Gemcitabine

吉西他滨
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)是胰腺癌的最常见形式,一种总体生存率很低的疾病。缺乏临床前模型阻碍了治疗的进展。这里,我们展示了从切除组织创建的个性化器官型\"化身\"如何允许对完整的原位肿瘤微环境进行空间和时间报告,并反映临床反应.我们的灌注培养方法扩展了肿瘤切片的活力,保持稳定的肿瘤含量,新陈代谢,基质成分,和免疫细胞群持续12天。使用多重免疫荧光和空间转录组学,我们确定了免疫邻域和免疫疗法的潜力。我们使用化身来评估临床前验证的代谢疗法的影响,并显示基质和免疫表型的恢复以及肿瘤再分化。为了确定临床相关性,我们监测了患者对吉西他滨治疗的化身反应,并从临床随访中确定了患者化身可预测的反应.因此,化身为治疗方法的同基因测试提供了有价值的信息,并为患者提供了一个真正个性化的治疗评估平台。
    Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common form of pancreatic cancer, a disease with dismal overall survival. Advances in treatment are hindered by a lack of preclinical models. Here, we show how a personalized organotypic \"avatar\" created from resected tissue allows spatial and temporal reporting on a complete in situ tumor microenvironment and mirrors clinical responses. Our perfusion culture method extends tumor slice viability, maintaining stable tumor content, metabolism, stromal composition, and immune cell populations for 12 days. Using multiplexed immunofluorescence and spatial transcriptomics, we identify immune neighborhoods and potential for immunotherapy. We used avatars to assess the impact of a preclinically validated metabolic therapy and show recovery of stromal and immune phenotypes and tumor redifferentiation. To determine clinical relevance, we monitored avatar response to gemcitabine treatment and identify a patient avatar-predictable response from clinical follow-up. Thus, avatars provide valuable information for syngeneic testing of therapeutics and a truly personalized therapeutic assessment platform for patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    吉西他滨加nab-紫杉醇(GnP)和FOLFIRINOX被广泛用作不可切除的胰腺癌(PC)的一线方案。当选择GnP治疗时,考虑到患者的年龄或状况,二线FOLFIRINOX由于其毒性有时难以给药。本研究旨在确定S-IROX(S-1,奥沙利铂,和伊立替康联合用药)一线GnP失败后无法切除的PC患者的治疗方案。该I期研究使用了两种剂量水平的“3+3”剂量递增设计。纳入一线GnP治疗无法切除的PC失败的患者。在第1天施用奥沙利铂和伊立替康,并且在第1-7天每天两次口服施用S-1,随后休息7天。主要终点是剂量限制性毒性(DLTs)和RD的测定。次要终点是潜在抗肿瘤活性的评估。9例患者接受了二线S-IROX方案。在0级(S-1,80毫克/平方米;奥沙利铂,85毫克/平方米;伊立替康,120mg/m2),没有患者经历DLT;然而,1例患者出现3级中性粒细胞减少症.在1级(伊立替康增加到150毫克/平方米),六名患者中有一名经历了DLT,包括G3腹泻。RD在1级剂量下得到证实。响应率,疾病控制率,中位无进展生存期,中位总生存率为33.3%,77.8%,172(范围:77-422)天,和414(101-685)天,分别。一名患者在二线S-IROX治疗后接受了手术。二线S-IROX治疗被认为是可接受的。RD设定为1级剂量(S-1,80mg/m2;奥沙利铂,85毫克/平方米;伊立替康,150mg/m2)。
    Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) and FOLFIRINOX are widely used as first-line regimens for unresectable pancreatic cancer (PC). When GnP therapy is selected, considering patient age or condition, second-line FOLFIRINOX is sometimes difficult to administer owing to its toxicity. This study aimed to determine the recommended dose (RD) of S-IROX (S-1, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan combination) regimens in patients with unresectable PC after first-line GnP failure. This phase-I study used the \"3 + 3\" dose-escalation design with two dose levels. Patients who failed first-line GnP therapy for unresectable PC were enrolled. Oxaliplatin and irinotecan were administered on day 1, and S-1 was administered orally twice daily on days 1-7, followed by 7 days of rest. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and determination of RD. The secondary endpoint was the evaluation of potential antitumor activity. Nine patients received the second-line S-IROX regimen. In level-0 (S-1, 80 mg/m2; oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2; and irinotecan, 120 mg/m2), no patient experienced DLT; however, one patient experienced grade 3 neutropenia. At level-1 (irinotecan increased to 150 mg/m2), one of six patients experienced DLTs, including G3 diarrhea. The RD was confirmed at the level-1 dose. The response rate, disease control rate, median progression-free survival, and median overall survival were 33.3%, 77.8%, 172 (range:77-422) days, and 414 (101-685) days, respectively. One patient underwent surgery after the second-line S-IROX therapy. Second-line S-IROX treatment was deemed acceptable. The RD was set at level-1 dose (S-1, 80 mg/m2; oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2; and irinotecan, 150 mg/m2).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耐药性仍然是胰腺癌治疗中的重大挑战。耐药细胞系的开发对于理解耐药的潜在机制和开发新药以改善临床结果至关重要。这里,一种新的胰腺癌细胞系,来自中国患者的PDAC-X1已经建立。PDAC-X1的特点是免疫表型,生物学遗传学,分子特征,和致瘤性。体外分析显示,PDAC-X1细胞表现出上皮形态和细胞标志物(CK7和CK19),表达的癌症相关标志物(E-钙黏着蛋白,Vimentin,Ki-67,CEA,CA19-9),并在悬浮培养中产生胰腺癌样器官。体内分析显示PDAC-X1细胞以100%的肿瘤形成率维持致瘤性。该细胞系表现出复杂的核型,以亚三倍体核型为主。此外,PDAC-X1细胞对多种药物表现出内在的多药耐药性,包括吉西他滨,紫杉醇,5-氟尿嘧啶,和奥沙利铂.总之,PDAC-X1细胞系已经建立和表征,代表一个有用的和有价值的临床前模型来研究潜在的耐药机制,并开发新的药物疗法,以改善患者的结果。
    Drug resistance remains a significant challenge in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. The development of drug-resistant cell lines is crucial to understanding the underlying mechanisms of resistance and developing novel drugs to improve clinical outcomes. Here, a novel pancreatic cancer cell line, PDAC-X1, derived from Chinese patients has been established. PDAC-X1 was characterized by the immune phenotype, biology, genetics, molecular characteristics, and tumorigenicity. In vitro analysis revealed that PDAC-X1 cells exhibited epithelial morphology and cell markers (CK7 and CK19), expressed cancer-associated markers (E-cadherin, Vimentin, Ki-67, CEA, CA19-9), and produced pancreatic cancer-like organs in suspension culture. In vivo analysis showed that PDAC-X1 cells maintained tumorigenicity with a 100% tumor formation rate. This cell line exhibited a complex karyotype, dominated by subtriploid karyotypes. In addition, PDAC-X1 cells exhibited intrinsic multidrug resistance to multiple drugs, including gemcitabine, paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin. In conclusion, the PDAC-X1 cell line has been established and characterized, representing a useful and valuable preclinical model to study the underlying mechanisms of drug resistance and develop novel drug therapeutics to improve patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    根治性膀胱切除术是肌层浸润性膀胱癌的标准治疗方法,术前治疗可以提高生存率。卡铂和吉西他滨化疗被认为是有效的,对于因肾功能下降而不适合以顺铂为基础的化疗的患者的安全治疗。然而,关于肾小球滤过率<30mL/min的卡铂和吉西他滨化疗术前治疗的证据有限.我们讨论了由于膀胱肿瘤大小为12cm(cT3bN0M1a)和严重肾功能不全(血清肌酐:2.57mg/dL,估计肾小球滤过率:20.2毫升/分钟/1.73平方米)。患者接受了两个疗程的卡铂和吉西他滨化疗后,膀胱肿瘤大小减少了60%.未观察到恶心或肾功能障碍;抗生素治疗和粒细胞集落刺激因子可改善发热性中性粒细胞减少症。然后,手术前化疗后,他可以接受机器人辅助的根治性膀胱切除术。卡铂和吉西他滨化疗的术前治疗是肌层浸润性膀胱癌和严重肾功能不全患者的可行治疗选择。
    Radical cystectomy is the standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, and pre-surgical treatment can improve survival. Carboplatin and gemcitabine chemotherapy is considered an effective, safe treatment for patients ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy owing to reduced renal function. However, there is limited evidence on pre-surgical treatment with carboplatin and gemcitabine chemotherapy with glomerular filtration rates < 30 mL/min. We discuss the treatment of a patient who did not undergo surgery owing to bladder tumor size of 12 cm (cT3bN0M1a) and severe renal dysfunction (serum creatinine: 2.57 mg/dL, estimated glomerular filtration rate: 20.2 mL/min/1.73 m2). After the patient received two courses of carboplatin and gemcitabine chemotherapy, the bladder tumor size had reduced by 60%. No nausea or renal dysfunction was observed; febrile neutropenia improved with antibiotic therapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Then, he could undergo robot-assisted radical cystectomy after the pre-surgical chemotherapy treatment. Pre-surgical treatment with carboplatin and gemcitabine chemotherapy is a viable treatment option for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer and severe renal dysfunction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的特征是纤维化增加,可以促进肿瘤的进展和扩散。这里,我们对高转移性KPC(Pdx1-Cre,LSL-KrasG12D/+,LSL-Trp53R172H/+)和低转移性KPflC(Pdx1-Cre,LSL-KrasG12D/+,Trp53fl/+)使用质谱蛋白质组学对胰腺癌进行基因工程小鼠模型。我们在早期的评估-,mid-,和晚期疾病揭示了与KPflC相比,KPC模型中nidogen-2(NID2)的丰度增加,进一步验证显示NID2主要由癌症相关成纤维细胞(CAF)表达。使用生物力学评估,二次谐波产生成像,和双折射分析,我们表明,在CAF中通过CRISPR干扰(CRISPRi)减少NID2降低了三维模型中的刚度和基质重塑,导致癌细胞侵袭受损。活体成像显示NID2耗尽的活体肿瘤血管通畅改善,对吉西他滨/Abraxane的反应增强。在原位模型中,NID2CRISPRi肿瘤肝转移较少,生存率增加,突出显示NID2作为潜在的PDAC共目标。
    Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by increasing fibrosis, which can enhance tumor progression and spread. Here, we undertook an unbiased temporal assessment of the matrisome of the highly metastatic KPC (Pdx1-Cre, LSL-KrasG12D/+, LSL-Trp53R172H/+) and poorly metastatic KPflC (Pdx1-Cre, LSL-KrasG12D/+, Trp53fl/+) genetically engineered mouse models of pancreatic cancer using mass spectrometry proteomics. Our assessment at early-, mid-, and late-stage disease reveals an increased abundance of nidogen-2 (NID2) in the KPC model compared to KPflC, with further validation showing that NID2 is primarily expressed by cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). Using biomechanical assessments, second harmonic generation imaging, and birefringence analysis, we show that NID2 reduction by CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) in CAFs reduces stiffness and matrix remodeling in three-dimensional models, leading to impaired cancer cell invasion. Intravital imaging revealed improved vascular patency in live NID2-depleted tumors, with enhanced response to gemcitabine/Abraxane. In orthotopic models, NID2 CRISPRi tumors had less liver metastasis and increased survival, highlighting NID2 as a potential PDAC cotarget.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    癌症的多样性使其成为世界范围内第二大死亡原因,并且近年来作为一种治疗手段,治疗无关性前药越来越受欢迎。通过高精度实时药物释放监测,可同时诊断和治疗肿瘤。在这里,我们报道了小型治疗前药GF的发展,基于核苷抗癌剂吉西他滨和荧光染料5(6)-羧基荧光素。我们已经成功地证明了它在肿瘤细胞中的有效内化,显示在整个早期和晚期内吞途径中的定位。对其细胞内化机制进行了评价,确认其独立于核苷转运蛋白。通过共聚焦显微镜对其细胞定位揭示了网格蛋白介导的内吞作用机制,将其与先前研究的类似化合物区分开来。此外,GF在各种pH值和人血浆中表现出稳定性。随后,在三种人类癌细胞系(A549,U87和T98)中评估了其体外细胞毒性。此外,研究了其在小鼠体内的药代动力学特征,并监测了随之而来的药物释放。最后,其体内可视化在斑马鱼异种移植模型中完成,并在A549异种移植物中评估其体内功效。结果揭示了一个有趣的功效概况,将GF定位为令人信服的候选人,需要进一步调查。
    The multiplexity of cancer has rendered it the second leading cause of mortality worldwide and theragnostic prodrugs have gained popularity in recent years as a means of treatment. Theragnostic prodrugs enable the simultaneous diagnosis and therapy of tumors via high-precision real-time drug release monitoring. Herein, we report the development of the small theragnostic prodrug GF, based on the nucleoside anticancer agent gemcitabine and the fluorescent dye 5(6)-carboxyfluorescein. We have successfully demonstrated its efficient internalization in tumor cells, showing localization throughout both the early and late endocytic pathways. Its mechanism of cell internalization was evaluated, confirming its independence from nucleoside transporters. Its cellular localization via confocal microscopy revealed a clathrin-mediated endocytosis mechanism, distinguishing it from analogous compounds studied previously. Furthermore, GF exhibited stability across various pH values and in human blood plasma. Subsequently, its in vitro cytotoxicity was assessed in three human cancer cell lines (A549, U87 and T98). Additionally, its pharmacokinetic profile in mice was investigated and the consequent drug release was monitored. Finally, its in vivo visualization was accomplished in zebrafish xenotransplantation models and its in vivo efficacy was evaluated in A549 xenografts. The results unveiled an intriguing efficacy profile, positioning GF as a compelling candidate warranting further investigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在评估亚叶酸的临床益处,5-氟尿嘧啶,伊立替康和奥沙利铂(FOLFIRINOX)vs.吉西他滨联合Nab-紫杉醇(GnP)作为无法手术的胰腺癌患者的一线治疗。为此,我们对2014年至2019年接受FOLFIRINOX或GnP一线治疗的45例患者的内部数据进行了回顾性分析.总的来说,21和24例患者接受FOLFIRINOX和GnP,分别。尽管中位无进展生存期没有显着差异,FOLFIRINOX组的中位总生存期长于GnP组(16.7vs.7.2个月)。共有14名患者接受FOLFIRINOX,然后接受GnP,而3例患者接受GnP后再接受FOLFIRINOX。所有因可行性差而未转为二线治疗的患者均纳入GnP组。数据表明,接受GnP作为一线治疗的患者不太可能转换为FOLFIRINOX,因此,预后较差。
    The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefits of leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) vs. gemcitabine plus Nab-paclitaxel (GnP) as a first-line therapy for patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer. For this purpose, in-house data available for 45 patients who received FOLFIRINOX or GnP as first-line treatment between 2014 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. In total, 21 and 24 patients received FOLFIRINOX and GnP, respectively. Although there were no significant differences in the median progression-free survival, the median overall survival was longer in the FOLFIRINOX group than in the GnP group (16.7 vs. 7.2 months). A total of 14 patients received FOLFIRINOX followed by GnP, whereas 3 patients received GnP followed by FOLFIRINOX. All patients who did not switch to second-line therapy owing to poor feasibility were included in the GnP group. The data indicated that patients receiving GnP as first-line therapy were less likely to switch to FOLFIRINOX and, consequently, had a worse prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)与不良预后相关,复发率>70%,即使在可切除的情况下。复发性PDAC的治疗策略包括全身化疗,吉西他滨(GEM)单药治疗历来是标准治疗。本研究描述了患有PDAC和术后肝转移的患者在GEM单一疗法后维持临床完全缓解(cCR)>7年的情况。一名63岁的上腹痛妇女被诊断为可切除的PDAC,并接受了胰十二指肠切除术。患者接受GEM+S-1辅助化疗6个月。术后15个月检测到多发性肝转移,患者仅接受GEM治疗。12次循环后,计算机断层扫描显示cCR和GEM单药治疗在15个周期后停止.患者在首次复发后>7年没有复发的体征或症状。此外,本研究分析了四名患者的PDAC切除标本,包括这个案子,检测hENT1蛋白在肿瘤组织中的表达水平。hENT1是跨膜蛋白,其充当核苷转运蛋白,并且是GEM摄取进入人细胞的主要介质。在目前的情况下,hENT1染色在中心区表现出低频和弱阳性,而在癌症侵袭性前部的几乎所有细胞膜中都观察到强烈的阳性反应。位置,强度,hENT1染色的频率因病例而异。总之,GEM的疗效可以在治疗前通过评估hENT1表达来预测。
    Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with a poor prognosis, and it has a recurrence rate of >70%, even in resectable cases. The treatment strategy for recurrent PDAC involves systemic chemotherapy, with gemcitabine (GEM) monotherapy historically serving as the standard of care. The present study describes the case of a patient with PDAC and postoperative liver metastases that maintained clinical complete remission (cCR) for >7 years following GEM monotherapy. A 63-year-old woman with upper abdominal pain was diagnosed with resectable PDAC and underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. The patient was treated with GEM + S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy for 6 months. Multiple liver metastases were detected 15 months post-operation and the patient was administered GEM alone. After 12 cycles, computed tomography showed cCR and GEM monotherapy was discontinued after 15 cycles. The patient has had no signs or symptoms of recurrence >7 years after the first recurrence. In addition, the present study analyzed PDAC resection specimens from four patients, including this case, to determine the expression levels of hENT1 protein in the tumor tissues. hENT1 is a transmembrane protein that acts as a nucleoside transporter and is a major mediator of GEM uptake into human cells. In the present case, hENT1 staining exhibited low frequency and weak positivity in the central region, whereas a strong positive reaction was observed in nearly all cell membranes at the invasive front of the cancer. The location, intensity, and frequency of hENT1 staining varied among cases. In conclusion, the efficacy of GEM may be predicted prior to treatment by evaluating hENT1 expression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的:吉西他滨已被用于治疗各种实体癌,包括,自1997年以来,转移性胰腺癌。这里,我们开发了HPLC-UV法测定血清吉西他滨水平,并将其用于药代动力学研究.材料和方法:分析是在反相柱上进行单个蛋白沉淀步骤后进行的,用磷酸钠缓冲液和甲醇等度洗脱。对于药代动力学研究,NOD/SCID小鼠通过皮下(SC)或腹膜内(IP)施用以100mg/kg接受单剂量的吉西他滨。在施用吉西他滨后5、15和30分钟以及1、2、4和6小时收集血样用于进一步分析。结果:分析的持续时间为~12.5分钟。校准曲线在1-400μM的范围内是线性的(r2=0.999)。GEM的平均回收率为96.53%,检测限为0.166μΜ。T1/2,Tmax,Cmax,AUC0-t,清除率为64.49分钟,5.00分钟,264.88μmol/L,9351.95μmol/L*min,0.0103(mg)/(μmol/L)/min,分别,SC管理。IP管理的相应值为59.34分钟,5.00分钟,300.73μmol/L,8981.35μmol/L*min和0.0108(mg)/(μmol/L)/min(与SC给药没有统计学差异)。结论:一个简单的,有效,敏感,已经开发了用于测量血清中吉西他滨的廉价方法。该方法可用于监测癌症患者的吉西他滨水平,作为治疗药物监测的一部分。
    Background and Objectives: Gemcitabine has been used to treat various solid cancers, including, since 1997, metastatic pancreatic cancer. Here, we developed an HPLC-UV method to determine serum gemcitabine levels and use it in pharmacokinetic studies. Materials and Methods: The analysis was performed after a single protein precipitation step on a reversed-phase column, isocratically eluted with sodium phosphate buffer and methanol. For the pharmacokinetic study, NOD/SCID mice received a single dose of gemcitabine at 100 mg/kg by either subcutaneous (SC) or intraperitoneal (IP) administration. Blood samples were collected at 5, 15, and 30 min and 1, 2, 4, and 6 h after the administration of gemcitabine for further analysis. Results: The duration of the analysis was ~12.5 min. The calibration curve was linear (r2 = 0.999) over the range of 1-400 μM. The mean recovery of GEM was 96.53% and the limit of detection was 0.166 μΜ. T1/2, Tmax, Cmax, AUC0-t, and clearance were 64.49 min, 5.00 min, 264.88 μmol/L, 9351.95 μmol/L*min, and 0.0103(mg)/(μmol/L)/min, respectively, for the SC administration. The corresponding values for the IP administration were 59.34 min, 5.00 min, 300.73 μmol/L, 8981.35 μmol/L*min and 0.0108(mg)/(μmol/L)/min (not statistically different from the SC administration). Conclusions: A simple, valid, sensitive, and inexpensive method for the measurement of gemcitabine in serum has been developed. This method may be useful for monitoring gemcitabine levels in cancer patients as part of therapeutic drug monitoring.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于肺癌(LC)的年发病率上升,需要新的治疗策略。虽然存在各种选择,许多,如果不是全部,保持次优。一些研究表明冷冻消融是一种有前途的方法。然而,缺乏与LC对冷冻的反应和经皮介入治疗要求相关的基本信息限制了临床应用.在这项研究中,我们调查了A549肺癌细胞系对冷冻的反应。数据显示,冷冻至-15°C的单个5分钟不会影响细胞活力,而-20°C和-25°C导致冷冻后1天活力显著降低至<10%。这些人口,然而,能够在文化中恢复。重复(双重)冷冻的应用导致在-25°C下完全细胞死亡。然后进行调查辅助吉西他滨(75nM)预处理与冷冻组合的影响的研究。单独暴露于吉西他滨导致最小的细胞死亡。吉西他滨预处理和-20°C单次冷冻的组合以及-15°C重复冷冻的组合处理均导致完全细胞死亡。这表明吉西他滨预处理在与冷冻组合时可能是协同有效的。对与增加的细胞死亡相关的细胞死亡模式的研究表明,联合治疗中坏死的参与增加。总之,这些结果表明,重复冷冻至-20°C至-25°C导致高度的LC破坏。Further,数据表明,吉西他滨预处理和冷冻的组合导致LC的最低致死温度从-25°C转变为-15°C。这些发现,结合以前的报告,提示单独冷冻消融术或联合化疗可能为LC的治疗提供改善的途径.
    Due to the rising annual incidence of lung cancer (LC), new treatment strategies are needed. While various options exist, many, if not all, remain suboptimal. Several studies have shown cryoablation to be a promising approach. Yet, a lack of basic information pertaining to LC response to freezing and requirement for percutaneous access has limited clinical use. In this study, we investigated the A549 lung carcinoma cell line response to freezing. The data show that a single 5 min freeze to -15 °C did not affect cell viability, whereas -20 °C and -25 °C result in a significant reduction in viability 1 day post freeze to <10%. These populations, however, were able to recover in culture. Application of a repeat (double) freeze resulted in complete cell death at -25 °C. Studies investigating the impact of adjunctive gemcitabine (75 nM) pretreatment in combination with freezing were then conducted. Exposure to gemcitabine alone resulted in minimal cell death. The combination of gemcitabine pretreatment and a -20 °C single freeze as well as combination treatment with a -15 °C repeat freeze both resulted in complete cell death. This suggests that gemcitabine pretreatment may be synergistically effective when combined with freezing. Studies into the modes of cell death associated with the increased cell death revealed the increased involvement of necroptosis in combination treatment. In summary, these results suggest that repeat freezing to -20 °C to -25 °C results in a high degree of LC destruction. Further, the data suggest that the combination of gemcitabine pretreatment and freezing resulted in a shift of the minimum lethal temperature for LC from -25 °C to -15 °C. These findings, in combination with previous reports, suggest that cryoablation alone or in combination with chemotherapy may provide an improved path for the treatment of LC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号