暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: To secure a residency in the United States, medical students must pass the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 and Step 2 CK exams. This study examines the correlation between international medical graduates\' (IMGs) self-study habits and their USMLE scores.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted with 51 anonymous third- and fourth-year IMGs from Saint James Medical School, IL, United States. Participants completed an online survey about their study habits and USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores. All participants were undergoing clinical clerkships at South Texas Health Hospitals in McAllen, TX.
RESULTS: The highest mean Step 1 scores were 211.3 for completing ≥7,000 questions, 222.2 for 91-120 days of study, 209.2 for 76-100% time on practice questions, 229.7 for 16-19 hours/day of study, and 228.0 for 51-75% group study. The highest mean Step 2 CK scores were 241.0 for completing ≥6,000 questions, 239.8 for <30 days of study, 238.8 for 76-100% time on practice questions, 239.0 for 16-19 hours/day of study, and 237.5 for 26-50% group study. No significant relationship was found between study habits and passing Step 1 scores (p>0.05), but moderate correlations were found for completing ≥4,000 questions and 61-90 days of study. No significant relationship was found between study habits and the national average Step 2 CK score, but a strong correlation was found for 25-50% time on practice questions.
CONCLUSIONS: While some study habits correlate with higher scores, no significant relationship was found between specific study habits and passing Step 1 or achieving the national average Step 2 CK score.

From July 2019 through April 2021, the Latino Center for Health, a bicultural population health research center at the University of Washington, partnered with community stakeholders to generate evidence to inform elected officials about the need to increase the diversity of the state\'s physician workforce and ultimately improve Latina/o health in Washington state. Legislative efforts resulted in legislation creating goals for the state\'s medical schools to admit students representative of the state\'s population diversity and the creation of a new residency pathway for international medical graduates. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(S6):S467-S471. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307627) [Formula: see text].

BACKGROUND: The administration of performance assessments during the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic posed many challenges, especially for examinations employed as part of certification and licensure. The National Assessment Collaboration (NAC) Examination, an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), was modified during the pandemic. The purpose of this study was to gather evidence to support the reliability and validity of the modified NAC Examination.
METHODS: The modified NAC Examination was delivered to 2,433 candidates in 2020 and 2021. Cronbach\'s alpha, decision consistency, and accuracy values were calculated. Validity evidence includes comparisons of scores and sub-scores for demographic groups: gender (male vs. female), type of International Medical Graduate (IMG) (Canadians Studying Abroad (CSA) vs. non-CSA), postgraduate training (PGT) (no PGT vs. PGT), and language of examination (English vs. French). Criterion relationships were summarized using correlations within and between the NAC Examination and the Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination (MCCQE) Part I scores.
RESULTS: Reliability estimates were consistent with other OSCEs similar in length and previous NAC Examination administrations. Both total score and sub-score differences for gender were statistically significant. Total score differences by type of IMG and PGT were not statistically significant, but sub-score differences were statistically significant. Administration language was not statistically significant for either the total scores or sub-scores. Correlations were all statistically significant with some relationships being small or moderate (0.20 to 0.40) or large (> 0.40).
CONCLUSIONS: The NAC Examination yields reliable total scores and pass/fail decisions. Expected differences in total scores and sub-scores for defined groups were consistent with previous literature, and internal relationships amongst NAC Examination sub-scores and their external relationships with the MCCQE Part I supported both discriminant and criterion-related validity arguments. Modifications to OSCEs to address health restrictions can be implemented without compromising the overall quality of the assessment. This study outlines some of the validity and reliability analyses for OSCEs that required modifications due to COVID.

UNASSIGNED: Physician shortages and the geographic maldistribution of general and specialist physicians impair health care delivery and worsen health inequity in the US. International medical graduates (IMGs) represent a potential solution given their ready supply.
UNASSIGNED: Despite extensive clinical experience, evidence of competence, and willingness to practice in underserved communities, IMGs experience multiple barriers to entry in the US, including the immigration process, the pathways available for certification and licensing, and institutional reluctance to consider non-US-trained candidates. International medical graduates applying to postgraduate training programs compare favorably with US-trained candidates in terms of clinical experience, prior formal postgraduate training, and research, but have higher application withdrawal rates and significantly lower residency and fellowship match rates, a disparity that may be exacerbated by the recent elimination of objective performance metrics, such as the US Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 score. Once legally in the US, IMGs encounter additional obstacles to board eligibility, research funding, and career progression.
UNASSIGNED: International medical graduates offer a viable and available solution to bridge the domestic physician supply gap, while improving workforce diversity and meaningfully addressing the public health implications of geographic maldistribution of general and specialist physicians, without disrupting existing physician stature and salaries. The US remains unable to integrate IMGs until systematic policy changes at the national level are implemented.

BACKGROUND: International medical trainees, including residents and fellows, must cope with many challenges, such as differences in cultural hierarchical systems, languages, and acceptance. Nonetheless, the need for adjustment perpetuates even after training is completed abroad. When some international trainees return to their countries of origin, they continue to face adjustment challenges due to reverse culture shock. Others must make many further readjustments. This study presents an exploration of the adjustment and coping strategies of international medical learners after returning to their countries of origin upon completion of their programs.
METHODS: This study employed a qualitative approach grounded in interpretivism and utilised inductive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke\'s method. Semi-structured, in-depth individual interviews were employed to explore the participants\' coping strategies. Participants included international medical learners who were (1) international medical graduates who had already returned to their countries of origin, (2) non-Canadian citizens or nonpermanent residents by the start of the programs, and (3) previously enrolled in a residency or fellowship training programme at the University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
RESULTS: Seventeen participants were included. Three main themes and seven subthemes were created from the analysis and are represented by the Ice Skater Landing Model. According to this model, there are three main forces in coping processes upon returning home: driving, stabilising, and situational forces. The sum and interaction of these forces impact the readjustment process.
CONCLUSIONS: International medical learners who have trained abroad and returned to their countries of origin often struggle with readjustment. An equilibrium between the driving and stabilising forces is crucial for a smooth transition. The findings of this study can help stakeholders better understand coping processes. As healthy coping processes are related to job satisfaction and retention, efforts to support and shorten repatriation adjustment are worthwhile.

The brain drain of physicians from lower-middle-income countries to high-income countries is a growing phenomenon that contributes to global health inequalities. Retention strategies are difficult to implement locally and to specifically target the population at risk of migrating. We hypothesize that medical students who are teaching assistants have greater intentions to migrate to practice Medicine abroad.
Medical students from Argentina were invited to an online survey of 22 multiple-choice questions based on the LIRHUS Network survey, previously used in Latin America.
2,301 medical students were enrolled. Most were young (23 [20-25] years old), single (90%), and female (79%). The majority studied at public universities (87%). The intention to migrate to practice Medicine abroad was more frequent among teaching assistants (36% vs 31%; χ2 = 4.4982; p = 0.0339). After adjusting for sex and age, being a teaching assistant was associated with the intention to migrate to practice Medicine abroad (OR = 1.26; 95% CI 1.02 - 1.55; p = 0.002).
Argentine teaching assistants have a greater risk of migrating to practice Medicine abroad. Given their high academic profile, these are valuable human resources trained using the public financing of low-middle-income countries. The loss of these resources could contribute to health inequalities. This is an easily identifiable and accessible subgroup toward which local retention policies could be directed.
La fuga de cerebros de médicos de países de ingresos medianos- bajos a países de ingresos altos es un fenómeno creciente que contribuye a las desigualdades mundiales en salud. Las estrategias de retención son difíciles de implementar localmente y de dirigir específicamente a la población en riesgo de migrar. Hipotetizamos que los estudiantes de Medicina que son ayudantes tienen mayores intenciones de migrar para ejercer la Medicina en el extranjero.
Estudiantes de Medicina de Argentina fueron invitados a una encuesta online de 22 preguntas de opción múltiple basada en la encuesta de la Red LIRHUS, previamente utilizada en América Latina.
Se enrolaron 2.301 estudiantes de Medicina. La mayoría eran jóvenes (23 [20-25] años), solteras (90%) y mujeres (79%). La mayoría estudiaba en universidades públicas (87%). La intención de migrar para ejercer la Medicina en el extranjero fue más frecuente entre los ayudantes (36% vs 31%; χ2 = 4,4982; p = 0,0339). Después de ajustar por sexo y edad, ser ayudante se asoció con la intención de migrar para ejercer la Medicina (OR = 1,26; IC 95% 1,02 - 1,55; p = 0,002).
Los ayudantes argentinos tienen mayor riesgo de migrar para ejercer la Medicina en el exterior. Dado su alto perfil académico, se trata de recursos humanos valiosos formados con la financiación pública de un país de ingresos medianos-bajos, cuya pérdida puede contribuir a las desigualdades en salud. Es un subgrupo fácilmente identificable y accesible hacia el que se pueden dirigir políticas de retención locales.

BACKGROUND: Following India and Pakistan gaining independence from British colonial rule, many doctors from these countries migrated to the UK and supported its fledgling National Health Service (NHS). Although this contribution is now widely celebrated, these doctors often faced hardship and hostility at the time and continue to face discrimination and racism in UK medical education. This study sought to examine discursive framings about Indian and Pakistani International Medical Graduates (IPIMGs) in the early period of their migration to the UK, between 1960 and 1980.
METHODS: We assembled a textual archive of publications relating to IPIMGs in the UK during this time period in The BMJ. We employed critical discourse analysis to examine knowledge and power relations in these texts, drawing on postcolonialism through the contrapuntal approach developed by Edward Said.
RESULTS: The dominant discourse in this archive was one of opportunity. This included the opportunity for training, which was not available to IPIMGs in an equitable way, the missed opportunity to frame IPIMGs as saviours of the NHS rather than \'cheap labour\', and the opportunity these doctors were framed to be held by being in the \'superior\' British system, for which they should be grateful. Notably, there was also an opportunity to oppose, as IPIMGs challenged notions of incompetence directed at them.
CONCLUSIONS: As IPIMGs in the UK continue to face discrimination, we shed light on how their cultural positioning has been historically founded and engrained in the imagination of the British medical profession by examining discursive trends to uncover historical tensions and contradictions.