Fitness to dive

健身潜水
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    常规试纸尿液分析是许多潜水医学评估方案的一部分。然而,这在无症状和健康个体中很有可能产生假阳性或假阴性结果.评估潜水医学评估中尿液分析价值的研究有限。
    所有尿液分析结果,作为潜水员潜水医学评估的一部分,潜艇,和2013年至2023年荷兰皇家海军的高压人员被纳入本研究.此外,有关额外测试的任何信息,转介,或收集有关上述内容的测试结果。
    有5,899项评估,导致46(0.8%)阳性试纸尿液分析结果,主要是显微镜下的血尿。女性比例明显过高,和修订导致的阳性检测结果明显多于初始评估.最后,几乎一半的病例被认为适合潜水,而另一半被认为暂时不适合。这些情况需要额外的测试,一位泌尿科医生被咨询了三次。
    据我们所知,这是在潜水医学评估中评估尿液分析的最广泛的研究。在我们的军事人口中,阳性检测结果的发生率非常低,并且在10年内没有临床相关结果。因此,常规评估无症状健康军事候选人的尿液并不符合成本效益或有效.作者建议对潜水进行全面的健康评估,并且仅在存在临床指征时才分析尿液。
    UNASSIGNED: Routine dipstick urinalysis is part of many dive medical assessment protocols. However, this has a significant chance of producing false-positive or false-negative results in asymptomatic and healthy individuals. Studies evaluating the value of urinalysis in dive medical assessments are limited.
    UNASSIGNED: All results from urinalysis as part of dive medical assessments of divers, submarines, and hyperbaric personnel of the Royal Netherlands Navy from 2013 to 2023 were included in this study. Additionally, any information regarding additional testing, referral, or test results concerning the aforementioned was collected.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 5,899 assessments, resulting in 46 (0.8%) positive dipstick urinalysis results, predominantly microscopic haematuria. Females were significantly overrepresented, and revisions resulted in significantly more positive test results than initial assessments. Lastly, almost half of the cases were deemed fit to dive, while the other half were regarded as temporarily unfit. These cases required additional testing, and a urologist was consulted three times.
    UNASSIGNED: To our knowledge, this is the most extensive study evaluating urinalysis in dive medical assessments. In our military population, the incidence of positive test results is very low, and there have not been clinically relevant results over a period of 10 years. Therefore, routinely assessing urine in asymptomatic healthy military candidates is not cost-effective or efficacious. The authors advise taking a thorough history for fitness to dive assessments and only analysing urine when a clinical indication is present.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:肺内充满空气的空腔,例如,bullae,气泡,和囊肿,被认为会导致潜水员的上肺气压伤(PBT)和动脉气体栓塞(AGE)。然而,关于健康成人大疱患病率的文献尚不清楚,范围为2.3-33.8%。虽然这可以部分解释为由于放射学成像质量的提高,比如计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描,其他方法学因素也可能影响这些发现.这项研究旨在确定年轻和健康成年人中大疱的患病率。方法:这项单中心横断面观察性研究重新评估了因临床怀疑肺栓塞而进行的成人(18-40岁)的CT扫描,2016年1月1日至2020年3月1日。大疱的存在记录在电子数据库中。卡方和Fisher精确检验用于统计分析。此外,我们进行了多因素logistic回归分析,以研究已确定的危险因素的独立预测价值.结果:共确诊1,014例,其中836可以包括在内。年龄组(18-25、26-30、31-35和36-40)之间的分布几乎相等,然而,75%的人口是女性。在男性比例中,41%吸烟,女性为27%。在7.2%(95%CI5.6-9.1)中,大疱被鉴定。患病率随着年龄的增长而增加(p<0.001),在年龄最大的年龄组中,奇数比率高达5.347(95%CI2.164-13.213,p<0.001)。男性和吸烟者大疱的比值比更高,为2.460(95%CI1.144-4.208;p=0.001)和3.406(95%CI1.878-6.157,p<0.001),分别。在多变量逻辑回归分析中也看到了类似的结果,在哪里年龄,男性和吸烟均是大疱的独立危险因素。讨论:在40岁以下的健康人群中,有7.2%的人出现了Bullae。年龄增长,吸烟,男性被确定为具有统计学意义的危险因素,在独立和多变量逻辑回归分析中。我们的观察结果可能需要重新评估大鱼对PBT和AGE的贡献,由于后两者很少发生,并且bullae似乎比以前假设的更频繁地存在。
    Introduction: Intrapulmonary air-filled cavities, e.g., bullae, blebs, and cysts, are believed to contribute topulmonary barotrauma (PBT) and arterial gas embolism (AGE) in divers. However, literature is unclear about the prevalence of bullae in healthy adults, ranging from 2.3-33.8%. While this could in part be explained due to increasing quality of radiologic imaging, such as computed tomography (CT) scans, other methodological factors may also affect these findings. This study aims to ascertain the prevalence of bullae in young and healthy adults. Methods: This single-center cross-sectional observational study re-assessed the CT scans of adults (aged 18-40) performed for a clinical suspicion for pulmonary embolism, from 1 January 2016 to 1 March 2020. Presence of bullae was recorded in an electronic database. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used for statistical analyses. Additionally, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to study the independent predictive value of identified risk factors. Results: A total of 1,014 cases were identified, of which 836 could be included. Distribution amongst age groups (18-25, 26-30, 31-35, and 36-40) was almost equally, however, 75% of the population was female. Of the male proportion, 41% smoked, compared to 27% in females. In 7.2% (95% CI 5.6-9.1) bullae were identified. The prevalence increased with increasing age (p < 0.001), with odd ratios up to 5.347 (95% CI 2.164-13.213, p < 0.001) in the oldest age group. Males and smokers had higher odds ratios for bullae of 2.460 (95% CI 1.144-4.208; p = 0.001) and 3.406 (95% CI 1.878-6.157, p < 0.001), respectively. Similar results were seen in the multivariate logistic regression analysis, where age, male sex and smoking were all statistically significant independent risk factors for bullae. Discussion: Bullae were seen in 7.2% of a healthy population up to 40 years old. Increasing age, smoking, and being male were identified as statistically significant risk factors, both in independent and in multivariate logistic regression analyses. Our observations may warrant a re-evaluation of the contribution of bullae to PBT and AGE, as the latter two occur very rarely and bullae appear to be more frequently present than earlier assumed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    气管支气管憩室(TBD)是无症状的,气管和支气管腔外的良性囊性病变。这是第一例诊断为TBD的SCUBA(自给式水下呼吸器)潜水员,这是潜水的潜在风险。到目前为止,尚无有关先天性或获得性TBD疾病患者的潜水适应性的文献或指南。一名健康的26岁男性职业潜水员有潜水记录,潜水深度为40米海水。他在职业生涯中没有任何与潜水有关的伤害或症状,也没有吸烟史,饮酒,或其他特殊疾病,但COVID-19感染除外。通过计算机断层扫描(CT)意外发现了气管憩室,但是最初它与气管的联系并不清楚。因此,进行高分辨率CT和电子支气管镜检查以明确憩室的情况并确定潜水风险。高分辨率CT显示憩室可能有开口,但是在电子支气管镜下没有看到。尽管在高分辨率CT中显示出潜在的开口,缺乏视觉支气管镜检查证据使其可能是死腔。由于减压期间气压伤的理论风险较高,导致纵隔气肿,出血,或者动脉气体栓塞,目前的临床共识是,含空气的组织应被视为潜水的相对禁忌症。总的来说,建议潜水员小心潜水,避免上升太快。
    Tracheobronchial diverticulum (TBD) is an asymptomatic, benign cystic lesion outside the lumen of the trachea and bronchus. This is the first report case of a SCUBA (self contained underwater breathing apparatus) diver diagnosed with TBD, which is a potential risk to diving. No literature or guideline is available so far on the diving fitness for patients with congenital or acquired TBD condition. A healthy 26-year-old male professional diver has records of SCUBA diving up to a depth of 40 meters sea water. He did not have any diving-related injuries or symptoms during his career and had no history of smoking, drinking, or other special illnesses except for a COVID-19 infection. A tracheal diverticulum was found accidentally by computed tomography (CT), but its communication with the trachea was not clear initially. Therefore, high-resolution CT and electronic bronchoscopy were done to clarify the situation of the diverticulum and identify the diving risk. High-resolution CT showed a possible opening in the diverticulum, but this was not seen under electronic bronchoscopy. Although a potential opening was shown in high-resolution CT, the lack of visual bronchoscopic evidence made it likely to be a dead cavity. As there is a higher theoretical risk of barotrauma during decompression, leading to pneumomediastinum, hemorrhage, or arterial gas embolism, the current clinical consensus is that air-containing tissue should be regarded as a relative contraindication for diving. Overall, it is recommended that the diver should dive carefully and avoid ascending too rapidly.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在无症状个体中进行常规胸部X光检查(CXR)以评估高压暴露风险是有争议的。在许多情况下,辐射风险可能会掩盖低产量。然而,在某些情况下,产量可能会更高,如结核病流行国家。我们评估了常规CXR在南非潜水和潜艇体检中的实用性。
    对31年的894名潜水员和潜艇运动员的3,568项体能检查中的2,777名CXR记录进行了审查,以确定CXR异常的发生率。使用比值比和二项逻辑回归模型评估相关因素,用Kaplan-Meier图来描述服务的持续时间,直到第一个异常CXR。
    在每人每年的服务中报告了异常的CXR,研究参与者的累积发生率为6.5%(58/894).在他们的病史中只有4个人具有CXR的临床指征。看到了一系列潜在的病理,其中15.5%被宣布不合格,其余(84.5%)接受治疗,或进一步调查显示该人可以被宣布健康。
    在南非,常规CXR在检测与压力暴露不相容的异常方面可以发挥作用。在初次检查期间和有长期服务记录的个人中发现的异常数量最多。在我们研究的31年中,只有4个人具有CXR的临床指征。应进行类似的研究,以便在其他国家和环境中提出建议。
    UNASSIGNED: Performance of routine Chest X-rays (CXRs) in asymptomatic individuals to assess hyperbaric exposure risk is controversial. The radiation risk may overshadow the low yield in many settings. However, the yield may be higher in certain settings, such as tuberculosis-endemic countries. We evaluated the utility of routine CXR in diving and submarine medical examinations in South Africa.
    UNASSIGNED: Records of 2,777 CXRs during 3,568 fitness examinations of 894 divers and submariners spanning 31 years were reviewed to determine the incidence of CXR abnormality. Associated factors were evaluated using odds ratios and a binomial logistic regression model, with a Kaplan-Meier plot to describe the duration of service until first abnormal CXR.
    UNASSIGNED: An abnormal CXR was reported in 1.1% per person year of service, yielding a cumulative incidence of 6.5% (58/894) of the study participants. Only four individuals had a clinical indication for the CXR in their medical history. A range of potential pathologies were seen, of which 15.5% were declared disqualifying and the rest (84.5%) were treated, or further investigation showed that the person could be declared fit.
    UNASSIGNED: In South Africa, a routine CXR has a role to play in detecting abnormalities that are incompatible with pressure exposures. The highest number of abnormalities were found during the initial examinations and in individuals with long service records. Only four individuals had a clinical indication for their CXR during the 31-year span of our study. Similar studies should be performed to make recommendations in other countries and settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在潜水社区,特别需要了解无症状或轻度COVID-19疾病是否会影响职业暴露于极端环境的个体的心肺功能。迄今为止,尚未进行对照研究,比较受COVID-19感染的高压氧员工和未受COVID-19感染的军人同龄人.
    方法:2020年6月至2021年6月,健康,高压,年龄在18至54岁之间的军事人员,至少一个月前从无症状或亚临床COVID-19疾病中恢复过来,进行了分析。同期接受医学评估的非COVID感染同龄人作为对照组。测体温,肺活量测定,最大伏安,测量各组的DLCO。
    结果:体测量没有临床相关差异,肺功能检查,在COVID-19组和对照组之间进行了运动测试。然而,COVID组估计VO2-max降低10%或更多的个体百分比显著高于对照组(24vs.7.8%,P=0.004)。
    结论:在无症状或轻度症状的COVID-19感染后,军事高压雇员和那些没有遇到COVID-19的人一样健康。由于这项研究是基于军事人口,它不能外推到非军事人口。有必要在非军事人群中进行进一步的研究,以确定本发现的医学相关性。
    BACKGROUND: In the diving community there is a special need to know if asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 disease impacts the cardiopulmonary functioning of individuals with occupational exposure to extreme environments. To date, no controlled studies have been conducted comparing COVID-19-infected hyperbaric employees and non-COVID-19-infected peers in a military setting.
    METHODS: Between June 2020 and June 2021, healthy, hyperbaric, military personnel aged between 18 and 54 years old, who had recovered from asymptomatic or subclinical COVID-19 disease at least one month earlier, were analysed. Non-COVID-infected peers with medical assessments during the same period were used as the control group. Somatometry, spirometry, VO₂ max, and DLCO were measured for each group.
    RESULTS: No clinically relevant differences in somatometry, lung function tests, and exercise testing were found between the COVID-19 group and the controls. However, the percentage of individuals with a decrease in estimated VO2-max of 10% or more was significantly greater in the COVID group than in the control group (24 vs. 7.8%, P = 0.004).
    CONCLUSIONS: After asymptomatic or mild symptomatic COVID-19 infections, military hyperbaric employees are as fit as those who had not encountered COVID-19. As this research was based on a military population, it cannot be extrapolated to a nonmilitary population. Further studies in nonmilitary populations are necessary to determine the medical relevance of the present findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究旨在调查2014-2018年澳大利亚的压缩气体潜水死亡人数,并与2001-2013年的死亡人数进行比较,以找出持续存在的问题并评估对策。
    方法:搜索了媒体报道和国家冠状信息系统,以确定2014-2018年水肺潜水死亡人数。数据是从证人和警察报告中提取的,病史,和尸检。创建Excel®数据库并进行事件链分析。与先前的报告进行了比较。
    结果:确认42人死亡,38人使用水肺,4人使用表面供式呼吸器,涉及30名男性和12名女性。受害者的平均年龄是49.7岁,比之前的队列高出六年。54%的人肥胖。六名受害者不合格,三人接受指导,至少28名是经验丰富的潜水员,显著高于之前的队列。与健康相关的诱发因素,主要是肥胖和心脏相关,被确定为可能促成26起事件,并计划至少22人死亡。三分之一的致残条件是原发性溺水,四分之一是心脏病。三名潜水员死于一氧化碳中毒,三名可能死于浸入肺水肿。
    结论:提高年龄,肥胖和相关的心脏病在潜水事故中变得越来越普遍,因此显然需要对潜水健康状况进行适当评估.
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate compressed gas diving deaths in Australia from 2014-2018 and make comparison to those from 2001-2013 to identify ongoing problems and assess countermeasures.
    METHODS: Media reports and the National Coronial Information System were searched to identify scuba diving deaths for 2014-2018, inclusive. Data were extracted from the witness and police reports, medical histories, and autopsies. An Excel® database was created and a chain of events analysis conducted. Comparisons were made with the earlier report.
    RESULTS: Forty-two fatalities were identified, 38 using scuba and four using surface-supplied breathing apparatus involving 30 males and 12 females. The mean age of victims was 49.7 years, six years higher than the previous cohort. Fifty-four percent were obese. Six victims were unqualified, three were under instruction and at least 28 were experienced divers, significantly more than in the previous cohort. Health-related predisposing factors, predominantly obesity and cardiac-related, were identified as likely contributory to 26 incidents, and planning shortcomings to at least 22 deaths. One-third of the disabling conditions were primary drowning and one-quarter were cardiac. Three divers died subsequent to carbon monoxide poisoning and three likely from immersion pulmonary oedema.
    CONCLUSIONS: Advancing age, obesity and the associated cardiac disease have become increasingly prevalent in diving fatalities and the need for appropriate assessment of fitness to dive is evident.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    传统上,对于患有先天性心脏病(ACHD)的成年患者,不鼓励进行水肺潜水。在缺乏高质量的潜水特定研究的情况下,这种限制性运动建议基于专家的意见。然而,在过去的几十年中,先天性心脏病(CHD)患者的生存率和生活质量得到了显着改善,有必要对这种限制性体育建议是否仍然适用进行严格评估。在这次审查中,描述了潜水对心血管的影响,并提供了希望进行水肺潜水的ACHD患者的检查框架。此外,提出了针对特定CHD诊断组的潜水建议。
    Conventionally, scuba diving has been discouraged for adult patients with congenital heart disease (ACHD). This restrictive sports advice is based on expert opinion in the absence of high-quality diving-specific studies. However, as survival and quality of life in congenital heart disease (CHD) patients have dramatically improved in the last decades, a critical appraisal whether such restrictive sports advice is still applicable is warranted. In this review, the cardiovascular effects of diving are described and a framework for the work-up for ACHD patients wishing to engage in scuba diving is provided. In addition, diving recommendations for specific CHD diagnostic groups are proposed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:解释肺功能测试(PFT)结果需要有效的参考集和区分病理性与生理性肺功能的界限;正常下限(LLN)。然而,在潜水医学中,尚不清楚健康受试者的LLN为2.5%(LLN-2.5)或5%(LLN-5)是否构成适当的界限。
    方法:在2015年1月1日至2021年1月1日期间在荷兰皇家海军潜水医疗中心进行的所有PFT导致强制肺活量(FVC),包括一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)和/或Z评分在-1.64(LLN-5)和-1.96(LLN-2.5)之间的FEV1/FVC.筛选了额外测试的记录,转诊给肺科专家,放射成像结果,和健身潜水。
    结果:对814名受试者的2,108项评估的分析表明,83名受试者,74男9女,平均年龄32.4(SD8.2)岁,身高182(7.0)厘米,有一个FVC,FEV1和/或FEV1/FVC,Z评分在-1.64和-1.96之间。在这83个科目中,35人(42%)接受了额外的测试,77(93%)被转诊给肺部专家,31(37%)接受了高分辨率CT成像。由于各种原因,十名受试者(12%)被宣布“不适合潜水”。从他们的病史信息可以识别这些人。
    结论:在无症状个体中使用LLN-2.5而不是LLN-5治疗FEV1/FVC减少了额外的调查和转诊给肺部专科医生,而不会遗漏重要的诊断,提供了全面的病史。采用LLN-2.5可以节省用于潜水医学评估的资源,并保护受试者免受与额外调查相关的有害副作用。同时保持同等的安全水平。
    BACKGROUND: Interpreting pulmonary function test (PFT) results requires a valid reference set and a cut-off differentiating pathological from physiological pulmonary function; the lower limit of normal (LLN). However, in diving medicine it is unclear whether an LLN of 2.5% (LLN-2.5) or 5% (LLN-5) in healthy subjects constitutes an appropriate cut-off.
    METHODS: All PFTs performed at the Royal Netherlands Navy Diving Medical Centre between 1 January 2015 and 1 January 2021 resulting in a forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and/or FEV1/FVC with a Z-score between -1.64 (LLN-5) and -1.96 (LLN-2.5) were included. Records were screened for additional tests, referral to a pulmonary specialist, results of radiological imaging, and fitness to dive.
    RESULTS: Analysis of 2,108 assessments in 814 subjects showed that 83 subjects, 74 men and nine women, mean age 32.4 (SD 8.2) years and height 182 (7.0) cm, had an FVC, FEV1 and/or FEV1/FVC with Z-scores between -1.64 and -1.96. Of these 83 subjects, 35 (42%) underwent additional tests, 77 (93%) were referred to a pulmonary specialist and 31 (37%) underwent high-resolution CT-imaging. Ten subjects (12%) were declared \'unfit to dive\' for various reasons. Information from their medical history could have identified these individuals.
    CONCLUSIONS: Use of LLN-2.5 rather than LLN-5 for FEV1/FVC in asymptomatic individuals reduces additional investigations and referrals to a pulmonary specialist without missing important diagnoses, provided a thorough medical history is taken. Adoption of LLN-2.5 could save resources spent on diving medical assessments and protect subjects from harmful side effects associated with additional investigations, while maintaining an equal level of safety.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:香港目前的做法是让潜在的康乐潜水员在参加潜水前完成一份康乐训练委员会自我申报的医疗声明(RSTC表格)。文献中还没有关于中文版形式有用性的报导。
    方法:由117名研究参与者填写了潜水教练专业协会(PADI)RSTC表格(中文版),然后对他们进行了单独的访谈(未经检查),以确定表格是否未捕获相关信息。记录发现的任何差异或问题以供进一步分析。
    结果:在参与者中,15.4%的人表示难以完成RSTC表格。不到三分之一(28.2%)对问题回答“全部否定”。仅靠问卷并不能得出一些可能带来潜水风险的健康状况。然而,有很好的灵敏度,特异性,除几个问题外,阳性预测值和阴性预测值。然而,在比较英文和中文版本时,发现了重大差异。在执行方面也存在不确定性,包括用户和提供者的态度,自我声明答案的可靠性和完成问卷的处理。
    结论:针对娱乐性潜水员的健康筛查问卷仍然是可行和可接受的。鉴于结构效度和翻译方面的问题,建议全面修订中文RSTC表格。应告知人们有关休闲潜水员健康评估的非处方方法。对表格实施的进一步研究可能有助于改进今后的筛查策略。
    BACKGROUND: The current practice in Hong Kong is to have potential recreational divers complete a Recreational Scuba Training Council self-declared medical statement (RSTC form) prior to participation in diving. There are no reports in the literature on the usefulness of the Chinese version of the form.
    METHODS: The Professional Association of Diving Instructors (PADI) RSTC form (Chinese version) was completed by 117 research participants who were then individually interviewed (without examination) to establish whether relevant information was not captured by the form. Any discrepancies or problems identified were recorded for further analysis.
    RESULTS: Among participants, 15.4% expressed difficulty in completing the RSTC form. Less than one-third (28.2%) replied \'all negative\' to the questions. Some health conditions that could impose diving risks were not elicited by the questionnaire alone. Nevertheless, there was good sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value with the exception of a few questions. However, significant discrepancies were identified when comparing the English and Chinese versions. There was also uncertainty with aspects of implementation, including attitudes of the user and provider, reliability of self-declaration answers and the handling of completed questionnaires.
    CONCLUSIONS: Health screening with a questionnaire for recreational divers remains practical and acceptable. Full revision of the RSTC form in Chinese is recommended in view of problems with the construct validity and translation. People should be informed about the non-prescriptive approach of health assessment for recreational divers. Further research on the implementation of the form may help to improve the screening strategy in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号