BACKGROUND: The most known and commonly studied behavioral obstacle to dental care is dental anxiety. An obstacle that is less studied though no less problematic is excessive gag reflex, which can severely impede dental treatment. Another understudied and possibly related syndrome is emetophobia (a specific phobia of vomiting).
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine possible comorbidity amongst self-reported emetophobia, dental anxiety, and excessive gagging in the dental office.
METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted using the following self-report questionnaires: Dental Anxiety Scale, Gagging Problem Assessment, Gagging Assessment Scale (GAS), and Specific Phobia of Vomiting Inventory (SPOVI).
RESULTS: In all, 164 participants fully completed the questionnaires (87.8% female; mean age, 34 ± 11.07 years). Positive correlations were found amongst all variables (P < .001). High gagging (GAS > 6) was associated with a 7.29 times (P < .000) greater risk of positive emetophobia (SPOVI ≥ 10). Linear regression analyses revealed that the intensity of the reflex and the experience of gagging upon encountering odours in the dental office as well as dental anxiety and vomiting phobia significantly predicted participants\' gagging scores as evaluated by GAS (R2 = 0.59; F = 21.16; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that excessive gagging reflex in the dental office is closely related both to dental anxiety and to emetophobia.

Dysphagia occurs in various diseases and constitutes a major concern in patients with psychiatric disorders. The Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability (MASA) comprises 24 clinical parameters designed to identify swallowing disorders. One item in MASA, the \"gag reflex\", involves an unpleasant stimulus, which means that it is often omitted when the test is administered. The aims of this study were to determine the presence/absence of dysphagia in patients with psychiatric disorders using the MASA and determine its diagnostic accuracy when the gag reflex item was excluded in patients with psychiatric disorders. The study participants comprised patients admitted to a hospital psychiatric ward in whom dysphagia had been suspected based on oral intake status. The following items were determined: age, total MASA score (23 out of 24 items, giving a score out of 195 points), body mass index score, milligram equivalents of chlorpromazine, and the Food Intake Level Scale score. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of swallowing problems as assessed by videoendoscopic or videofluoroscopic examination. The scores for each item investigated in the MASA, including the total score, were compared between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was carried out to determine the optimum cut-off value. The total MASA score, which excluded the \"gag reflex\" item, was lower in the problematic swallowing group than in the non-problematic swallowing group. The MASA scores for cooperation, respiratory, dysphasia, tongue coordination, oral preparation, pharyngeal phase, and pharyngeal response tended to be lower in the problematic swallowing group. Furthermore, an optimum cut-off value of 169 points (sensitivity, 0.92; specificity, 0.68; likelihood ratio, 2.84) was identified. These results indicate that the cut-off MASA score is effective in screening for dysphagia, even when the \"gag reflex\" item is excluded.

The aim of this study is to see if microcurrent electrical stimulation on two acupoints, auricular and Hegus, can help patients prevent their gag reflex.
This was an in vivo cross-sectional study.
Thirty patients were randomly assigned to three groups: A, B, or C, of ten patients present in each group. Group A and Group B undergone electroacupuncture (microcurrent electrical stimulation) using electroacupuncture device on auricular point and Hegus point (Li 4), respectively, for 1 min and Group C formed the placebo group, point Shou San Li (Li 10). The gag severity index and the gag prevention index were used to measure the gag reflex, which was done in two steps.
SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL, USA) version 24 software was used for statistical analysis. Paired t-test, one-way analysis of variance test, post hoc Bonferroni test was used to analyse and compare the data.
It was found that Point A and Point B were significantly effective in reducing the severity of gag reflex. Point C demonstrated insignificant results. In addition, Point B (Hegus [Li4]) is more effective than Point A (auricular) in controlling the gag reflex in patients within the set age group of 20-70 years of age.
Microcurrent electrical stimulation is a useful adjuvant in the treatment of unfavorable gag reflexes during routine dental procedures. Point Hegus and point auricular acupuncture are both useful in decreasing the severity of gag reflex, with point Hegus being more effective than point auricular.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of laser acupuncture on controlling gag reflexes by stimulating pericardium 6 (PC6) and conception vessel 24 (CV24) acupuncture points in patients in need of taking dental impressions.
In this randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial study, in 30 patients aged 20-60 years, alginate impressions were taken in the prosthetic and orthodontic clinic at the Dental School of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. The participants were randomly divided into 2 groups. The intervention and the control group each included 15 subjects. Both groups were in the exact status of age, gender, and indexes, including the Gagging Severity Index (GSI), Subjective Severity of Gag Reflex (SSGR), Vomiting Number (VN), as well as the Improvement Index, measured. Both groups underwent alginate impressions pre-and postintervention. PC6 and CV24 acupuncture points were irradiated for 4 seconds in contact mode with a laser prob pressure on the skin that was slightly bleached without causing pain for the patient. The laser energy was 0.8 J with an energy density of 2.854 J/cm2 at the surface of the probe (spot size, 0.28 cm2). The total radiation dose was 45.7 J/cm2, and the power density was 714.2 w/cm2.
The findings showed that SSGR and VN significantly improved (P ≤ .05) in the intervention group compared to the control group, but GSI was higher in the intervention group. In the intragroups analysis for the comparison between before and after the intervention, it was found that although the average GSI was elevated after the intervention rather than before, the difference was insignificant (P = .083). Also, after the intervention, the average SSGR was significantly reduced (P< .001), and VN was insignificantly lessened (P = .334). Moreover, it was observed after the intervention rather than before that GSI was significantly increased (P< .001), whereas SSGR significantly declined (P< .001), and VN meaningfully decreased (P = .001). The observations demonstrated that the Improvement Index status was significantly better in the intervention group compared to the control group (P = .002).
This study found that the application of laser acupuncture on PC6 and CV24 acupuncture points might be effective in reducing the gag reflex and can be used as a noninvasive technique while taking dental impressions.

Objective: Gagging is a problem for many dental patients, as well as patients undergoing medical procedures, such as intubation. Research to date on the gag reflex has been limited by a lack of objective measures for measuring this reflex. Materials and Methods: A validated quantitative method was used to measure if acupuncture or transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) at Pericardium 6 (PC 6) and Stomach 36 (ST 36) suppressed the gag reflex, compared with a sham placebo. The subjects were 60 healthy adults randomly chosen to receive acupuncture, TEAS, or sham-TEAS on PC 6, located on the forearm, and ST 36, located on the lower leg. The gag reflex was measured by inserting a saliva ejector slowly down each participant\'s throat to determine the maximum tolerance of the gag reflex; the insertion length was used as an index of this reflex. Results: There was a significant difference in pre- and postintervention insertion lengths in all groups (paired t-test; all groups; P < 0.001). The differences in the insertion length among the groups (P = 0.76) and the interaction effect (group × time) were not significant (P = 0.79; 2-way analysis of variance). Conclusions: This study suggested that PC 6 and ST 36 stimulation was no different than placebo for alleviating the gag reflex.

BACKGROUND: Gagging condition is among factors contributing to avoidance behavior to seek the dental treatment, and rigorous management is still under investigation. This study aims to explore the effect of listening to the self-preference music in reducing the gagging condition during dental impression procedure towards gagging patient. Physiology and psychological impact to the procedure with and without musical intervention are investigated.
METHODS: A group of twenty-five patients that will undergo impression procedure was randomly selected. Self-reported Gagging Problem Assessment (GPA-pa-SF) questionnaires was then administered to determine the severity of gagging. Maxillary impression was taken twice within the same patient in two different time intervals (1st without any intervention and 2nd with musical intervention). During both procedures, the pulse rate/minutes (BPM) and arterial oxygen saturation of haemoglobin (SpO2%) were recorded and psychometric assessment was evaluated through the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14).
RESULTS: Mean value of BPM was significantly reduced with music (p < 0.05) while SpO2 was considerably has positive effect although was found no significant. The OHIP 14 demonstrated that functional limitation and psychological disability were the most affected before the intervention. Overall, musical stimuli had a significant effect on stress reduction in both physiological (p < 0.05) and psychological (p < 0.05) outcomes except for social disability and handicap items.
CONCLUSIONS: Listening to self-preference music during impression taking had improved physiology and psychology of gagging patients thus, can be attributed to the better dental management.

This randomized trial aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the GAGLESS mouthpiece for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with that of the conventional mouthpiece. In all, 90 participants were divided into the GAGLESS mouthpiece and conventional mouthpiece groups. The primary endpoint was the severity of pain using the visual analog scale (VAS), and secondary endpoints were examination time, past history of endoscopy, success of the procedure, systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure, oxygen saturation, pulse rate before and after EGD, and adverse events. Endoscopy was completed in all cases, and no complications were observed. VAS, when passing the scope through the pharynx, was 2.5 ± 2.4 and 2.0 ± 1.9 cm (p = 0.24) in the conventional and GAGLESS groups, respectively, and that, throughout the examination, was 2.5 ± 2.4 and 1.7 ± 1.5 cm (p = 0.06), respectively. The difference in blood pressure between the GAGLESS and conventional groups was not significant for SBP (p = 0.08) and significant for DBP (p = 0.03). The post-EGD difference in DBP was significantly lower in the GAGLESS group than in the conventional group. The results indicate that GAGLESS mouthpieces had a lower VAS during endoscopy than the conventional mouthpieces, and the changes in blood pressure were smaller with the GAGLESS mouthpiece.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of interactive distraction technique on the severity of gagging and success of impression taking in children between age 5 and 10 years.
METHODS: This single blind, randomised controlled trial recruited 48 children aged 5-10 years requiring maxillary impressions. Selected children were randomly allocated to one of the two groups: (1) Test group, use of interactive distraction, and (2) Control group, no use of interactive distraction, during impression taking. Dental anxiety was scored using Facial Image Scale (FIS) before and after impression taking. Gagging-related Impression Success Scale (GISS) and Gagging Severity Index (GSI) were recorded by a blinded assessor. Nonparametric tests were used to compare the variables between the groups.
RESULTS: Maxillary impressions were successfully recorded in all children in the Test group; either with no gag (87.5%) or with gag (12.5%). In 33.3% control children impressions could not be recorded. Statistically significant, strong association was found between the interactive distraction and GISS (p = 0.003, Cramer\'s V = 0.32). Mean GSI and post-impression FIS scores were significantly lesser in the Test group (p = 0.029 and p = 0.048, respectively). Significant increase in the mean FIS scores was observed after recording impression in the Control group. Post-impression FIS showed significant positive correlation with GSI (Test: p = 0.003, Control: p = 0.009) and significant inverse correlation with GISS (Test: p = 0.003, Control: p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Interactive distraction technique used in this study is a simple, non-invasive and cost-effective method to effectively manage gagging and successfully record a maxillary impression in children between age 5 and 10 years.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the impact of transoral rigid laryngoscopy (TORL) and transnasal flexible laryngoscopy (TNFL) methods on intraocular pressure (IOP).
METHODS: This study included 100 patients, with 50 patients undergoing a TORL, and 50 patients a TNFL. Before procedure IOP values were recorded by an ophthalmologist using Icare Pro tonometry, also immediately post procedure, and at the 15th, 30th and 60th minute after laryngoscopy.
RESULTS: Both groups were similar in terms of age, gender, mean body mass index (BMI), and pre-laryngoscopy IOP values. When the TNFL and TORL groups were compared, no significant differences were observed between pre-laryngoscopy, and 60th minute IOP values (p = 0.891, p = 0.149, respectively). IOP values measured immediately after laryngoscopy, and at the 15th and 30th minute were significantly higher in the TORL group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.002, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated higher IOP fluctuations in the TORL group, when compared to the TNFL group. For this reason, TNFL may be considered a safer method for evaluating laryngeal tissues in conditions that require lower IOP fluctuation as in glaucoma. However, further studies are required to clarify the exact effects of IOP fluctuations during TNFL and TORL in patients with glaucoma.

Background: Gagging during transesophageal echocardiography examination (TEE) can be distressing and even dangerous for patients. The needling of acupuncture point CV24 was described to be effective in reducing the gag reflex during TEE in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Methods: We describe a proposal for a prospective, randomized, patient, practitioner and assessor-blinded, single-center trial with two arms/groups; real acupuncture will be compared to placebo acupuncture. A total of 60 (30 per group) patients scheduled for elective TEE in order to exclude a cardiac embolic source, endocarditis or for valve failure evaluation will be recruited according to patients\' selection criteria and receive either indwelling fixed intradermal needles at acupoints CV24 and bilateral PC6 or placebo needles at the same areas. Patients, the practitioners who will perform the TEE procedure, and the assessor of the outcome measures will be unaware of the group\'s (real or placebo) allocation. Results: The primary outcome is the intensity of gagging, measured using verbal rating scale (VRS-11) from 0 = no gagging to 10 = intolerable gagging. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of gagging, the use of rescue medication, patients\' satisfaction with relief of unwanted side effects during TEE procedure, success of patients\' blinding (patients\' opinion to group allocation), heart rate and oxygen saturation measured by pulse oxymetry. Conclusions: To study the effects of acupuncture against gagging during TEE, we test the needling of acupoints CV24 and PC6 bilaterally. A placebo acupuncture is used for the control group. Trial registration number: NCT NCT0382142.