Food waste sorting

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    机构食品服务产生的食物浪费占全球食物浪费的很大一部分。食物垃圾分类(FWS)在源头上减少了废物管理成本和对组织的环境影响。然而,驱动个人FWS行为的因素仍然没有得到充分的探索。本研究探讨了FWS在机构餐饮环境中的心理过程,整合价值-信念-规范模型,计划行为理论,和自决理论。收集来自中国431名大学生的数据,并使用偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)进行分析。结果表明值的相互作用,信仰,规范,以及塑造FWS行为的动机。社会价值取向(SVO)通过对后果和个人规范的认识间接影响了FWS。主观规范,可能归因于食堂的外部法规,通过个人规范影响FWS意图,主要通过控制动机诱导FWS。研究结果表明,诱导FWS的行为策略可以利用社会影响和外部监管,同时还可以通过教育计划和意识活动将价值观和知识转化为内在动机。
    Food waste from institutional food services accounts for a significant part of global food waste. Food waste sorting (FWS) at the source reduces waste management costs and environmental impacts in organizations. Yet what drives individual FWS behavior remains underexplored. This study explores the psychological process of FWS in institutional catering environments, integrating the value-belief-norm model, the theory of planned behavior, and self-determination theory. Data were collected from 431 university students in China and analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Results indicated the interplay of values, beliefs, norms, and motivations in shaping FWS behaviors. Social value orientations (SVO) indirectly affected FWS through awareness of consequences and personal norms. Subjective norms, potentially attributed to external regulations in canteens, influenced FWS intention through personal norms and induced FWS primarily via controlled motivations. The findings imply that behavioral strategies to induce FWS may leverage social influence and external regulation while also translating values and knowledge into intrinsic motivations through educational programs and awareness campaigns.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    食物浪费是目前广泛讨论的现象,具有重大的经济和社会后果。世界上三分之一的粮食被浪费在食品供应链的各个点。本文提出了一项全面的研究,研究了消费者在处理食物浪费和堆肥过程中实现废物卫生的行为。作为这项研究的一部分进行的调查表明,消费者希望消除异味,担心潜在的感染,一般来说,食物垃圾分类较少。这项研究表明,添加适当的添加剂可能是一个解决方案。结果表明,添加剂可以消除负面副作用,如令人不快的气味,昆虫和啮齿动物的存在,并起到预防病原生物发生的作用。茶树油在所测试的添加剂(CaCO3和柠檬酸)中表现出最佳的正理化性质,对沙门氏菌等细菌菌株的生长具有显著的抑制作用,抑菌效果最强,中和的令人不快的气味,并稳定了废物。添加剂的使用可能是满足消费者需求的未来解决方案,改善食物垃圾的质量,推进循环经济,以提高农业系统的可持续性。
    Food waste is currently a widely discussed phenomenon with significant economic and social consequences. One third of the food produced in the world is wasted at various points along the food supply chain. This article presents a comprehensive study that examines consumer behavior in dealing with food waste and activities in the composting process that enable waste sanitation. The survey conducted as part of this study showed that consumers want to eliminate odors, are concerned about potential infections, and generally sort less food waste. This study suggested that the addition of appropriate additives could be a solution. The results indicated that additives could eliminate negative side effects such as unpleasant odors, the presence of insects and rodents, and act as a prevention of the occurrence of pathogenic organisms. Tea tree oil showed the best positive physical and chemical properties among the additives tested (CaCO3 and citric acid) with a significant effect on inhibiting the growth of bacterial strains such as Salmonella strains and had the strongest antibacterial effect, neutralized unpleasant odors, and stabilized the waste. The use of additives could be a future solution to meet consumer demands, improve the quality of food waste and advance the circular economy to improve the sustainability of agricultural systems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经济激励被认为是一种很好的干预类型,可以鼓励居民进行食物垃圾分类。然而,缺乏长期的,大规模的研究。因此,以南京市为例,对企业主导的激励方案进行了研究,中国,专注于食物垃圾分类。结果表明,该激励措施最多可鼓励平均37%的居民开始,然后继续定期进行餐厨垃圾分类。稍后,即使有许多非经济干预措施,这种激励也不能鼓励更多。这些参与居民中的大多数(31%)在前12个月受到鼓励。结果还表明,房价与社区排序绩效呈负相关。比较研究结果表明,社区委员会必须参与非经济干预,以鼓励更多居民参与;否则,即使经过多次尝试,公司也会失败。因此,政府应以辩证的观点在餐厨垃圾分类中运用激励政策。激励计划应让所有利益相关者参与,以应用非经济干预措施,以鼓励更多的居民进行食物垃圾分类。
    Economic incentive is thought a good intervention type that can encourage residents to do food waste sorting by many cities\' government in China. However, there is a lack of long-term, large-scale study. So the business-led incentive scheme was studied by a case study in Nanjing, China, which focuses on food waste sorting. The results showed that the incentive can encourage at most an average 37% of residents to start and then continue to do food waste sorting regularly. Later, the incentive cannot encourage more even with many non-economic interventions. And most of these participating residents (31%) were encouraged at the first 12 months. The results also showed that house price had a negative relationship with the community sorting performance. The comparative study results showed that the community committee must be involved in the non-economic interventions to encourage more residents to take part; otherwise, the company will fail even after many attempts. So the government should apply the incentive policy by dialectical view in food waste sorting. And the incentive scheme should involve all the stakeholders to apply non-economic interventions to encourage more residents to do food waste sorting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号