GLP-1RA

GLP - 1RA
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肠促胰岛素是肠道产生的肽激素,可增强胰岛素分泌,尤其是在食物摄入后。肠促胰岛素的概念形成于100多年前,甚至在分离胰岛素并将其用于治疗1型糖尿病患者之前。第一个肠衣,葡萄糖依赖性促胰岛素多肽(GIP),在1960年代后期和1970年代早期被发现;而第二个,被称为胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1),在1980年代被认可。今天,基于GLP-1的治疗剂[也称为GLP-1受体(GLP-1R)激动剂,GLP-1RAs]是2型糖尿病的一线药物之一。除了充当胰岛素外,GLP-1RAs的胰腺外功能已得到广泛认可,包括肝脏中的那些,尽管肝组织中没有GLP-1R。GLP-1RA的胰岛素非依赖性或肠-胰腺-肝轴非依赖性肝功能的存在解释了为什么这些治疗剂在具有胰岛素抗性的受试者中有效及其对脂质稳态的深远影响。在简要回顾了GLP-1的发现之后,我们回顾了有关GLP-1和GLP-1RAs的肝功能探索的文献,并讨论了肝激素成纤维细胞生长因子21(FGF21)在动物模型中介导GLP-1RAs功能的作用的最新研究。随后提出了我们的观点。
    Incretins are gut-produced peptide-hormones that potentiate insulin secretion, especially after food intake. The concept of incretin was formed more than 100 years ago, even before insulin was isolated and utilized in the treatment of subjects with type 1 diabetes. The first incretin, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), was identified during later 1960\'s and early 1970\'s; while the second one, known as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), was recognized during 1980\'s. Today, GLP-1-based therapeutic agents [also known as GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists, GLP-1RAs] are among the first line drugs for type 2 diabetes. In addition to serving as incretin, extra-pancreatic functions of GLP-1RAs have been broadly recognized, including those in the liver, despite the absence of GLP-1R in hepatic tissue. The existence of insulin-independent or gut-pancreas-liver axis-independent hepatic function of GLP-1RAs explains why those therapeutic agents are effective in subjects with insulin resistance and their profound effect on lipid homeostasis. Following a brief review on the discovery of GLP-1, we reviewed literature on the exploration of hepatic function of GLP-1 and GLP-1RAs and discussed recent studies on the role of hepatic hormone fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) in mediating function of GLP-1RAs in animal models. This was followed by presenting our perspective views.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    葡萄糖依赖性促胰岛素多肽(GIP)和胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)是两种肠促胰岛素,它们结合各自的受体并激活各种组织和器官中的下游信号。GIP和GLP-1通过刺激大脑饱腹感中心的神经元来调节食物摄入。它们还刺激胰腺β细胞的胰岛素分泌,但是它们对胰腺α细胞中胰高血糖素产生的影响不同,其中GIP在低血糖期间具有促胰高血糖素作用,而GLP-1在高血糖期间表现出胰高血糖素抑制作用。此外,GIP直接刺激脂肪生成,而GLP-1间接促进脂解,共同维持健康的脂肪细胞,减少异位脂肪分布,增加脂肪细胞脂联素的产生和分泌。一起,这两种肠促胰岛素有助于代谢稳态,预防高血糖和低血糖,缓解血脂异常,降低2型糖尿病和肥胖患者心血管疾病的风险。已经开发了几种GLP-1和双重GIP/GLP-1受体激动剂,以利用这些药理作用治疗2型糖尿病。其中一些在体重管理和预防心血管疾病方面表现出强大的有效性。阐明潜在的细胞和分子机制可能会导致新一代肠促胰岛素模拟物的发展,具有增强的功效和更少的不良反应。治疗指南正在根据临床试验结果发展,塑造代谢和心血管疾病的管理。
    Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) are two incretins that bind to their respective receptors and activate the downstream signaling in various tissues and organs. Both GIP and GLP-1 play roles in regulating food intake by stimulating neurons in the brain\'s satiety center. They also stimulate insulin secretion in pancreatic β-cells, but their effects on glucagon production in pancreatic α-cells differ, with GIP having a glucagonotropic effect during hypoglycemia and GLP-1 exhibiting glucagonostatic effect during hyperglycemia. Additionally, GIP directly stimulates lipogenesis, while GLP-1 indirectly promotes lipolysis, collectively maintaining healthy adipocytes, reducing ectopic fat distribution, and increasing the production and secretion of adiponectin from adipocytes. Together, these two incretins contribute to metabolic homeostasis, preventing both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, mitigating dyslipidemia, and reducing the risk of cardiovascular diseases in individuals with type 2 diabetes and obesity. Several GLP-1 and dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonists have been developed to harness these pharmacological effects in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, with some demonstrating robust effectiveness in weight management and prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Elucidating the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms could potentially usher in the development of new generations of incretin mimetics with enhanced efficacy and fewer adverse effects. The treatment guidelines are evolving based on clinical trial outcomes, shaping the management of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    新的抗糖尿病药物,指南中推荐包括胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT2)抑制剂,以减少2型糖尿病(T2DM)的心肾事件,独立于血糖控制。然而,它们在现实世界中可能没有得到充分利用。这项研究旨在解决知识差距,中国医生面临的处方模式和障碍。心血管代谢调查是一项横断面研究,在临床实践中管理糖尿病患者的医生中进行,从5月1日起通过指定的在线问卷,至12月31日,2022年。来自北京57家医院的358名医生参加了这次调查,34.9%来自三级医院。只有30-40%的医生对GLP-1RA或SGLT2抑制剂的机制和临床应用有所了解。总体上对这两种药物的理解没有差异(p=0.336)。然而,与非三级医院相比,三级医院的医生对GLP-1RA和SGLT2抑制剂的了解更高(分别为p=0.049和0.008).40.2%的医生从未开过GLP-1RA,SGLT2抑制剂为36.6%。使用SGLT2抑制剂的频率显著高于使用GLP-1RA(p=0.005)。处方的主要障碍包括高成本,依从性差,副作用令人担忧,对这些药物的了解不足。中国医生目前对GLP-1RA和SGLT2抑制剂的了解有限且处方频率低。需要多方面的方法来提高医生的知识并加强他们有效管理T2DM的能力。
    New anti-diabetic medications, including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are recommended in guidelines to reduce cardio-renal events in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), independent of glucose control. Yet they might be underused in real world. This study aims to address the knowledge gap, prescription patterns and barriers faced by Chinese doctors. Cardio-Metabolic Survey was a cross-sectional study conducted among doctors managing diabetic patients in clinical practice, via a designated online questionnaire from May 1st, to Dec. 31th, 2022. A total of 358 doctors from 57 hospitals across Beijing participated in this survey, 34.9% from tertiary hospitals. Only 30-40% doctors demonstrated somewhat understanding of the mechanism and clinical applications of GLP-1RA or SGLT2 inhibitors. There is no difference in understanding of these two medications overall (p = 0.336). However, doctors in tertiary hospitals have a higher understanding of GLP-1RA and SGLT2 inhibitors compared to those in non-tertiary hospitals (p = 0.049, and 0.008, respectively). 40.2% doctors have never prescribed GLP-1RA, and 36.6% for SGLT2 inhibitors. The frequency of prescribing SGLT2 inhibitors was significantly higher than prescribing GLP-1RA (p = 0.005). The main barriers on prescription include high cost, poor adherence, side effects concern, and insufficient knowledge about these medications. Chinese doctors currently have limited understanding and low prescription frequency for GLP-1RA and SGLT2 inhibitors. Multifaceted approaches are needed to improve doctors\' knowledge and strengthen their ability to manage T2DM effectively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    据报道,胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)会增加急性胰腺炎(AP)的风险。这项现实世界的研究没有观察到在患有T2D和既往AP病史的成年人中,GLP-1RA暴露的AP频率更高,无论病因如何。
    Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) have been reported to increase the risk of acute pancreatitis (AP). This real-world study did not observe a higher frequency of AP with GLP-1RA exposure in adults with T2D and a prior history of AP regardless of etiology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心血管结局试验表明胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)对肾脏有益;然而,在糖尿病肾病(DKD)的实际疗效和安全性研究很少.
    这次回顾展,单臂真实世界试验包括接受GLP-1RA治疗至少6个月的DKD成人.主要终点是6个月后的血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)水平。
    本研究共纳入364名DKD患者,其中153人(42.0%)为女性。中位病程为8.0年,和年龄的平均值,HbA1c水平,身体质量指数,尿白蛋白肌酐比值(UACR)为52.1年,8.6%,27.8kg/m2,88.0mg/g,分别。此外,73.6%和26.4%的患者患有轻度和中度DKD,分别。GLP-1RA治疗6个月后,平均HbA1c水平和UACR下降了1.77%和40.3%,分别(均p<0.001)。与它们的基线值相比,患者24小时尿蛋白显着改善,估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR),空腹血糖,体重,收缩压(SBP),舒张压(DBP),总胆固醇,甘油三酯,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇,和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(均p<0.001)。病程<10年的患者HbA1c水平有更明显的变化,UACR,和eGFR(所有p<0.001)比那些病程≥10年的患者。同时服用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ACEis/ARBs)的患者SBP和DBP的变化比不服用ACEis/ARBs的患者更明显,而UACR和eGFR的变化没有显著差异.
    6个月GLP-1RA治疗可改善血糖,血压,脂质,轻度至中度DKD患者的体重,同时减缓肾脏疾病的进展。它独立地减少蛋白尿超过ACEi/ARB的影响,早期使用会产生更快的结果,支持循证实践。
    UNASSIGNED: Cardiovascular outcome trials indicate renal benefits of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs); however, real-world efficacy and safety studies in Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) are scarce.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective, single-arm real-world trial involved adults with DKD treated with GLP-1RA for at least 6 months. The primary endpoint was hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels after 6 months.
    UNASSIGNED: This study included a total of 364 patients with DKD, 153 (42.0%) of whom were female. The median disease duration was 8.0 years, and the mean values of age, HbA1c level, body mass index, and the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) were 52.1 years, 8.6%, 27.8 kg/m2, and 88.0 mg/g, respectively. Additionally, 73.6% and 26.4% of patients had mild and moderate DKD, respectively. Following 6 months of GLP-1RA treatment, the mean HbA1c level and UACR declined by 1.77% and 40.3%, respectively (both p < 0.001). Compared to their baseline values, patients exhibited significant improvements in 24-h urinary protein, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), fasting blood glucose, body weight, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (all p < 0.001). Patients with a disease duration of <10 years had more pronounced changes in the HbA1c level, UACR, and eGFR (all p < 0.001) than those with a disease duration of ≥10 years. Changes in SBP and DBP were more pronounced in patients also taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACEis/ARBs) than in those not taking ACEis/ARBs, whereas the changes in UACR and eGFR did not significantly differ.
    UNASSIGNED: Six-month GLP-1RA treatment improves glucose, blood pressure, lipids, and body weight in patients with mild-to-moderate DKD while slowing down kidney disease progression. It independently reduces proteinuria beyond ACEi/ARB impact, with early use yielding faster outcomes, supporting evidence-based practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:全球监管机构正在审查胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)的安全性数据,继冰岛药品管理局于2023年7月报告服用利拉鲁肽和司马鲁肽的个体的自杀意念和自我伤害(SIS)之后。我们旨在评估GLP-1RA新使用者与钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT-2i)使用者相比的SIS风险。用于治疗肥胖患者的2型糖尿病。
    方法:这是一项队列研究,结合了几个全人口数据库,涵盖了500万西班牙人口。包括从2015年至2021年开始使用GLP-1RA或SGLT-2i治疗2型糖尿病的所有肥胖成年人。为了评估GLP-1RA对SIS风险的比较效果,我们雇佣了一个新用户,主动比较器设计,我们进行了多变量Cox回归建模,采用基于倾向评分的治疗概率加权逆(IPTW)。我们进行了一些分层和敏感性分析。
    结果:我们纳入了3040例开始使用GLP-1RA治疗的患者和11,627例使用SGLT-2i治疗的患者。与SGLT-2i治疗的患者相比,GLP-1RA组的年龄较小(55岁vs60岁,p<0.001),有更多的焦虑(49.4%vs41.5%,p<0.001),睡眠障碍(43.2%vs34.1%,p<0.001)和抑郁(24.4%vs19.0%,p<0.001),并且更肥胖(BMI≥40的个体中有35.1%vs15.1%,p<0.001)。在倾向得分加权后,所有协变量的组间标准化平均差异均<0.1,在调整后的基线时显示出组间足够的平衡。在主要的符合方案分析中,我们没有发现GLP-1RA增加SIS发生率的证据(HR1.04;95%CI0.35,3.14)。意向治疗分析的HR为1.36(95%CI0.51,3.61)。在排除没有BMI信息的个体并使用BMI缺失值的归因的分析中,相应的HR分别为0.89(95%CI0.26,3.14)和1.29(95%CI0.42,3.92)。分层分析显示亚组之间没有差异。
    结论:我们的研究结果不支持2型糖尿病和肥胖患者服用GLP-1RA时SIS风险增加;然而,SIS事件的稀有性和效应大小的广泛不确定性(尽管为零,效果可能与高达三倍的风险相一致),需要对我们的结果进行谨慎的解释。进一步研究,包括监管机构的最终评估,被要求放弃GLP-1RA和自杀之间的因果关系。
    OBJECTIVE: Regulators worldwide are reviewing safety data on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), following reports by the Icelandic Medicines Agency in July 2023 of suicidal ideation and self-injury (SIS) in individuals taking liraglutide and semaglutide. We aimed to assess the risk of SIS in new users of GLP-1RA when compared with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) users, prescribed to treat type 2 diabetes in individuals with obesity.
    METHODS: This is a cohort study combining several population-wide databases and covering a Spanish population of five million inhabitants, including all adults with obesity who initiated treatment with either GLP-1RA or SGLT-2i for type 2 diabetes from 2015 to 2021. To estimate the comparative effect of GLP-1RA on the risk of SIS, we employed a new user, active comparator design and we carried out multivariable Cox regression modelling with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores. We performed several stratified and sensitivity analyses.
    RESULTS: We included 3040 patients initiating treatment with GLP-1RA and 11,627 with SGLT-2i. When compared with patients treated with SGLT-2i, those in the GLP-1RA group were younger (55 vs 60 years old, p<0.001), had more anxiety (49.4% vs 41.5%, p<0.001), sleep disorders (43.2% vs 34.1%, p<0.001) and depression (24.4% vs 19.0%, p<0.001), and were more obese (35.1% of individuals with BMI ≥40 vs 15.1%, p<0.001). After propensity score weighting, standardised mean differences between groups were <0.1 for all covariates, showing adequate balance between groups at baseline after adjustment. In the main per-protocol analyses we found no evidence that GLP-1RA increased the incidence of SIS (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.35, 3.14). Intention-to-treat analyses resulted in an HR of 1.36 (95% CI 0.51, 3.61). In analyses excluding individuals with no BMI information and using imputation for BMI missing values, respective HRs were 0.89 (95% CI 0.26, 3.14) and 1.29 (95% CI 0.42, 3.92). Stratified analyses showed no differences between subgroups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not support an increased risk of SIS when taking GLP-1RA in individuals with type 2 diabetes and obesity; however, the rarity of SIS events and the wide uncertainty of effect size (although null, effect may be compatible with a risk as high as threefold) calls for a cautious interpretation of our results. Further studies, including final evaluations from regulatory bodies, are called for to discard a causal link between GLP-1RA and suicidality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:白细胞碎裂性血管炎(LCV)是一种累及小动脉的小血管血管炎,毛细血管和毛细血管后小静脉。LCV通常局限于皮肤,皮肤外表现发生频率较低。LCV具有多种潜在病因。的确,组织学LCV可以在抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)相关血管炎中发现,免疫复合物血管炎,与全身性疾病相关的血管炎(即,结节病,干燥综合征,类风湿性关节炎,和系统性红斑狼疮),或与癌症相关的血管炎,感染,败血症和某些药物的使用。LCV在高达50%的病例中也可以是特发性的。病例报告:塞马鲁肽是一种胰高血糖素样肽1(GLP-1)受体激动剂,用于治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)。已经描述了使用每日一次口服司马鲁肽的药物诱导的LCV病例。在这里,我们描述了在一名73岁的T2DM患者中,由每周一次皮下semaglutide诱导的第一例皮肤受限LCV,在停止司马鲁肽治疗后不久,皮肤病变完全消退。结论:未来的前瞻性研究,不良事件报告和上市后监测肯定有助于确定LCV是否比口服和皮下司马鲁肽制剂的副作用少。
    UNASSIGNED: Leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV) is a small vessel vasculitis involving arterioles, capillaries and postcapillary venules. LCV is generally confined to the skin, with extracutaneous manifestations occurring less frequently. LCV has multiple potential etiologies. Indeed, histological LCV can be found in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, immune complex vasculitis, vasculitis associated with systemic diseases (i.e. sarcoidosis, Sjögren\'s syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus), or in vasculitis associated with cancer, infections, sepsis and use of certain medications. LCV can also be idiopathic in up to 50% of cases.
    UNASSIGNED: Semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist used for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), obesity and overweight associated with one or more weight-related comorbidities. A case of drug-induced LCV has already been described with the use of once-daily oral semaglutide. Herein, we describe the first case of skin-limited LCV induced by once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide in a 73-year-old man with T2DM, who experienced the complete resolution of the skin lesions shortly after the discontinuation of semaglutide therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: Future prospective studies, adverse event reporting and post-marketing surveillance will certainly contribute to establishing if LCV represents a less rare than expected side effect of both oral and subcutaneous semaglutide formulations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在使用真实世界数据评估钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2i)和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1Ra)与2型糖尿病(T2D)患者痛风发生率的相对相关性。
    方法:我们使用来自TriNetX(国际联合数据库)的数据进行了一项队列研究。我们纳入了开始服用二甲双胍或胰岛素的患者,单独或与SGLT2i或GLP-1Ra一起使用,在分析日期前至少2年。我们对26个相关特征的倾向评分匹配(PSM)(1:1)。进行事件发生时间分析以评估痛风的发生率,全因死亡率(阳性对照),和带状疱疹感染(阴性对照)在药物开始后5年。
    结果:在PSM之前,队列编号如下:二甲双胍对照,1,111,449;SGLT2i与二甲双胍,101,706;GLP-1Ra与二甲双胍,110,180,胰岛素控制,1,398,066;SGLT2i与胰岛素,68,697;和GLP-1Ra与胰岛素,99,693。与二甲双胍对照队列相比,SGLT2i与二甲双胍一起显示5年时痛风发生率显著降低(HR0.75[95%CI0.69-0.82],P<0.0001)。同样,与胰岛素对照组相比,SGLT2i与胰岛素对照组相比,5年时痛风发生率显着降低(HR0.83[95%CI0.74-0.92],P<0.0001)。相反,在使用GLP-1Ra和匹配的对照之间,痛风发生率没有显著差异.亚组分析显示,与GLP-1Ra相比,使用SGLT2i的痛风发生率降低,在使用二甲双胍的组中(HR0.77[95%CI0.70-0.86],P<0.0001)或胰岛素(HR0.82[95%CI0.73-0.91)],P<0.0001)。
    结论:在这项大规模的现实世界研究中,与胰岛素和二甲双胍对照相比,T2D患者使用SGLT2i与痛风发生率较低相关。这些发现表明SGLT2i作为治疗该人群痛风的有希望的治疗选择的潜力。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the relative association between sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1Ra) with the incidence of gout in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) using real-world data.
    METHODS: We conducted a cohort study using data from TriNetX (an international federated database). We included patients commenced on metformin or insulin, either alone or with an SGLT2i or GLP-1Ra, at least 2 years prior to date of analysis. We propensity score matched (PSM) (1:1) for 26 relevant characteristics. Time to event analysis was performed to assess the incidence of gout, all-cause mortality (positive control), and herpes zoster infection (negative control) at 5 years following drug initiation.
    RESULTS: Prior to PSM, the cohort numbers were as follows: metformin control, 1,111,449; SGLT2i with metformin, 101,706; GLP-1Ra with metformin, 110,180, insulin control, 1,398,066; SGLT2i with insulin, 68,697; and GLP-1Ra with insulin, 99,693. SGLT2i with metformin demonstrated a statistically significant decreased incidence of gout at 5 years compared to the metformin control cohort (HR 0.75 [95% CI 0.69-0.82], P < 0.0001). Similarly, SGLT2i with insulin demonstrated a statistically significant decreased incidence of gout at 5 years compared to the insulin control cohort (HR 0.83 [95% CI 0.74-0.92], P < 0.0001). Conversely, no significant disparity in gout incidence was observed between the use of GLP-1Ra and matched controls. Subgroup analysis showed an associated reduced incidence of gout with SGLT2i use compared to GLP-1Ra, in groups using metformin (HR 0.77 [95% CI 0.70-0.86], P < 0.0001) or insulin (HR 0.82 [95% CI 0.73-0.91)], P < 0.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: In this large-scale real-world study, SGLT2i use was associated with a lower incidence of gout in patients with T2D compared to both insulin and metformin controls. These findings suggest the potential of SGLT2i as a promising therapeutic option for treating gout in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的治疗方法不断取得进展,持续的高复发率表明需要更有效的方法,包括新的药物干预措施。胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)作为用于治疗OUD的非阿片类药物提供了有希望的途径。尽管GLP-1RA已显示出有望治疗酒精和尼古丁使用障碍,到目前为止,尚未进行对照临床试验以确定GLP-1RA是否可以减少OUD患者的渴求。当前方案的目的是评估GLP-1RA的潜力,利拉鲁肽,安全有效地减少OUD人群在住院治疗中的渴望。
    方法:这项初步研究是一项随机,双盲,安慰剂对照临床试验,旨在测试GLP-1RA的安全性和有效性,利拉鲁肽,OUD住院治疗的40名参与者。在采取一系列安全措施的同时,在功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)和渴求期间,使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估了治疗前(第1天)和治疗后(第19天)对线索诱导渴求的疗效。在(研究第1天)之前,使用生态瞬时评估(EMA)评估对环境渴望的治疗功效,跨(研究第2-19天),并遵循(研究第20-21天)住院治疗。
    结论:本手稿描述了收集GLP-1RA安全性和有效性临床数据的方案,利拉鲁肽,在OUD患者的住院治疗期间,为更大范围的进一步评估奠定基础,门诊OUD人群。提高对创新的理解,OUD的非阿片类药物治疗将有可能为基于社区的干预措施和卫生政策提供信息。协助医生和卫生保健专业人员治疗OUD患者,并支持OUD患者努力过健康的生活。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT04199728。2019年12月16日注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04199728?term=NCT04199728。
    方法:2023年5月10日。
    BACKGROUND: Despite continuing advancements in treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD), continued high rates of relapse indicate the need for more effective approaches, including novel pharmacological interventions. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) provide a promising avenue as a non-opioid medication for the treatment of OUD. Whereas GLP-1RAs have shown promise as a treatment for alcohol and nicotine use disorders, to date, no controlled clinical trials have been conducted to determine if a GLP-1RA can reduce craving in individuals with OUD. The purpose of the current protocol was to evaluate the potential for a GLP-1RA, liraglutide, to safely and effectively reduce craving in an OUD population in residential treatment.
    METHODS: This preliminary study was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial designed to test the safety and efficacy of the GLP-1RA, liraglutide, in 40 participants in residential treatment for OUD. Along with taking a range of safety measures, efficacy for cue-induced craving was evaluated prior to (Day 1) and following (Day 19) treatment using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in response to a cue reactivity task during functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and for craving. Efficacy of treatment for ambient craving was assessed using Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) prior to (Study Day 1), across (Study Days 2-19), and following (Study Days 20-21) residential treatment.
    CONCLUSIONS: This manuscript describes a protocol to collect clinical data on the safety and efficacy of a GLP-1RA, liraglutide, during residential treatment of persons with OUD, laying the groundwork for further evaluation in a larger, outpatient OUD population. Improved understanding of innovative, non-opioid based treatments for OUD will have the potential to inform community-based interventions and health policy, assist physicians and health care professionals in the treatment of persons with OUD, and to support individuals with OUD in their effort to live a healthy life.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04199728. Registered 16 December 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04199728?term=NCT04199728 .
    METHODS: 10 May 2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号