Monte Carlo (MC) techniques are regarded as an accurate method to simulate the dose calculation in radiotherapy for many years. The present paper aims to validate the simulated model of the 6-MV beam of OMID linear accelerator (BEHYAAR Company) by EGSnrc codes system and also investigate the effects of initial electron beam parameters (energy, radial full width at half maximum, and mean angular spread) on dose distributions. For this purpose, the comparison between the calculated and measured percentage depth dose (PDD) and lateral dose profiles was done by gamma index (GI) with 1%-1 mm acceptance criteria. MC model validating was done for 3 cm × 3 cm, 5 cm × 5 cm, 8 cm × 8 cm, 10 cm × 10 cm, and 20 cm × 20 cm field sizes. To study the sensitivity of model to beam parameters, the field size was selected as 10 cm × 10 cm and 30 cm × 30 cm. All lateral dose profiles were obtained at 10 cm. Excellent agreement was achieved with a 99.2% GI passing percentage for PDD curves and at least 93.8% GI for lateral dose profiles for investigated field sizes. Our investigation confirmed that the lateral dose profile severely depends on the considered source parameters in this study. PDD only considerably depends on the initial electron beam energy. Therefore, source parameters should not be specified independently. These results indicate that the current model of OMID 6-MV Linac is well established, and the accuracy of the simulation is high enough to be used in various applications.

UNASSIGNED: EBT-XD film specially designed for high dose verifications such as stereotactic treatments. The dose response of the film can be affected by several factors, the curly nature of the film being one of them. In this study this curly nature of the film was investigated for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plan verifications.
UNASSIGNED: For this study, 18 SBRT (11 prostate, 3 spines, and 4 lungs) cases were enrolled. For all the cases, VMAT plans were created in the Monaco treatment planning system and plan was delivered in Elekta Versa HD linear accelerator and delivered fluence was captured by EBT-XD films. All films were scanned with and without a compression plate. All the films were analyzed using the single-channel film method using the red channel.
UNASSIGNED: A significant difference in the gamma passing rates (GPR) for the films scanned with and without the compression plate was observed. The maximum percentage differences in GPR between using and not using a compression plate were 12.7% for 1% 1 mm, 8.1% for 2% 2 mm, 7.5% for 3% 2 mm, and 5% for 3% 3mm criteria. Similarly, the mean %difference in GPR was 5.8% for 1% 1 mm, 2.4% for 2% 2 mm, 1.6% for 3% 2 mm and 0.96% for 3% 3 mm criteria.
UNASSIGNED: The results suggest that placing a compression plate over the film during scanning provided a great advantage in achieving a more accurate gamma passing rate irrespective of gamma criteria.

OBJECTIVE: Carbon ion therapy treatments can be monitored non-invasively with in-beam Positron Emission Tomography (PET). At CNAO the INSIDE in-beam PET scanner has been used in a clinical trial (NCT03662373) to monitor cancer treatments with proton and carbon therapy. In this work we present the analysis results of carbon therapy data, acquired during the first phase of the clinical trial, analyzing data of nine patients treated at CNAO for various malignant tumors in the head-and-neck region.
METHODS: The patient group contained two patients requiring replanning, and seven patients without replanning, based on established protocols. For each patient the PET images acquired along the course of treatment were compared with a reference, applying two analysis methods: the beam-eye-view (BEV) method and the γ-index analysis. Time trends in several parameters were investigated, as well as the agreement with control CTs, if available.
RESULTS: Regarding the BEV-method, the average sigma value σ was 3.7 mm of range difference distributions for patients without changes (sensitivity of the INSIDE detector). The 3D-information obtained from the BEV analysis was partly in agreement with what was observed in the control CT. The data quality and quantity was insufficient for a definite interpretation of the time trends.
CONCLUSIONS: We analyzed carbon therapy data acquired with the INSIDE in-beam PET detector using two analysis methods. The data allowed to evaluate sensitivity of the INSIDE detector for carbon therapy and to make several recommendations for the future.

OBJECTIVE: SRS MapCHECK (SMC) is a commercially available patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) tool for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) applications. This study investigates the effects of degree of modulation, location off-axis, and low dose threshold (LDT) selection on gamma pass rates (GPRs) between SMC and treatment planning system, Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA), or Vancouver Island Monte Carlo (VMC++ algorithm) system calculated dose distributions.
METHODS: Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans with modulation factors (MFs) ranging from 2.7 to 10.2 MU/cGy were delivered to SMC at isocenter and 6 cm off-axis. SMC measured dose distributions were compared against AAA and VMC++ via gamma analysis (3%/1 mm) with LDT of 10% to 80% using SNC Patient software.
RESULTS: Comparing on-axis SMC dose against AAA and VMC++ with LDT of 10%, all AAA-calculated plans met the acceptance criteria of GPR ≥ 90%, and only one VMC++ calculated plan was marginally outside the acceptance criteria with pass rate of 89.1%. Using LDT of 80% revealed decreasing GPR with increasing MF. For AAA, GPRs reduced from 100% at MF of 2.7 MU/cGy to 57% at MF of 10.2 MU/cGy, and for VMC++ calculated plans, the GPRs reduced from 89% to 60% in the same MF range. Comparison of SMC dose off-axis against AAA and VMC++ showed more pronounced reduction of GPR with increasing MF. For LDT of 10%, AAA GPRs reduced from 100% to 83% in the MF range of 2.7 to 9.8 MU/cGy, and VMC++ GPR reduced from 100% to 91% in the same range. With 80% LDT, GPRs dropped from 100% to 42% for both algorithms.
CONCLUSIONS: MF, dose calculation algorithm, and LDT selections are vital in VMAT-based SRT PSQA. LDT of 80% enhances sensitivity of gamma analysis for detecting dose differences compared to 10% LDT. To achieve better agreement between calculated and SMC dose, it is recommended to limit the MF to 4.6 MU/cGy on-axis and 3.6 MU/cGy off-axis.

Dosimetry audits for passive motion management require dynamically-acquired measurements in a moving phantom to be compared to statically calculated planned doses. This study aimed to characterise the relationship between planning and delivery errors, and the measured dose in the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) thorax phantom, to assess different audit scoring approaches. Treatment plans were created using a 4DCT scan of the IROC phantom, equipped with film and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). Plans were created on the average intensity projection from all bins. Three levels of aperture complexity were explored: dynamic conformal arcs (DCAT), low-, and high-complexity volumetric modulated arcs (VMATLo, VMATHi). Simulated-measured doses were generated by modelling motion using isocenter shifts. Various errors were introduced including incorrect setup position and target delineation. Simulated-measured film doses were scored using gamma analysis and compared within specific regions of interest (ROIs) as well as the entire film plane. Positional offsets were estimated based on isodoses on the film planes, and point doses within TLD contours were compared. Motion-induced differences between planned and simulated-measured doses were evident even without introduced errors Gamma passing rates within target-centred ROIs correlated well with error-induced dose differences, while whole film passing rates did not. Isodose-based setup position measurements demonstrated high sensitivity to errors. Simulated point doses at TLD locations yielded erratic responses to introduced errors. ROI gamma analysis demonstrated enhanced sensitivity to simulated errors compared to whole film analysis. Gamma results may be further contextualized by other metrics such as setup position or maximum gamma.

UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to optimize efficiency in Monte Carlo (MC) simulation using sensitivity analysis of a beam model.
UNASSIGNED: The BEAMnrc-based model of 6 MV beam of a Siemens Primus linac was developed. For sensitivity analysis, the effect of the electron source, treatment head, and virtual phantom specifications on calculated percent depth dose (PDD) and lateral dose profiles was evaluated.
UNASSIGNED: The optimum mean energy (E) and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the intensity distribution of the electron beam were calculated as 6.7 MeV and 3 mm, respectively. Increasing E from 6.1 to 6.7 MeV, increased the PDD in the fall-off region by 4.70% and decreased the lateral profile by 8.76%. Changing the FWHM had a significant effect on the buildup region of PDD and the horns and out-of-field regions of the lateral profile. Increasing the collimators opening by 0.5 mm, PDD increased by 2.13% and the central and penumbra regions of profiles decreased by 1.98% and 11.40% respectively. Collimator properties such as thickness and density were effective in changing the penumbra (11.32% for 0.25 cm increment) and the out-of-field (22.82% for 3 g/cm3) regions of the lateral profiles.
UNASSIGNED: Analysis of a 6 MV model showed that PDD profiles were more sensitive to changes in energy than to FWHM of the electron source. The lateral profiles were sensitive to E, FWHM, and collimator opening. The density of the collimator affected only the out-of-field region of lateral profiles. The findings of this study may be used to make benchmarking of an MC beam model more efficient.

BACKGROUND: To develop a fully automated in-house gamma analysis software for the \"Cheese\" phantom-based delivery quality assurance (QA) of helical tomotherapy plans.
METHODS: The developed in-house software was designed to automate several procedures, which need to be manually performed using commercial software packages. The region of interest for the analysis was automatically selected by cropping out film edges and thresholding dose values (>10% of the maximum dose). The film-measured dose was automatically aligned to the computed dose using an image registration algorithm. An optimal film scaling factor was determined to maximize the percentage of pixels passing gamma (gamma passing rate) between the measured and computed doses (3%/3 mm criteria). This gamma analysis was repeated by introducing setup uncertainties in the anterior-posterior direction. For 73 tomotherapy plans, the gamma analysis results using the developed software were compared to those analyzed by medical physicists using a commercial software package.
RESULTS: The developed software successfully automated the gamma analysis for the tomotherapy delivery quality assurance. The gamma passing rate (GPR) calculated by the developed software was higher than that by the clinically used software by 3.0%, on average. While, for 1 of the 73 plans, the GPR by the manual gamma analysis was higher than 90% (pass/fail criteria), the gamma analysis using the developed software resulted in fail (GPR < 90%).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of automated and standardized gamma analysis software can improve both the clinical efficiency and veracity of the analysis results. Furthermore, the gamma analyses with various film scaling factors and setup uncertainties will provide clinically useful information for further investigations.

OBJECTIVE: The Medical Physics Working Group of the Radiation Therapy Study Group at the Japan Clinical Oncology Group is currently developing a virtual audit system for intensity-modulated radiation therapy dosimetry credentialing. The target dosimeters include films and array detectors, such as ArcCHECK (Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, Florida, USA) and Delta4 (ScandiDos, Uppsala, Sweden). This pilot study investigated the feasibility of our virtual audit system using previously acquired data.
METHODS: We analyzed 46 films (32 and 14 in the axial and coronal planes, respectively) from 29 institutions. Global gamma analysis between measured and planned dose distributions used the following settings: 3%/3 mm criteria (the dose denominator was 2 Gy), 30% threshold dose, no scaling of the datasets, and 90% tolerance level. In addition, 21 datasets from nine institutions were obtained for array evaluation. Five institutions used ArcCHECK, while the others used Delta4. Global gamma analysis was performed with 3%/2 mm criteria (the dose denominator was the maximum calculated dose), 10% threshold dose, and 95% tolerance level. The film calibration and gamma analysis were conducted with in-house software developed using Python (version 3.9.2).
RESULTS: The means ± standard deviations of the gamma passing rates were 99.4 ± 1.5% (range, 92.8%-100%) and 99.2 ± 1.0% (range, 97.0%-100%) in the film and array evaluations, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of virtual audits. The proposed virtual audit system will contribute to more efficient, cheaper, and more rapid trial credentialing than on-site and postal audits; however, the limitations should be considered when operating our virtual audit system.

Monte Carlo simulations of medical linear accelerator heads help in visualizing the energy spectrum and angular spread of photons and electrons, energy deposition, and scattering from each of the head components. Hence, the purpose of this study was to validate the Monte Carlo model of the Elekta synergy medical linear accelerator equipped with stereotactic radio surgical connical collimators. For this, the Elekta synergy medical linear accelerator was modelled using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code. The model results were validated using the measured data. The primary electron beam parameters, beam size, and energy were tuned to match the measured data; a dose profile with a field size of 40 × 40 cm2 and percentage depth dose with a field size of 10 × 10 cm2 were matched during tuning. The validation of the modelled data with the measurement results was performed using gamma analysis, point dose, and field size comparisons. For small radiation fields, relative output factors were also compared. The gamma analysis revealed good agreement between the Monte Carlo modeling results and the measured data. A gamma pass rate of more than 95% was obtained for field sizes of 40 × 40 cm2 to 2 × 2 cm2 with gamma criteria of 1% and 1 mm for the dose difference (DD) and distance to agreement (DTA), respectively; this gamma pass rate was more than 98% for the corresponding values of 2% and 2 mm for the DD and DTA, respectively. A gamma pass rate of more than 99% was obtained for a percentage depth dose with 1 mm and 1% criteria. The field size was also in good agreement with the measurement results, and the maximum deviation observed was 1.1%. The stereotactic cone field also passed this analysis with a gamma pass rate of more than 98% for dose profiles and 99% for the percentage depth dose. The small field output factor exhibited a deviation of 4.3%, 3.4%, and 1.9% for field sizes of 5 mm, 7.5 mm, and 10 mm, respectively. Thus, the Monte Carlo model of the Elekta Linear accelerator was successfully validated. The validation of radio surgical cones passed the analysis in terms of the dose profiles and percentage depth dose. The small field relative output factors exhibited deviations of up to 4.3%, and to resolve this, detector-specific and field-specific correction factors must be derived.

The high-density measurement (HDm) mode of the ArcCHECK device can achieve a twofold resolution enhancement compared to the standard measurement (Sm) mode. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of HDm on the gamma passing rate (GPR) for the patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) in head and neck cancer. We retrospectively evaluated 30 patients who underwent volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for head and neck cancer. Absolute gamma analysis was performed on Sm and HDm data. We also investigated correlations between the modulation complexity score for VMAT (MCSv) and differences in the GPR between the two measurement modes. The global GPR of Sm and HDm was 81.0% ± 8.4% and 82.6% ± 7.6% for the 2%/2 mm criterion, 94.0% ± 4.1% and 94.9% ± 3.6% for the 3%/2 mm criterion, and 96.6% ± 2.4% and 97.0% ± 2.4% for the 3%/3 mm criterion, respectively. HDm slightly improved GPR (p < 0.01) for the 2%/2 mm criterion. Differences in GPR between Sm and HDm for the 2%/2 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 3%/3 mm criteria were 1.6% ± 3.0%, 0.8% ± 2.0%, and 0.4% ± 1.2%, respectively. No correlation was identified between the MCSv and the difference in GPR between Sm and HDm. Despite an improvement in GPR with HDm, the difference in GPR between Sm and HDm was approximately 2% even when the tighter criteria were used. Moreover, the change in the GPR between Sm and HDm did not depend on plan complexity. Thus, the effect of HDm on GPR is limited for the PSQA in VMAT for head and neck cancer.