UASSIGNED:可用的在线医疗信息量正在快速增长,YouTube被认为是当今最受欢迎的医疗保健信息来源。然而,尚未进行全面评估与颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)相关的YouTube视频的研究.因此,本研究旨在评估YouTube视频作为TMD医疗信息来源的内容和质量。
UASSIGNED:总共237个YouTube视频,使用五个关键词(颞下颌关节紊乱病,tmd,颞下颌关节,tmj,和颌骨关节)包括在内。包括的视频按目的和来源进行分类以进行分析。质量(否认,网上健康(HON),确保患者的质量信息(EQIP),和全球质量量表(GQS))和视频内容的科学准确性进行了评估。
未经评估:总含量,DISCERN,亲爱的,EQIP,GQS评分为7.5%,38.9%,35.2%,53.0%,最高可能得分的48.6%,分别。只有69个视频(29.1%)被认为对患者“有用”。新闻媒体,内科医生,医疗来源视频的评价得分高于其他视频。质量评价得分与公众偏好指数无显著相关或负相关。在ROC曲线分析中,内容和DISCERN评分对基于GQS(P<0.001)和总分(P<0.001)的高质量视频显示出上述优异的辨别能力。
UASSIGNED:与TMD相关的YouTube视频包含低质量和科学上不准确的信息,可能会对TMD患者产生负面影响。
UNASSIGNED: The amount of online medical information available is rapidly growing and YouTube is considered as the most popular source of healthcare information nowadays. However, no study has been conducted to comprehensively evaluate YouTube videos related to temporomandibular disorders (TMD). So this study aimed to evaluate the content and quality of YouTube videos as a source of medical information on TMD.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 237 YouTube videos that were systematically searched using five keywords (temporomandibular disorders, tmd, temporomandibular joint, tmj, and jaw joint) were included. Included videos were categorized by purpose and source for analysis. The quality (DISCERN, Health on the Net (HON), Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP), and Global Quality Scale (GQS)) and scientific accuracy of video contents were evaluated.
UNASSIGNED: Total content, DISCERN, HON, EQIP, and GQS scores were 7.5%, 38.9%, 35.2%, 53.0%, and 48.6% of the maximum possible score, respectively. Only 69 videos (29.1%) were considered as \"useful\" for patients. News media, physician, and medical source videos showed higher evaluation scores than others. Quality evaluation scores were not significantly correlated or negatively correlated with public preference indices. In the ROC curve analysis, content and DISCERN score showed above excellent discrimination ability for high-quality videos based on GQS (P < 0.001) and total score (P < 0.001).
UNASSIGNED: YouTube videos related to TMD contained low quality and scientifically inaccurate information that could negatively influence patients with TMD.