BACKGROUND: Currently, non- or minimally displaced distal radius fractures are treated by 3 to 5 weeks of cast immobilisation. Many patients with a distal radius fracture suffer from long-term functional restrictions, which might be related to stiffness due to cast immobilisation. Current literature indicates that 1 week of immobilisation might be safe; however, no level 1 evidence is available. This trial aims to compare 1 week of brace immobilisation with 3 weeks of cast immobilisation in patients with distal radius fractures that do not need reduction.
METHODS: The aim of this trial is to evaluate the non-inferiority of 1 week of brace immobilisation in patients with non- or minimally displaced distal radius fractures. A two-armed single blinded multicentre randomised clinical trial will be conducted in three hospitals. Adult patients, between 18 and 50 years old, independent for activities of daily living, with a non- or minimally displaced distal radius fracture can be included in this study. The intervention group is treated with 1 week of brace immobilisation, and the control group with 3 weeks of cast immobilisation. Primary outcome is the patient-reported outcome measured by the Patient-Related Wrist Evaluation score (PRWE) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes are patient-reported outcome measured by the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score at 6 weeks and 6 months, PRWE at 6 weeks, range of motion, patient-reported pain score measured by VAS score, radiological outcome (dorsal/volar tilt, radial height, ulnar variance, presence of intra-articular step off), complications and cost-effectiveness measured by the EuroQol 5 Dimension questionnaire, Medical Consumption Questionnaire and Productivity Cost Questionnaire.
CONCLUSIONS: This study will provide evidence on the optimal period of immobilisation in non-operatively treated displaced and reduced distal radius fractures. Both treatment options are accepted treatment protocols and both treatment options have a low risk of complications. Follow-up will be according to the current treatment protocol. This study will provide level 1 evidence on the optimal period and way of immobilisation for non- or minimally displaced distal radius fractures in adult patients.
BACKGROUND: ABR 81638 | NL81638.029.22 | www.toetsingonline.nl . 18th of October 2023.

OBJECTIVE: To report on adverse events during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with external fixators.
METHODS:  .
METHODS: Retrospective case series.
METHODS: Two Level 1 trauma centers.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with external fixators on the appendicular skeleton or pelvis undergoing MRI between January 2005 and September 2023.
UNASSIGNED: Adverse events, defined as any undesirable event associated with the external fixator being inside or outside the MRI bore during imaging, including (subjective) heating, displacement or pullout of the external fixator, or early MRI termination for any reason.
RESULTS: A total of 97 patients with 110 external fixators underwent at least one MRI scan with an external fixator inside or outside of the MRI bore. The median age was 51 years (interquartile range: 39-63) and 56 (58%) were male. The most common external fixator locations were the ankle (24%), knee (21%), femur (21%), and pelvis (19%). The median duration of the MRI was 40 minutes (interquartile range: 26-58), 86% was performed using 1.5-Tesla MRI, and 14% was performed using 3.0-Tesla MRI. Ninety-five percent of MRI was performed for the cervical spine/head. Two MRI scans (1.6%), one of the shoulder and one of the head and cervical spine, with the external fixator outside of the bore were terminated early because of patient discomfort. There were no documented events of displacement or pullout of the external fixator.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that MRI scans of the (cervical) spine and head can be safely obtained in patients with external fixators on the appendicular skeleton or pelvis. Given the low numbers of MRI scans performed with the external fixator inside the bore, additional studies are necessitated to determine the safety of this procedure. The results from this study can aid orthopaedic surgeons, radiologists, and other stakeholders in developing local institutional guidelines on MRI scanning with external fixators in situ.
METHODS: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

UNASSIGNED: To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of Kirschner wires (KWs) as a blocking screw technique for extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia treated with intramedullary nails (IMNs).
UNASSIGNED: Fifty-three patients were treated with KW-assisted IMN for extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia via the blocking screw technique or Poller screw (PS) technique. The operation time, number of fluoroscopies, number of blocking screws used, blood loss and time to union were compared between the two groups. Additionally, the functional outcomes of the two groups were compared using range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), and Lysholm scores.
UNASSIGNED: Compared with those in the PS group, the operation time in the KW group was significantly shorter, and the number of fluoroscopy procedures and amount of blood loss during KW surgery were also significantly lower (p = 0.014, 0.001, and 0.036, respectively). Regarding the functional outcomes, there were no significant differences in the ROM, VAS score, AOFAS score or Lysholm score between the two groups (p > 0.05).
UNASSIGNED: In the treatment of extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia with nails, the use of KW as a blocking screw technique is safe and reliable.

BACKGROUND: Although the microplate system is commonly used for the treatment of maxillofacial fractures, its use in the fixation of mandibular fractures is not widely accepted.
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of microplates and miniplates in osteosynthesis for the internal fixation of undisplaced and minimally displaced anterior mandibular fractures.
METHODS: A total of 40 patients diagnosed with undisplaced or minimally displaced symphyseal and parasymphyseal fractures were randomly assigned to 2 study groups (group A and group B). Patients in group A (microplate group) were treated with two 0.8-mm microplates, whereas patients in group B (miniplate group) received two 2.0-mm miniplates. Bite force values were recorded in 30 healthy individuals (control group) to establish baseline values. Postoperative bite force values were recorded at various intervals and compared between the study groups and the control group.
RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated a progressive improvement in the bite force. However, the bite force values recorded at the 2nd, 4th and 6th postoperative weeks were comparatively lower in the microplate group. At the six-week follow-up, the bite force values were lower in both study groups in comparison to the control group. There were no differences in the incidence of postoperative complications between the study groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of microplates in the management of undisplaced or minimally displaced anterior mandibular fractures results in a reduction in the recovery of biting force in comparison to the conventional miniplate system.

Intertrochanteric fractures are a common occurrence in the general population; however, in patients with above-knee amputations, they are relatively rare. In this patient population, positioning on a fracture table presents a particularly difficult problem prior to the fixation of an intertrochanteric fracture. Here, we describe a 57-year-old man with extensive vasculopathy and reduced bone density who presents with an intertrochanteric fracture after a fall from standing. Adequate traction of the amputated leg was achieved via the modification of a standard fracture table and the utilization of a Bohler traction bow. Fixation of the intertrochanteric fracture was successful, and the patient suffered no postoperative complications.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of surgical stabilization of pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures with the use of crossed Kirschner wires versus divergent lateral pinning wires.
METHODS: This is a systematic review with meta-analysis carried out by searching the MEDLINE/PubMed, Science Direct and Scielo databases. In these, the search for journals was carried out between January and August 2023, where 695 studies were found. To assess the quality of the studies, the Jadad and the MINORS scales were used.. The selection and reading of relevant articles were carried out by the researchers and 11 studies met the selection criteria.
RESULTS: From the 11 selected studies, 963 patients who met the criteria for the surgical treatment of these fractures were grouped. After the statistical analysis, we found that the ulnar nerve injury had a higher incidence when the crossed-K wire technique was used; and the lateral fixation is safer for the ulnar nerve.
CONCLUSIONS: Both fixation techniques determine good functional results. However, fixation with lateral Kirschner wires proves to be safer considering the risk of iatrogenic injury to the ulnar nerve. Crossed-K wire fixation is more effective in terms of stability and maintenance of fracture reduction. Level of Evidence II, Systematic Review of Level II or Level I Studies with discrepant results.
Objetivo: Comparar os desfechos da estabilização cirúrgica das fraturas supracondilianas do úmero pediátricas com o uso de fios de Kirschner cruzados versus fios laterais divergentes. Métodos: Trata-se de uma Revisão Sistemática com metanálise realizada pela pesquisa nas bases de dados MEDLINE/PubMed, Science Direct e Scielo. Nessas, a busca dos periódicos foi realizada entre janeiro e agosto de 2023, e foram encontrados 695 estudos. Para a avaliação da sua qualidade, foram utilizadas a escala de Jadad e a escala MINORS. A seleção e a leitura dos artigos pertinentes foram realizadas pelos pesquisadores e 11 estudos preencheram os critérios de escolha. Resultados: Dos estudos selecionados, agrupamos 963 pacientes que preenchiam os critérios para o tratamento cirúrgico das fraturas. Após a análise estatística, observamos que maior incidência de lesão do nervo ulnar quando foi utilizada a técnica de pinagem cruzada; e a fixação lateral demonstrou ser mais segura para tal. Conclusão: Ambas as técnicas de fixação determinam bons resultados funcionais. Entretanto, a fixação com fios de Kirschner laterais demonstra ser mais segura, considerando o risco de lesão iatrogênica do nervo ulnar. A fixação com fios cruzados é mais eficaz, levando em conta a estabilidade e a manutenção da redução das fraturas. Nível de evidência II, Revisão sistemática de Estudos de Nível II ou Nível I com resultados discrepantes.

OBJECTIVE: The management of length-unstable femoral shaft fractures(LUFSFs) in pediatric patients is still controversial. This study aims to explore the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided closed reduction combined with external fixation for treating LUFSFs in children.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from 19 pediatric patients with LUFSFs who underwent ultrasound-guided closed reduction and external fixation between January 2018 and January 2023. Ultrasound was employed not only to facilitate closed reduction of the fracture but also to guide real-time insertion of Schanz pins and monitor pin length as it traversed the opposite cortex. Surgical time, intraoperative fluoroscopy count, hospital stay length, fracture fixation duration, complication incidence, fracture reduction quality at the final follow-up were recorded.
RESULTS: The patients\' average age was 7.5 years( range: 5 to 11 years). The mean surgical duration was 70.4 min (range: 48-105 min), and the average intraoperative fluoroscopy count was 6.5 (range: 2-16). Fracture fixation lasted an average of 10.9 weeks (range: 7-20 weeks). All patients were followed up for more than one year. 6 cases of superficial pin tract infection occurred, which resolved with oral antibiotics and enhanced needle tract care. No deep infections were observed. Temporary stiffness of the knee joint was observed in 2 patients. According to Flynn\'s efficacy evaluation system, fracture reduction quality at the final follow-up was rated as excellent in 11 cases and satisfactory in 8 cases, yielding a combined success rate of 100% (19/19).
CONCLUSIONS: The technique of ultrasound-guided closed reduction combined with external fixation offers favorable outcomes for children aged 5 to 11 years with LUFSFs, reducing reliance on fluoroscopic guidance.

BACKGROUND: Proximal femur fractures are common among older individuals and pose challenges in achieving effective post-operative analgesia. Age-related co-morbidities limit the selection of analgesics in this population. This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of transdermal buprenorphine (TDB) patch with traditional analgesics after fixation of an extracapsular fracture of the proximal femur.
METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted over a 2-year period, involving 60 patients who underwent surgery for extra capsular intertrochanteric fracture fixation. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups by random envelope method. Group A received an intravenous formulation of paracetamol and tramadol for the initial 48 h, followed by an oral formulation. Group B received a transdermal buprenorphine (TDB) patch delivering 5 mcg/hour immediately after surgery, which continued for 2 weeks postoperatively. During the 14-day monitoring period, patients\' pain scores were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at rest and during movement. The primary objective was to maintain a VAS score of 4 or lower. Rescue analgesics were administered if the VAS score reached 6. The secondary objectives included evaluating the quantity of rescue analgesics required and monitoring for any adverse effects or complications.
RESULTS: Pain scores at rest and during movement were significantly lower in Group B at all-time points (p-value 0.0006 - ≤ 0.0001), and the requirement for rescue analgesia was also significantly lower in this group. The administration of the TDB patch did not result in any significant adverse effects.
CONCLUSIONS: TDB patch is secure and offers better compliance and analgesia than other analgesics in the postoperative period whilst treating proximal femur extra capsular fracture.

UNASSIGNED: Current treatments do not support direct exposure of fracture fragments, resulting in the inability to directly observe the articular surface during surgery for accurate reduction and firm fixation.
UNASSIGNED: The aim of the study was to explore the treatment effect of digital virtual reduction combined with individualized guide plate of lateral tibial condyle osteotomy on tibial plateau fracture involving the lateral posterior condyle collapse.
UNASSIGNED: 41 patients with tibial plateau fracture involving the lateral posterior condyle collapse were recruited in the trial. All patients underwent Computed Tomography (CT) scanning before operation. After operation, fracture reduction was evaluated using Rasmussen score and function of knee joint was assessed using hospital for special surgery (HSS) score.
UNASSIGNED: 41 patients were followed-up 6-26 months (mean, 15.2 months). Fracture reduction was good after operation, with an average of 13.3 weeks of fracture healing without serious complications. The excellent and good rate was 97.6%. The joint movement degree was -5∘∼0∘∼135∘ with an average of 125.5∘.
UNASSIGNED: Digital virtual reduction combined with individualized guide plate of lateral tibial condyle osteotomy was effectively for treating tibial plateau fracture involving the lateral posterior condyle collapse.

BACKGROUND: The standard starting point for percutaneous sacroiliac screw insertion was initially determined at the intersection of the line posterior to the anterior superior iliac spine and the line continuing the anatomical axis of the femur. The technique was pioneered in patients lying prone in surgery, although it has been used with patients in the supine position. The optimal starting point for patients in both prone and supine positions remains uncertain.
OBJECTIVE: This cadaveric study aimed to determine the best entry point for the percutaneous insertion of sacroiliac screws depending on the patient\'s positioning for surgery.
METHODS: Kirschner wires (K-wires) were percutaneously inserted into the sacral body of 8th human cadavers. In addition to the so-called standard sacroiliac screw entry point (point A), points located consecutively 1 cm (point B) and 2 cm (point C) cranially from the point along the line, prolonging the femoral axis were also studied. The K-wires were inserted into the studied entry points on the right side in a supine position and on the left side of the same cadaver in a prone position. The placement of the K-wires was assessed using radiographic imaging and cadaver dissection.
RESULTS: An analysis of the K-wire placement in the supine position revealed incorrect positioning of 100% of the K-wires inserted at entry point A and 87% at entry point B. All the K-wires inserted in the supine position at entry point C were correctly placed. All K-wires inserted in the prone position were correctly positioned.
CONCLUSIONS: All 3 studied entry points enabled the correct placement of orthopedic implants for prone position surgery. The best entry point for surgery performed in the supine position was located 2 cm cranially from the standard entry point, along the line prolonging the femoral axis.