Gammaknife

GammaKnife
  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    无框架伽玛刀立体定向放射外科(GKSRS)已成为基于框架的有效补充,然而,这是对患者的不自主运动敏感,容易延长治疗持续时间。治疗期间的这种延迟不可避免地导致患者不适和不能完成预期的治疗。这项研究的目的是调查无框架GKSRS期间的主动指导是否可以减少实际治疗时间。
    对2017年至2020年在单一机构接受无框GKSRS治疗的患者进行回顾性鉴定。从2019年开始,所有接受无框GKSRS治疗的患者都得到了积极的指导,以防止治疗中断。在接受和未接受主动指导的患者队列之间比较了患者特征和治疗计划。对任一组群进行计划和实际治疗时间之间的线性回归。使用ANOVA和Wilcoxon检验进行统计学分析,其中p值小于0.05被认为是显著的。
    在确定的43名患者和105个疗程中,27例患者在主动指导下接受了51次无框架GKSRS治疗。两组之间的患者特征和治疗计划没有显着差异。积极指导治疗的患者在治疗期间经历了明显更少的CBCT。非教练队列的中位计划和实际治疗持续时间分别为31.4和51.7分钟,教练队列的38.6分钟和49.8分钟。线性回归的结果表明,在有和没有主动指导的情况下,实际治疗持续时间分别延长了1.29和1.56倍,分别,这表明积极指导的实际治疗持续时间显着减少。
    我们的结果表明,主动指导与实际治疗时间的显著缩短有关。这种简单的干预可以在临床上实施,以防止不必要的治疗中断,改善患者的舒适度,并确保在无框GKSRS期间完成规定的治疗。
    UNASSIGNED: Frameless Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSRS) has become an effective supplement to frame-based, which is however sensitive to patient\'s involuntary motions and prone to prolonged treatment duration. Such delays during treatment inevitably result in patient discomfort and the inability to complete intended treatment. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether active coaching during frameless GKSRS can reduce actual treatment duration.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients treated at a single institution with frameless GKSRS from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively identified. Beginning in 2019, all patients treated with frameless GKSRS were actively coached to prevent treatment interruptions. Patient characteristics and treatment plans were compared between the cohorts of patients treated with and without active coaching. Linear regressions between the planned and actual treatment duration of treatment sessions were performed on either cohort. ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analyses with a p-value less than 0.05 considered as significant.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the total 43 patients and 105 treatment sessions identified, 27 patients underwent 51 treatment sessions of frameless GKSRS with active coaching. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics and treatment plans between the two cohorts. Patients treated with active coaching underwent significantly fewer CBCTs during treatment. The median planned and actual treatment durations were 31.4 and 51.7 min for the non-coached cohort, and 38.6 and 49.8 min for the coached cohort. The results of linear regressions showed that the actual treatment duration was 1.29 and 1.56 times longer with and without active coaching, respectively, which indicated a significant reduction in the actual treatment duration with active coaching.
    UNASSIGNED: Our results suggest that active coaching was associated with significant reductions of actual treatment duration. This simple intervention can be clinically implemented to prevent unnecessary treatment interruptions, improve patient comfort and ensure completion of treatment as prescribed during frameless GKSRS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    早期识别GKRS治疗三叉神经痛(TN)后将经历延迟性疼痛缓解的患者将允许最佳的患者管理,避免不必要的程序。用于识别对GKRS的后期响应者的非侵入性工具目前不可用。我们试图评估在GKRS后3个月时间点获得的基于MRI的扩散率指标作为治疗反应的预测因子。
    对43例TN患者进行了术前和术后3个月的3TMRI检查。扩散张量度量,包括轴向扩散率(AD),径向扩散系数(RD),从双侧三叉神经桥脑内纤维中提取部分各向异性(FA),脑池放射外科目标(或相应的对侧神经段),和非靶向脑池神经段。在最后一次随访时,在BarrowNeurologicalInstitute(BNI)I-II量表上,将良好的治疗反应定义为疼痛强度。最后一次随访时的疼痛缓解和治疗反应被检查与GKRS扩散后3个月指标的相关性。
    在中位临床随访5个月(范围0.5至24.5个月)时,在3个月的脑扩散张量图像中,末次随访时未出现疼痛缓解的所有患者的脑池AD值显著降低(p=0.04).在经典TN患者中,平均胸骨池AD降低(p=0.032),RD(p=0.026),3个月DTI随访时的FA(p=0.042)值与末次随访时的BNI>2相关。此外,平均胸骨池AD降低(p=0.036),RD(p=0.029),和FA(p=0.037)在经典TN患者中未能在最后一次随访时在BNI量表上降低2分。
    GKRS治疗后3个月,经典TN治疗后三叉神经的扩散率指标变化与末次随访时对GKRS无反应显著相关。有必要进一步研究以阐明DTI作为一种非侵入性工具来预测用GKRS管理的TN患者对治疗的反应。
    UNASSIGNED: Early identification of patients who will experience delayed-onset pain relief after GKRS for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) will allow optimal patient management, and avoidance of unnecessary procedures. A non-invasive tool to identify late responders to GKRS is currently unavailable. We sought to evaluate MRI based diffusivity metrics obtained at the 3-month post-GKRS time point as predictors of treatment response.
    UNASSIGNED: Pre-procedural and 3-month post-procedural 3T MRI examinations were obtained in 43 patients with TN. Diffusion tensor metrics including axial diffusivity (AD), radial diffusivity (RD), and fractional anisotropy (FA) were extracted from the bilateral trigeminal nerve intra-pontine fibers, cisternal radiosurgical targets (or corresponding contralateral nerve segments), and non-targeted cisternal nerve segments. A favorable treatment response was defined as pain intensity on the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) scale of I-II at last follow-up. Pain relief and treatment response at last follow-up were examined for correlation with the 3-month post-GKRS diffusivity metrics.
    UNASSIGNED: At a median clinical follow-up of 5 months (range 0.5 to 24.5 months), all patients who did not experience pain relief at last follow-up had significantly reduced cisternal AD values (p=0.04) at the 3-month brain Diffusion Tensor image. In patients with classic TN, reduced mean cisternal AD (p=0.032), RD (p=0.026), and FA (p=0.042) values at the 3-month DTI follow-up were associated with BNI >2 at last follow-up. In addition, decreased mean cisternal AD (p=0.036), RD (p=0.029), and FA (p=0.037) were noted in patients with classic TN that failed to achieve a decrease of 2 points on the BNI scale at last follow-up.
    UNASSIGNED: Alterations of diffusivity metrics on the treated trigeminal nerve 3 months after GKRS for classic TN significantly correlated with no response to GKRS at last follow-up. Further studies to clarify the value of DTI as a non-invasive tool to predict response to treatment in patients with TN managed with GKRS are warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    立体定向放射外科(SRS)是前庭神经鞘瘤(VS)的既定治疗方式。我们的目标是总结SRS在VS中的基于证据的使用,并解决与之相关的具体考虑,以及我们自己的临床经验。对文献进行了全面审查,以收集有关SRS在VS中的安全性和有效性的证据。此外,我们回顾了资深作者在2009年至2021年间治疗VSs(N=294)的经验,以及我们在SRS后患者中进行显微手术的经验.现有的科学证据支持SRS在VS中的作用,在中小型肿瘤(5年局部肿瘤控制>95%)。不利辐射影响的风险仍然很小,而听力保持率是可变的。我们中心的伽马刀后VS随访队列(散发性-157,神经纤维瘤病-2-14)在最后一次随访中显示出出色的肿瘤控制率为95.5%(散发性)和93.8%(神经纤维瘤病-2),中位边缘剂量为13Gy,平均随访时间为3.6年(散发性)和5.2年(神经纤维瘤病-2)。由于导致的蛛网膜增厚和与关键神经血管结构的粘连,SRS后VSs的显微外科手术提出了艰巨的挑战。在这种情况下,几乎完全切除是获得更好功能结果的关键。SRS在这里仍然是VS管理中的可信替代方案。需要进一步的研究来提出准确预测听力保持率的方法,并比较各种SRS模式的相对有效性。
    Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established modality of treatment for vestibular schwannomas (VS). We aim to summarize the evidence-based use of SRS in VSs and address the specific considerations pertaining to the same, along with our own clinical experiences. A thorough review of the literature was done to gather evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of SRS in VSs. Additionally, we have reviewed the senior author\'s experience in treating VSs (N = 294) between 2009 and 2021 and our experiences with microsurgery in post-SRS patients. Available scientific evidence upholds the role of SRS in VSs, in small-to-medium-sized tumors (5-year local tumor control >95%). The risk of adverse radiation effects remains minimal, while the hearing preservation rates are variable. Our center\'s post-GammaKnife VS follow-up cohort (sporadic - 157, neurofibromatosis-2 - 14) showed excellent tumor control rates at the last follow-up of 95.5% (sporadic) and 93.8% (neurofibromatosis-2), with a median margin dose of 13 Gy and mean follow-up periods of 3.6 (sporadic) and 5.2 (neurofibromatosis-2) years. Microsurgery in post-SRS VSs poses a formidable challenge due to the resulting thickened arachnoid and adhesions to critical neurovascular structures. Near-total excision is the key to better functional outcomes in such cases. SRS is here to stay as a trusted alternative in the management of VSs. Further studies are required to propose means of accurate prediction of hearing preservation rates and also to compare the relative efficacies of various SRS modalities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    未经评估:确定与在GammaKnife™(GK)MRI上发现新的和/或扩大的脑转移瘤(BM)风险增加相关的因素及其对患者预后的影响。
    未经证实:43.9%的患者出现BM生长,32.9%有额外的脑转移(aBM),18.1%的人两者都有。初始脑转移速度(iBMV)与发现aBM有关。诊断性MRI(dMRI)和GKMRI之间的时间与间隔增长有关,每天增加2%的风险。先前的脑转移切除术以及dMRI或最新的颅外RT和GKMRI之间的更长时间可以预测aBM和BM的生长。aBM和/或BM的增长导致1.8%的病例发生管理变化,与OS或远处颅内衰竭的发生率无关.
    UNASSIGNED:在dMRI和iBMV上看到的转移数量预测aBM和/或BM生长,然而,这些因素对生存率或远处颅内衰竭的发生率无显著影响.
    UNASSIGNED: To determine factors associated with increased risk of finding new and/or enlarged brain metastases (BM) on GammaKnife™ (GK) MRI and their impact on patient outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: 43.9% of patients showed BM growth, 32.9% had additional brain metastases (aBM), and 18.1 % had both. Initial brain metastasis velocity (iBMV) was associated with finding aBM. Time between diagnostic MRI (dMRI) and GK MRI was associated with interval growth and each day increased this risk by 2%. Prior brain metastasectomy and greater time between either dMRI or latest extracranial RT and GK MRI predicted both aBM and BM growth. aBM and/or BM growth led to management change in 1.8% of cases and were not associated with OS or incidence of distant intracranial failure.
    UNASSIGNED: Number of metastases seen on dMRI and iBMV predicted both aBM and/or BM growth, however, these factors did not significantly affect survival or incidence of distant intracranial failure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究调查了患者运动对接受无框GammaKnife®Icon™治疗的转移性患者治疗计划的剂量学质量的影响。通过量化增加高清运动管理(HDMM)门控容差的剂量测定鲁棒性,这项研究调查了我们中心治疗的患者的HDMM阈值从我们目前的1mm标准提高的可能性.
    UNASSIGNED:使用三种运动模型通过改变治疗计划中射击的立体定向坐标来回顾性模拟运动。比较了原始计划和转移计划的剂量质量指标。确定目标位置和大小的影响。
    UNASSIGNED:运动模型显示目标覆盖率的中位数(p值)绝对变化高达-0.133%(<0.0001),对于1mm的HDMM公差,-0.267%(<0.0001)和-0.667%(<0.0001),1.5mm和3mm。帕迪克合格指数(PCI)和梯度指数(GI)的最大中位数(p值)绝对变化为-0.008(0.0032)和0.017(0.6893)。对于所有模型和HDMM容差,目标尺寸的减小与目标覆盖率的更大变化弱相关(r2=0.040-0.309)。没有观察到位置依赖性。
    UNASSIGNED:高达3mm的HDMM容差均导致PCI和GI的变化可忽略不计。目标覆盖范围对运动表现出更大的敏感性,但目标覆盖率仅为3mm,低于当地规划目标。因此,我们的HDMM公差可能会增加到1.5mm,对治疗输送效率有可能的好处。
    This study investigated the impact of patient motion on the dosimetric quality of treatment plans for metastatic patients undergoing frameless GammaKnife® Icon™ treatments. By quantifying dosimetric robustness at increasing high definition motion management (HDMM) gating tolerances, this study investigated the possibility of increasing the HDMM threshold for patients treated at our centre from our current standard of 1 mm.
    UNASSIGNED: Motion was retrospectively simulated by shifting the stereotactic co-ordinates of shots in treatment plans using three motion models. Dosimetric quality indicators of original and shifted plans were compared. Influence of target location and size was determined.
    UNASSIGNED: Motion models showed median (p-value) absolute changes in target coverage of up to -0.133% (<0.0001), -0.267% (<0.0001) and -0.667% (<0.0001) for HDMM tolerances of 1mm, 1.5mm and 3mm. The greatest median (p-value) absolute changes in Paddick Conformity Index (PCI) and Gradient Index (GI) were -0.008 (0.0032) and 0.017 (0.6893). A reduction in target size correlated weakly with greater changes in target coverage for all models and HDMM tolerances (r2 =0.040-0.309). No location dependence was observed.
    UNASSIGNED: HDMM tolerances up to and including 3mm all resulted in negligible changes in PCI and GI. Target coverage exhibited greater sensitivity to motion, but only at 3mm was the target coverage reduced below local planning aims. Our HDMM tolerance could therefore potentially be increased to 1.5mm, with likely benefits to treatment delivery efficiency.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们使用GammaKnife®ICON™(GK)和CyberKnife®M6™(CK)评估了使用SRS治疗的脑转移的病变数量和体积的影响。四组病变大小(<5mm,5-10毫米,>10-15毫米,和>15mm)的轮廓和处方剂量为20Gy/1分数。增加病变的数量,直到达到8Gy的阈值平均脑剂量;然后单独优化以达到最大一致性。在GK计划中,所有大小的平均脑剂量与病变数量和总GTV成线性比例.每个大小组达到GK阈值所需的病变数量分别为177、57、29和10。相应的总GTV分别为3.62cc,20.37cc,30.25cc,和57.96cc,分别。对于CK,病变的阈值数为135、35、18和8,相应的总GTT为2.32cc,12.09cc,18.24cc,和41.52cc。平均脑剂量随病变数量和总GTV线性增加,而V8Gy,V10Gy,V12Gy与病变数量和总GTV呈二次相关。现代专用的颅内SRS系统可以治疗许多脑转移瘤,尤其是≤10mm的脑转移瘤;支持这种做法的临床证据对于临床扩展至关重要。
    We evaluated the effect of lesion number and volume for brain metastasis treated with SRS using GammaKnife® ICON™ (GK) and CyberKnife® M6™ (CK). Four sets of lesion sizes (<5 mm, 5-10 mm, >10-15 mm, and >15 mm) were contoured and prescribed a dose of 20 Gy/1 fraction. The number of lesions was increased until a threshold mean brain dose of 8 Gy was reached; then individually optimized to achieve maximum conformity. Across GK plans, mean brain dose was linearly proportional to the number of lesions and total GTV for all sizes. The numbers of lesions needed to reach this threshold for GK were 177, 57, 29, and 10 for each size group, respectively; corresponding total GTVs were 3.62 cc, 20.37 cc, 30.25 cc, and 57.96 cc, respectively. For CK, the threshold numbers of lesions were 135, 35, 18, and 8, with corresponding total GTVs of 2.32 cc, 12.09 cc, 18.24 cc, and 41.52 cc respectively. Mean brain dose increased linearly with number of lesions and total GTV while V8 Gy, V10 Gy, and V12 Gy showed quadratic correlations to the number of lesions and total GTV. Modern dedicated intracranial SRS systems allow for treatment of numerous brain metastases especially for ≤10 mm; clinical evidence to support this practice is critical to expansion in the clinic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:海绵窦脑膜瘤(CSM)的演变可能是不可预测的,并且由于其缓慢的演变,其治疗效果具有挑战性。症状的变化和波动,分类的异质性和缺乏随机对照试验。这里,一个专门的工作组就CSM的整体管理提供了共识声明。
    UNASSIGNED:为了确定CSM的最佳整体管理,根据他们的临床表现,尺寸,和进化以及患者特征。
    未经批准:使用PRISMA2020指南,我们纳入了2000年1月至2020年12月的文献。总共保留了400份摘要和77份标题,用于全文筛选。
    UNASSIGNED:工作组提出了8项建议(C级证据)。CSM应由高度专业化的多学科团队管理。对患者的初步评估包括临床,眼科,内分泌学和放射学评估。CSM的治疗应包括经验丰富的颅底神经外科医生或神经放射科医生,放射肿瘤学家,放射科医生,眼科医生,和内分泌学家。
    UNASSIGNED:放射外科是首选的一线治疗方法,随函附上,有症状的病变/老年患者,而不适合切除或WHOII-III级的大型CSM是放疗的候选人。显微外科手术是表现为动眼/视觉/内分泌障碍的年轻患者的侵袭性/快速进展性病变的一种选择。每当手术时,开颅入路是目前的标准。关于内镜经鼻入路治疗CSM的经验报道有限,主要适应症是海绵窦减压以改善症状。每当需要手术时,目前的趋势是提供减压,然后进行放射外科。
    UNASSIGNED: The evolution of cavernous sinus meningiomas (CSMs) might be unpredictable and the efficacy of their treatments is challenging due to their indolent evolution, variations and fluctuations of symptoms, heterogeneity of classifications and lack of randomized controlled trials. Here, a dedicated task force provides a consensus statement on the overall management of CSMs.
    UNASSIGNED: To determine the best overall management of CSMs, depending on their clinical presentation, size, and evolution as well as patient characteristics.
    UNASSIGNED: Using the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we included literature from January 2000 to December 2020. A total of 400 abstracts and 77 titles were kept for full-paper screening.
    UNASSIGNED: The task force formulated 8 recommendations (Level C evidence). CSMs should be managed by a highly specialized multidisciplinary team. The initial evaluation of patients includes clinical, ophthalmological, endocrinological and radiological assessment. Treatment of CSM should involve experienced skull-base neurosurgeons or neuro-radiosurgeons, radiation oncologists, radiologists, ophthalmologists, and endocrinologists.
    UNASSIGNED: Radiosurgery is preferred as first-line treatment in small, enclosed, pauci-symptomatic lesions/in elderly patients, while large CSMs not amenable to resection or WHO grade II-III are candidates for radiotherapy. Microsurgery is an option in aggressive/rapidly progressing lesions in young patients presenting with oculomotor/visual/endocrinological impairment. Whenever surgery is offered, open cranial approaches are the current standard. There is limited experience reported about endoscopic endonasal approach for CSMs and the main indication is decompression of the cavernous sinus to improve symptoms. Whenever surgery is indicated, the current trend is to offer decompression followed by radiosurgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:基于伽玛刀图标的大分割立体定向放射外科(GKI-HSRS)是一种治疗脑转移瘤的新技术范例,它既具有GKI立体定向放射外科(SRS)平台的剂量学优势,也具有分割的生物学优势。我们报告了完整脑转移瘤的5分GKI-HSRS后成熟的局部控制和不良放射效应(ARE)结果。
    方法:回顾性分析接受5-分数GKI-HSRS治疗的完整脑转移患者。生存,本地控制,并确定了不良辐射影响率。对潜在预测因素进行单变量和多变量回归(MVA)。
    结果:在146例患者中发现了两百九十九个转移。中位临床随访时间为10.7个月(范围0.5-47.6)。中位总剂量和处方剂量为27.5Gy(范围,20-27.5)中的5个每日分数和52%(范围,45-93),分别。中位总生存期(OS)为12.7个月,1年局部失败率为15.2%。MVA确定总剂量为27.5Gy与≤25Gy(危险比[HR]0.59,p=0.042),和先前的化疗暴露(HR1.99,p=0.015),作为LC的重要预测因子。1年ARE率为10.8%,症状性ARE率为1.8%。MVA确定总肿瘤体积≥4.5cc(HR7.29,p<0.001)是症状性ARE的重要预测指标。
    结论:每天5次GKI-HSRS的中等总剂量与LC的高发生率和有症状的ARE的低发生率相关。
    OBJECTIVE: Gamma Knife Icon-based hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (GKI-HSRS) is a novel technical paradigm in the treatment of brain metastases that allows for both the dosimetric benefits of the GKI stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) platform as well as the biologic benefits of fractionation. We report mature local control and adverse radiation effect (ARE) outcomes following 5 fraction GKI-HSRS for intact brain metastases.
    METHODS: Patients with intact brain metastases treated with 5-fraction GKI-HSRS were retrospectively reviewed. Survival, local control, and adverse radiation effect rates were determined. Univariable and multivariable regression (MVA) were performed on potential predictive factors.
    RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-nine metastases in 146 patients were identified. The median clinical follow-up was 10.7 months (range 0.5-47.6). The median total dose and prescription isodose was 27.5 Gy (range, 20-27.5) in 5 daily fractions and 52% (range, 45-93), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 12.7 months, and the 1-year local failure rate was 15.2%. MVA identified a total dose of 27.5 Gy vs. ≤ 25 Gy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, p = 0.042), and prior chemotherapy exposure (HR 1.99, p = 0.015), as significant predictors of LC. The 1-year ARE rate was 10.8% and the symptomatic ARE rate was 1.8%. MVA identified a gross tumor volume of ≥ 4.5 cc (HR 7.29, p < 0.001) as a significant predictor of symptomatic ARE.
    CONCLUSIONS: Moderate total doses in 5 daily fractions of GKI-HSRS were associated with high rates of LC and a low incidence of symptomatic ARE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:根据未破裂脑动静脉畸形(ARUBA)的一项随机试验,保守治疗似乎优于未破裂脑动静脉畸形(AVM)的任何干预措施。本研究旨在评估前期和重复伽玛刀放射手术(GKRS)对符合ARUBA纳入标准的小AVM患者的安全性和有效性。
    方法:进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估未破裂的幼稚脑AVM的结果,其体积为5cc,符合接受GKRS治疗的ARUBA至少3年的随访。
    结果:从1992年到2014年,249例患者符合本研究的纳入标准。中位年龄为36岁[18-78]。病灶的中位治疗体积为1.3cc[0.4-5],并且63%的AVM位于雄辩的区域。基于放射外科的AVM评分为1-1.8(76%),Spetzler-Martin等级为II-III(73%),弗吉尼亚放射外科AVM量表≤1分(75%)。多达3次GKRS疗程后,总的AVM闭塞率为77.1%。边缘的中位剂量为24Gy[15-25],中位随访时间为45个月[36-205]。8例(3.2%)GKRS术后出血,对应于GKRS术后年出血率为1.03%。永久性症状性放射性改变率为2%(4次癫痫发作增加,1神经功能缺损)。
    结论:对于未破裂的小AVM(≤5cc),极低毒性率和高闭塞率有利于前期和重复GKRS。
    OBJECTIVE: According to A Randomized Trial of Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations (ARUBA) conservative treatment seems to be superior to any intervention for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (AVM). This study aims to evaluate safety and efficacy of upfront and repeated Gamma-Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) in patients harbouring small AVM fulfilling the inclusion criteria of ARUBA.
    METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate outcomes of unruptured naive brain AVM with a volume ⩽ 5cc eligible to ARUBA treated by GKRS with at least 3 years of follow-up.
    RESULTS: From 1992 to 2014, 249 patients were fulfilling the inclusion criteria of this study. The median age was 36 years [18-78]. The median treated volume of the nidus was 1.3 cc [0.4-5] and 63% of the AVM were in eloquent areas. Radiosurgery Based AVM score was 1-1.8 (76%), the Spetzler-Martin grade was II-III (73%), and the Virginia Radiosurgery AVM scale was ≤1point (75%). The overall AVM obliteration rate was 77.1% after up to 3 GKRS sessions. The median dose at the margin was 24 Gy [15-25] and the median follow-up was 45 months [36-205]. Eight patients (3.2%) experienced hemorrhage after GKRS, corresponding to a post-GKRS hemorrhage annual rate of 1.03%. Permanent symptomatic radio-induced changes rate was 2% (4 increased seizures, 1 neurological deficit).
    CONCLUSIONS: The very low toxicity rate and the high occlusion rate are preaching in favor of upfront and repeated GKRS for unruptured small AVM (≤5cc).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号