BACKGROUND: Even though alcohol consumption is an established risk factor for cancer, evidence regarding the effect of a reduction or cessation of alcohol consumption on cancer incidence is scarce. Our main study aim was to assess the effect of alcohol rehabilitation and abstinence on cancer incidence in people with alcohol dependence.
METHODS: We conducted a nationwide hospital retrospective cohort study which included all adults residing in mainland France and discharged in 2018-21. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the effect of rehabilitation treatment at hospital or a history of abstinence versus alcohol dependence without rehabilitation or abstinence on the risk for incident alcohol-associated cancers by sex, controlled for potential confounding risk factors.
RESULTS: 10 260 056 men and 13 739 369 women were discharged from French hospitals in 2018-21. Alcohol dependence was identified in 645 720 (6·3%) men and 219 323 (1·6%) women. Alcohol dependence was strongly related to alcohol-associated cancer sites in both sexes (hepatocellular carcinoma and oral, pharyngeal, laryngeal, oesophageal, and colorectal cancers), except for breast cancer. Rehabilitation treatment or abstinence was associated with significantly lower risks compared with alcohol dependence without rehabilitation or abstinence (adjusted hazard ratios: 0·58, 99·89% CI 0·56-0·60 in men and 0·62, 0·57-0·66 in women). Relative risk reductions were significant for each alcohol-associated cancer site in both sexes and supported by all subgroup and sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study results support the clear benefits of alcohol rehabilitation and abstinence in reducing the risk for alcohol-associated cancers. As only two in five patients with alcohol dependence were recorded with a history of rehabilitation treatment or abstinence, a large untapped potential exists for reducing cancer incidence.
BACKGROUND: European Union\'s EU4Health programme.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: The COHQoL is a set of questionnaires used to evaluate the impact of oral health on children\'s quality of life. Although the CPQ8-10 and the P-CPQ have been translated and validated in French, the CPQ11-14 14 has not yet been validated. The aim was to develop a French version of the CPQ11-14 16-items.
METHODS: The French version of CPQ11-14 was obtained by a forward-backward translation process and pretested. The final version was tested on children aged 11-14 and divided into three groups: children with orofacial clefts, children with rare dental diseases other than clefts, and children without anomalies. We conducted a cross-sectional study and evaluated the reliability with test-retest and internal consistency, and the questionnaire validity with construct validity and discriminant validity. We performed an Exploratory Factory Analysis (EFA).
RESULTS: 187 children tested the questionnaire. The ICC of the test-retest was 0.76 and the Cronbach\'s alpha was 0.77. The correlation between the CPQ11-14 and self-assessment of oral health and general well-being was > 0.2. Patients with orofacial clefts and rare diseases had significantly higher scores for overall short-form CPQ11-14. The EFA revealed six factors.
CONCLUSIONS: The French CPQ11-14 is valid to assess the impact of oral health on children\'s quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: The translation of this questionnaire into French will enable us to assess the impact of oral health on the quality of life of adolescents. This questionnaire complements the 8-10 years version of the CPQ, as well as the parental version that can be used in conjunction with the questionnaire.

In recent years, the relationship between patients and healthcare professionals, and more broadly between public health actors and citizens, has shifted from a paternalistic, top-down approach to one of increased patient involvement in decision-making. Primary and secondary cancer prevention involve both benefits and risks, underscoring the importance of informed decision-making aligned with each patient and citizen\'s unique values and preferences. Shared decision-making, supported by decision aids, offers patients and citizens clear and comprehensible information about their options, enabling informed choices. This article aims to compile and define the characteristics of tools developed or translated into French for this purpose.
Depuis plusieurs années, la relation entre les patients et les professionnels de la santé et plus largement entre les acteurs de la santé publique et les citoyens a évolué, passant d’une approche paternaliste et top-down à une implication accrue des patients dans les décisions les concernant. La prévention primaire et secondaire des cancers présente des bénéfices mais parfois également des risques, nécessitant une décision alignée avec les valeurs et les préférences des patients et des citoyens. La prise de décision partagée, via des outils d’aide à la décision, offre aux patients des informations claires et faciles à comprendre à propos des options qui leur sont offertes, afin de prendre une décision éclairée. Cet article vise à recenser les outils créés ou traduits en français et à en définir les caractéristiques.

BACKGROUND: According to the World Health Organization, alcohol is a major global public health problem, leading to a significant increase in illness and death. To treat alcohol use disorders, new therapeutic tools are being promoted, among which virtual reality (VR) shows promise. Previous research has demonstrated the efficacy of VR in reducing alcohol cravings in patients, but there is a lack of data on its effectiveness in maintaining abstinence or reducing consumption in recently abstinent individuals. The E-Reva study aims to compare the efficacy of a treatment strategy combining virtual reality cue exposure therapy (VR-CET) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) with conventional CBT in reducing alcohol consumption and craving in patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD). In addition to this primary objective, the study will compare the effects of VR-CET combined with CBT on anxiety, depression, rumination, and feelings of self-efficacy versus conventional CBT.
METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled trial will be conducted over 8 months in four addiction departments in France. It includes two parallel groups: i) the VR-CET + CBT group, and ii) the CBT-only group, which serves as a control group. Participants will be recruited by the investigating doctor in the addiction centers. The sample will consist of 156 patients diagnosed with AUD and abstinent for at least 15 days. Both treatment groups will participate in four group CBT sessions followed by four individual sessions: i) the VR-CET group will be exposed to virtual environments associated with alcohol-related stimuli, ii) the CBT-only group will receive traditional CBT sessions. After completion of the 8 sessions, patients will be followed up for 6 months. The primary outcome is the cumulative number of standard drinks consumed at 8 months, assessed using the TLFB method.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the promise of VR-CET to reduce the desire to drink, the effect on alcohol consumption remains uncertain in the existing literature. Our protocol aims to address the limitations of previous research by increasing sample size, targeting consumption reduction, and incorporating neutral environments. E-Reva aims to enrich the literature on the use of VR in the treatment of AUD and open new perspectives for future interventions.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT06104176, Registered 2023/11/13 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06104176?id=NCT06104176&rank=1 ). N° IDRCB: 2022-A02797-36. Protocol version 1.0, 12/05/2023.

BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) have a central role to play on reduction of polypharmacy and deprescribing. This study aimed to assess beliefs and attitudes towards deprescribing in patients, aged 65 years or older in primary care, and to identify factors associated with deprescribing and their willingness to stop medication.
METHODS: A questionnaire study was performed between 23 May and 29 July 2022 on patients aged 65 years or older attending a GP\'s surgery in a French area. We used the French version of the revised Patients\' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing self-report questionnaire (rPATD), which measures four subscales (\"Burden\", \"Appropriateness\", \"Concerns about stopping\" and, \"Involvement\"), patients\' willingness to stop one of their regular medicines, and patients\' satisfaction with their current medicines.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 200 patients. Median age was 76 years old (IQR 71-81), 55% were women, and 42.5% took 5 or more medications per day. Although most patients (92.5%) were satisfied with their current medicines, 35% were reluctant to stop medications they had been taking for a long time, and 89.5% were willing to stop medication if asked to by their GP. Patients aged less than 75 years old reported more concerns about stopping. Women and patients with higher educational attainment showed significantly higher involvement in medication management.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of older adults were willing to stop one or more of their regular medicines if asked to do so by their GP. GPs should address deprescribing into their current practice.

OBJECTIVE: Oncologists\' psychological health is a major challenge due to the consequential concerning the quality of the care they provide. However, only critical states of their health have been really examined by scientists. This study sought to plug this gap by investigating the mediating role of psychological flourishing in the relationship between the perception of the professional social context (i.e., perceived workplace isolation and organizational support) and positive attitudes at work among oncologists (i.e., work engagement, task adjustment and empathy).
METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional, including 541 French oncologists. Participants completed a self-report questionnaire. Structural Equation Modeling was employed to test the hypotheses.
RESULTS: The analysis revealed that workplace isolation and organizational support perceptions were related to oncologists\' work engagement, task adjustment and empathy. Additionally, psychological flourishing acted as a partial mediator between these perceptions of professional social context and oncologists\' work-related attitudes.
CONCLUSIONS: This research underlined the potential of enhancing the psychological flourishing of oncologists by improving organizational support and mitigating their sense of isolation, and in turn, to enhance some dimensions of their positive attitudes at work.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to understand a major result of ComCor, an online epidemiological study conducted to identify the circumstances of COVID-19 infection in France from 2020 to 2022: One third of respondents reported ignoring the circumstances of their infection.
METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study through semi-structured interviews, diagnosed in spring or summer 2021. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed.
RESULTS: Fifty interviews were conducted. Half of the participants in Qualicor were able to identify several at-risk situations, most often involving their entourage (family, friends, colleagues), but were uncertain as to which specific situation was the source of infection. Less than one quarter strongly suspected a specific situation without certainty, a similar proportion were unable to identify any circumstances, and only two people were certain about the origin of the infection. Several factors contributed to this lack of knowledge: a desire to conceal these circumstances (in a few rare cases), limitations of the questionnaire, lack of knowledge about how the virus is transmitted, selective perception of at-risk situations, co-existence of several possible sources of infection, and the difficulty of taking an objective view of certain circumstances of transmission.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows the benefits of a mixed approach designed to better understand the perception of Covid 19 contamination circumstances in the French population. It also highlights the need to strengthen or improve communication on modes of virus transmission, especially airborne transmission, and the importance of maintaining certain preventive behaviors after vaccination.

BACKGROUND: The situation in France is unique, having a legal framework for continuous and deep sedation (CDS). However, its use in intensive care units (ICU), combined with the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies, still raises ethical issues, particularly its potential to hasten death. The legalization of assistance in dying, i.e., assisted suicide or euthanasia at the patient\'s request, is currently under discussion in France. The objectives of this national survey were first, to assess whether ICU professionals perceive CDS administered to ICU patients as a practice that hastens death, in addition to relieving unbearable suffering, and second, to assess ICU professionals\' perceptions of assistance in dying.
METHODS: A national survey with online questionnaires for ICU physicians and nursesaddressed through the French Society of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine.
RESULTS: A total of 956 ICU professionals responded to the survey (38% physicians and 62% nurses). Of these, 22% of physicians and 12% of nurses (p < 0.001) felt that the purpose of CDS was to hasten death. For 20% of physicians, CDS combined with terminal extubation was considered an assistance in dying. For 52% of ICU professionals, the current framework did not sufficiently cover the range of situations that occur in the ICU. A favorable opinion on the potential legalization of assistance in dying was observed in 83% of nurses and 71% of physicians (p < 0.001), with no preference between assisted suicide and euthanasia.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the tension between CDS and assisted suicide/euthanasia in the specific context of intensive care and suggest that ICU professionals would be supportive of a legislative evolution.

BACKGROUND: In France, influenza accounts for an average of over one million consultations with GPs, 20,000 hospitalizations, and 9000 deaths per year, particularly among the over-65s. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of the adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza vaccine (aQIV) compared to standard (SD-QIV) and high-dose (HD-QIV) quadrivalent influenza vaccines for individuals aged 65 and older in France.
METHODS: The age-structured SEIR transmission model, calibrated to simulate a mean influenza season, incorporates a contact matrix to estimate intergroup contact rates. Epidemiological, economic, and utility outcomes are evaluated. Vaccine effectiveness and costs are derived from literature and national insurance data. Quality of life adjustments for influenza attack rates and hospitalizations are applied. Deterministic and probabilistic analyses are also conducted.
RESULTS: Compared to SD-QIV, aQIV demonstrates substantial reductions in healthcare utilization and mortality, avoiding 89,485 GP consultations, 2144 hospitalizations, and preventing 1611 deaths. Despite an investment of EUR 110 million, aQIV yields a net saving of EUR 14 million in healthcare spending. Compared to HD-QIV, aQIV saves 62 million euros on vaccination costs. Cost-effectiveness analysis reveals an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EUR 7062 per QALY.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the cost-effectiveness of aQIV versus SD-QIV and HD-QIV, preventing influenza cases, hospitalizations, and deaths.