Flow diversion

导流
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:血栓栓塞(TE)事件是血流转流(FD)后最令人恐惧的并发症之一,据报道即使使用足够的双重抗血小板治疗也会发生。在这里,作者描述了FD后发生的血栓形成和栓塞事件,重点关注这些事件的发病率和与其发展相关的诱发因素。
    方法:对2013年至2023年在美国一家机构接受FD治疗的动脉瘤进行了回顾性分析。作者记录了术中和术后TE事件的出现。进行生存分析和Cox回归模型以确定与这些事件相关的预测因子。
    结果:作者纳入了591例患者的651例手术,以治疗746个动脉瘤。在执行的38个手术中发生了TE事件(5.8%),导致20名患者的永久性缺陷和4名患者的死亡。11例急性支架内血栓形成,11大血管闭塞,和9带穿孔器行程。中位随访时间为9.5个月,73.0%的缺血性事件患者的改良Rankin量表评分≤2。其中3例死亡是继发于基底干和椎动脉闭塞。在前循环发生TE事件的患者中,11例大脑中动脉闭塞患者中的7例和12例颈内动脉闭塞患者中的9例获得了独立性。事件发生时间Cox回归分析显示,出现阿司匹林抵抗的患者发生TE事件更为频繁(风险比2.66;95%CI1.10-6.70)。
    结论:FD后的TE事件是由多种因素引起的,包括年龄,动脉瘤特征,动脉瘤位置,抗血小板抵抗,和程序因素。在我们的队列中,我们发现在大脑中动脉出现大血管闭塞的TE事件患者的发病率最高,和椎基底动脉系统.
    OBJECTIVE: Thromboembolic (TE) events are among the most feared complications after flow diversion (FD) and have been reported to occur even with adequate dual antiplatelet therapy. Herein, the authors characterize thrombotic and embolic events that developed after FD, focusing on the morbidity of each of these events and the predisposing factors associated with their development.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis of aneurysms treated with FD at a single institution in the US between 2013 and 2023 was performed. The authors documented the emergence of intraprocedural and postoperative TE events. A survival analysis and a Cox regression model was conducted to identify predictors associated with these events.
    RESULTS: The authors included 651 procedures performed in 591 patients to treat 746 aneurysms. TE events occurred in 38 of the procedures performed (5.8%), causing permanent deficit in 20 patients and death in 4 patients. Eleven cases presented with acute stent thrombosis, 11 with large-vessel occlusion, and 9 with perforator strokes. At a median follow-up of 9.5 months, 73.0% of patients with an ischemic event had a modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 2. Three of the deaths were secondary to occlusion at the basilar trunk and vertebral artery. In patients with TE events in the anterior circulation, 7 of 11 patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion and 9 of 12 patients with internal carotid artery occlusion achieved independence. Time-to-event Cox regression analysis demonstrated that TE events were more frequent in patients exhibiting aspirin resistance (hazard ratio 2.66; 95% CI 1.10-6.70).
    CONCLUSIONS: TE events after FD result from multiple factors, including age, aneurysm characteristics, aneurysm location, antiplatelet resistance, and procedural factors. In our cohort, we found the highest morbidity for patients with TE events presenting with large-vessel occlusion at the middle cerebral artery, and vertebrobasilar system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:脉络膜前动脉(AChA)动脉瘤占所有颅内动脉瘤的2%-5%。治疗考虑因素包括显微外科手术夹闭,导流,或卷绕有或没有辅助装置。由于动脉瘤从AChA的起源或近端段起源,因此AChA动脉瘤在治疗中提出了挑战。在治疗期间,AChA特别容易受到血管痉挛和闭塞的影响,包括偏瘫,半麻醉,嗜睡,疏忽,和偏盲。在这项研究中,作者进行了一项荟萃分析,以量化AChA动脉瘤不同治疗方式的结局和并发症发生率,并确定文献中报道的危险因素.
    方法:作者对手术夹闭治疗的AChA动脉瘤进行了系统评价,血管内卷绕,或流量转移,并在PubMed中报告,Embase,Scopus,和Cochrane搜索数据库。在RStudio中对选定结果进行单臂荟萃分析。
    结果:文献综述得出25项符合纳入标准的研究。总的来说,1627名患者被纳入分析,有554名男性,1009名女性,和64未指定。整个队列中任何并发症的发生率为11.6%,缺血性并发症的发生率为5.5%,所有治疗患者的康复率为90.3%。总的来说,1064例患者接受手术夹闭,443用卷取处理,和120例分流患者。在夹住的病人中,手术总并发症发生率为17.6%,缺血性并发症发生率为9.4%。良好的功能恢复率,根据格拉斯哥结果量表得分为4-5分或改良的兰金量表得分为0-2分,为88.0%,在84.5%的手术夹闭动脉瘤中实现了完全闭塞。患者并发症发生率为10.3%,缺血并发症发生率为3.0%。88.6%的卷曲患者实现了良好的功能恢复,74.1%的动脉瘤完全闭塞。分流导致并发症发生率为1.3%,缺血并发症发生率为0.7%。在分流组中,98.4%的患者实现了良好的功能恢复,79.0%的患者实现了动脉瘤完全闭塞。还确定了影响并发症发生率的动脉瘤形态学特征,以增加定量数据并帮助指导AChA动脉瘤的治疗选择。
    结论:与夹闭和卷绕相比,分流术显示出显著降低的总并发症和缺血性并发症,并改善了预后。治疗类型之间的结果可能存在差异,特别是在考虑指导治疗选择的各种患者介绍时。
    OBJECTIVE: Anterior choroidal artery (AChA) aneurysms account for 2%-5% of all intracranial aneurysms. Treatment considerations include microsurgical clipping, flow diversion, or coiling with or without adjunctive devices. AChA aneurysms pose challenges in treatment due to the origination of the aneurysm from the origin or proximal segment of the AChA. The AChA is particularly susceptible to vasospasm and occlusion during treatment with devastating neurological deficits, including hemiparesis, hemianesthesia, lethargy, neglect, and hemianopia. In this study, the authors performed a meta-analysis to quantify the outcomes and complication rates across treatment modalities for AChA aneurysms and to identify risk factors reported in the literature.
    METHODS: The authors performed a systematic review of AChA aneurysms treated with surgical clipping, endovascular coiling, or flow diversion and reported in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane search databases. Single-arm meta-analyses of the selected outcomes were performed in RStudio.
    RESULTS: Literature review yielded 25 studies that met the inclusion criteria. In total, 1627 patients were included in the analysis, with 554 males, 1009 females, and 64 unspecified. The rate of any complication in the full cohort was 11.6%, with a rate of ischemic complications of 5.5% and a favorable recovery rate of 90.3% of all patients treated. In total, 1064 patients underwent surgical clipping, 443 were treated with coiling, and 120 patients with flow diversion. In clipped patients, the rate of total surgical complications was 17.6%, with an ischemic complication rate of 9.4%. The rate of good functional recovery, defined on the basis of a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 4-5 or modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2, was 88.0%, and complete obliteration was achieved in 84.5% of surgically clipped aneurysms. The complication rate in coiled patients was 10.3%, with an ischemic complication rate of 3.0%. Good functional recovery was achieved in 88.6% of coiled patients and complete aneurysm obliteration in 74.1%. Flow diversion resulted in a complication rate of 1.3%, with 0.7% rate of ischemic complications. Good functional recovery was achieved in 98.4% of patients and complete aneurysm obliteration in 79.0% in the flow diversion group. Aneurysm morphological features that impacted the complication rate were also identified to augment quantitative data and to help guide treatment selection for AChA aneurysms.
    CONCLUSIONS: Flow diversion showed significantly lower total and ischemic complications and improved outcomes compared to clipping and coiling. There may be differences in outcomes between treatment types, especially when considering the varied patient presentations that guide treatment selection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:治疗基底尖动脉瘤(BAA)的血管内选择是异质的,证据仅限于回顾性队列和病例系列。我们试图评估与各种血管内治疗方法相关的BAA的疗效和并发症。
    方法:PubMed的系统评价,Embase,和WebofScience坚持PRISMA准则。纳入2010年1月至2024年7月期间评估BAA血管内治疗的回顾性和前瞻性研究。相关信息,包括闭塞率,动脉瘤复发,再治疗率,和并发症进行荟萃分析。
    结果:纳入了15项1,049个BAAs的研究。动脉瘤的中位直径为8.5mm(范围为4.6-19.75),中位随访时间为33.7个月(范围6.0-117.6)。在初次盘绕后,残留的动脉瘤充盈发生率为24%(95%CI=0.16-0.32),单支架辅助卷绕后25%(s-SAC;95%CI=0.04-0.46),Y型支架置入后25%(95%CI=0.12-0.37),分流支架置入后为23%(FDS;95%CI=0.11-0.35)。初次卷取的复发率很高(27%,95%CI=0.18-0.36)和s-SAC(19%,95%CI=0.13-0.26),但Y支架显著降低(9%,95%CI=0.03-0.15)和FDS(4%,95%CI=-0.04-0.11)。一次卷取的复治率为19%(95%CI=0.12-0.26),S-SAC为17%(95%CI=0.07-0.27),5%的Y支架(95%CI=-0.03-0.12),FDS为13%(95%CI=-0.01-0.27)。Meta回归显示较大的动脉瘤有较高的并发症发生率(p=0.02)。FDS和Y支架置入术中血栓栓塞事件最常见(12%)。
    结论:不同治疗组的闭塞率相似,但与原发性卷绕相比,Y型支架置入和FDS治疗后的复发率明显较低,尽管他们携带更多的血栓栓塞并发症。
    BACKGROUND: Endovascular options for the treatment of basilar apex aneurysms (BAAs) are heterogeneous, and evidence is limited to retrospective cohorts and case series. We seek to evaluate the efficacy and complications associated with various endovascular treatment methods of BAAs.
    METHODS: Systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. Retrospective and prospective studies evaluating endovascular treatment of BAAs between January 2010 and July 2024 were included. Relevant information including occlusion rates, aneurysm recurrence, retreatment rates, and complications were subjected to meta-analysis.
    RESULTS: Fifteen studies with 1,049 BAAs were included. The median aneurysm diameter was 8.5 mm (range 4.6-19.75), with a median follow-up of 33.7 months (range 6.0-117.6). Residual aneurysm filling occurred in 24% after primary coiling (95% CI=0.16-0.32), 25% after single stent-assisted coiling (s-SAC; 95% CI=0.04-0.46), 25% after Y-stenting (95% CI=0.12-0.37), and 23% after flow diverter stenting (FDS; 95% CI=0.11-0.35). Recurrence rates were high for primary coiling (27%, 95% CI=0.18-0.36) and s-SAC (19%, 95% CI=0.13-0.26), but significantly lower for Y-stenting (9%, 95% CI=0.03-0.15) and FDS (4%, 95% CI=-0.04-0.11). Retreatment rates were 19% for primary coiling (95% CI=0.12-0.26), 17% for s-SAC (95% CI=0.07-0.27), 5% for Y-stenting (95% CI=-0.03-0.12), and 13% for FDS (95% CI=-0.01-0.27). Meta-regression indicated larger aneurysms had higher complication rates (p=0.02). Thromboembolic events were most frequent with FDS and Y-stenting (12%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Occlusion rates were similar across treatments, but recurrence rates were significantly lower after Y-stenting and FDS treatments compared to primary coiling, although they carried a higher number of thromboembolic complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的二十年中,颅内动脉瘤的流量转移已成为一种有效且持久的治疗选择。在从囊内动脉瘤栓塞到母体血管重塑作为作用机制的范式转变中,分流装置的大量增加使许多以前认为无法治疗的动脉瘤得以治疗.在这次审查中,我们回顾了分流器的历史和发展,强调关键的临床试验导致他们的监管批准,回顾当前的设备,包括腔内和囊内分流器,并讨论其使用的当前和扩展适应症。临床平衡领域,包括破裂动脉瘤和宽颈分叉动脉瘤,总结了这些病变的重点是分流器。最后,我们讨论了分流技术的未来方向,包括生物可吸收的分流器,转录组学和放射基因组学,机器学习和人工智能。
    Flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms emerged as an efficacious and durable treatment option over the last two decades. In a paradigm shift from intrasaccular aneurysm embolization to parent vessel remodeling as the mechanism of action, the proliferation of flow-diverting devices has enabled the treatment of many aneurysms previously considered untreatable. In this review, we review the history and development of flow diverters, highlight the pivotal clinical trials leading to their regulatory approval, review current devices including endoluminal and intrasaccular flow diverters, and discuss current and expanding indications for their use. Areas of clinical equipoise, including ruptured aneurysms and wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms, are summarized with a focus on flow diverters for these pathologies. Finally, we discuss future directions in flow diversion technology including bioresorbable flow diverters, transcriptomics and radiogenomics, and machine learning and artificial intelligence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管在治疗方式如分流器方面取得了进步,后交通动脉(PComA)动脉瘤的最佳治疗仍不确定.虽然已经报道了用管道栓塞装置(PED)治疗的PComA动脉瘤,不完全闭塞动脉瘤的特征和进展仍不清楚.因此,本研究旨在探讨PED治疗PComA动脉瘤的闭塞状态和复发率.对2015年1月至2020年12月期间接受PED治疗的连续PComA动脉瘤患者进行了回顾性研究。仅包括接受放射学随访的患者。PComA动脉瘤分为不完全闭塞组和完全闭塞组。主要结果包括随访血管造影时不完全闭塞的特征。在我们机构接受PED治疗的121例PComA动脉瘤中,80个动脉瘤符合我们的研究条件。在后续期间,19例(23.8%)动脉瘤显示不完全闭塞。值得注意的是,在80例随访病例中,没有复发.患者和动脉瘤的基线特征在完全和不完全闭塞组之间具有可比性。然而,不完全闭塞组的辅助弹簧圈栓塞率较低(21.2%vs.55.7%,P=0.017)和较短的中位手术时间(91.0vs.145.5分钟,P=0.039)。功能结果的差异,并发症,且PComA闭塞状态组间差异无统计学意义。多变量分析显示使用线圈与PComA动脉瘤不完全闭塞的几率较低相关(OR0.01,95%CI0.001-0.12;P=0.001),而动脉瘤大小与较高的不完全闭塞几率相关(OR1.25,95%CI1.10-1.46;P=0.002).PED治疗PComA动脉瘤的结果良好,不完全闭塞率可接受,未观察到复发。然而,需要进一步的研究来探索大型PComA动脉瘤的最佳手术策略.
    Despite advancements in treatment modalities such as flow diverters, the optimal management of posterior communicating artery (PComA) aneurysms remains uncertain. While PComA aneurysms treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) has been reported, the characteristics and progression of incomplete occluded aneurysms remain unclear. Therefore, our study aims to investigate the occlusion status and recurrence rates of PComA aneurysms treated with PED. A retrospective review of consecutive PComA aneurysm patients treated with PED was conducted between January 2015 and December 2020. Only patients with radiological follow-up were included. PComA aneurysms were categorized into incomplete occlusion and complete occlusion group. The primary outcomes included the characteristics of incomplete occlusion at the follow-up angiography. Among 121 PComA aneurysms treated with PED at our institution, 80 aneurysms were eligible in our study. During the follow-up period, 19 (23.8%) aneurysms demonstrated incomplete occlusion. Notably, there were no instances of recurrence among the 80 followed-up cases. Baseline characteristics of patients and aneurysms were comparable between the groups with complete and incomplete occlusion. However, the incomplete occlusion group showed a lower rate of assisted coils embolization (21.2% vs. 55.7%, P = 0.017) and shorter median operative time (91.0 vs. 145.5 min, P = 0.039). Differences in functional outcomes, complications, and PComA occlusion status between the groups were not significant. Multivariate analysis revealed the use of coils was associated with lower odds of incomplete PComA aneurysm occlusion (OR 0.01, 95% CI 0.001-0.12; P = 0.001), while aneurysm size was associated with higher odds of incomplete occlusion (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.10-1.46; P = 0.002). The treatment of PED for PComA aneurysm demonstrated favorable outcomes, with an acceptable rate of incomplete occlusion and no instances of recurrence observed. However, further research is needed to explore the optimal procedural strategy for large-sized PComA aneurysms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    位于眼动脉起点的颈内动脉上的脑动脉瘤可以通过开放手术或血管内技术进行治疗。前者提供了更多的动脉瘤闭塞的确定性,而后者对视力的风险较小。血流分流是一种越来越被接受的治疗侧壁颈动脉动脉瘤,尽管眼动脉分支点的位置已知为中度闭塞结果。
    我们介绍了一例中年女性患者,其形态学上不规则的4-mm眼动脉瘤(OphA)和较小的垂体上动脉(SHA)动脉瘤,其成功且简单的闭塞通过球囊测试闭塞(BTO)进行了预测。在支架放置之前采用BTO以确认a)眼动脉远端与颈外动脉(ECA)分支的侧支和b)通过眼底镜检查可见的视网膜中保留的动脉流量。血管造影后1年,患者术后无缺陷,且受益于OphA和SHA完全闭塞.
    OphAs构成了一种复杂的外科疾病,历史上与高视觉发病率相关。我们提出了一种新颖的先进的BTO血管内技术,然后通过辅助线圈进行分流,成功地消除了OphA,同时保持了视力。
    UNASSIGNED: Cerebral aneurysms located along the internal carotid artery at the origin of the ophthalmic artery can be treated through open surgery or endovascular technique. The former affords more certainty of aneurysm obliteration, while the latter poses less risk to vision. Flow diversion is an increasingly accepted treatment for side-wall carotid aneurysms, although location at the branch point of the ophthalmic artery is known to moderate occlusion outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: We present a case of a middle-aged female patient with a morphologically irregular 4-mm ophthalmic artery aneurysm (OphA) and a smaller superior hypophyseal artery (SHA) aneurysm whose successful and uncomplicated obliteration by flow diversion with adjunctive coiling was predicted via a balloon test occlusion (BTO). BTO was employed prior to stent placement to confirm a) ophthalmic artery distal collateralization with external carotid artery (ECA) branches and b) preserved arterial flow in the retina visualized via fundoscopy. At 1 year following angiography, the patient had no postoperative deficits and benefitted from complete occlusion of the OphA and SHA.
    UNASSIGNED: OphAs constitute a complex surgical disease that is historically associated with high visual morbidity. We present a novel advanced endovascular technique of BTO followed by flow diversion with adjunctive coiling that successfully obliterated an OphA while preserving vision.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Derivo2治疗栓塞装置(D2HED)是一种新型的分流器(FD),其提供基于纤维蛋白/肝素的表面涂层,旨在降低血栓形成性。我们评估了颅内动脉瘤治疗的围手术期方面和动脉瘤闭塞的初步疗效。
    方法:34个D2HED部署(34个动脉瘤,分析了2021年4月至2023年10月的32例患者)。所有患者均接受双重抗血小板治疗(dAPT)。程序期间详细信息,不良事件,和随访(FU)成像由顾问级别的神经放射学家进行审查。基于文献研究,将并发症发生率和动脉瘤闭塞疗效与其他FD的表现数据进行比较。
    结果:每次干预成功部署了一个D2HED。根据O\'Kelly-Marotta(OKM)分级量表,73.5%的病例在D2HED部署后立即出现明显和/或增加的动脉瘤内造影剂停滞。3例患者发生了临床相关的早期不良事件:其中2例后循环梭形动脉瘤(缺血事件,早期支架内血栓形成)和31例治疗的颈内动脉动脉瘤中的大多数患者(缺血性事件)(3,2%)。关于中期FU(>165天),1个动脉瘤未显示进行性闭塞,推测是由晚期ICA动脉瘤本身引起的显著A1段引起的.除此之外,可以证明中期完全/部分闭塞率为80%/20%。
    结论:我们的病例系列-尽管样本量有限-提示D2HED在治疗颅内动脉瘤方面具有潜在的有效性。需要对更大样本的进一步研究来量化长期闭塞功效和抗血栓形成表面涂层对必要的(d)APT的影响。
    BACKGROUND: The Derivo 2 Heal Embolization Device (D2HED) is a novel flow diverter (FD) providing a fibrin-/heparin-based surface coating aiming at lower thrombogenicity. We evaluate periprocedural aspects and preliminary aneurysm occlusion efficacy for intracranial aneurysm treatment.
    METHODS: Thirty-four D2HEDs deployments (34 aneurysms, 32 patients) between 04/2021 and 10/2023 were analyzed. All patients were under dual antiplatelet therapy (dAPT). Periprocedural details, adverse events, and follow-up (FU) imaging were reviewed by consultant-level neuroradiologists. Complication rates and aneurysm occlusion efficacy are compared with performance data of other FDs based on literature research.
    RESULTS: Each intervention succeeded in the deployment of one D2HED. Significant and/or increased intraaneurysmal contrast stagnation immediately after D2HED deployment was seen in 73.5% of cases according to O\'Kelly-Marotta (OKM) grading scale. Clinically relevant early adverse events occurred in three patients: Among them two cases with fusiform aneurysms in the posterior circulation (ischemic events, early in-stent-thrombosis) and one patient (ischemic event) out of the majority of 31 treated internal carotid artery aneurysms (3,2%). Regarding mid-term FU (> 165 days), one aneurysm did not show progressive occlusion presumably caused by a prominent A1 segment arising from the terminal ICA aneurysm itself. Apart from that, mid-term complete / partial occlusion rates of 80% / 20% could be demonstrated.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our case series - although suffering from restricted sample size - suggests a potential effectiveness of D2HED in managing intracranial aneurysms. Further studies with larger samples are warranted to quantify long-term occlusion efficacy and the impact of antithrombogenic surface coating on the necessary (d)APT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较支架辅助卷绕(SAC)与编织支架(BS)的结果,分流器(FD),和激光切割支架(LCS),以确定BS(狮子座婴儿和Accero)的相对流量转向能力。方法:回顾性评估SAC和FD辅助卷绕治疗的囊状颅内动脉瘤。动脉瘤闭塞,根据Raymond-Roy的评分,分为再通/稳定的残余充盈(A组;缺乏分流效应)或稳定/进行性闭塞(B组具有“分流效应”)。评估了预测分流效果的因素。结果:在194个动脉瘤中,LCS,BS,FD用于70(36.1%),86(44.3%),和38个(19.6%)动脉瘤,分别。FD治疗的动脉瘤较大,有更宽的脖子,并且位于较大的亲本动脉上(分别为p<0.01、0.02和<0.01)。平均影像学随访时间为24.5个月。A组29例(14.9%)动脉瘤,B组165例(85.1%)动脉瘤。包括性,年龄,动脉瘤大小,颈部宽度,父动脉直径,随访持续时间,和支架类型,稳定/进展性动脉瘤闭塞的阳性预测因子是动脉瘤大小和FD或BS的放置(分别为p<0.01和p<0.01,并且是LCS的阳性预测因子:ORs6.34(95%CI:1.62-24.76)和3.11(95%CI:1.20-8.07),分别)在多变量分析中。结论:BS的放置可以预测激光切割支架上的流量转移。然而,流量分流效应约为FD的一半,这表明BS可能只被认为具有一些(部分)流量分流效应。
    Objective: Comparison of the results of stent-assisted coiling (SAC) with braided stents (BS), flow diverters (FD), and laser-cut stents (LCS) to determine the relative flow-diverting capacity of BS (Leo baby and Accero). Methods: Saccular intracranial aneurysms treated by SAC and FD-assisted coiling were retrospectively evaluated. Aneurysm occlusion, as graded per Raymond-Roy score, was categorized as either recanalization/stable residual filling (Group A; lacking a flow diversion effect) or stable/progressive occlusion (Group B with a \"flow diversion effect\"). Factors predicting the flow diversion effect were evaluated. Results: Of the 194 aneurysms included, LCS, BS, and FD were used in 70 (36.1%), 86 (44.3%), and 38 (19.6%) aneurysms, respectively. Aneurysms treated by FD were larger, had wider necks, and were located on larger parent arteries (p < 0.01, 0.02, and <0.01, respectively). The mean imaging follow-up duration was 24.5 months. There were 29 (14.9%) aneurysms in Group A and 165 (85.1%) in Group B. Among a spectrum of variables, including sex, age, aneurysm size, neck width, parent artery diameter, follow-up duration, and stent type, the positive predictors for stable/progressive aneurysm occlusion were aneurysm size and placement of an FD or BS (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively, and were positive predictors over LCS: ORs 6.34 (95% CI: 1.62-24.76) and 3.11 (95% CI: 1.20-8.07), respectively) in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: The placement of BS was a predictor of flow diversion over laser-cut stents. However, the flow diversion effect was approximately half that of FDs, suggesting that BS may only be considered to have some (partial) flow diversion effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇全面的综述深入研究了颅内动脉瘤神经介入治疗的发展领域。探索双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)对血管内卷绕的关键辅助手段,支架辅助卷绕(SAC),分流支架,和流动中断(囊内)装置。尽管越来越多的证据支持DAPT成功减少血栓栓塞事件,对最佳方案缺乏共识,剂量,持续时间很明显。导致这种变异性的因素包括影响治疗反应的遗传多态性和关于与DAPT相关的出血性并发症的临床意义的持续辩论。这篇综述分析了各种干预措施的术前和术后抗血小板使用情况。当务之急是正在进行的研究,以定义最佳的DAPT持续时间,在颅内动脉瘤治疗中,确保血栓形成和出血之间的微妙平衡。
    This comprehensive review delves into the evolving field of neurointervention for intracranial aneurysms, exploring the critical adjunct of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) to endovascular coiling, stent-assisted coiling (SAC), flow-diversion stents, and flow-disruption (intrasaccular) devices. Despite growing evidence supporting the success of DAPT in reducing thromboembolic events, the lack of consensus on optimal regimens, doses, and duration is evident. Factors contributing to this variability include genetic polymorphisms affecting treatment response and ongoing debates regarding the clinical significance of hemorrhagic complications associated with DAPT. This review analyzes pre- and post-procedural antiplatelet usage across various interventions. The imperative lies in ongoing research to define optimal DAPT durations, ensuring a nuanced approach to the delicate balance between thrombosis and hemorrhage in intracranial aneurysm management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇全面的综述探讨了内皮祖细胞(EPCs)在血管疾病中的多方面作用,重点关注它们在发病机制中的参与以及它们对增强颅内动脉瘤血管内治疗(IAs)疗效的贡献。最初发现CD34+骨髓来源的细胞与血管生成有关,EPCs与血管修复有关,血管生成,和血管生成微环境。EPC的起源和分化一直存在争议,挑战骨髓起源的传统观念。量化方法,包括CD34+,CD133+,和各种化验,揭示因素的影响,像年龄,性别,和EPC层面的合并症。细胞机制突出了骨髓和血管生成微环境之间的相互作用,涉及生长因子,基质金属蛋白酶,和信号通路,例如磷脂酰肌醇-3-激酶(PI3K)和丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)。在IAs发病机理的背景下,EPCs通过替代受损和功能失调的内皮细胞在维持血管完整性方面发挥作用。最近的研究还表明,EPCs在线圈栓塞和分流后具有治疗潜力,这导致了旨在增强内皮化的设备表面修饰的发展。全面的见解强调了进一步研究EPCs作为IAs中的治疗靶标和生物标志物的重要性。
    This comprehensive review explores the multifaceted role of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in vascular diseases, focusing on their involvement in the pathogenesis and their contributions to enhancing the efficacy of endovascular treatments for intracranial aneurysms (IAs). Initially discovered as CD34+ bone marrow-derived cells implicated in angiogenesis, EPCs have been linked to vascular repair, vasculogenesis, and angiogenic microenvironments. The origin and differentiation of EPCs have been subject to debate, challenging the conventional notion of bone marrow origin. Quantification methods, including CD34+ , CD133+ , and various assays, reveal the influence of factors, like age, gender, and comorbidities on EPC levels. Cellular mechanisms highlight the interplay between bone marrow and angiogenic microenvironments, involving growth factors, matrix metalloproteinases, and signaling pathways, such as phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). In the context of the pathogenesis of IAs, EPCs play a role in maintaining vascular integrity by replacing injured and dysfunctional endothelial cells. Recent research has also suggested the therapeutic potential of EPCs after coil embolization and flow diversion, and this has led the development of device surface modifications aimed to enhance endothelialization. The comprehensive insights underscore the importance of further research on EPCs as both therapeutic targets and biomarkers in IAs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号