GVHD prophylaxis

GVHD 预防
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:基于抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)的移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)预防被广泛用于错配无关供体异基因造血细胞移植(HCT),尽管最佳剂量仍不清楚。尽管最近的文献表明,与基于ATG的方案相比,基于PTCy的方案的结局有所改善,但这些研究使用剂量的ATG≥5mg/kg。因此,我们分析了我们中心使用基于ATG的低剂量方案的HLA9/10MMUD同种异体HCTs的结局.
    方法:我们回顾性分析了2015年至2022年在渥太华医院接受同种异体HCT的所有成年人使用基于较低剂量ATG的方案的HLA9/10MMUD同种异体HCT的结果。有关人口统计的数据,调理方案,ATG的剂量,GVHD的比率,缓解的持续时间,和生存,进行了收集和分析。
    结果:77名(n=77)患者(男性62.3%;中位年龄50岁)接受了来自MMUD的同种异体HCT。大多数(81%;n=63)接受了2.5mg/kg的兔ATG,其余18.2%(n=14)接受了4.5mg/kg。24.7%(n=19)发生II-IV级急性GVHD,而32.5%(n=25)患者发生任何慢性GVHD。经过21个月的中位随访,28.6%的患者复发.两年操作系统,GRFS,CIR,NRM为60.6%,45.3%,16.9%,和18.2%。ATG的剂量(2.5mg/kg与在单变量或多变量分析中,4.5mg/kg)与结果无关。
    结论:与使用ATG剂量≥5mg/kg的已发表研究相比,使用较低剂量ATG预防GVHD可能潜在地导致接受MMUD同种异体HCT的患者的预后改善。需要进一步的研究来直接比较低剂量ATG与基于PTCy的方案,以确定这些患者的理想GVHD预防。
    BACKGROUND: Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) based graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis is widely used for mismatched unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) although optimal dose remains unclear. Although recent literature suggested improved outcomes with PTCy-based regimens when compared to ATG-based regimens these studies used doses of ATG ≥5 mg/kg. Thus, we analyzed outcomes of HLA 9/10 MMUD allogeneic HCTs using lower-dose ATG-based regimens at our center.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of HLA 9/10 MMUD allogeneic HCTs using lower dose ATG-based regimens for all adults undergoing allogeneic HCT at The Ottawa Hospital from 2015 to 2022. Data regarding demographics, conditioning regimen, dose of ATG, rates of GVHD, duration of remission, and survival, were collected and analyzed.
    RESULTS: Seventy-seven (n = 77) patients (males 62.3%; median age 50 years) underwent allogeneic HCT from MMUD. Majority(81%; n = 63) received 2.5 mg/kg of rabbit ATG and remaining 18.2% (n = 14) received 4.5 mg/kg. Grade II-IV acute GVHD occurred in 24.7% (n = 19) while any chronic GVHD occurred in 32.5% (n = 25) patients. After a median follow-up of 21 months, relapse occurred in 28.6% of patients. Two-year OS, GRFS, CIR, and NRM were 60.6%, 45.3%, 16.9%, and 18.2% respectively. Dose of ATG (2.5 mg/kg vs. 4.5 mg/kg) was not associated with outcomes in either univariate or multivariate analyses.
    CONCLUSIONS: When compared to published studies using ATG doses ≥5 mg/kg, GVHD prophylaxis using lower dose ATG may potentially lead to improved outcomes in patients undergoing MMUD allogeneic HCT. Further studies are needed to directly compare lower dose ATG to PTCy-based regimens to determine ideal GVHD prophylaxis for these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:缺乏分析造血干细胞移植(HSCT)过程中儿童口腔黏膜炎(OM)与营养失衡之间关系的研究。这项研究的目的是比较非恶性疾病(NMD)和恶性疾病(MD)的儿科患者在HSCT期间OM和营养失衡的危险因素。
    方法:年龄数据,性别,原发疾病,移植类型,调理方案,GVHD预防,胃肠道毒性,OM,体重减轻或增加的百分比,营养重新定位,从132份病历中回顾性收集总生存期(OS).然后比较NMD(n=70)和MD(n=62)患者的数据。
    结果:两组间OM的严重程度相似。NMD组OM的主要危险因素是白消安预处理方案,而在MD组中,使用环孢菌素和甲氨蝶呤预防GVHD。OM对任何组的体重减轻或体重增加都没有影响。在NMD中,液体超负荷导致的体重增加更为明显,并且与较低的年龄范围相关。两组间OS相似,未受OM影响。
    结论:OM模式在有或没有MD的儿科患者中相似,但是决定这些口腔病变的因素是不同的。两组之间的体重变化存在差异,并且这些更改与OM无关。
    BACKGROUND: There is a lack of studies analyzing the association between oral mucositis (OM) and nutritional imbalance in children during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The aim of this study was to compare the risk factors for OM and nutritional imbalance during HSCT in pediatric patients with nonmalignant diseases (NMD) and malignant diseases (MD).
    METHODS: Data on age, sex, primary disease, transplantation type, conditioning regimen, GVHD prophylaxis, gastrointestinal toxicity, OM, percent body weight loss or gain, nutritional repositioning, and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively collected from the 132 medical records. The data were then compared between patients with NMD (n = 70) and MD (n = 62).
    RESULTS: OM had a similar severity between the groups. The primary risk factor for OM in the NMD group was the conditioning regimen with busulfan, while in the MD group it was GVHD prophylaxis with cyclosporin and methotrexate. OM did not have an impact on body weight loss or gain in any of the groups. In the NMD, body weight gain due to fluid overload was more pronounced and associated with a lower age range. OS was similar between the groups and was not affected by OM.
    CONCLUSIONS: OM pattern was similar in pediatric patients with or without MD, but the factors that determined these oral lesions were different. There were disparities in body weight changes between the two groups, and these changes were not associated to OM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    匹配无关供体异基因干细胞移植(MUDHSCT)后第1、3、6和11天的甲氨蝶呤(MTX)剂量是一种常见的移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)预防方案。然而,MTX与预处理化疗的重叠毒性有时需要省略第四剂MTX.先前的单机构研究显示,比较接受三剂与四剂MTX的患者的结果相互矛盾。但就我们所知,伴随抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)的作用尚未报道。回顾了2009年至2023年期间接受MUDHSCT的患者的图表。患者接受兔ATG(胸腺球蛋白),在第-3天给予0.5mg/kg,在第-2天给予2mg/kg,在第-1天给予2.5mg/kg。MTX在第+1天给予15mg/m2,在第+3、+6和+11天给予10mg/m2。严重的粘膜炎是第11天MTX遗漏的最常见适应症(82%)。我们确定了292名患者(3剂量队列中的116名和4剂量队列中的176名)。中位随访时间为23个月(范围1-151)。4剂量队列中的患者更常见的是男性(68%vs.50%,p<0.01),接受了降低强度的预处理方案(38.0%vs.22%,p<0.01),年龄较大(中位数58vs.54年,p=0.02),并在较早的时代接受了移植(2014年HSCT中位数与2018年,p<0.01)。对于以下结果,队列之间没有统计学上的显着差异:急性GVHD(aGVHD)(HR1.1,95%CI0.9-1.5),慢性GVHD(cGVHD)(HR1.3,95%CI0.8-1.6),无复发生存率(RFS)(HR1.0,95%CI0.6-1.5),非复发死亡率(NRM)(HR1.4,95%CI0.9-2.2),和总生存期(OS)(HR1.2,95%CI0.9-1.7)。两组在14天时具有与嗜中性粒细胞植入相似的中值时间。当加入ATG时,省略+11天的MTX不会显著影响aGVHD的植入率或累积发生率,cGVHD,RFS,NRM,和OS。
    Methotrexate (MTX) doses on days +1, +3, +6, and +11 after match unrelated donor allogeneic stem cell transplant (MUD HSCT) is a common graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimen. However, the overlapping toxicity of MTX with conditioning chemotherapy sometimes warrants the omission of the fourth dose of MTX. Prior single-institution studies showed conflicting results comparing the outcomes of patients who received three versus four doses of MTX, but to our knowledge, the effect of concomitant antithymocyte globulin (ATG) has not been reported. Charts of patients who underwent MUD HSCT between 2009 and 2023 were reviewed. Patients received rabbit ATG (Thymoglobulin), given at 0.5 mg/kg on day -3, 2 mg/kg on day -2, and 2.5 mg/kg on day -1. MTX is given at 15 mg/m2 on day +1 and 10 mg/m2 on days +3, +6, and +11. Severe mucositis was the most common indication for day +11 MTX omission (82%). We identified 292 patients (116 in 3 dose cohort and 176 in 4 dose cohort). Median follow-up was 23 months (range 1-151). Patients in the 4 doses cohort were more frequently male (68% vs. 50%, p < 0.01), received a reduced intensity conditioning regimen (38.0% vs. 22%, p < 0.01), were older (median 58 vs. 54 years, p = 0.02), and received a transplant in the earlier era (median HSCT year 2014 vs. 2018, p < 0.01). A statistically significant difference was not evidenced between the cohorts for the following outcomes: acute GVHD (aGVHD) (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.5), chronic GVHD (cGVHD) (HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.8-1.6), relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.6-1.5), non-relapse mortality (NRM) (HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.9-2.2), and overall survival (OS) (HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.9-1.7). Both cohorts had similar median time to neutrophil engraftment at 14 days. When ATG is incorporated, omission of day +11 MTX does not significantly impact the rate of engraftment or cumulative incidence of aGVHD, cGVHD, RFS, NRM, and OS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:记忆T细胞是提供适应性免疫的免疫细胞的异质群体。它的完全恢复似乎对于移植物抗肿瘤反应至关重要,这为急性白血病患者的生物治疗提供了机会。错配或单倍体供体的使用有所增加,由于移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)预防的修饰,这已成为可能。材料和方法:65例白血病患者(急性髓系白血病-40例,急性淋巴细胞白血病-25例),中位年龄33(17-61)岁,2016年至2019年在国家血液学研究中心接受了allo-HSCT。根据GVHD预防对T细胞恢复的影响,将患者分为三组:基于马抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)的方案(n=32),马ATG联合移植后环磷酰胺(PT-Cy)(n=18),和离体T细胞消耗(n=15)。结果:移植后的早期(100天之前)的特征是T初始的绝对数量显着降低,ATG+PT-Cy方案或离体T细胞耗竭后患者外周血中的记忆干细胞和T中枢记忆细胞高于基于ATG的预防(p<0.05)。此外,原始T和记忆干细胞的强烈消耗阻止了GVHD的发展,以每微升1.31个细胞的截止值确定CD8+初始T和记忆干细胞的绝对数量似乎是评估发生急性GVHD风险的一个观点(p=0.008).T细胞恢复的动力学表明,在所有患者中,同种异体移植后不久,循环或骨髓驻留的T效应细胞都参与其中。但是使用具有离体T细胞消耗的操纵移植物需要原始和记忆干细胞的参与。同种异体移植后T细胞恢复对白血病复发无明显影响。结论:这些实验结果有助于提供对移植后早期发生的免疫学事件的最佳理解,并有助于进行同种异体移植的患者的GVHD预防的合理选择。我们的研究证明了移植后环磷酰胺和离体T细胞耗竭以及马ATG预防GVHD的免疫无效性。
    Background: Memory T cells are a heterogeneous population of immune cells that provide adaptive immunity. Its full recovery seems essential for graft-versus-tumor reactions that provide an opportunity for biological cure in patients with acute leukemia. The use of mismatched or haploidentical donors has increased, which has become possible because of modifications in graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Materials and Methods: Sixty-five leukemia patients (acute myeloid leukemia - 40, acute lymphoblastic leukemia - 25), median age 33 (17-61) years, underwent allo-HSCT from 2016 to 2019 in the National Research Centre for Hematology. Patients were divided into three groups based on the impact of GVHD prophylaxis on T cell recovery: horse antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-based regimen (n=32), horse ATG combined with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) (n=18), and ex vivo T cell depletion (n=15). Results: The early period after transplantation (before day +100) was characterized by significantly lower absolute numbers of T naïve, memory stem and T central memory cells in peripheral blood in patients after ATG+PT-Cy-regimen or ex vivo T cell depletion than after ATG-based prophylaxis (p<0.05). Moreover, strong depletion of naïve T and memory stem cells prevents the development of GVHD, and determining the absolute number of CD8+ naïve T and memory stem cells with a cutoff of 1.31 cells per microliter seems to be a perspective in assessing the risks of developing acute GVHD (p=0.008). The dynamics of T cell recovery showed the involvement of either circulating or bone marrow resident T effector cells shortly after allogeneic transplantation in all patients, but the use of manipulated grafts with ex vivo T cell depletion requires the involvement of naïve and memory stem cells. There was no significant effect of T cell recovery on leukemia relapse after allogeneic transplantation. Conclusion: These experimental outcomes contribute to providing the best understanding of immunological events that occur early after transplantation and help in the rational choice of GVHD prophylaxis in patients who will undergo allogeneic transplantation. Our study demonstrated the comparable immunological effects of posttransplant cyclophosphamide and ex vivo T cell depletion and immunological inefficiency of horse ATG for GVHD prevention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:当没有HLA匹配的相关或无关供者时,单倍体相合造血干细胞移植(haplo-HCT)是一种合适的选择。由于其有效抑制GVHD及其安全性,使用移植后环磷酰胺(PTCy)的Haplo-HCT在全球范围内越来越多地进行。
    方法:我们进行了一项全国范围的大型队列研究,回顾性分析了2010年至2019年间366例接受PTCyhaplo-HCT的急性髓细胞白血病患者,并确定预后因素。
    结果:多变量Cox分析显示,受者年龄较大(≥60岁),男性捐赠者给男性接受者,巨细胞病毒IgG阴性供体到巨细胞病毒IgG阳性受体,细胞遗传学风险很低,移植时的非完全缓解状态,和HCT病史与较差的总生存期(OS)独立相关。根据每个危险比,对这些因素进行评分(1-2分),并按其总分分为三组:有利(0-1分),中间(2-3分),和贫困(4分或以上)组,两年OS率为79.9%,49.2%,和25.1%,分别(P<0.001)。
    结论:本研究揭示了伴PTCy的haplo-HCT的显著预后因素,基于这些因素的评分系统可用于预测结果。
    Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) is an appropriate option when an HLA-matched related or unrelated donor is not available. Haplo-HCT using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is being increasingly performed worldwide due to its effective suppression of GVHD and its safety.
    We conducted a large nationwide cohort study to retrospectively analyze 366 patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing haplo-HCT with PTCy between 2010 and 2019 and to identify prognostic factors.
    A multivariate Cox analysis revealed that an older recipient age (≥60 years), a male donor to a male recipient, a cytomegalovirus IgG-negative donor to a cytomegalovirus IgG-positive recipient, a poor cytogenetic risk, a noncomplete remission status at the time of transplantation, and a history of HCT were independently associated with worse overall survival (OS). Based on each hazard ratio, these factors were scored (1-2 points) and stratified by their total score into three groups: favorable (0-1 points), intermediate (2-3 points), and poor (4 points or more) groups, and 2-year OS rates were 79.9%, 49.2%, and 25.1%, respectively (P < 0.001).
    The present study revealed significant prognostic factors in haplo-HCT with PTCy, and a scoring system based on these factors may be used to predict outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:脐带血(UCB)是异基因造血干细胞移植的有价值的替代供体来源。探索了各种预处理方案和移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)预防方法,以改善脐带血移植(UCBT)的结果。然而,其效果的差异仍不清楚。
    目的:阐明在全国范围内不同疾病类型的条件治疗方案和GVHD预防对UCBT结局的影响差异,回顾性研究。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了预处理方案和GVHD预防对急性髓细胞性白血病(AML,n=1126)患者采用环磷酰胺/全身照射(CY/TBI)为基础的UCBT治疗结局的影响,急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL;n=620),骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS;n=170),和淋巴瘤(n=128)。
    结果:对总生存期(OS)的多变量分析证明了在CY/TBI方案中添加大剂量阿糖胞苷对AML的益处(相对风险[RR],0.76;P=0.003)和淋巴瘤(RR,0.54;P=0.02)组,但不是在ALL和MDS组中。在ALL组中测试了在CY/TBI方案中添加依托泊苷的益处;它与较低的OS(RR,1.45;P=0.03)。在GVHD预防的情况下,他克莫司/甲氨蝶呤方案导致AML组的OS低于环孢菌素/甲氨蝶呤方案(RR,1.26;P=0.01);在其他组中未观察到这一点。根据预处理方案和GVHD预防,OS的这些差异主要归因于复发风险的差异。
    结论:调节方案和GVHD预防对UCBT结局的影响因疾病类型而异。可以通过为每种疾病类型选择最佳的调节方案和GVHD预防来改善UCBT结果。
    Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is a valuable alternative donor source for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Various conditioning regimens and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimens aimed at improving the outcomes of umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) have been explored; however, the differences in their effects remain unclear. This study was conducted to elucidate the differences in the effects of conditioning and GVHD prophylaxis regimens on UCBT outcomes by disease type in a nationwide, retrospective study. We retrospectively analyzed the effects of conditioning and GVHD prophylaxis regimens on the outcomes of UCBT performed with cyclophosphamide (Cy)/total body irradiation (TBI)-based regimens in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML; n = 1126), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL; n = 620), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS; n = 170), and lymphoma (n = 128). Multivariate analysis for overall survival (OS) demonstrated the benefit of adding high-dose cytarabine to the Cy/TBI regimen for the AML group (relative risk [RR], .76; P = .003) and lymphoma group (RR, .54; P = .02), but not for the ALL and MDS groups. In the ALL group, adding etoposide to the Cy/TBI regimen was associated with a lower OS (RR, 1.45; P = .03). For GVHD prophylaxis, a tacrolimus/methotrexate regimen was associated with a lower OS compared with a cyclosporine/methotrexate regimen in the AML group (RR, 1.26; P = .01); this difference was not observed in the other groups. These differences in OS according to the conditioning and GVHD prophylaxis regimen were attributable mainly to differences in relapse risk. Our data show that the effects of conditioning regimens and GVHD prophylaxis on UCBT outcomes differed according to disease type. UCBT outcomes could be improved by selecting optimal conditioning regimens and GVHD prophylaxis for each disease type.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase II
    移植后环磷酰胺(PTCy)预防移植物抗宿主病(GVHD),他克莫司,和霉酚酸酯(MMF)用于同种异体单倍体供体(haplo)造血细胞移植(HCT)的结果与匹配的无关供体HCT具有可比性。Moffitt癌症中心的一项II期研究报告了在该预防方案中使用西罗莫司(Siro)代替Tac的II-IV级急性GVHD(aGVHD)的发生率相当。根据更好的副作用概况,许多中心在此设置中将Siro替换为Tac,虽然比较数据有限。在这项研究中,我们回顾性地比较了haplo-HCT+PTCy/Siro/MMF与haplo-HCT+PTCy/Tac/MMF的结局.该研究队列包括2014年至2019年在Moffitt癌症中心或希望市国家医疗中心接受单倍体供体T细胞充足的外周血干细胞(PBSC)HCT治疗血液恶性肿瘤的所有连续患者。共纳入423例患者,其中84名(20%)接受PTCy/Siro/MMF,339名(80%)接受PTCy/Tac/MMF。整个队列的平均年龄为54岁(范围,18至78岁),中位随访时间为30个月.西罗组患者年龄≥60岁的比例较高(58%对34%;P<0.01),这些组的诊断类型也不同,调理方案,和巨细胞病毒血清状态。在第100天,II-IV级aGVHD(45%对47%;P=.6)或慢性GVHD(cGVHD)(47%对54%;P=.79)的发生率在HCT后2年没有显着差异。在多变量分析中,在Tac组中,中性粒细胞在第30天的植入显着更好(优势比,.30;95%置信区间,.1至.83;P=.02),西罗组的植入时间中位数为17天,而不是18天,但两组的血小板植入相似.否则,在多变量分析中,GVHD预防类型对aGVHD或cGVHD无显著影响,非复发死亡率,复发,无GVHD无复发生存,无病生存,或PBSChaplo-HCT后的总生存率。这些发现表明,西罗是Tac与PTCy/MMF联合预防GVHD的可比替代品,尽管外周血干细胞haplo-HCT后移植延迟,但总体临床结局相似。尽管Tac仍然是护理标准,根据这些药物的副作用,可以用西罗代替,考虑到HCT患者的合并症。
    Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), tacrolimus (Tac), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for allogeneic haploidentical donor (haplo) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) results in comparable outcomes to matched unrelated donor HCT. A phase II study from the Moffitt Cancer Center substituting sirolimus (Siro) for Tac in this prophylactic regimen reported comparable rates of grade II-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD). Many centers have substituted Siro for Tac in this setting based on a preferable side effect profile, although comparative data are limited. In this study, we retrospectively compared outcomes in haplo-HCT with PTCy/Siro/MMF versus haplo-HCT with PTCy/Tac/MMF. The study cohort included all consecutive patients receiving haploidentical donor T cell-replete peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) HCT for hematologic malignancies at Moffitt Cancer Center or the City of Hope National Medical Center between 2014 and 2019. A total of 423 patients were included, of whom 84 (20%) received PTCy/Siro/MMF and 339 (80%) received PTCy/Tac/MMF. The median age for the entire cohort was 54 years (range, 18 to 78 years), and the median follow-up was 30 months. The Siro group had a higher proportion of patients age ≥60 years (58% versus 34%; P < .01), and the groups also differed in diagnosis type, conditioning regimen, and cytomegalovirus serostatus. There were no significant differences in the rates of grade II-IV aGVHD (45% versus 47%; P = .6) at day +100 or chronic GVHD (cGVHD) (47% versus 54%; P = .79) at 2 years post-HCT. In multivariate analysis, neutrophil engraftment at day +30 was significantly better in the Tac group (odds ratio, .30; 95% confidence interval, .1 to .83; P = .02), with a median time to engraftment of 17 days versus 18 days in the Siro group, but platelet engraftment was similar in the 2 groups. Otherwise, in multivariate analysis, GVHD prophylaxis type had no significant influence on aGVHD or cGVHD, nonrelapse mortality, relapse, GVHD-free relapse-free survival, disease-free survival, or overall survival after PBSC haplo-HCT. These findings suggest that Siro is a comparable alternative to Tac in combination with PTCy/MMF for GVHD prophylaxis, with overall similar clinical outcomes despite delayed engraftment after peripheral blood stem cell haplo-HCT. Although Tac remains the standard of care, Siro may be substituted based on the side effect profile of these medications, with consideration of patient medical comorbidities at HCT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:尽管钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(CNIs)在异基因造血细胞移植(HCT)后预防移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)中具有公认的作用,它们的使用可能受到显著毒性的限制,这可能导致过早停止治疗。CNI不耐受患者的最佳管理是未知的。这项研究的目的是确定皮质类固醇作为CNI不耐受患者GVHD预防的有效性。
    方法:这项回顾性的单中心研究包括连续的成人恶性血液病患者,这些患者接受了清髓性外周血同种异体HCT和抗胸腺细胞球蛋白,CNI,和甲氨蝶呤在艾伯塔省预防GVHD,加拿大。多变量竞争风险回归用于比较GVHD的累积发病率,复发,皮质类固醇与持续CNI预防接受者之间的非复发死亡率,多变量Cox比例风险回归用于比较总生存率,无复发生存率(RFS)和中度至重度慢性GVHD和RFS。
    结果:在509名同种异体HCT接受者中,58例(11%)患者出现CNI不耐受,并在HCT后中位28天(范围1-53)转为皮质类固醇预防。与接受持续CNI预防的患者相比,接受皮质类固醇预防的患者2-4级急性GVHD的累积发生率明显更高(亚风险比[SHR]1.74,95%置信区间[CI]1.08-2.80,P=0.024),3-4级急性GVHD(SHR3.22,95%CI1.55-6.72,P=0.002),与GVHD相关的非复发死亡率(SHR3.07,95%CI1.54-6.12,P=0.001)。中度至重度慢性GVHD(SHR0.84,95%CI0.43-1.63,P=0.60)或复发(SHR0.92,95%CI0.53-1.62,P=0.78)没有显着差异,但皮质类固醇预防与显著较差的总生存率相关(风险比[HR]1.77,95%CI1.20-2.61,P=0.004),RFS(HR1.54,95%CI1.06-2.25,P=0.024),和慢性GVHD和RFS(HR1.46,95%CI1.04-2.05,P=0.029)。
    结论:患有CNI不耐受的同种异体HCT受者发生急性GVHD的风险增加,尽管在CNI过早停药后采取了皮质类固醇预防措施。这种高危人群需要替代的GVHD预防策略。
    Although calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) have a well-established role in the prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), their use can be limited by significant toxicities, which may result in premature treatment discontinuation. The optimal management of patients with CNI intolerance is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of corticosteroids as GVHD prophylaxis for patients with CNI intolerance.
    This retrospective single-center study included consecutive adult patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent myeloablative peripheral blood allogeneic HCT with anti-thymocyte globulin, CNI, and methotrexate GVHD prophylaxis in Alberta, Canada. Multivariable competing-risks regression was used to compare cumulative incidences of GVHD, relapse, and non-relapse mortality between recipients of corticosteroid versus continuous CNI prophylaxis, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was applied to compare overall survival, relapse-free survival (RFS) and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD and RFS.
    Among 509 allogeneic HCT recipients, 58 (11%) patients developed CNI intolerance and were switched to corticosteroid prophylaxis at median 28 days (range 1-53) after HCT. Compared with patients who received continuous CNI prophylaxis, recipients of corticosteroid prophylaxis had significantly greater cumulative incidences of grade 2-4 acute GVHD (subhazard ratio [SHR] 1.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-2.80, P = 0.024), grade 3-4 acute GVHD (SHR 3.22, 95% CI 1.55-6.72, P = 0.002), and GVHD-related non-relapse mortality (SHR 3.07, 95% CI 1.54-6.12, P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD (SHR 0.84, 95% CI 0.43-1.63, P = 0.60) or relapse (SHR 0.92, 95% CI 0.53-1.62, P = 0.78), but corticosteroid prophylaxis was associated with significantly inferior overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.77, 95% CI 1.20-2.61, P = 0.004), RFS (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.06-2.25, P = 0.024), and chronic GVHD and RFS (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.04-2.05, P = 0.029).
    Allogeneic HCT recipients with CNI intolerance are at increased risks of acute GVHD and poor outcomes despite institution of corticosteroid prophylaxis following premature CNI discontinuation. Alternative GVHD prophylaxis strategies are needed for this high-risk population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大剂量移植后环磷酰胺(PTCy)现在被认为是预防急性和慢性GvHD的非常有效的方法,它的使用在世界范围内迅速扩展。
    High dose Post transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is now regarded as a very effective way of preventing acute and chronic GvHD, and it\'s use has rapidly expanded world-wide.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号