In the investigation of heterotrimeric G protein-mediated signal transduction in planta, their roles in the transmittance of low K+ stimuli remain to be elucidated. Here, we found that the primary root growth of wild-type Arabidopsis was gradually inhibited with the decrease of external K+ concentrations, while the primary root of the mutants for G protein β subunit AGB1 and γ subunits AGG1, AGG2 and AGG3 could still grow under low K+ conditions (LK). Exogenous NAA application attenuated primary root elongation in agb1 and agg1/2/3 but promoted the growth in wild-type seedlings under LK stress. Using ProDR5:GFP, ProPIN1:PIN1-GFP and ProPIN2:PIN2-GFP reporter lines, a diminishment in auxin concentration at the radicle apex and a reduction in PIN1and PIN2 efflux carrier abundance were observed in wild-type roots under LK, a phenomenon not recorded in the agb1 and agg1/2/3. Further proteolytic and transcriptional assessments revealed an enhanced degradation of PIN1 and a suppressed expression of PIN2 in the wild-type background under LK, contrasting with the stability observed in the agb1 and agg1/2/3 mutants. Our results indicate that the G protein β and γ subunits play pivotal roles in suppressing of Arabidopsis root growth under LK by modulating auxin redistribution via alterations in PIN1 degradation and PIN2 biosynthesis.

The family of human G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is comprised of about 800 different members, with about 35% of current pharmaceutical drugs targeting GPCRs. However, GPCR structural biology, necessary for structure-guided drug design, has lagged behind that of other membrane proteins, and it was not until the year 2000 when the first crystal structure of a GPCR (rhodopsin) was solved. Starting in 2007, the determination of additional GPCR structures was facilitated by protein engineering, new crystallization techniques, complexation with antibody fragments, and other strategies. More recently, the use of camelid heavy-chain-only antibody fragments (nanobodies) as crystallographic chaperones has revolutionized the field of GPCR structural biology, aiding in the determination of more than 340 GPCR structures to date. In most cases, the GPCR structures solved as complexes with nanobodies (Nbs) have revealed the binding mode of cognate or non-natural ligands; in a few cases, the same Nb has acted as an orthosteric or an allosteric modulator of GPCR signaling. In this review we summarize the multiple ingenious strategies that have been conceived and implemented in the last decade to capitalize on the discovery of nanobodies to study GPCRs from a structural perspective. Significance Statement G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are major pharmacological targets, and the determination of their structures at high resolution has been essential for structure-guided drug design and for insights about their functions. Single domain antibodies (nanobodies) have greatly facilitated the structural determination of GPCRs, by forming complexes directly with the receptors or indirectly through protein partners.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest class of transmembrane receptors encoded in the human genome, and they initiate cellular responses triggered by a plethora of extracellular stimuli ranging from neurotransmitters and hormones to photons. Upon stimulation, GPCRs activate heterotrimeric G proteins (Gαβγ) in the cytoplasm, which then convey signals to their effectors to elicit cellular responses. Given the broad biological and biomedical relevance of GPCRs and G proteins in physiology and disease, there is great interest in developing and optimizing approaches to measure their signaling activity with high accuracy and across experimental systems pertinent to their functions in cellular communication. This review provides a historical perspective on approaches to measure GPCR-G protein signaling, from quantification of second messengers and other indirect readouts of activity to biosensors that directly detect the activity of G proteins. The latter is the focus of a more detailed overview of the evolution of design principles for various optical biosensors of G protein activity with different experimental capabilities. We will highlight advantages and limitations of biosensors that detect different G protein activation hallmarks, like dissociation of Gα and Gβγ or nucleotide exchange on Gα, as well as their suitability to detect signaling mediated by endogenous versus exogenous signaling components or in physiologically relevant systems like primary cells. Overall, this review intends to provide an assessment of the state-of-the-art for biosensors that directly measure G protein activity to allow readers to make informed decisions on the selection and implementation of currently available tools. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: G protein activity biosensors have become essential and widespread tools to assess GPCR signaling and pharmacology. Yet, investigators face the challenge of choosing from a growing list of G protein activity biosensors. This review provides an overview of the features and capabilities of different optical biosensor designs for the direct detection of G protein activity in cells, with the aim of facilitating the rational selection of systems that align with the specific scientific questions and needs of investigators.

The class F of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) consists of ten Frizzleds (FZD1-10) and Smoothened (SMO). FZDs bind and are activated by secreted lipoglycoproteins of the Wingless/Int-1 (WNT) family and SMO is indirectly activated by the Hedgehog (Hh) family of morphogens acting on the transmembrane protein Patched (PTCH). The advance of our understanding of FZDs and SMO as dynamic transmembrane receptors and molecular machines, which emerged during the past 14 years since the first class F GPCR IUPHAR nomenclature report, justifies an update. This article focuses on the advances in molecular pharmacology and structural biology providing new mechanistic insight into ligand recognition, receptor activation mechanisms, signal initiation and signal specification. Furthermore, class F GPCRs continue to develop as drug targets, and novel technologies and tools such as genetically encoded biosensors and CRISP/Cas9 edited cell systems have contributed to refined functional analysis of these receptors. Also, advances in crystal structure analysis and cryogenic electron microscopy contribute to a rapid development of our knowledge about structure-function relationships providing a great starting point for drug development. Despite the progress questions and challenges remain to fully understand the complexity of the WNT/FZD and Hh/SMO signaling systems. Significance Statement The recent years of research have brought about substantial functional and structural insight into mechanisms of activation of Frizzleds and Smoothened. While the advance furthers our mechanistic understanding of ligand recognition, receptor activation, signal specification and initiation, broader opportunities emerge that allow targeting class F GPCRs for therapy and regenerative medicine employing both biologics and small molecule compounds.

\"Molecular Glues\" are defined as small molecules that can either be endogenous or synthetic which promote interactions between proteins at their interface. Allosteric modulators, specifically GPCR allosteric modulators, can promote both the association and the dissociation of a given receptor\'s transducer but accomplishes this \"at a distance\" from the interface. However, recent structures of GPCR G protein complexes in the presence of allosteric modulators indicate that some GPCR allosteric modulators can act as \"molecular glues\" interacting with both the receptor and the transducer at the interface biasing transducer signaling in both a positive and negative manner depending on the transducer. Given these phenomena we discuss the implications for this class of allosteric modulators to be used as molecular tools and for future drug development.

The cytotoxic necrotizing factor (CNF) family of AB-type bacterial protein toxins catalyze two types of modification on their Rho GTPase substrates: deamidation and transglutamination. It has been established that E. coli CNF1 and its close homolog proteins catalyze primarily deamidation and Bordetella dermonecrotic toxin (DNT) catalyzes primarily transglutamination. The rapidly expanding microbial genome sequencing data have revealed that there are at least 13 full-length variants of CNF1 homologs. CNFx from E. coli strain GN02091 is the most distant from all other members of the CNF family with 50%-55% sequence identity at the protein level and 0.45-0.52 nucleotide substitutions per site at the DNA level. CNFx modifies RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42, and like CNF1, activates downstream SRE-dependent mitogenic signaling pathways in human HEK293T cells, but at a 1,000-fold higher EC50 value. Unlike other previously characterized CNF toxins, CNFx modifies Rho proteins primarily through transglutamination, as evidenced by gel-shift assay and confirmed by MALDI mass spectral analysis, when coexpressed with Rho-protein substrates in E. coli BL21 cells or through direct treatment of HEK293T cells. A comparison of CNF1 and CNFx sequences identified two critical active-site residues corresponding to positions 832 and 862 in CNF1. Reciprocal site-specific mutations at these residues in each toxin revealed hierarchical rules that define the preference for deamidase versus a transglutaminase activity in CNFs. An additional unique Cys residue at the C-terminus of CNFx was also discovered to be critical for retarding cargo delivery.IMPORTANCECytotoxic necrotizing factor (CNF) toxins not only play important virulence roles in pathogenic E. coli and other bacterial pathogens, but CNF-like genes have also been found in an expanding number of genomes from clinical isolates. Harnessing the power of evolutionary relationships among the CNF toxins enabled the deciphering of the hierarchical active-site determinants that define whether they modify their Rho GTPase substrates through deamidation or transglutamination. With our finding that a distant CNF variant (CNFx) unlike other known CNFs predominantly transglutaminates its Rho GTPase substrates, the paradigm of \"CNFs deamidate and DNTs transglutaminate\" could finally be attributed to two critical amino acid residues within the active site other than the previously identified catalytic Cys-His dyad residues. The significance of our approach and research findings is that they can be applied to deciphering enzyme reaction determinants and substrate specificities for other bacterial proteins in the development of precision therapeutic strategies.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are efficient Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and exchange GDP to GTP on the Gα subunit of G protein heterotrimers in response to various extracellular stimuli, including neurotransmitters and light. GPCRs primarily broadcast signals through activated G proteins, GαGTP, and free Gβγ, and are major disease drivers. Evidence shows that the ambient low threshold signaling required for cells is likely supplemented by signaling regulators such as non-GPCR GEFs and Guanine nucleotide Dissociation Inhibitors (GDIs). Activators of G protein Signaling 3 (AGS3) are recognized as a GDI involved in multiple health and disease-related processes. Nevertheless, understanding of AGS3 is limited, and no significant information is available on its structure-function relationship or signaling regulation in living cells. Here, we employed in silico structure-guided engineering of a novel optogenetic GDI, based on the AGS3\'s G protein regulatory (GPR) motif, to understand its GDI activity and induce standalone Gβγ signaling in living cells on optical command. Our results demonstrate that plasma membrane recruitment of OptoGDI efficiently releases Gβγ, and its subcellular targeting generated localized PIP3 and triggered macrophage migration. Therefore, we propose OptoGDI as a powerful tool for optically dissecting GDI-mediated signaling pathways and triggering GPCR-independent Gβγ signaling in cells and in vivo.

GNAO1 mutated in pediatric encephalopathies encodes the major neuronal G protein Gαo. Of the more than 80 pathogenic mutations, most are single amino acid substitutions spreading across the Gαo sequence. We performed extensive characterization of Gαo mutants, showing abnormal GTP uptake and hydrolysis and deficiencies in binding Gβγ and RGS19. Plasma membrane localization of Gαo was decreased for a subset of mutations that leads to epilepsy; dominant interactions with GPCRs also emerged for the more severe mutants. Pathogenic mutants massively gained interaction with Ric8A and, surprisingly, Ric8B proteins, relocalizing them from cytoplasm to Golgi. Of these 2 mandatory Gα-subunit chaperones, Ric8A is normally responsible for the Gαi/Gαo, Gαq, and Gα12/Gα13 subfamilies, and Ric8B solely responsible for Gαs/Gαolf. Ric8 mediates the disease dominance when engaging in neomorphic interactions with pathogenic Gαo through imbalance of the neuronal G protein signaling networks. As the strength of Gαo-Ric8B interactions correlates with disease severity, our study further identifies an efficient biomarker and predictor for clinical manifestations in GNAO1 encephalopathies. Our work uncovers the neomorphic molecular mechanism of mutations underlying pediatric encephalopathies and offers insights into other maladies caused by G protein malfunctioning and further genetic diseases.

Mutations in the GNAO1 gene, which encodes the abundant brain G-protein Gα o, result in neurologic disorders characterized by developmental delay, epilepsy, and movement abnormalities. There are over 50 mutant alleles associated with GNAO1 disorders; the R209H mutation results in dystonia, choreoathetosis, and developmental delay without seizures. Mice heterozygous for the human mutant allele (Gnao1 +/R209H) exhibit hyperactivity in open field tests but no seizures. We developed self-complementary adeno-associated virus serotype 9 (scAAV9) vectors expressing two splice variants of human GNAO1 Gα o isoforms 1 (GoA, GNAO1.1) and 2 (GoB, GNAO1.2). Bilateral intrastriatal injections of either scAAV9-GNAO1.1 or scAAV9-GNAO1.2 significantly reversed mutation-associated hyperactivity in open field tests. GNAO1 overexpression did not increase seizure susceptibility, a potential side effect of GNAO1 vector treatment. This represents the first report of successful preclinical gene therapy for GNAO1 encephalopathy applied in vivo. Further studies are needed to uncover the molecular mechanism that results in behavior improvements after scAAV9-mediated Gα o expression and to refine the vector design. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: GNAO1 mutations cause a spectrum of developmental, epilepsy, and movement disorders. Here we show that intrastriatal delivery of scAAV9-GNAO1 to express the wild-type Gα o protein reduces the hyperactivity of the Gnao1 +/R209H mouse model, which carries one of the most common movement disorder-associated mutations. This is the first report of a gene therapy for GNAO1 encephalopathy applied in vivo on a patient-allele model.

The dorsal striatum is composed of the caudate nucleus and the putamen in human and non-human primates. These two regions receive different cortical projections and are functionally distinct. The caudate is involved in the control of goal-directed behaviors, while the putamen is implicated in habit learning and formation. Previous reports indicate that ethanol differentially influences neurotransmission in these two regions. Because neurotransmitters primarily signal through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to modulate neuronal activity, the present study aimed to determine whether ethanol had a region-dependent impact on the expression of proteins that are involved in the trafficking and function of GPCRs, including G protein subunits and their effectors, protein kinases, and elements of the cytoskeleton. Western blotting was performed to examine protein levels in the caudate and the putamen of male cynomolgus macaques that self-administered ethanol for 1 year under free access conditions, along with control animals that self-administered an isocaloric sweetened solution under identical operant conditions. Among the 18 proteins studied, we found that the levels of one protein (PKCβ) were increased, and 13 proteins (Gαi1/3, Gαi2, Gαo, Gβ1γ, PKCα, PKCε, CaMKII, GSK3β, β-actin, cofilin, α-tubulin, and tubulin polymerization promoting protein) were reduced in the caudate of alcohol-drinking macaques. However, ethanol did not alter the expression of any proteins examined in the putamen. These observations underscore the unique vulnerability of the caudate nucleus to changes in protein expression induced by chronic ethanol exposure. Whether these alterations are associated with ethanol-induced dysregulation of GPCR function and neurotransmission warrants future investigation.