Gamma Knife®

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在研究伽玛刀®联合经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)和免疫疗法治疗原发性肝癌的临床疗效和安全性。
    目的:探讨伽玛刀联合TACE及免疫靶向治疗原发性肝癌的临床疗效和安全性。
    方法:回顾性收集2018年5月至2022年10月我院收治的51例原发性肝癌患者的临床资料。所有患者均接受伽玛刀®治疗联合TACE和免疫疗法。临床疗效,肝功能的变化,总生存期(OS),评估了不同治疗反应的患者的无进展生存期(PFS),并记录不良反应。
    结果:这项研究的最后一次随访是在2023年10月31日进行的。51例原发性肝癌患者的临床评估显示27例患者的部分反应(PR),占52.94%(27/51);16例疾病稳定(SD),占31.37%(16/51);进展性疾病(PD)8例,占15.69%(8/51)。客观有效率为52.94%,疾病控制率为84.31%。丙氨酸转氨酶,天冬氨酸转氨酶,乳酸脱氢酶,与治疗前相比,治疗后甲胎蛋白同工型水平下降(所有P=0.000)。PR组的中位OS为26个月[95%置信区间(95CI):19.946-32.054],SD+PD组为19个月(95CI:14.156-23.125),差异有统计学意义(P=0.015)。PR组的中位PFS为20个月(95CI:18.441-34.559),SD+PD组的中位PFS为12个月(95CI:8.745-13.425),差异有统计学意义(P=0.002)。治疗过程中常见的不良反应包括恶心呕吐(39.22%),血小板减少症(27.45%),和白细胞减少症(25.49%),无治疗相关死亡报告。
    结论:伽玛刀®联合TACE及免疫靶向治疗原发性肝癌安全有效,对提高患者临床获益率及肝功能均有较好的效果。
    BACKGROUND: This study was designed to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of Gamma Knife® combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and immunotherapy in the treatment of primary liver cancer.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of Gamma Knife® combined with TACE and immune-targeted therapy in the treatment of primary liver cancer.
    METHODS: Clinical data from 51 patients with primary liver cancer admitted to our hospital between May 2018 and October 2022 were retrospectively collected. All patients underwent Gamma Knife® treatment combined with TACE and immunotherapy. The clinical efficacy, changes in liver function, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with different treatment responses were evaluated, and adverse reactions were recorded.
    RESULTS: The last follow-up for this study was conducted on October 31, 2023. Clinical evaluation of the 51 patients with primary liver cancer revealed a partial response (PR) in 27 patients, accounting for 52.94% (27/51); stable disease (SD) in 16 patients, accounting for 31.37% (16/51); and progressive disease (PD) in 8 patients, accounting for 15.69% (8/51). The objective response rate was 52.94%, and the disease control rate was 84.31%. Alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, and alpha-fetoprotein isoform levels decreased after treatment compared with pretreatment (all P = 0.000). The median OS was 26 months [95% confidence interval (95%CI): 19.946-32.054] in the PR group and 19 months (95%CI: 14.156-23.125) in the SD + PD group, with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.015). The median PFS was 20 months (95%CI: 18.441-34.559) in the PR group and 12 months (95%CI: 8.745-13.425) in the SD + PD group, with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.002). Common adverse reactions during treatment included nausea and vomiting (39.22%), thrombocytopenia (27.45%), and leukopenia (25.49%), with no treatment-related deaths reported.
    CONCLUSIONS: Gamma Knife® combined with TACE and immune-targeted therapy is safe and effective in the treatment of primary liver cancer and has a good effect on improving the clinical benefit rate and liver function of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的40年中,多个脑转移瘤的立体定向放射外科(SRS)得到了发展,使中心可以在单个治疗部分中治疗越来越多的脑转移瘤。HyperArcTM计划优化技术是一种这样的发展,可以简化单个等中心的多发性转移瘤的治疗。一些研究已经调查了HyperArc与射波刀或伽玛刀相比的计划质量,然而,包括所有三种模式的研究数量有限。这项研究的目的是在三个SRS平台之间评估计划质量,评估十名患者的多个布兰转移,每位患者的范围为3至8个转移。建立了严格的计划工作流程,以避免偏向任何特定的治疗平台。计划质量是通过对有风险器官的剂量来评估的,帕迪克一致性指数(PCI),梯度指数(GI),全球效率指数(Gη)和对正常脑组织的剂量。这项研究的结果发现,在伽玛刀计划中观察到的平均PCI明显低于HyperArc和Cyberknife。HyperArc计划观察到的光束开启时间明显较短,比Cyberknife和GammaKnife计划快10到20倍。发现伽玛刀和射波刀产生的计划具有明显优越的GI,与HyperArc计划相比,全球效率指数和健康大脑接收量大于12Gy(V12Gy)。可见损伤体积影响系统之间剂量度量的相对差异。研究表明,所有三种治疗方式都为多发性脑转移瘤的SRS治疗提供了高质量的计划,每个人都有各自的好处和局限性。 .
    Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of multiple brain metastases has evolved over the last 40 years allowing centres to treat an increasing number of brain metastases in a single treatment fraction. HyperArcTMplanning optimisation technique is one such development that streamlines the treatment of multiple metastases with a single isocentre. Several studies have investigated the plan quality of HyperArc compared to CyberKnife or Gamma Knife, however there are limited number of studies that include all three modalities. It is the aim of this study to provide an assessment of plan quality between the three SRS platforms across ten patients with multiple brain metastases ranging from three to eight metastases per patient. Strict planning workflows were established to avoid bias towards any particular treatment platform. Plan quality was assessed through dose to organs at risk, Paddick conformity index (PCI), gradient index (GI), global efficiency index (Gη) and dose to normal brain tissue. Results from this study found mean PCI observed across Gamma Knife plans was significantly lower than HyperArc and CyberKnife. HyperArc plans observed significantly shorter beam-on times which were 10 to 20 times faster than CyberKnife and Gamma Knife plans. Gamma Knife and CyberKnife were found to produce plans with significantly superior GI, global efficiency index and the volume of healthy brain receiving greater than 12 Gy (V12Gy) when compared to HyperArc plans. Lesion volume was seen to influence the relative difference in dose metrics between systems. The study revealed that all three treatment modalities produced high quality plans for the SRS treatment of multiple brain metastases, each with respective benefits and limitations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    UNASSIGNED: To report a case of retinal detachment with unique optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings after Gamma Knife® (GK; Elekta Instrument AB, Stockholm, Sweden) treatment for choroidal melanoma (CM).
    UNASSIGNED: A 48-year-old woman underwent GK therapy for CM in her right eye from the macula to the temporal side. While the tumor subsequently shrank, the patient developed radiation retinopathy, which was treated with laser photocoagulation. The tumor lesions later subsided; however, her visual acuity (VA) decreased 8 years after the initial treatment. Although the tumor lesions in the right eye had become scarred, a bullous retinal detachment with fixed folds occurred in the superior-nasal quadrants. OCT examination revealed a preretinal membrane, vitreoretinal traction, and an inner retinal break; however, no outer retinal break was clearly detectable. MRI scans showed no increase in tumorous lesions, and 123I-IMP SPECT imaging showed no photon accumulation. Thus, it was determined that there was no tumor activity. The corrected VA in her right eye was light perception, and it was determined that there was no indication for vitreous surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: In this case, an inner retinal break was formed by the vitreoretinal traction around the scarred tumor and radiation retinopathy, thus suggesting the possibility of the development of a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment presumably complicated with an outer retinal break.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号