Forensic psychology

法医心理学
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    世界卫生组织将自杀视为全球卫生紧急情况。在自杀中,在收集证言数据时,往往会遇到家庭成员拒绝接受自残事件的假设以及提供有关此事的明确信息的情况.心理尸检是一种历史上以收集死者信息而闻名的调查工具,尽管到目前为止,还没有标准的方法协议来进行与家庭成员/近亲的访谈。
    我们提出了三起可疑的自杀案件:与燃料有关的死亡;在聚会中吊死;喉咙割伤多处刺伤。在采访过程中,操作员避免对事件提出紧迫或直接的问题,更喜欢自由讨论死者(意识流)的采访。
    最初,亲属表现出明确拒绝自杀假设的态度,并坚持要求澄清所发生的事情。随后,通过使用自由形式的面试,仍然有可能拦截,在故事中,自杀意念或精神病合并症的预测迹象,以前没有治疗,可能不被亲属接受,特别是通过描述死者的日常行为和家庭习惯和环境条件。这些案例证明了使用标准化方法和对家庭成员进行免费访谈以间接调查事件的重要性。
    UNASSIGNED: Suicide is considered a global health emergency by the WHO. In suicide, the collection of testimonial data often encounters the refusal of family members to accept the hypothesis of a self-harming event and to provide clear information on the matter. The psychological autopsy is an investigative tool historically known for collecting information on the deceased, although to date there is no standard methodological protocol for conducting interviews with family members/next of kin.
    UNASSIGNED: We present three dubious suicide cases: fuel-related death; hanging during a party; throat cutting with multiple stab wounds. During the interview the operators avoided pressing or direct questions about the event, preferring the interview with free discussion about the deceased (stream of consciousness).
    UNASSIGNED: Initially, the relatives showed an attitude of clear rejection of the suicidal hypothesis with insistent requests for clarity on what had happened. Subsequently, through the use of free-form interviews, it was still possible to intercept, in the stories, predictive signs of suicidal ideation or psychiatric comorbidities previously un-treated and probably not accepted by the relatives, especially through the description of daily acts and household habits and environmental conditions of the deceased. The cases demonstrate the importance of using standardized methods with the use of free interviews with family members in order to indirectly investigate the event.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先前的研究表明,自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的核心特征可能会导致犯罪行为和刑事司法系统内的脆弱性增加。迄今为止,缺乏证据来评估ASD成人犯罪行为干预措施的有效性,但在广泛的法医环境中没有同时发生智力残疾(ID).缺乏有力的证据令人担忧,因为有限的有效性可能会增加长期监禁的可能性,特别是在最严格的设置中。进行了PRISMA系统审查,并进行了叙述性综合,以:(a)评估旨在减少累犯的干预措施有效性的证据,(b)评估ASD的核心特征是否影响这些干预措施的有效性,(c)确定可能影响该人群干预措施有效性的其他因素。确定了涉及10名男性参与者的7项研究。研究结果表明,对无智力障碍(ID)的ASD成年人的冒犯行为的干预措施在很大程度上是不够的,并且需要考虑核心ASD功能。此外,提出了可能影响干预效果的风险因素的复杂相互作用.局限性包括干预类型之间的异质性,有效性的措施,以及什么构成了有效性。尽管研究数量和数据质量有限,该综述与越来越多的文献相一致,这些文献强调了ASD患者的脆弱性和基于证据的干预措施的必要性.审查还讨论了无效干预措施的更广泛影响。
    Previous research has suggested that the core features of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) may contribute to offending behaviours and increased vulnerability within the Criminal Justice System. To date, there is a paucity of evidence assessing the effectiveness of interventions for offending behaviour in adults with ASD but without co-occurring intellectual disability (ID) across a broad range of forensic settings. The lack of robust evidence is concerning, as limited effectiveness may contribute to an increased likelihood of prolonged incarceration, particularly in the most restrictive settings. A PRISMA systematic review was conducted with a narrative synthesis to: (a) evaluate the evidence of the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing recidivism, (b) assess whether the core features of ASD impact the effectiveness of these interventions, and (c) identify additional factors that may affect the effectiveness of interventions within this population. Seven studies involving ten male participants were identified. The findings suggest that interventions for offending behaviours in adults with ASD without intellectual disability (ID) are largely inadequate, and that core ASD features need to be considered. Additionally, a complex interplay of risk factors potentially impacting intervention effectiveness was suggested. Limitations include heterogeneity across intervention types, measures of effectiveness, and what constitutes effectiveness. Despite the limited number of studies and data quality, the review aligns with a growing body of literature highlighting vulnerability and a need for evidence-based interventions for people with ASD. The review also discusses the broader implications of ineffective interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    五十年前,在挑战应用测谎理论和科学的尖锐分析中,DavidLykken(1974)将测谎讯问方法引起了学术界的注意,希望这些技术将属于心理学和心理生理学的范畴。从这个角度来看,我研究了心理生理学的这种应用在过去的半个世纪中是如何发展的,以及它的地位是如何变化的,因为1)比较(对照)问题测试(CQT),用于法医应用;2)测谎仪筛查测试,用于评估考生的完整性;3)隐蔽信息技术(CIT),用于评估犯罪细节的识别记忆。在过去的半个世纪中,学术界对Lykken提出的CQT和筛选测试的批评得到了扩大和关注。然而,这对这些方法的实践几乎没有影响,也没有减少它们的使用。尽管现在禁止大多数私营部门员工筛查测试,对政府雇员的人员筛选有所增加,性犯罪者的筛查测试现在已经司空见惯。尽管CIT作为一种科学上可辩护的技术引起了心理生理学家的兴趣,它的现场使用微不足道。测谎审讯的主要目的仍然是提取录取和供词。测谎仪测试现状缺乏变化,很大程度上源于政府对使用这些方法的坚定支持。因此,测谎仪理论和研究支持继续处于不稳定的基础上,而实践继续不受有效批评的束缚。
    Fifty years ago, in a trenchant analysis that challenged applied lie detection theory and science, David Lykken (1974) brought polygraphic interrogation methods to the attention of academia with the hope that these techniques would come under the purview of psychology and psychophysiology. In this perspective, I examine how this application of psychophysiology has evolved over the last half century and how its status has changed for 1) the comparison (control) question test (CQT), used in forensic applications; 2) polygraph screening tests, used to evaluate examinee integrity; and 3) the concealed information technique (CIT), used to assess recognition memory of crime details. The criticisms of the CQT and screening tests advanced by Lykken have been amplified and focused by the academic community over the last half century. However, this has had little effect on how these methods are practiced and has not curtailed their use. Although most private sector employee screening tests are now prohibited, personnel screening of government employees has increased, and screening tests of sex offenders are now commonplace. Even though the CIT has captured the interest of psychophysiologists as a scientifically defensible technique, its field use is negligible. A primary purpose of polygraphic interrogations continues to be the extraction of admissions and confessions. The lack of change in the polygraph testing status quo stems in large part from unwavering government support for the use of these methods. As a result, polygraph theory and research support continues to rest on shaky ground while practice continues unfettered by valid criticism.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    长期自杀,特定类型的杀人自杀事件,具有严重的社会后果,但仍然缺乏系统的研究。这项回顾性研究调查了中国中部地区51例涉及精神障碍的长期自杀病例,目的是更好地了解此类事件的危险因素并指导预防策略。从2015年到2022年的8年期间,从法医机构收集了案件,和人口特征,案例详细信息,并记录精神病数据.这51起事件涉及51名肇事者和79名受害者,更多的女性犯罪者(58.8%)和更多的女性受害者(54.4%)。肇事者的平均年龄为36.1岁,大多数已婚(88.2%)。几乎所有受害者都是肇事者的家人,像最多的孩子(64.6%),其次是配偶(24.1%)。最常见的杀人死亡方式是机械性窒息(38.0%),其次是尖锐装置(36.7%)和药物中毒(16.5%)。抑郁症(76.5%)是肇事者最常见的精神障碍诊断。该研究分析了长期自杀的独特特征,以丰富此类数据。这些发现有助于加强对潜在肇事者和受害者的筛查和识别,以防止此类案件发生。
    Extended suicide, a specific type of homicide-suicide event, has severe social consequences yet remains lacking systematic research. This retrospective study investigated 51 cases of extended suicide involving mental disorders in central China with aim of better understanding risk factors for such events and guiding prevention strategies. Over an 8-year period from 2015 to 2022, cases were collected from forensic institutions, and demographic characteristics, case details, and psychiatric data were recorded. The 51 incidents involved 51 perpetrators and 79 victims, with more female perpetrators (58.8%) and more female victims (54.4%). The average age of the perpetrators was 36.1, and most were married (88.2%). Almost all of the victims were family members of the perpetrator, like the most numerous children (64.6%), followed by spouses (24.1%). The most common homicide mode of death was mechanical asphyxia (38.0%), followed by sharp devices (36.7%) and drug poisoning (16.5%). Depressive disorders (76.5%) were the most common diagnosis of mental disorder for perpetrators. The study analyzed the unique characteristics of extended suicide to enrich such data. These findings help strengthen the screening and identification of potential perpetrators and victims to prevent such cases from occurring.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    技术促进的性虐待是指利用信息和通信技术促进虚拟和当面性犯罪。关于这个主题的研究集中在费率上,危险因素,和后果。本范围审查旨在了解法医心理程序是否以及如何适应评估青少年受害者,以及基于互联网的信息如何作为补充数据有用。遵循系统审查和Meta分析扩展的首选报告项目,用于范围审查指南,2023年4月在五个电子数据库中进行了搜索,包括葡萄牙语,西班牙语,或英语定量,定性,或混合方法同行评审的研究。在2523项研究中,六个被认为是合格的。确定的程序包括根据国家儿童健康和人类发展协议研究所进行的法医访谈,风险和创伤评估。虽然在采访中讨论技术在滥用中的作用是有益的,面对青少年的虐待证据会对他们的证词和康复产生不利影响。除非明确披露,否则评估工具通常只关注或忽视滥用,暗示转介,或者当保护问题被提出时。临床,法医,并详细阐述了刑事影响。
    Technology-facilitated sexual abuse refers to the use of information and communication technologies to facilitate both virtual and in-person sexual crimes. Research on this topic has focused on rates, risk factors, and consequences. This scoping review aims to understand whether and how forensic psychological procedures are adapted to assess adolescent victims and how Internet-based information might be useful as complementary data. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extensions for Scoping Reviews guidelines, searches were conducted in April 2023 in five electronic databases to include Portuguese, Spanish, or English quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method peer-reviewed studies. Of the 2523 studies, six were considered eligible. Identified procedures include forensic interviews following the National Institute for Child Health and Human Development Protocol, and risk and trauma assessments. While discussing technology\'s role in abuse during interviews was informative, confronting adolescents with evidence of their abuse had adverse effects on their testimony and recovery. The assessment tools often had a narrow focus or overlooked the abuse unless explicitly disclosed, implied a referral, or when safeguarding concerns were raised. Clinical, forensic, and criminal implications are elaborated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着其作为神经心理学亚专业的成立,法医神经心理学评估是许多刑事和民事法医评估不可或缺的一部分。除了评估认知缺陷,法医神经心理学家可以提供关于症状放大的可靠信息,恶意,以及其他可能影响特定法律案件结果的神经认知和心理问题。本文是对法医心理健康背景下的神经心理学评估的概述和介绍。总结了影响当前法医神经心理学实践的主要问题,并强调了案例法的几个例子。
    With its firm establishment as a neuropsychology subspecialty, forensic neuropsychological assessment is integral to many criminal and civil forensic evaluations. In addition to evaluating cognitive deficits, forensic neuropsychologists can provide reliable information regarding symptom magnification, malingering, and other neurocognitive and psychological issues that may impact the outcome of a particular legal case. This article is an overview and introduction to neuropsychological assessment in the forensic mental health context. Major issues impacting the current practice of forensic neuropsychology are summarized, and several examples from case law are highlighted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究探讨了认知功能和攻击性之间的复杂关系,特别关注容易反应或主动攻击的个人。该研究的目的是确定重要的神经心理学结构和适当的测试,以理解和解决侵略。
    一个由32名法医神经心理学专家组成的国际小组参与了这项由迭代在线问卷组成的三轮Delphi研究。专家们根据研究领域标准(RDoC)框架对结构的重要性进行了评估。随后,他们提出了可用于评估这些结构的测试,并对其适用性进行评级。
    小组确定了RDoC域负价系统,社会进程,认知系统和正价系统是理解侵略最重要的系统。值得注意的是,结果强调了积极效价系统在主动侵略中的重要性和消极效价系统在反应侵略中的重要性。小组提出了一系列223种不同的测试,尽管他们指出,并非每个RDoC构建体都可以通过神经心理学测试进行有效测量。讨论了多模态评估策略的附加值。
    这项研究促进了我们对与侵略相关的RDoC结构的理解,并为评估策略提供了有价值的见解。与其建议一套固定的测试,我们的研究采用灵活的方法,为每个构建体提供前3名列表.这种方法允许定制评估以满足特定的临床或研究需求。一个重要的限制是专家小组主要由荷兰组成,尽管进行了广泛的多样化努力。
    UNASSIGNED: This study explores the intricate relationship between cognitive functioning and aggression, with a specific focus on individuals prone to reactive or proactive aggression. The purpose of the study was to identify important neuropsychological constructs and suitable tests for comprehending and addressing aggression.
    UNASSIGNED: An international panel of 32 forensic neuropsychology experts participated in this three-round Delphi study consisting of iterative online questionnaires. The experts rated the importance of constructs based on the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework. Subsequently, they suggested tests that can be used to assess these constructs and rated their suitability.
    UNASSIGNED: The panel identified the RDoC domains Negative Valence Systems, Social Processes, Cognitive Systems and Positive Valence Systems as most important in understanding aggression. Notably, the results underscore the significance of Positive Valence Systems in proactive aggression and Negative Valence Systems in reactive aggression. The panel suggested a diverse array of 223 different tests, although they noted that not every RDoC construct can be effectively measured through a neuropsychological test. The added value of a multimodal assessment strategy is discussed.
    UNASSIGNED: This research advances our understanding of the RDoC constructs related to aggression and provides valuable insights for assessment strategies. Rather than suggesting a fixed set of tests, our study takes a flexible approach by presenting a top-3 list for each construct. This approach allows for tailored assessment to meet specific clinical or research needs. An important limitation is the predominantly Dutch composition of the expert panel, despite extensive efforts to diversify.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着法医心理学作为一个独立的领域不断扩大,专业人员经常诉诸心理评估工具来评估司法系统中涉及的人员。人格评估清单(PAI)是344项,自我报告清单,旨在为诊断和临床决策提供有意义的信息,特别是关于精神病理学,个性,和社会心理环境。与其他自我报告清单相比,其在法医环境中的适用性已得到越来越多的认可(例如,MMPI-2,MCMI-III),因为它包括与法医设置相关的尺度(例如,暴力风险水平,精神病,药物滥用),当处理高度防御性和/或恶意人群时,轮廓扭曲指标的存在是有用的。本文的目的是对PAI在法医环境中的实用程序进行全面审查,通过关注PAI评估的相关法医结构(例如,人格障碍,精神病,药物滥用,侵略,累犯风险,和响应失真),以及它在罪犯和囚犯群体中的应用,亲密伴侣暴力背景,家庭法案件,和法医专业人员。总的来说,PAI继续获得国际认可,其在法医环境中的相关性和有用性得到了普遍接受和认可。
    As Forensic Psychology continues to expand as an independent field, professionals regularly resort to psychological assessment tools to assess people involved within the justice system. The Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) is a 344-item, self-report inventory that aims to provide meaningful information for diagnosis and clinical decision-making, specifically relating to psychopathology, personality, and psychosocial environment. Its applicability in forensic settings has been increasingly recognized on account of its benefits in comparison to other self-report inventories (e.g., MMPI-2, MCMI-III), since it includes scales that are relevant to forensic settings (e.g., violence risk levels, psychopathy, substance abuse), and the existence of profile distortion indicators is useful when dealing with highly defensive and/or malingering populations. The goal of this paper is to conduct a thorough review of the PAI\'s utility in forensic settings, by focusing on the relevant forensic constructs assessed by the PAI (e.g., personality disorders, psychosis, substance abuse, aggression, recidivism risk, and response distortion), as well as its application to offender and inmate populations, intimate partner violence contexts, family law cases, and forensic professionals. Overall, the PAI continues to gather international recognition and its relevance and usefulness in forensic settings is generally accepted and acknowledged.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    互联网在现代生活中起着普遍的作用,包括人类性行为和性侵犯的表达。一系列在线性活动可能对法医心理健康评估(FMHE)感兴趣,包括那些明显非法的或那些合法但功能上有问题的。在线性犯罪显然会促使法医评估人员考虑互联网在这些犯罪行为中的作用。互联网也可能与接触性犯罪的法医评估有关,包括告知混合或交叉犯罪的历史,和互联网促进的接触犯罪。对互联网数据的审查可能跨越几个在线域,其中许多为用户提供了实质性的匿名性,并且可能无法提供给评估者,除非通过发现过程提供。已经提出了审查FMHE中互联网数据的早期指南,并支持互联网作为对性行为进行法医评估的有用的附带数据来源。
    The Internet plays a pervasive role in modern life including the expression of human sexuality and sexual offending. A range of online sexual activities may be of interest in forensic mental health evaluations (FMHE), including those which are clearly illegal or those which are legal but functionally problematic. Online sexual offenses will clearly prompt forensic evaluators to consider the role of the Internet in these offending behaviors. The Internet may also be relevant in forensic evaluations of contact sexual offending including informing on history of mixed or cross-over offending, and Internet-facilitated contact offenses. A review of Internet-data may span several online domains, many of which provide the user with substantial anonymity and would likely not be available to the evaluator unless provided through the process of discovery. Early guidelines for the review of Internet-data in FMHEs have been proposed and support the Internet as a useful source of collateral data in the conduct of forensic evaluations of sexual behavior.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    法医心理健康评估的核心原则是使用多种数据源。传统上,这些来源包括对考生的临床访谈和观察,书面记录审查,心理测试数据,以及对抵押品来源的采访。来自社交媒体和社交网站(SNS)的数据现在被广泛用于民事诉讼。然而,现有的专业实践标准和指南没有具体解决SNS数据的使用。这使得法医心理健康评估人员几乎没有指导为什么,何时以及如何将SNS数据纳入他们的评估中。我们回顾了有关在人身伤害和残疾案件中使用SNS和其他社交媒体数据的现有文献,包括法律,伦理,和实际考虑,目的是为法医心理健康从业者提供一个框架,以决定何时以及如何将这些数据纳入他们的评估和意见。我们提倡谨慎进行社交媒体和互联网的独立搜索,并根据SNS帖子对内部状态进行推断。为了说明这些观点,我们包括一个案例研究。
    A central tenet of forensic mental health assessment is the use of multiple sources of data. Traditionally, these sources have included clinical interviews with and observations of the examinee, written records review, psychological test data, and interviews with collateral sources. Data from social media and social networking sites (SNS) is now widely used in civil litigation. However, existing professional practice standards and guidelines do not specifically address the use of SNS data. This leaves forensic mental health evaluators with little guidance as to why, when and how to incorporate SNS data into their evaluations. We review the extant literature on the use of SNS and other social media data in personal injury and disability cases, including legal, ethical, and practical considerations, with the goal of providing forensic mental health practitioners with a framework for making decisions about when and how to incorporate these data into their evaluations and opinions. We advocate caution in conducting independent searches of social media and the Internet, and in making inferences about internal states based on SNS postings. To illustrate these points, we include a case study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号