背景:人工栖息地可以使许多鱼类聚集在一起并相互作用,并已被广泛用于恢复和保护渔业资源。这项研究旨在阐明罗非鱼(Oreochromismosambicus)肠道与人工渔业栖息地(水和沉积物)之间的微生物群落关系。因此,16SrDNA测序技术用于研究肠道细菌群落,水,和沉积物。
结果:结果表明,与水和沉积物相比,罗非鱼肠的操作分类单位(OTU)的丰富度最低,细菌群落的多样性最低。肠道,水,和沉积物微生物群落共享许多OTU。总的来说,从罗非鱼肠道中鉴定出663个共享OTU(76.20%),周围的水(71.14%),和人工生境中的沉积物(56.86%)。然而,在不同的样本类型中检测到独特的OTU。在罗非鱼肠道中观察到81、77和112个独特的OTU,周围的水和沉积物,分别。变形杆菌,蓝细菌,放线菌,Firmicutes,镰刀菌,拟杆菌是罗非鱼肠道和栖息地之间最常见和占优势的细菌门。在两组中,微生物群落的分类组成相似,但细菌门的丰度不同。有趣的是,Firmicutes增加,而人工生境中的镰刀菌减少。这些发现表明,人工栖息地对水环境的影响较小,并且表明人工栖息地的模式可能对罗非鱼肠道中的富集细菌产生影响。
结论:这项研究分析了肠道人工栖息地的细菌群落,水,和沉积物,这可以解释罗非鱼肠道与栖息地之间的关系,并增强人工栖息地提供生态服务的价值。
Artificial habitats can allow many fish to flock together and interact and have been widely used to restore and protect fishery resources. The piece of research intends to elucidate the relationship of microbial communities between tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) intestines and artificial fishery habitats (water and sediments). Hence, 16 S rDNA sequencing technology was used to study the bacterial communities from intestines, water, and sediments.
The results showed that the tilapia intestines had the lowest richness of Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) and the lowest diversity of the bacterial community compared to water and sediments. The intestine, water, and sediment microbial communities shared many OTUs. Overall, 663 shared OTUs were identified from the tilapia intestines (76.20%), the surrounding water (71.14%), and sediment (56.86%) in artificial habitats. However, there were unique OTUs that were detected in different sample types. There were 81, 77 and 112 unique OTUs observed in tilapia intestines, the surrounding water and sediment, respectively. Proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes,
Fusobacteria, and Bacteroidetes were the most common and dominant bacterial phyla between the tilapia intestines and habitats. In the two groups, the microbial communities were similar in the taxonomic composition but different in the abundance of bacterial phyla. Interestingly, Firmicutes increased, while
Fusobacteria decreased in artificial habitats. These findings indicated that the artificial habitats had fewer effects on the water environment and indicated that the mode of artificial habitats could have an effect on the enriched bacteria in the tilapia intestines.
This study analysed the bacterial communities of artificial habitats from the intestines, water, and sediments, which can explain the relationship between the tilapia intestines and habitats and strengthen the value of ecological services provided by artificial habitats.