GINA

吉娜
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    工作场所健康计划是与健康相关的基因检测的新兴途径,一些大雇主现在向员工提供这样的测试。员工对基因歧视的知识和担忧可能会影响他们对工作场所基因检测(wGT)的决策和吸收。这项研究描述了受雇成年人对《遗传信息非歧视法》(GINA)的客观知识,并评估了这些知识与wGT的态度和信念之间的关系。分析利用来自大型、全国就业成年人网络调查(N=2000;平均年龄=43岁;51%女性;55.2%受过大学教育)。总的来说,大多数受访者(57.3%)表示,他们不知道有任何防止遗传歧视的法律。具体来说,62.6%的人表示他们根本不熟悉GINA。主要研究结果是受访者在评估GINA基本事实知识的13项指标上的得分。参与者总体GINA知识较低(M=4.6/13项正确(35%),SD=2.9),员工通常认为GINA提供的法律保护比它提供的保护更大(例如,45.3%的人错误地认可GINA保护人寿保险免受歧视)。Logistic回归分析评估了GINA知识与员工人口统计学特征之间的关联,以前有基因检测的经验,以及关于wGT的态度。与GINA知识显著相关的变量包括对wGT的兴趣较高(aOR=1.45;95%CI:1.20,1.77),自我报告对GINA的熟悉程度(aOR=2.02;95%CI:1.64,2.50),和对wGT的积极态度(aOR=1.92;95%CI:1.52,2.44)。结果表明,GINA通过15年后,公众对GINA的了解仍然很低。这些发现强调了在参加wGT之前对GINA进行员工教育的必要性,以及关于GINA法律保护和限制的更广泛的公共教育。遗传咨询师在临床和公共场所领导GINA教育工作,并可以在正在进行的有关GINA的公共教育计划中发挥关键作用。
    Workplace wellness programs are an emerging avenue for health-related genetic testing, with some large employers now offering such testing to employees. Employees\' knowledge and concerns regarding genetic discrimination may impact their decision-making about and uptake of workplace genetic testing (wGT). This study describes employed adults\' objective knowledge of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) and evaluates how this knowledge correlates with attitudes and beliefs regarding wGT. Analyses utilized data from a large, national web-based survey of employed adults (N = 2000; mean age = 43 years; 51% female; 55.2% college educated). Overall, most respondents (57.3%) said they were unaware of any laws protecting against genetic discrimination. Specifically, 62.6% indicated they were not at all familiar with GINA. The primary study outcome was respondents\' score on a 13-item measure assessing knowledge of basic facts about GINA. Participants had low overall GINA knowledge (M = 4.6/13 items correct (35%), SD = 2.9), with employees often presuming GINA offers greater legal protections than it does (e.g., 45.3% erroneously endorsed that GINA protected against discrimination in life insurance). Logistic regression analyses assessed associations between GINA knowledge and employees\' demographic characteristics, prior experience with genetic testing, and attitudes regarding wGT. Variables significantly associated with GINA knowledge included higher interest in wGT (aOR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.20, 1.77), self-reported familiarity with GINA (aOR = 2.02; 95% CI: 1.64, 2.50), and favorable attitudes toward wGT (aOR = 1.92; 95% CI: 1.52, 2.44). Results indicate public knowledge of GINA remains low over 15 years after its passage. These findings highlight the need for employee education on GINA before participating in wGT, as well as broader public education on GINA\'s legal protections and limitations. Genetic counselors lead GINA education efforts in clinical and public settings and can play a pivotal role in ongoing public education initiatives about GINA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:上皮细胞分泌alarmin细胞因子,包括胸腺基质淋巴细胞生成素(TSLP),白细胞介素(IL)-25和IL-33在哮喘中引发炎症级联反应。然而,哮喘患者上呼吸道的alarmin细胞因子表达在很大程度上仍未知.方法:我们根据全球哮喘倡议(GINA)步骤将40名哮喘患者分为四组(GINA1/2、3、4和5每组10名)。细胞来自鼻腔,颊,和喉咙刷。细胞内细胞因子表达(TSLP,收集后立即通过流式细胞术在细胞角蛋白8(Ck8)上皮细胞中评估IL-25和IL-33)。结果:GINA5例患者的经鼻TSLP显着增加(p<0.001),颊,和咽喉Ck8+上皮细胞,而IL-25在鼻部和喉部样本中升高(p<0.003),和IL-33水平是可变的,与GINA1-4患者相比。单独的GINA亚组比较显示,GINA5患者的鼻样本中的TSLP水平显着升高(p=0.03),但在有和没有鼻合并症的患者之间没有差异。IL-25和IL-33(从鼻腔获得,颊,和喉咙样本)在各个组中没有显着差异。结论:我们的研究首次证明GINA5哮喘患者的Ck8+鼻上皮细胞表达TSLP水平升高。
    Background: The secretion of alarmin cytokines by epithelial cells, including thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), interleukin (IL)-25, and IL-33, initiates inflammatory cascades in asthma. However, alarmin cytokine expression in the upper airways in asthma remains largely unknown. Methods: We recruited 40 participants with asthma into four groups as per the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) steps (10 in each group of GINA 1/2, 3, 4, and 5). Cells were derived from nasal, buccal, and throat brushings. Intracellular cytokine expression (TSLP, IL-25, and IL-33) was assessed by flow cytometry in cytokeratin 8+ (Ck8+) epithelial cells immediately following collection. Results: TSLP was significantly increased (p < 0.001) in GINA 5 patients across nasal, buccal, and throat Ck8+ epithelial cells, while IL-25 was elevated in nasal and throat samples (p < 0.003), and IL-33 levels were variable, compared with GINA 1-4 patients. Individual GINA subgroup comparison showed that TSLP levels in nasal samples from GINA 5 patients were significantly (p = 0.03) elevated but did not differ between patients with and without nasal comorbidities. IL-25 and IL-33 (obtained from nasal, buccal, and throat samples) were not significantly different in individual groups. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates for the first time that Ck8+ nasal epithelial cells from GINA 5 asthma patients express elevated levels of TSLP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    短效β2受体激动剂(SABA)在哮喘中的不当使用与不良结局有关。制定了这项全国专家共识,以传播对SABA过度使用的认识,并就消除SABA在马来西亚哮喘护理中的过度处方和过度依赖的方法提供建议。
    此专家共识是通过搜索PubMed数据库而形成的,使用指数术语确定SABA过度使用相关负担,并在哮喘指南中提出建议.通过德尔菲法提出了共识建议,涉及一个由13名医疗保健专业人员组成的马来西亚专家委员会(五名肺科医生,四位家庭医学专家,两名急诊医师和两名药剂师)。
    审查的文章包括随机对照试验,系统评价,荟萃分析,观察性研究,指导方针,和调查,英文摘要,出版至2023年6月。相关建议也来自经核实的医疗机构和社团网站。
    提出了11项共识声明,每个陈述达到至少70%的先验协议水平。这些陈述反映了SABA在哮喘护理中的过度依赖,以及消除马来西亚SABA过度处方和过度依赖的建议。详细阐述了文献中的支持证据以及专家委员会的讨论,以制定最终的声明。
    这项全国专家共识讨论了SABA过度依赖的负担,并提出了具体建议,以消除马来西亚背景下的SABA过度处方和过度依赖。该共识文件预计将使马来西亚医疗保健提供者更好地认识,并有助于该国哮喘护理的持续改善。
    UNASSIGNED: Inappropriate use of short-acting beta2-agonists (SABA) in asthma has been associated with undesired outcomes. This national expert consensus was developed to increase awareness of SABA overuse and provide recommendations on the ways to eliminate SABA overprescription and overreliance in Malaysia.
    UNASSIGNED: This expert consensus was developed by searching the PubMed database, using index terms to identify SABA overuse-related burden and recommendations made in asthma guidelines. Consensus recommendations were made via the Delphi method, involving a Malaysian expert committee comprising 13 healthcare professionals (five pulmonologists, four family medicine specialists, two emergency medicine physicians and two pharmacists).
    UNASSIGNED: The articles reviewed include randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, observational studies, guidelines, and surveys, with abstracts in English and published up until June 2023. Relevant recommendations were also sourced from verified websites of medical organizations and societies.
    UNASSIGNED: Eleven consensus statements were developed, each statement achieving a priori agreement level of at least 70%. The statements reflect SABA overreliance in asthma care, as well as recommendations to eliminate SABA overprescription and overreliance in Malaysia. Supporting evidence in the literature as well as expert committee discussions leading to the development of the finalized statements were elaborated.
    UNASSIGNED: This national expert consensus discussed the burden of SABA overreliance and made specific recommendations to eliminate SABA overprescription and overreliance in the Malaysian context. This consensus document is anticipated to impart better awareness among Malaysian healthcare providers and contribute to the continuous improvement of asthma care in the country.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    必须对哮喘进行适当的治疗和管理,以尽量减少症状,减轻负担,并降低恶化的机会。为了更好地控制哮喘,本研究的目的是评估和提高儿科注册医师对哮喘治疗的认识和应用.
    苏丹医学专业委员会(SMSB)儿科注册人员在2021年4月至9月间为这项准介入研究提供了数据。两次,在干预教育会议之前和之后,问卷已经发放。在Excel文档中清理数据后,使用SPSS版本28来分析数据。
    261人中有203人(或77.8%)是女性。干预前后注册人员的平均总体知识得分从8.1±4.12SD大幅上升至18±5.03SD。在干预后阶段观察到显著差异(p=0.001),第一年注册商(R1)的分数高于高级同事。在干预前期间,注册服务商的总知识分数彼此没有显着差异。全球哮喘倡议(GINA)管理指南在一定程度上得到了实施,根据研究。在注册服务商中,148(56.7%)和203(77.8%)评估了5岁及以下儿童的第一步管理;66(25.3%)和213(81.6%)评估了6至11岁儿童的第一步管理;在干预前后,66(25.3%)和213(81.6%)评估了6至11岁儿童的第一步管理。分别。
    鉴于本研究中的干预大大增加了注册商的知识,医生应通过会议获得有关GINA2019建议的培训,工作坊,和学术课程。要找出为什么R1的表现优于他们的老同行,需要做更多的调查。
    UNASSIGNED: It is essential to have proper treatment and management for asthma in order to minimise symptoms, lessen the burden, and lower the chance of exacerbations. To better control asthma, the purpose of this study was to evaluate and enhance paediatric registrars\' understanding and application of asthma treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: The Sudan Medical Specialisation Board (SMSB) paediatric registrars provided data for this quasi-interventional study between April and September of 2021. Twice, both before to and following the intervention education sessions, the questionnaire was delivered. SPSS version 28 was used to analyse the data after it had been cleaned up in an Excel document.
    UNASSIGNED: 203 (or 77.8%) of the 261 were women. A substantial rise from 8.1 ± 4.12 SD to 18 ± 5.03 SD in the mean overall knowledge score of registrars between the pre-and post-intervention periods. A significant difference (p=0.001) was observed in the post-intervention phase, with first-year registrars (R1) demonstrating higher scores than their senior colleagues. The registrars\' total knowledge scores did not differ significantly from one another during the pre-intervention period. The Global Initiative of Asthma (GINA) guidelines of management were implemented to a certain extent, according to the study. Of the registrars, 148 (56.7%) and 203 (77.8%) evaluated step one management in children ages 5 and under; 66 (25.3%) and 213 (81.6%) evaluated step one management in children ages 6 to 11; and 66 (25.3%) and 213 (81.6%) evaluated step one management in children ages 6 to 11 in pre- and post-intervention, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Given that the intervention in this study greatly increased registrars\' knowledge, doctors should obtain training on the GINA 2019 recommendations through conferences, workshops, and academic programmes. To find out why R1 outperforms their older counterparts, more investigation has to be done.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:2019年全球哮喘倡议(GINA)和2020年国家心肺和血液研究所(NHLBI)哮喘指南对轻度哮喘进行了重大更新。这些小组不再推荐短效β-激动剂(SABA)作为轻度(GINA)或轻度持续性(NHLBI)哮喘的单药治疗。由于指南或证据更新与实践变化之间可能出现的滞后,这项研究试图评估是否采用了指南.
    方法:在这篇回顾性图表综述中,从2021年7月1日至2022年7月1日,我们对来自大型医疗系统的患者电子病历进行了评估,以确定有多少轻度哮喘患者根据需要进行处方,或根据需要在SABA的基础上每天使用吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS).次要结果是评估轻度哮喘患者急性发作的发生率,比较指南指导治疗与否。此外,我们评估了增加轻度哮喘急性发作风险的其他患者因素.
    结果:对于主要结果,在符合纳入标准的1,107名患者中,284例患者(26%)在研究期间没有针对轻度哮喘的指南指导治疗文件,而823(74%)接受指南指导的治疗(Diff:48.7%;95%CI:45.1至52.3%,p<0.001)。对于次要目标,161例患者出现恶化(12%的患者接受指南指导的治疗,15.4%不接受指南指导的治疗)。两个治疗组之间的恶化发生率差异无统计学意义(Diff:-3.4%;95%CI:-8至1.1%;p=0.133)。此外,作为女性,有GERD,在我们的患者人群中,肥胖是与哮喘加重相关的统计学显著因素.
    结论:近1/4的轻度持续性哮喘患者没有接受指南指导的治疗,尽管哮喘指南有更新(GINA2019,NHLBI2020)。诸如女性等因素,有GERD,在轻度持续性哮喘患者中,肥胖是与哮喘加重相关的统计学显著因素.
    BACKGROUND: A significant update was made to both the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) in 2019 and the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) asthma guidelines in 2020 for mild asthma. These groups no longer recommend short-acting beta-agonists (SABA) as monotherapy for mild (GINA) or mild-persistent (NHLBI) asthma. With the lag that can occur between guideline or evidence updates and changes in practice, this study sought to evaluate whether guideline adoption had occurred.
    METHODS: In this retrospective chart review, patient electronic medical records from a large healthcare system were evaluated from July 1 of 2021 to July 1 of 2022 to determine how many patients with mild asthma were prescribed as needed or daily inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in addition to as needed SABA. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the incidence of exacerbations in patients with mild asthma, comparing those on guideline-directed therapy or not. In addition, we evaluated other patient factors increasing exacerbation risk in mild asthma.
    RESULTS: For the primary outcome, of the 1,107 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 284 patients (26%) did not have documentation of guideline-directed therapy for mild asthma during the study period, while 823 (74%) were on guideline-directed therapy (Diff:48.7%; 95% CI:45.1 to 52.3%, p < 0.001). For the secondary objective, 161 patients had an exacerbation (12% on guideline-directed therapy, 15.4% not on guideline-directed therapy). This difference in incidence of exacerbation between the two treatment groups was not statistically significant (Diff: -3.4%; 95% CI: -8 to 1.1%; p = 0.133). In addition, being female, having GERD, and being obese were all statistically significant factors associated with having asthma exacerbations among our patient population.
    CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one-fourth of patients with mild persistent asthma were not on guideline-directed therapy, despite updates in asthma guidelines (GINA 2019, NHLBI 2020). Factors such as being female, having GERD, and being obese were all statistically significant factors associated with having asthma exacerbations among patients with mild persistent asthma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在评估约旦医疗保健专业人员的知识,技能,在处理和治疗成人哮喘患者方面的经验,以及评估医护人员对约旦哮喘治疗和管理全球哮喘倡议(GINA)指南建议的遵守情况。
    在2023年5月至6月之间在约旦进行了一次横断面调查。这项研究包括医生,药剂师,和护士在临床环境中工作,并直接与有资格参与这项研究的约旦私人和政府医疗机构的哮喘患者互动。在线调查的三个主要部分是使用GoogleForms构建的,其中包括人口统计数据,对疾病的诊断和管理,和世界范围内哮喘的医学参考清单。
    共有300名医疗保健专业人员,包括药剂师(103),护士(87)药学博士(28)和医生(82),参与了这项研究。调查受访者对哮喘的性质和症状的一般知识相当高,超过84%和86%,分别。调查还显示了对哮喘诊断的高度了解。研究还显示,大约四分之一的参与者始终报告哮喘的严重程度。影响采取控制或维持药物的决定的最常见因素是症状严重程度(86%的参与者报告)。几乎一半的参与者选择GINA指南作为哮喘信息来源。最后,47%的参与者知道GINA2019年对建议的调整。
    这项研究表明,约旦医疗保健专业人员了解自然,症状,和哮喘疾病的诊断。然而,许多调查参与者缺乏依从性,意识,了解GINA关于哮喘管理的建议。需要更多的研究来评估对循证建议的遵守情况,并评估培训课程的影响。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to evaluate Jordanian healthcare professionals\' knowledge, skills, and experience in dealing with and treating adult asthmatic patients and assess healthcare professionals\' compliance with the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guideline recommendations for asthma treatment and management in Jordan.
    UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Jordan between May and June 2023. This study included physicians, pharmacists, and nurses working in clinical settings and directly interacting with asthma patients in Jordan\'s private and governmental healthcare facilities who were eligible to participate in this research. Three primary sections of an online survey were constructed using Google Forms and included demographic data, a diagnosis and management of the illness, and a list of worldwide medical references for asthma.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 300 healthcare professionals, including pharmacists (103), nurses (87), Doctor of Pharmacy (28), and physicians (82), took part in this research. The survey respondents\' general knowledge of the nature and symptoms of asthma is quite high, exceeding 84% and 86%, respectively. The survey also showed a high degree of awareness of asthma diagnosis. It was also revealed that around one-quarter of participants consistently reported the severity of asthma. The most frequent factor influencing the decision to take controller or maintenance medicines is symptom severity (reported from 86% of participants). The GINA guidelines were selected as the asthma information source by almost half of the participants. Finally, 47% of participants were aware of the GINA\'s 2019 adjustments of the recommendations.
    UNASSIGNED: This study showed that Jordanian healthcare professionals understand the nature, symptoms, and diagnoses of asthma disease. However, many of the survey participants lack adherence, awareness, and understanding of the GINA recommendations about asthma management. More research is required to assess the adherence to the evidence-based recommendations and evaluate the impact of training courses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)是一类吸入器,最近被纳入GINA指南作为附加疗法。在单一吸入器装置中使用吸入糖皮质激素加长效β2-激动剂(ICS+LABA)(封闭式三联吸入器治疗)或单独吸入(开放式三联吸入器治疗)。这篇综述总结了现有的证据,即在持续不受控制的哮喘患者中添加LAMA,尽管ICS+LABA治疗是基于减轻哮喘症状和加重的临床疗效。肺功能的改善,和它的安全概况。
    Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) are a class of inhalers that has recently been included as add-on therapy in the GINA guidelines, either in a single inhaler device with inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting β2-agonists (ICS + LABA) (closed triple inhaler therapy) or in a separate one (open triple inhaler therapy). This review summarizes the existing evidence on the addition of LAMAs in patients with persistently uncontrolled asthma despite ICS + LABA treatment based on clinical efficacy in the reduction of asthma symptoms and exacerbations, the improvement in lung function, and its safety profile.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于大多数哮喘患者来说,症状控制仍然具有挑战性。这项研究旨在评估GINA(全球哮喘治疗)实施后5年的哮喘症状控制水平和肺功能。我们纳入了在胡志明市大学医学中心的哮喘和COPD门诊病房(ACOCU)按照GINA建议进行管理的所有哮喘患者,越南从2006年10月到2016年10月。1388名哮喘患者按照GINA建议进行治疗,哮喘控制良好的患者比例从基线时的2.6%,第3个月时的66.8%,第1年时的64.8%,第2年时的59.6%,第3年时的58.6%,第4年时的57.7%和第5年时的59.5%显著提高(所有比较p<0.0001).持续气流受限的患者比例从基线时的26.7%显著下降到第1年的12.6%(p<0.0001),第二年14.4%(p<0.0001),第3年15.9%(p=0.0006),第4年为12.7%(p=0.0047),第5年为12.2%(p=0.0011)。在根据GINA建议治疗的哮喘患者中,哮喘症状控制和肺功能在3个月后得到改善,且改善持续5年以上.
    Symptoms control remains challenging for most patients with asthma. This study was conducted to evaluate the level of asthma symptoms control and lung function over 5 years of GINA (Global INitiative for Asthma) implementation. We included all patients with asthma who had been managed following GINA recommendations at the Asthma and COPD Outpatient Care Unit (ACOCU) of the University Medical Center in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam from October 2006 to October 2016. Of 1388 patients with asthma managed following GINA recommendations, the proportion of patients with well-controlled asthma significantly improved from 2.6% at baseline to 66.8% at month 3, 64.8% at year 1, 59.6% at year 2, 58.6% at year 3, 57.7% at year 4, and 59.5% at year 5 (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons). The proportion of patients with persistent airflow limitation significantly decreased from 26.7% at baseline to 12.6% at year 1 (p < 0.0001), 14.4% at year 2 (p < 0.0001), 15.9% at year 3 (p = 0.0006), 12.7% at year 4 (p = 0.0047), and 12.2% at year 5 (p = 0.0011). In patients with asthma managed according to GINA recommendations, asthma symptoms control and lung function improved after 3 months and the improvement was sustained over 5 years.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对吸入性皮质类固醇(ICS)的依从性已被描述为较差。在依从性研究中,如果没有实际规定的剂量,在评估依从性时,使用通用定义的每日剂量(DDD)。我们在一项大型前瞻性随访调查中评估了哮喘患者的依从性。我们还分析了世界卫生组织(WHO)和全球哮喘倡议(GINA)参考剂量是否给出了不同的结果。当前的研究是横断面的,包括2012年参加HeSSup随访问卷的受访者。在12,854名成年参与者中,共有1,141名积极回答了有关哮喘的问题。根据芬兰社会保险机构的药物登记,其中686人在2011年期间购买了ICS药物。WHO对ICS的DDDs以及GINA报告中的中等剂量用作参考剂量来评估依从性。要估计对ICS的坚持,计算每位患者1年以上的承保天数(PDC)比例.如果使用GINA中等ICS剂量的下限作为参考,65%的患者为粘附性(PDC≥80%)。使用WHO的DDD作为参考将粘附患者的比例减半。与仅使用类固醇吸入器的患者相比,使用皮质类固醇和长效β2激动剂联合吸入器的患者的依从性更高。使用WHO的每日确定剂量作为参考值可能会导致对吸入性皮质类固醇的依从性低估。因此,在选择参考剂量以评估哮喘患者对吸入糖皮质激素的依从性时,应注意。
    Adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) has been described as poor. In adherence studies, if the actual prescribed dosing is not available, generic defined daily doses (DDD) are applied instead when assessing adherence. We evaluated asthma patients\' adherence in a large prospective follow-up survey. We also analysed whether World Health Organization (WHO) and Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) reference doses give different results. The current study was cross-sectional and included respondents attending to HeSSup follow-up questionnaire in 2012. Altogether 1,141 of 12,854 adult participants answered positively to the question about having asthma. According to the Finnish Social Insurance Institutions\' medication register, 686 of them had purchased ICS medication during 2011. DDDs for ICS by WHO as well as medium doses from GINA report were used as reference doses to evaluate adherence. To estimate adherence to ICS, the proportion of days covered (PDC) over one year was calculated for every patient. If the lower limit of GINA medium ICS dose was used as a reference, 65% of the patients were adherent (PDC ≥ 80%). Use of WHO\'s DDD as reference halved the proportion of adherent patients. Adherence was higher among those using a combination inhaler of corticosteroid and long-acting β2-agonist compared to those using steroid only inhalers. Use of WHO\'s daily defined doses as reference values may lead to underestimation of adherence to inhaled corticosteroids. Thus, attention should be paid when choosing the reference doses for the evaluation of adherence to inhaled corticosteroids in asthma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    短效β2激动剂(SABA)自1950年代以来一直是哮喘治疗的主要药物,在过去的30年中,主要推荐根据需要缓解症状,同时每天进行以吸入型皮质类固醇(ICS)为基础的维持治疗。然而,患者对常规基于ICS的抗炎维持治疗的依从性通常较差,导致SABA过度使用以缓解症状和相关的不良结局。目前,关于如何使用SABA的治疗指南之间缺乏共识,一些人建议根据需要使用ICS-福莫特罗作为替代缓解疗法。这里,我们研究了吸入SABA的药理学和当前使用,确定定期给药ICS可以鼓励适当的SABA使用,并评估用于支持不断变化的缓解剂治疗建议的证据。我们得出结论,SABA继续在哮喘管理领域发挥重要作用,并就如何在轻度-中度哮喘患者中使用它给出我们的观点,以补充常规基于ICS的维持治疗。
    Short-acting β2 agonists (SABAs) have been a mainstay of asthma treatment since the 1950s, and have been mainly recommended as-needed for symptom relief alongside daily inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-based maintenance treatment for the past 30 years. However, patient adherence to regular ICS-based anti-inflammatory maintenance therapy is frequently poor, leading to SABA overuse for symptom relief and associated poor outcomes. At present, there is a lack of consensus between treatment guidelines on how SABA should be used, and as-needed ICS-formoterol is suggested by some as an alternative reliever therapy. Here, we examine the pharmacology and current use of inhaled SABAs, identify that regular dosing of ICS can encourage appropriate SABA use, and appraise the evidence used to support the changing reliever treatment recommendations. We conclude that SABA continues to play an important role in the asthma management landscape, and give our views on how it should be used in patients with mild-moderate asthma, to complement regular ICS-based maintenance treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号