading and Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain score were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. The efficacy, safety, and risk factors related to the recurrence of the operation were retrospectively analysed, and the surgical techniques of fully E-MVD were summarised.
    RESULTS: A total of 248 patients (103 males) met the inclusion criteria and underwent fully E-MVD were retrospectively studied. The effective rate of 123 patients with HFS was 99.1%, of which 113 cases were completely relieved and 9 cases were significantly relieved. The effective rate of 115 patients with TN was 98.9%, of which 105 cases had completely pain relieved after surgery, 5 cases had significant pain relieved, 4 cases had partial pain relieved but still needed to be controlled by medication. The effective rate of 10 patients with GPN was 100%, 10 cases of GPN were completely relieved after surgery. As for complications, temporary facial numbness occurred in 4 cases, temporary hearing loss in 5 cases, dizziness with frequent nausea and vomiting in 8 cases, headache in 12 cases, and no cerebral hemorrhage, intracranial infection, and other complications occurred. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 42 months, with a mean of 18.6 ± 3.3 months. There were 4 cases of recurrence of HFS and 11 cases of recurrence of TN. The other effective patients had no recurrence or worsening of postoperative symptoms. The cerebellopontine angle (CPA) area ratio (healthy/affected side), the length of disease duration, and the type of responsible vessels are the risk factors related to the recurrence of HFS, TN, and GPN treated by fully E-MVD.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, our results suggest that the fully E-MVD for the treatment of NVC such as HFS, TN, and GPN, is a safe and effective surgical method. Fully E-MVD for the treatment of NVC has advantages and techniques not available with microscopic MVD, which may reduce the incidence of surgical complications while improving the curative effect and reducing the recurrence rate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号