Food desert

食物沙漠
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估低收入/低获取(LILA)普查区食物沙漠居民与非LILA居民之间阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)相关健康参数的差异研究设计:回顾性回顾。
    方法:从2017年到2023年,为南加州的一个大地区提供服务的单一机构。
    方法:如果相当大比例的居民生活在贫困线以下并且远离健康食品供应商,则将人口普查区定义为LILA。包括在多导睡眠图上新诊断为OSA的成年人。通过在美国农业部食品获取研究地图集中搜索患者地址来确定食品获取状态。收集基线和1年随访体重指数(BMI)和生命体征,并根据食物获取和其他人口统计学变量进行比较。
    结果:LILA+组共379例患者和LILA-组2281例患者符合纳入标准。LILA组的BMI较高(36.6±9.4vs35.2±8.9;P=.006)。食物获取的影响在某些人口统计学群体中最为显著:年龄<65岁的患者,男性,亚洲/太平洋岛民,西班牙裔,与LILA-组相比,LILA+组的医疗补助覆盖患者的BMI均较高。在考虑保险时,LILA+医疗补助覆盖患者的BMI显著高于LILA-非医疗补助覆盖患者(40.4±10.3vs34.2±8.4,P<0.001。血压,心率,LILA+/Medicaid组的呼吸暂停低通气指数也显著升高。在1年的随访中,所有人口群体的BMI变化都很小。
    结论:生活在LILA普查区可能会导致OSA相关健康参数恶化。在核算保险状况时,影响更加深远。关于体重管理重要性的强化咨询应该从OSA的诊断开始。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)-related health parameters between residents of low income/low access (LILA) census tracts-food deserts-and non-LILA residents STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review.
    METHODS: Single institution serving a large region in Southern California from 2017 to 2023.
    METHODS: Census tracts are defined as LILA if a significant proportion of residents live below the poverty threshold and far from healthy food vendors. Adults newly diagnosed with OSA on polysomnography were included. Food access status was determined by searching patient addresses in the US Department of Agriculture Food Access Research Atlas. Baseline and 1-year follow-up body mass index (BMI) and vitals were collected and compared based on food access and other demographic variables.
    RESULTS: A total of 379 patients in the LILA+ group and 2281 patients in the LILA- group met inclusion criteria. BMI was higher in the LILA group (36.6 ± 9.4 vs 35.2 ± 8.9; P = .006). The effect of food access was most significant in certain demographic groups: patients aged < 65, males, Asian/Pacific Islanders, Hispanics, and patients with Medicaid coverage all had a higher BMI when in the LILA+ group compared to the LILA- group. When considering insurance, LILA+ patients with Medicaid coverage had a significantly higher BMI than LILA- patients with non-Medicaid coverage (40.4 ± 10.3 vs 34.2 ± 8.4, P < .001. Blood pressure, heart rate, and apnea-hypopnea index were also significantly higher in LILA+/Medicaid group. BMI change across all demographic groups was minimal at 1-year follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: Living in a LILA census tract may result in worse OSA-related health parameters. When accounting for insurance status, the effects are even more profound. Intensive counseling on the importance of weight management should begin at the diagnosis of OSA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:儿童肥胖是一种全球范围内日益严重的流行病,需要一种生物心理社会治疗方法来实现健康的生活方式。这项关于儿童体重管理计划的研究检查了肥胖之间的关系,疾病并发症,和健康的社会决定因素。我们预计,肥胖程度较高的儿童更有可能生活在缺乏健康食品的地区,并具有类似的行为和社会经济特征。
    方法:项目参与者根据其家庭住址通过邻居食物获取状态进行识别。根据邻里食物的可及性分析了参与者中合并症的患病率。多变量回归评估了参与者的健康结果与其社会人口统计学和地理特征之间的关联。
    结果:共有283(98.3%)名参与者的年龄和性别的BMI≥95百分位数,68(23.6%)居住在食物获取有限的社区。几乎三分之一(Adj。R2=0.3302;p<0.01)研究人群BMI的变异性是由社会人口统计学因素驱动的,自我报告的饮食和身体活动行为,并且与获得健康食物有积极的关系。尽管如此,鉴于HbA1c水平表明糖尿病的参与者样本变化有限,HbA1c与获得健康食物呈负相关。
    结论:生活在食物获取有限的社区中的儿童的BMI高于其他计划参与者。因此,至关重要的是,要确定邻里食物可及性有限的儿童,并促进社会和立法变革,以改善获得健康食物的机会。
    BACKGROUND: Childhood obesity is a growing worldwide epidemic that requires a biopsychosocial treatment approach to achieve a healthy lifestyle. This study on children in a weight management program examines the relationship between obesity, disease complications, and social determinants of health. We expect that children with higher degrees of obesity are more likely to live in areas lacking access to healthy food and have similar behavioural and socioeconomic characteristics.
    METHODS: Program participants were identified by neighbourhood food access status based on their home address. The prevalence of comorbidities in the participants was analyzed according to neighbourhood food accessibility. Multivariate regressions evaluated the association between participants\' health outcomes and their sociodemographic and geographical characteristics.
    RESULTS: A total of 283 (98.3%) participants had a BMI ≥95th percentile for their age and sex and 68 (23.6%) lived in neighbourhoods with limited food access. Almost a third (Adj. R2 = 0.3302; p < 0.01) of the variability in study population\'s BMI was driven by sociodemographic factors, self-reported eating and physical activity behaviours, and had a positive relationship with access to healthy food. Nonetheless, HbA1c had a negative relationship with access to healthy food given the limited variation in the sample of participants with HbA1c levels indicating diabetes.
    CONCLUSIONS: Children living in neighbourhoods with limited food access had higher BMIs than other program participants. Thus, it is critical to identify children with limited neighbourhood food accessibility and promote societal and legislative change to improve access to healthy food.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    营养是对健康产生深远和直接影响的重要因素。食物环境显著影响个体的饮食行为,健康结果,和整体粮食安全。食物沙漠和食物沼泽中的个人无法获得更健康的食物选择。在这两种情况下,重点主要是环境的物理配置,因为它与食物供应有关。这项准实验研究旨在研究两种不同食物环境(定义为包括社会成分)对食物选择的影响。共有246名参与者通过电话进行了调查,其中一半的人使用了方案A(缺乏健康选择和支持和加强更健康选择的线索的食物环境),一半的人使用了方案B(具有丰富的健康食物选择和支持和加强健康饮食的线索的环境)。使用有序logit回归进行分析。结果显示两组之间可能的食物消耗存在显着差异。在情景B中,人们食用水果和蔬菜的可能性要高出4.48倍。此外,据确定,作为女性,食用更多水果和蔬菜的可能性增加0.92倍(1/0.52-1),坚持健康饮食增加3.64倍。年龄和种族不是重要的预测因素。这项研究强调了环境因素在塑造饮食习惯中的关键作用,并强调了食物环境的社会成分在促进采用更健康的饮食习惯方面的重要性。基于这些发现,政策制定者应优先制定战略,超越提供物理访问和考虑社会方面的环境,促进健康的饮食习惯,以改善公共健康和加强社区的粮食安全。
    Nutrition is a vital factor that exerts a profound and direct impact on health. Food environments significantly influence individuals\' dietary behaviors, health outcomes, and overall food security. Individuals in food deserts and food swamps do not have access to healthier food options. And in both cases, the emphasis is primarily on the physical configuration of the environment as it relates to food availability. This quasi-experimental study aims to investigate the impact of two different food environments (defined to include a social component) on food choices. A total of 246 participants were surveyed by telephone, half of whom were primed with Scenario A (a food environment deficient in healthy options and cues that support and reinforce healthier choices) and half were primed with Scenario B (an environment with an abundance of healthy food options and cues that support and reinforce healthy eating). Ordered logit regression was used for analysis. The results show significant differences in likely food consumption between the groups. Individuals in Scenario B were found to be 4.48 times more likely to consume fruits and vegetables. In addition, it was determined that being a woman increases the probability of consuming more fruits and vegetables by 0.92 times (1/0.52-1), and adherence to a healthy diet increases by 3.64 times. Age and race were not significant predictors. This study highlights the crucial role of environmental factors in shaping dietary habits and underscores the importance of the social components of the food environment in promoting the adoption of healthier dietary habits. Based on these findings, policymakers should prioritize developing strategies that go beyond providing physical access and consider social aspects of the environment in promoting healthy eating habits to improve public health and bolster the food security of communities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:社会经济差异在疾病流行病学和妊娠结局中起重要作用。
    目的:目的是评估生活在食物沙漠中的COVID-19孕妇,出现时的症状反映出更严重疾病的风险增加,需要住院治疗。
    方法:在这项回顾性观察研究中,我们回顾了所有有SARS-CoV-2感染记录的妊娠患者的电子病历.美国农业部定义了食物沙漠,并将患者的住所绘制在食物获取研究地图集上,以确定每个患者是否生活在食物沙漠中。使用单因素分析和多变量逻辑回归分析,对有记录的有症状的COVID-19需要住院治疗的患者与有记录的COVID-19不需要住院治疗的患者进行了比较。
    结果:该队列包括129例妊娠COVID-19患者,其中59.7%(n=77)无症状,33.3%(n=43)因疾病严重程度需要入院。大多数是西班牙裔(70.5%),和肥胖(BMI中位数31.91kg/m2),33.3%的人生活在食物沙漠中。疾病严重程度需要入院的患者更有可能居住在食物沙漠中(46.5%vs.27.9%,P0.037,OR2.246,95%CI1.048-4.814)。在单变量上没有发现其他显著差异。多变量二元逻辑回归模型证实,食物沙漠居住地是更严重COVID-19的唯一独立预测因子。
    结论:生活在食物沙漠中与怀孕期间需要住院治疗的有症状的COVID-19的发展之间存在很强的关联。
    BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic disparities play an important role in disease epidemiology and outcomes in pregnancy.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate whether pregnant women with COVID-19 living in a food desert, are at increased risk of more severe disease reflected by symptoms at presentation and need for hospitalization.
    METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, the electronic medical records of all pregnant patients with documented SARS-CoV-2 infection were reviewed. Food deserts were defined by the USDA and the patient\'s residence was mapped on the Food Access Research Atlas to determine whether each patient lived within a food desert. Comparisons between those with documented symptomatic COVID-19 required hospitalization to those with documented COVID-19 without need for hospitalization were made using univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis.
    RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 129 pregnant patients with COVID-19, with 59.7% (n = 77) asymptomatic and 33.3% (n = 43) requiring admission due to disease severity. The majority were Hispanic (70.5%), and obese (median BMI 31.91 kg/m2), with 33.3% living in a food desert. Patients with disease severity necessitating admission were significantly more likely to reside in a food desert (46.5% vs. 27.9%, P 0.037, OR 2.246, 95% CI 1.048-4.814). No other significant differences were identified on univariate. Multivariable binary logistic regression modeling confirmed food desert residence to be the only independent predictor of more severe COVID-19.
    CONCLUSIONS: There is a strong association between living in a food desert and the development of symptomatic COVID-19 requiring hospitalization in pregnancy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:食物沙漠(FD)居住已成为乳房不良结局的危险因素,结肠癌和食道癌。这项回顾性研究的目的是研究在接受解剖肺切除术(ALR)治疗的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中,FD的停留时间是相关的危险因素。
    方法:回顾了2015年1月至2017年12月在单一机构治疗I-III期NSCLC的所有连续ALR。感兴趣的主要暴露是美国农业部定义的FD居住地。主要结果是5-y总死亡率。次要结果是30天并发症和1-3-y死亡率。Cox比例风险分析用于对与每个结果相关的因素进行建模,针对协变量进行调整。
    结果:共包括348个ALR,101名(29%)患者居住在FD中。在未调整的Cox模型中,与未患有FD的患者相比,患有FD的患者的5年死亡风险较低(风险比=0.56,95%置信区间(0.33~0.97);P=0.04).一旦校正了协变量,该关联就没有统计学意义(风险比=0.59,95%置信区间(0.34-1.04);P=0.07)。
    结论:在这项研究中,FD的居住与5-y死亡率的风险增加无关。被认为健康足以接受手术的患者的选择偏差可能减轻了在其他癌症中表现出的FD驻留的负相关性。未来的工作将评估在我们机构接受治疗的所有NSCLC患者,以进一步评估FD作为不良预后的风险因素。
    BACKGROUND: Food desert (FD) residence has emerged as a risk factor for poor outcomes in breast, colon and esophageal cancers. The purpose of this retrospective study was to examine FD residence as an associated risk factor in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with anatomic lung resection (ALR).
    METHODS: All consecutive ALRs for stage I-III NSCLC from January 2015 to December 2017 at a single institution were reviewed. The primary exposure of interest was FD residence as defined by the United States Department of Agriculture. The primary outcome was 5-y overall mortality. Secondary outcomes were 30-d complications and 1- and 3-y mortality. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to model factors associated with each outcome, adjusted for covariates.
    RESULTS: A total of 348 ALRs were included, with 101 (29%) patients residing in an FD. In the unadjusted Cox model, those residing in FD had an associated lower 5-year mortality risk compared to those not residing in an FD (hazard ratio = 0.56, 95% confidence interval (0.33-0.97); P = 0.04). That association was not statistically significant once adjusted for covariates (hazard ratio = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (0.34-1.04); P = 0.07).
    CONCLUSIONS: In this study, FD residence was not associated with an increase in the risk of 5-y mortality. Selection bias of patients deemed healthy enough to undergo surgery may have mitigated the negative association of FD residence demonstrated in other cancers. Future work will evaluate all NSCLC patients undergoing treatments at our institution to further evaluate FDs as a risk factor for worse outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究探索了在位于食品沙漠的校园中参加健康零食计划八个月的学生的用户体验和满意度。
    郊区私立大学的学生(N=51)。
    使用描述性横截面设计,参与者扫描了快速响应代码并回复了在线问卷.进行了混合方法分析。
    大多数参与者在早上吃零食(44.4%)。在那些感到压力的人中,满意度最高[平均值(标准偏差):7.00=高的6.58(0.90)]。从开放式答复中确定了五个主要主题:(1)感恩;(2)寻找美味的零食;(3)便宜和健康的替代品;(4)感觉更好;(5)需要更好和更多的零食。
    需要进行未来的研究,以评估该计划的长期可行性和有效性,并在位于食物沙漠中的其他大学校园中开发类似的计划。
    UNASSIGNED: This study explored the user experiences and satisfaction levels of students who participated in a healthy snacks program over eight months on a campus located in a food desert.
    UNASSIGNED: Students at a suburban private university (N = 51).
    UNASSIGNED: Using a descriptive cross-sectional design, participants scanned a Quick-Response code and responded to an online questionnaire. Mixed methods analyses were conducted.
    UNASSIGNED: Most participants took snacks in the morning (44.4%). Satisfaction levels were highest [Mean (Standard deviation): 6.58 (0.90) out of 7.00 = high] among those feeling stressed. Five major themes from the open-ended responses were identified: (1) Being thankful; (2) Finding snacks to be tasty; (3) Inexpensive and healthy alternatives; (4) Feeling better; and (5) Needing better and additional snacks.
    UNASSIGNED: Future research is needed to assess the long-term feasibility and effectiveness of this program and develop similar programs on other college campuses located in food deserts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2020年,美国有1380万人在粮食安全方面苦苦挣扎。这意味着他们不确定是否会满足他们的食物需求。有人居住的地方可以影响与粮食安全的斗争。食品沙漠是人口普查区,贫困率很高(20%的居民处于或低于贫困线),并且很少有营养食品进入杂货店。食物荒漠和不安全因素不成比例地影响弱势社区,并可能导致健康问题,如糖尿病,高血压,和肥胖。可以利用公共政策来减轻粮食沙漠的影响,实现这一目标的一种方法是通过公共交通。
    我们通过从食物沙漠的数据中制定网络模型,来表征公共交通在将食物沙漠居民与食物联系起来方面所起的作用,杂货店,和五个有代表性的地点的公共交通系统:布朗鹿,WI;劳伦斯,KS;阿尔伯克基,NM;夏洛特,NC,还有罗利,NC。我们通过研究中心性度量来分析这些网络,特别是程度和亲密关系。这些中心性措施提供了有关食品沙漠杂货店访问情况的见解。
    研究地点的中心度测量结果各不相同;一个地点(劳伦斯)在每个食物沙漠的代表地址0.25英里(0.40公里)内至少有一个公交车站。相反,两个地点(夏洛特和罗利)各有2个代表地址,在0.75英里(1.21公里)内设有0个公交车站。当使用紧密度中心度量时,阿尔伯克基的2个食品沙漠在30分钟内的杂货店数量最多(22和9),而罗利的44%的食品沙漠在30分钟内有0个杂货店。
    使用这些结果,我们确定公共交通如何更好地将人们与食物联系起来,并向城市领导人提供建议,以帮助消除食物沙漠。
    UNASSIGNED: In 2020, 13.8 million people in the United States struggled with food security. This means they were uncertain whether their food needs would be met. Where someone lives can influence struggles with food security. Food deserts are census tracts that experience high rates of poverty (20 percent of residents at/below poverty thresholds) and low access to grocery stores with nutritious foods. Food deserts and insecurity disproportionately affect disadvantaged communities and may contribute to health issues like diabetes, high blood pressure, and obesity. Public policies can be utilized to lessen the impact of food deserts and one way this can be achieved is through public transit.
    UNASSIGNED: We characterized the role public transportation plays in connecting food desert residents with food by formulating network models from data on food deserts, grocery stores, and public transportation systems for five representative locations: Brown Deer, WI; Lawrence, KS; Albuquerque, NM; Charlotte, NC, and Raleigh, NC. We analyzed these networks by looking at centrality measures, specifically degree and closeness. These centrality measures provide insight on the situation regarding grocery store access for food deserts.
    UNASSIGNED: Results of the degree centrality measure varied across study sites; one site (Lawrence) had at least 1 bus stop within 0.25 miles (0.40 kilometers) of the representative address for each food desert. Conversely, two sites (Charlotte and Raleigh) each had 2 representative addresses with 0 bus stops within 0.75 miles (1.21 kilometers). When using the closeness centrality measure, 2 food deserts in Albuquerque had the highest number of grocery stores within 30 min (22 and 9) while 44% of food deserts in Raleigh had 0 grocery stores within 30 minutes.
    UNASSIGNED: Using these results, we identify how public transportation could better connect people with food and offer suggestions to city leaders as a way to help eradicate food deserts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:食物沙漠是一个主要的公共卫生问题。获得健康食品的不足与营养不良和与饮食相关的慢性疾病的发展有关。
    目的:确定获得营养食品的地理途径与早产之间的关联,以及妊娠期高血压是否介导了这种关系。
    方法:从美国农业部食品获取研究地图集(2019年)中检索了食品获取数据,并用于量化每个县的人口普查区域中食品荒漠的百分比:进入杂货店有限的低收入区域,超市,或其他健康来源,营养食品。通过使用产妇居住县(n=7,533,319),这些数据与2018年至2019年的美国出生记录合并。我们用广义估计方程拟合粗略和调整后的逻辑回归模型,以确定生活在食物沙漠中与早产几率之间的关联。我们通过对非西班牙裔白人和非西班牙裔黑人出生的人的种族对完全调整的模型进行分层,进行了次要的组内分析。
    结果:在完全调整的模型中,我们发现了剂量-反应关系.随着县内道级食物沙漠的流行增加,早产的可能性也是如此(中间范围:比值比(OR)=1.04,95%置信区间(C.I.)1.01-1.07;高:OR=1.07,95%C.I.1.03-1.11)。在白-黑分层模型中看到了类似的结果。然而,由于黑人分娩的人早产的几率最高,因此仍然存在差距。最后,妊娠期高血压似乎介导了营养食品获取与早产之间的关系(自然间接效应(NIE)=1.01,95%CI=1.00,1.01)。
    结论:很明显,特别是对于经历高不良分娩率的黑人分娩者,在母婴健康差距中探索食物沙漠居住权的作用。
    BACKGROUND: Food deserts are a major public health concern. Inadequate access to healthy food has been associated with poor nutrition and the development of dietary related chronic conditions.
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between geographic access to nutritious food and preterm birth and whether gestational hypertension mediates this relationship.
    METHODS: Food access data was retrieved from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Access Research Atlas (2019) and used to quantify the percentage of Census tracts within each county that were food deserts: low-income tracts with limited access to grocery stores, supermarkets, or other sources of healthy, nutritious foods. These data were merged with US birth records from 2018 to 2019 by using the maternal county of residence (n = 7,533,319). We fit crude and adjusted logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations to determine the association between living in a food desert and the odds of preterm birth. We conducted a secondary within-group analysis by stratifying the fully adjusted model by race for non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black birthing people.
    RESULTS: In the fully adjusted model, we found a dose-response relationship. As the prevalence of tract-level food deserts within counties increased, so did the likelihood of preterm birth (mid-range: odds ratio (OR) = 1.04, 95% confidence interval (C.I.) 1.01-1.07; high: OR = 1.07, 95% C.I. 1.03-1.11). Similar results were seen in the White-Black stratified models. However, a disparity remained as Black birthing people had the highest odds for preterm birth. Lastly, gestational hypertension appears to mediate the relationship between nutritious food access and preterm birth (natural indirect effect (NIE) = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.00, 1.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: It is salient, particularly for Black birthing people who experience high rates of adverse birth outcomes, that the role of food desert residency be explored within maternal and child health disparities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    贫困是烧伤的已知风险因素,并且与在食物沙漠和食物沼泽中的居住有关。我们的目的是确定在食物沙漠和食物沼泽中居住的患病率,并调查食物环境之间的关系。合并症,烧伤患者的伤口愈合。我们对2016年1月至2022年1月在ABA验证的城市学术中心急诊或接受烧伤服务的所有年龄≥18岁的烧伤患者进行了回顾性图表审查。使用患者GeoID对食物沙漠和食物沼泽中的居住地进行分类,并记录合并症和人口统计信息。确定了接受单次手术分层厚度皮肤移植的全身表面积小于20%的患者子集,用于伤口愈合分析。共纳入3,063名患者,206在愈合时间分析中。2,490(81.3%)生活在食物沼泽中,96(3.1%)生活在食物沙漠中。糖尿病,高血压,在食物沼泽中,吸烟比食物沙漠或良好的获取区域更为普遍。虽然食物环境对伤口愈合没有显著影响,糖尿病与较长的治愈时间有关。大多数烧伤患者居住在食物沼泽中,这与高血压患病率较高有关,糖尿病,和吸烟。食物环境与伤口愈合没有显着相关。没有糖尿病与更短的伤口愈合时间有关。
    Poverty is a known risk factor for burn injury and is associated with residency in food deserts and food swamps. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of residency in food deserts and food swamps and to investigate the relationship between food environment, comorbidities, and wound healing in patients with burns. We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients with burns aged ≥ 18 seen in the emergency department or admitted to the burn service at an American Burn Association-verified urban academic center between January 2016 and January 2022. Patient GeoIDs were used to classify residency in food deserts and food swamps, and comorbidities and demographics were recorded. A subset of patients with <20% total body surface area burns who underwent single-operation split-thickness skin grafting was identified for wound healing analysis. A total of 3063 patients were included, with 206 in the heal time analysis. In total, 2490 (81.3%) lived in food swamps and 96 (3.1%) lived in food deserts. Diabetes, hypertension, and tobacco smoking were more prevalent in food swamps than in food deserts or good access areas. While there was no significant effect of the food environment on wound healing, diabetes was associated with longer healing times. Most patients with burns reside in food swamps, which are associated with a higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and smoking. The food environment was not significantly associated with wound healing. Not having diabetes was associated with a shorter time for wound healing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    芝加哥的黑人孕妇受到孕产妇发病率和死亡率的影响不成比例,并且更有可能居住在比任何其他种族/种族经历更大的经济困难和食物种族隔离的社区。解决健康的社会决定因素,如结构不平等,经济环境,和食物种族隔离问题可能为消除黑人孕产妇发病率和死亡率差异提供见解。本研究探讨了年轻人的食物选择决定因素和饮食观点,城市,黑人孕妇两个录音焦点小组在芝加哥进行,2019年3月至2019年6月之间的IL讨论怀孕经历和影响孕妇营养的因素。使用主题分析来识别代码,主题,和数据的子主题。数据分析以社会生态模型(SEM)为理论框架。十一,年轻,黑人妇女被招募。三个主要主题在SEM水平上进行了讨论,这些主题影响了食物选择,包括食物获取,压力和家庭对饮食的影响,以及怀孕期间营养教育的需要。这些选择主要源于参与者社区中经历的食物种族隔离的有害影响。因此,承认,理解,在临床实践中需要解决食品种族隔离及其对黑人孕产妇健康差异的影响,研究,和政策变化。
    Black pregnant women in Chicago are disproportionately affected by maternal morbidity and mortality and are more likely to reside in neighborhoods that experience greater economic hardships and food apartheid than any other race/ethnicity. Addressing social determinants of health such as structural inequities, economic environment, and food apartheid issues may provide insights into eliminating Black maternal morbidity and mortality disparities. This study explores food choice determinants and dietary perspectives of young, urban, Black pregnant women. Two audio-recorded focus groups were conducted in Chicago, IL between March 2019 and June 2019 to discuss pregnancy experiences and factors affecting maternal nutrition. Thematic analysis was used to identify the codes, themes, and subthemes of the data. Data analysis was guided by the Social Ecological Model (SEM) as a theoretical framework. Eleven, young, Black women were recruited. Three major themes were discussed across the SEM levels that influenced food choice including food access, stress and family influences on eating, and the need for nutritional education during pregnancy. These choices were primarily rooted in the detrimental effects of food apartheid experienced within the participants\' neighborhoods. Therefore, acknowledging, understanding, and addressing food apartheid and its impact on Black maternal health disparities is needed in clinical practice, research, and policy change.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号