GAZEBO

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多年来,深度强化学习(DRL)在无雨自主机器人导航和路径规划方面显示出巨大的潜力。这些DRL方法依赖于配备不同光检测和距离(LiDAR)传感器的机器人,这些传感器具有宽视场(FOV)配置来感知其环境。这些类型的LiDAR传感器价格昂贵,不适合小规模应用。在本文中,我们解决了DRL模型中LiDAR传感器配置的性能影响。我们的重点是避免前方的静态障碍。我们提出了一种新颖的方法,通过使用传感器的宽度和机器人与障碍物之间所需的最小安全距离计算视角来确定初始视野。光束在FOV内返回,机器人的速度,机器人指向目标点的方向,和到目标点的距离被用作输入状态以生成新的速度值作为DRL的输出动作。避碰和路径规划的成本函数被定义为DRL模型的报酬。为了验证所提出方法的性能,我们将建议的FOV调整了±10°,给出了更窄和更宽的FOV。训练这些新的FOV以获得防撞和路径规划DRL模型来验证所提出的方法。我们的实验设置表明,以计算视角为FOV的LiDAR配置表现最佳,成功率为98%,时间复杂度较低,为0.25m/s。此外,使用哈士奇机器人,我们证明了该模型在现实世界中的良好性能和适用性。
    Over the years, deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has shown great potential in mapless autonomous robot navigation and path planning. These DRL methods rely on robots equipped with different light detection and range (LiDAR) sensors with a wide field of view (FOV) configuration to perceive their environment. These types of LiDAR sensors are expensive and are not suitable for small-scale applications. In this paper, we address the performance effect of the LiDAR sensor configuration in DRL models. Our focus is on avoiding static obstacles ahead. We propose a novel approach that determines an initial FOV by calculating an angle of view using the sensor\'s width and the minimum safe distance required between the robot and the obstacle. The beams returned within the FOV, the robot\'s velocities, the robot\'s orientation to the goal point, and the distance to the goal point are used as the input state to generate new velocity values as the output action of the DRL. The cost function of collision avoidance and path planning is defined as the reward of the DRL model. To verify the performance of the proposed method, we adjusted the proposed FOV by ±10° giving a narrower and wider FOV. These new FOVs are trained to obtain collision avoidance and path planning DRL models to validate the proposed method. Our experimental setup shows that the LiDAR configuration with the computed angle of view as its FOV performs best with a success rate of 98% and a lower time complexity of 0.25 m/s. Additionally, using a Husky Robot, we demonstrate the model\'s good performance and applicability in the real world.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,足式(四足)机器人一直是技术研究和不断发展的课题。这些机器人在复杂地形中需要高机动性技能的应用中发挥着主导作用,搜索和救援(SAR)。这些机器人因其适应不同地形的能力而脱颖而出,克服障碍,在非结构化环境中移动。最近开发的大多数实现都集中在使用传感器收集数据,如激光雷达或摄像机。这项工作旨在将6DoF手臂操纵器集成到Unitree的四足机器人ARTU-R(A1救援任务UPM机器人)中,以在SAR环境中执行操纵任务。这项工作的主要贡献集中在使用混合现实(MR)对机器人集(腿操纵器)的高级控制上。机器人集合工作区的优化阶段已经在Matlab中开发用于实现,以及Gazebo中的仿真阶段,以验证该集合在重建环境中的动态功能。第一代和第二代Hololens眼镜已被使用,并与常规接口进行了对比,以开发所提出方法的MR控制部分。已经对急救设备进行了操作,以评估所提出的方法。主要结果表明,与常规接口相比,该方法可以更好地控制机器人集。提高操作员执行机器人处理任务的效率,并提高决策信心。另一方面,Hololens2在图形和延迟时间方面表现出更好的用户体验。
    In recent years, legged (quadruped) robots have been subject of technological study and continuous development. These robots have a leading role in applications that require high mobility skills in complex terrain, as is the case of Search and Rescue (SAR). These robots stand out for their ability to adapt to different terrains, overcome obstacles and move within unstructured environments. Most of the implementations recently developed are focused on data collecting with sensors, such as lidar or cameras. This work seeks to integrate a 6DoF arm manipulator to the quadruped robot ARTU-R (A1 Rescue Tasks UPM Robot) by Unitree to perform manipulation tasks in SAR environments. The main contribution of this work is focused on the High-level control of the robotic set (Legged + Manipulator) using Mixed-Reality (MR). An optimization phase of the robotic set workspace has been previously developed in Matlab for the implementation, as well as a simulation phase in Gazebo to verify the dynamic functionality of the set in reconstructed environments. The first and second generation of Hololens glasses have been used and contrasted with a conventional interface to develop the MR control part of the proposed method. Manipulations of first aid equipment have been carried out to evaluate the proposed method. The main results show that the proposed method allows better control of the robotic set than conventional interfaces, improving the operator efficiency in performing robotic handling tasks and increasing confidence in decision-making. On the other hand, Hololens 2 showed a better user experience concerning graphics and latency time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本工作提出了一种表征方法,校准,比较,任何2DSLAM算法,提供强有力的统计证据,基于描述性和推断性统计,以提供有关算法及其比较的整体行为的置信度。这项工作的重点是表征,校准,比较制图师,Gmapping,Hector-SLAM,KARTO-SLAM,和RTAB-MapSLAM算法。有四个指标:姿势错误,地图精度,CPU使用率,和内存使用;从这四个指标来看,来描述它们的特征,进行了Plackett-Burman和阶乘实验,并在使用假设检验进行表征和校准后进行增强,除了中心极限定理。
    The present work proposes a method to characterize, calibrate, and compare, any 2D SLAM algorithm, providing strong statistical evidence, based on descriptive and inferential statistics to bring confidence levels about overall behavior of the algorithms and their comparisons. This work focuses on characterize, calibrate, and compare Cartographer, Gmapping, HECTOR-SLAM, KARTO-SLAM, and RTAB-Map SLAM algorithms. There were four metrics in place: pose error, map accuracy, CPU usage, and memory usage; from these four metrics, to characterize them, Plackett-Burman and factorial experiments were performed, and enhancement after characterization and calibration was granted using hypothesis tests, in addition to the central limit theorem.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The robot controller plays an important role in controlling the robot. The controller mainly aims to eliminate or suppress the influence of uncertain factors on the control robot. Furthermore, there are many types of controllers, and different types of controllers have different features. To explore the differences between controllers of the same category, this article studies some controllers from basic controllers and advanced controllers. This article conducts the benchmarking of the selected controller through pre-set tests. The test task is the most commonly used pick and place. Furthermore, to complete the robustness test, a task of external force interference is also set to observe whether the controller can control the robot arm to return to a normal state. Subsequently, the accuracy, control efficiency, jitter and robustness of the robot arm controlled by the controller are analyzed by comparing the Position and Effort data. Finally, some future works of the benchmarking and reasonable improvement methods are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号