UNASSIGNED: Offloading is a key principle to healing diabetic foot ulcers. Nonremovable knee-high offloading devices are considered the criterion standard for offloading plantar forefoot ulcers. However, patients exhibit a limited tolerance for these devices, which contributes to a lack of use. In this case series describing two patients, the authors share two alternative offloading modalities for the treatment of diabetic plantar forefoot ulcers. One patient was managed using a football offloading dressing, and the other was managed with a modified felted football dressing. The football and modified felted football offloading dressings provide a cost-effective, less time-consuming application and often are a better-tolerated alternative to nonremovable knee-high offloading devices. Clinical findings support further investigation into dressing options tolerated by patients with improved adherence and optimal healing outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Instep flaps are commonly used for the reconstruction of weight-bearing areas of the foot. However, in cases of large defects or damage to the instep area, non-instep flaps such as reverse sural flaps (RSF) or free anterolateral thigh flaps (ALTF) can be employed. Previous studies have primarily focused on heel reconstruction when comparing different flaps, without considering the forefoot. This study aims to verify the clinical outcomes of these flaps and determine the appropriate donor site for weight-bearing areas of the foot including forefoot reconstruction.
METHODS: In a retrospective study, 39 patients who had undergone flap reconstruction of weight-bearing area defects in the foot with a follow-up period of ≥1 year were included. The patients were categorized into two groups: Group A (n = 19) using instep flaps, and Group B (n = 20) using non-instep flap including RSFs and ALTFs. Surgical outcomes were assessed based on the success of the flap, the presence of partial necrosis, the number of additional surgeries, and complications related to the donor site. Clinical evaluation included visual analogue scale (VAS) and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and the occurrence of ulcers.
RESULTS: All flaps were successful, while partial necrosis occurred in one case in Group B. There were three reclosures after flap border debridement in both groups and one donor site debridement in Group A. The VAS scores during weight-bearing were 2.0 ± 1.1 and 2.2 ± 1.5 for Groups A and B, respectively (p = .716). The AOFAS scores were 52.8 ± 6.8 and 50.2 ± 12.7 for Groups A and B, respectively (p = .435). The occurrence of ulcers was 0.4 ± 0.9 times for Group A and 0.3 ± 0.7 times for Group B, with no significant difference between the two groups (p = .453).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in clinical outcomes between the types of flaps after reconstruction of the forefoot and hindfoot. Therefore, it is recommended to choose the appropriate flap based on factors such as the size of the defect, its location, and vascular status rather than the type of flap.

BACKGROUND: In distal forefoot defect, finding wound closure is challenging because of the distal site and small blood vessels involved. One possible resolution is the utilization of a metatarsal artery flap in a \'U-turn\' design. This method offers several advantages, including its long length and a viable option for distal forefoot defect.
METHODS: Thirty-six patients with forefoot injuries from metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint to distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint due to trauma were consecutively recruited and completed the study. Outcomes were analyzed descriptively, and risk prediction modeling for edge necrosis was performed.
RESULTS: The mean ± SD follow-up time was 27.3 months ±1.9. The median (IQR) MTP-to-DIP joint wound width and length were 1.8 (1.4, 3.0) and 3.2 cm (2.9, 6.2), respectively. The median (IQR) width, length, and width-to-length ratio flap dimensions were 3.6 (2.8, 6.0), 4.7 cm (4.3, 9.3), and 1.5 (1.2, 1.7), respectively. The mean ± SD operative time was 32.9 min ± 5.7. The median (IQR) intraoperative blood loss was 5.0 mL (4.0, 5.0). The mean ± SD hospital length of stay postoperatively was 4.0 days ±1.0. The mean ± SD Foot and Ankle Outcome Score and Foot Function Index were 64.1 ± 2.5 and 7.8% ± 3.3, respectively. All patients had good or excellent aesthetic satisfaction. Spontaneously resolving edge necrosis occurred in 13.9%. The mean ± SD time-to-start-ambulation was 1.7 weeks ±0.5. At the 2-year follow-up visit, all patients had reduced U-turn flap pivot point redundancy without shoe size impact, needing reoperation, or donor site morbidity. Edge necrosis was significantly associated with length-to-width ratio ( P = 0.014) but not with Foot and Ankle Outcome Score or Foot Function Index.
CONCLUSIONS: Metatarsal artery flap of U-turn design was reliable and was associated with a short recovery time, alternative resolution for forefoot area due to short operation time, minimal blood loss, short hospital length of stay, and excellent availability.

Using a curved carbon-fiber plate (CFP) in running shoes may offer notable performance benefit over flat plates, yet there is a lack of research exploring the influence of CFP geometry on internal foot loading during running. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of CFP mechanical characteristics on forefoot biomechanics in terms of plantar pressure, bone stress distribution, and contact force transmission during a simulated impact peak moment in forefoot strike running. We employed a finite element model of the foot-shoe system, wherein various CFP configurations, including three stiffnesses (stiff, stiffer, and stiffest) and two shapes (flat plate (FCFP) and curved plate (CCFP)), were integrated into the shoe sole. Comparing the shoes with no CFP (NCFP) to those with CFP, we consistently observed a reduction in peak forefoot plantar pressure with increasing CFP stiffness. This decrease in pressure was even more notable in a CCFP demonstrating a further reduction in peak pressure ranging from 5.51 to 12.62%, compared to FCFP models. Both FCFP and CCFP designs had a negligible impact on reducing the maximum stress experienced by the 2nd and 3rd metatarsals. However, they greatly influenced the stress distribution in other metatarsal bones. These CFP designs seem to optimize the load transfer pathway, enabling a more uniform force transmission by mainly reducing contact force on the medial columns (the first three rays, measuring 0.333 times body weight for FCFP and 0.335 for CCFP in stiffest condition, compared to 0.373 in NCFP). We concluded that employing a curved CFP in running shoes could be more beneficial from an injury prevention perspective by inducing less peak pressure under the metatarsal heads while not worsening their stress state compared to flat plates.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this investigation was to evaluate adverse short-term outcomes after partial forefoot amputation with a specific comparison performed based on patient height.
METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was analyzed to select patients with a 28805 Current Procedural Terminology code (amputation, foot; transmetatarsal) who underwent the procedure with \"all layers of incision (deep and superficial) fully closed.\" This resulted in 11 patients with a height of 60 inches or less, 202 with a height greater than 60 inches and less than 72 inches, and 55 with a height of 72 inches or greater.
RESULTS: Results of the primary outcome measures found no significant differences among groups with respect to the development of a superficial surgical site infection (0% versus 6.4% versus 5.5%; P = .669), deep incisional infection (9.1% versus 3.5% versus 10.9%; P = .076), or wound disruption (0% versus 5.4% versus 5.5%; P = .730). In addition, no significant differences were observed among groups with respect to unplanned reoperations (9.1% versus 16.8% versus 12.7%; P = .630) or unplanned hospital readmissions (45.5% versus 23.3% versus 20.0%; P = .190).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this investigation demonstrate no differences in short-term adverse outcomes after partial forefoot amputation with primary closure based on patient height. Although height has previously been described as a potential risk factor in the development of lower-extremity pathogenesis, this finding was not observed in this study from a large US database.

BACKGROUND: Goal of this work is a quantitative description of Jacquelin Perry\'s rocker concept by locating the position of the heel rocker and the forefoot rocker within segments of the foot via functional calibration.
METHODS: Two functional calibration tasks with the foot in ground contact were performed by ten typical developed adults and foot marker motion was captured. After applying a least-square method for constructing foot segments, their motion relative to the floor was analyzed via a functional algorithm. Resulting reference positions - namely the heel rotation center and the metatarsal rotation axis - were calculated. Further, the repeatability of the method and variability of outcome within the cohort was tested.
RESULTS: The heel rotation center is located substantially posterior (25 mm) and slightly more inferior (5 mm). to the midpoint of the two markers placed medially and laterally on the calcaneus. Repeated measures reveal a variation of this location around 5 mm. The forefoot center is slightly more medial to the \"toe marker\" (DMT2) and substantially more inferior (19 mm). The metatarsal rotation axis is slightly tilted in the frontal and transverse plane against the metatarsal line given between markers on MT1 and MT5 with small variation in repeated measures (1-2°).
CONCLUSIONS: The determination of heel rotation center and the metatarsal rotation axis relative to foot segments can be determined with good repeatability and their location meet the intuitive expectation. Since they have a direct biomechanical meaning in the foot roll-over process in gait, they may be used for a more functionally oriented definition of foot segments potentially improving the calculation of foot kinematics and kinetics in future work.

Hindfoot, midfoot, and forefoot motion during the stance phase of walking provide insights into the forward progression of the body over the feet via the rocker mechanisms. These segmental motions are affected by walking speed. Increases in walking speed are accomplished by increasing step length and cadence. It is unknown if taking short, medium, and long steps at the same speed would increase hindfoot, midfoot, and forefoot motion similarly to walking speed. We examined effects of different step lengths at the same preferred walking speed on peak forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot motions related to the foot rockers. Twelve young healthy adults completed five walking trials under three step length conditions in a random order as feet and lower extremity motion were measured via marker positions for the combined Oxford foot and conventional gait models. Peak hindfoot, midfoot, and forefoot joint angles indicating heel, ankle, and forefoot rockers were identified. When walking at the same preferred speed with increase in step length, there were increases in peak hindfoot-tibia plantarflexion angle (p < 0.001; ηp2 = 0.76) in early stance associated with the heel rocker and peak hindfoot-tibia dorsiflexion angle (p = 0.016; ηp2 = 0.39) in midstance associated with ankle rocker. In late stance, the peak hindfoot-tibia plantarflexion angle, forefoot-hindfoot angle, and forefoot-hallux dorsiflexion angle indicating forefoot rocker motion also increased with step length (p < 0.01). When foot kinematics are compared across different individuals or the same individual across different sessions, researchers and clinicians should consider the influence of step length as a contributor to differences in foot kinematics observed.

UNASSIGNED: The cavovarus foot is a complex 3-dimensional deformity. Although a multitude of techniques are described for its surgical management, few of these are evidence based or guided by classification systems. Surgical management involves realignment of the hindfoot and soft tissue balancing, followed by forefoot balancing. Our aim was to analyze the pattern of residual forefoot deformities once the hindfoot is corrected, to guide forefoot correction.
UNASSIGNED: We included 20 cavovarus feet from 16 adult patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth who underwent weightbearing CT (mean age 43.4 years, range: 22-78 years, 14 males). Patients included had flexible deformities, with no previous surgery. Using specialized software (Bonelogic 2.1, Disior) a 3-dimensional, virtual model was created. Using morphologic data captured from normal feet in patients without pathology as a guide, the talonavicular joint of the cavovarus foot was digitally reduced to a \"normal\" position to simulate the correction that would be achieved during surgical correction. Models of the corrected position were exported and geometrically analyzed using Blender 3.64 to identify anatomical trends.
UNASSIGNED: We identified 4 types of cavovarus forefoot morphotypes. Type 0 was defined as a balanced forefoot (2 cases, 10%). Type 1 was defined as a forefoot where the first metatarsal was relatively plantarflexed to the rest of the foot, with no significant residual adduction after talonavicular joint correction (12 cases, 60%). Type 2 was defined as a forefoot where the second and first metatarsals were progressively plantarflexed, with no significant adduction (4 cases, 20%). Type 3 was defined as a forefoot where the metatarsals were adducted after talonavicular derotation (2 cases, 10%).
UNASSIGNED: In this relatively small cohort, we identified 4 forefoot morphotypes in cavovarus feet that might help surgeons to recognize and anticipate the residual forefoot deformities after hindfoot correction. Different treatment strategies may be required for different morphotypes to achieve balanced correction.
UNASSIGNED: Level IV, retrospective case series.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: With the advent of effective disease-modifying medications, the surgical treatment of forefoot deformities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has evolved from joint-sacrificing to joint-preserving surgery. However, it is unclear whether joint-preserving surgery is effective for the full range of metatarsophalangeal joint involvement. Hence, this study investigated the postoperative outcomes of joint-preserving surgery for rheumatoid forefoot deformities with a wide range of joint destruction.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective observational study included 68 feet from 68 patients with RA who underwent joint-preserving surgery for forefoot deformities between 2014 and 2020. The Larsen grade classification was used to assess the first metatarsophalangeal joint destruction and classify patients into 4 groups as follows: 0 and 1 (n = 14), 2 (n = 21), 3 (n = 19), and 4 and 5 (n = 14). The Self-Administered Foot and Ankle Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q) score, hallux valgus angle (HVA), and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) were determined before surgery and at the last follow-up visit.
UNASSIGNED: The median observation duration was 40 (range, 24-78) months. SAFE-Q scores of all groups significantly improved in all subscales at the last observation, with no significant differences among the study groups. Radiographic evaluations of all groups revealed significant improvements in HVA and IMA after surgery, with no significant differences among the groups.
UNASSIGNED: In patients using the surgical approaches described in this study, joint-preserving surgery for rheumatoid forefoot deformities led to satisfactory clinical and radiographic improvements, regardless of the severity of joint destruction.
UNASSIGNED: Level III, case-control study.