Fiducial Markers

基准标记
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    具有图像引导(IGRT)的精确患者定位对于安全的前列腺放疗至关重要。我们提出了利用CT可见的水凝胶垫片的第一个报告,用于减少直肠辐射剂量,作为替代基准标记,在前列腺癌的立体定向放射治疗(SABR)中,通过锥形束CT(CBCT)辅助每日IGRT。
    在CT模拟之前,根据标准实践,患者接受了三个前列腺内金基准标记物和不透射线的水凝胶间隔物的放置.在治疗中,初始设置后,根据间隔物的三维匹配,采集CBCT并与计划CT融合.然后基于基准标记执行第二对准。记录了六个方向的偏移(三个线性和三个旋转),和差异比较。
    评估了41例连续患者的140个个体分数。基于水凝胶间隔物和基于基准的线性对齐之间的平均/中位数差异(垂直,纵向,横向)和旋转(旋转,螺距,辊)位移为0.9/0.6mm,0.8/0.5mm,和0.6/0.4mm,和0.38/0,0.62/0和0.35/0度,分别。在9.9%中没有观察到差异,22.9%,和22.14%的线性位移,和65.7%,65%,和66.4%的旋转偏移,分别。在后70个分数与前者,评估人员的结果一致。
    对于前列腺SABR用CBCT进行精确的每日IGRT,使用不透射线的水凝胶垫片的排列与前列腺内基准标记高度可比.这是第一份报告,支持CT可见的水凝胶间隔物的IGRT的额外指示,以进一步增强治疗准确性并且潜在地消除对额外的基准标记程序的需要。
    UNASSIGNED: Precise patient positioning with image guidance (IGRT) is essential for safe prostate radiotherapy. We present the first report of utilizing a CT-visible hydrogel spacer, used to decrease rectal radiation dose, as a surrogate fiducial marker to aid in daily IGRT with cone-beam CT (CBCT) in stereotactic radiotherapy (SABR) for prostate cancer.
    UNASSIGNED: Prior to CT simulation, patients underwent placement of three intraprostatic gold fiducial markers and radiopaque hydrogel spacer per standard practice. At treatment, after initial setup, a CBCT was acquired and fused to the planning CT based on 3-dimensional matching of the spacer. A second alignment was then performed based on the fiducial markers. The six directional shifts (three linear and three rotational) were recorded, and the differences compared.
    UNASSIGNED: 140 individual fractions across 41 consecutive patients were evaluated. Mean/median differences between hydrogel spacer-based and fiducial-based alignment in linear (vertical, longitudinal, lateral) and rotational (rotation, pitch, roll) shifts were 0.9/0.6mm, 0.8/0.5mm, and 0.6/0.4mm, and 0.38/0, 0.62/0, and 0.35/0 degrees, respectively. No difference was observed in 9.9%, 22.9%, and 22.14% of linear shifts, and 65.7%, 65%, and 66.4% rotational shifts, respectively. Significantly smaller differences were observed in the latter 70 fractions vs. the former, and results were consistent across evaluators.
    UNASSIGNED: For precise daily IGRT with CBCT for prostate SABR, alignment using a radiopaque hydrogel spacer was highly comparable to intraprostatic fiducial markers. This represents the first report supporting an additional indication of IGRT for a CT-visible hydrogel spacer, to further enhance treatment accuracy and potentially obviate the need for the additional fiducial marker procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    通过基准标记对头部姿势的光学跟踪已经被证明能够在磁共振成像期间有效地校正大脑中的运动伪影,但是由于冗长的校准和设置时间而仍然难以在临床中实现。由于运动校正所需的亚毫米空间分辨率,用于无标记头部姿势估计的深度学习的进展尚未应用于该问题。在目前的工作中,描述了两个用于开发和训练神经网络的光学跟踪系统:一个基于标记的系统(用于测量地面真相头部姿势的测试平台)具有高跟踪保真度作为训练标签,和一个无标记的基于深度学习的系统,使用无标记的头部的图像作为网络的输入。无标记系统有可能克服标记物遮挡的问题,标记的刚性连接不足,冗长的校准时间,以及跨自由度(DOF)的不平等性能,所有这些都阻碍了在临床中采用基于标记的解决方案。提供了有关用作地面实况的自定义莫尔增强基准标记的开发以及两个光学跟踪系统的校准程序的详细信息。此外,描述了合成头部姿态数据集的开发,以证明简单卷积神经网络的概念和初始预训练。结果表明,地面实况系统已得到充分校准,可以跟踪磁头姿态,误差<1mm和<1°。跟踪健康的数据,成人参与者显示。预训练结果表明,在训练数据集包含和排除的头部模型上,6个自由度的平均均方根误差为0.13和0.36(mm或度)。分别。总的来说,这项工作表明了基于深度学习的方法的出色可行性,并将使未来的工作能够在MRI环境中对真实数据集进行培训和测试。
    Optical tracking of head pose via fiducial markers has been proven to enable effective correction of motion artifacts in the brain during magnetic resonance imaging but remains difficult to implement in the clinic due to lengthy calibration and set up times. Advances in deep learning for markerless head pose estimation have yet to be applied to this problem because of the sub-millimetre spatial resolution required for motion correction. In the present work, two optical tracking systems are described for the development and training of a neural network: one marker-based system (a testing platform for measuring ground truth head pose) with high tracking fidelity to act as the training labels, and one markerless deep-learning-based system using images of the markerless head as input to the network. The markerless system has the potential to overcome issues of marker occlusion, insufficient rigid attachment of the marker, lengthy calibration times, and unequal performance across degrees of freedom (DOF), all of which hamper the adoption of marker-based solutions in the clinic. Detail is provided on the development of a custom moiré-enhanced fiducial marker for use as ground truth and on the calibration procedure for both optical tracking systems. Additionally, the development of a synthetic head pose dataset is described for the proof of concept and initial pre-training of a simple convolutional neural network. Results indicate that the ground truth system has been sufficiently calibrated and can track head pose with an error of <1 mm and <1°. Tracking data of a healthy, adult participant are shown. Pre-training results show that the average root-mean-squared error across the 6 DOF is 0.13 and 0.36 (mm or degrees) on a head model included and excluded from the training dataset, respectively. Overall, this work indicates excellent feasibility of the deep-learning-based approach and will enable future work in training and testing on a real dataset in the MRI environment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:总结我们使用自动束保持(ABH)技术进行全身前列腺立体定向身体放射治疗(SBRT)的经验,并评估10毫米(mm)直径的ABH耐受性。方法:分析了2018年1月3日至2021年3月使用ABH技术治疗的32例患者(160个分数)。治疗期间,每20度机架旋转获取kV图像,以可视化前列腺内的3-4个金基准以跟踪目标运动。如果基准中心落在公差圆(直径=10mm)之外,光束自动关闭重新成像和重新定位。记录了波束保持的数量和沙发平移运动的幅度。通过移动计划的等中心来计算与帧内运动的剂量学差异。主要结果:沙发垂直运动幅度(平均值±SD),纵向和横向分别为-0.7±2.5、1.4±2.9和-0.1±0.9mm,分别。对于大多数馏分(77.5%),没有必要纠正。需要一个的分数的数量,两个,或三次修正为15.6%,5.6%和1.3%,分别。在49项更正中,主要在垂直(31%)和纵向(39%)方向观察到大于3mm的沙发移位;在2%和6%的病例中,相应的沙发移位大于5mm.剂量测定,临床目标体积(CTV)的100%覆盖率下降不到2%(-1±2%),而PTV的覆盖率下降不到10%(-10±6%)。膀胱剂量,肠和尿道趋于增加(膀胱:ΔD10%:184±466cGy,ΔD40%:139±241cGy,肠道:ΔD1cm3:54±129cGy;ΔD5cm3:44±116cGy,尿道:ΔD0.03cm3:1±1%)。直肠剂量趋于减少(直肠:ΔD1cm3:-206±564cGy,ΔD10%:-97±426cGy;ΔD20%:-50±251cGy)。意义:随着从常规分级强度调制放射治疗到SBRT的转变,用于局部前列腺癌治疗,必须确保剂量递送在空间上是准确的,以便适当覆盖目标体积并限制剂量到周围器官.可以使用对基准标记和ABH成像的触发成像来实现帧内运动监测,以允许针对过度运动的重新成像和重新定位。
    Objective: To summarize our institutional prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) experience using auto beam hold (ABH) technique for intrafractional prostate motion and assess ABH tolerance of 10-millimeter (mm) diameter.Approach: Thirty-two patients (160 fractions) treated using ABH technique between 01/2018 and 03/2021 were analyzed. During treatment, kV images were acquired every 20-degree gantry rotation to visualize 3-4 gold fiducials within prostate to track target motion. If the fiducial center fell outside the tolerance circle (diameter = 10 mm), beam was automatically turned off for reimaging and repositioning. Number of beam holds and couch translational movement magnitudes were recorded. Dosimetric differences from intrafractional motion were calculated by shifting planned isocenter.Main Results: Couch movement magnitude (mean ± SD) in vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions were -0.7 ± 2.5, 1.4 ± 2.9 and -0.1 ± 0.9 mm, respectively. For most fractions (77.5%), no correction was necessary. Number of fractions requiring one, two, or three corrections were 15.6%, 5.6% and 1.3%, respectively. Of the 49 corrections, couch shifts greater than 3 mm were seen primarily in the vertical (31%) and longitudinal (39%) directions; corresponding couch shifts greater than 5 mm occurred in 2% and 6% of cases. Dosimetrically, 100% coverage decreased less than 2% for clinical target volume (CTV) (-1 ± 2%) and less than 10% for PTV (-10 ± 6%). Dose to bladder, bowel and urethra tended to increase (Bladder: ΔD10%:184 ± 466 cGy, ΔD40%:139 ± 241 cGy, Bowel: ΔD1 cm3:54 ± 129 cGy; ΔD5 cm3:44 ± 116 cGy, Urethra: ΔD0.03 cm3:1 ± 1%). Doses to the rectum tended to decrease (Rectum: ΔD1 cm3:-206 ± 564 cGy, ΔD10%:-97 ± 426 cGy; ΔD20%:-50 ± 251 cGy).Significance: With the transition from conventionally fractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy to SBRT for localized prostate cancer treatment, it is imperative to ensure that dose delivery is spatially accurate for appropriate coverage to target volumes and limiting dose to surrounding organs. Intrafractional motion monitoring can be achieved using triggered imaging to image fiducial markers and ABH to allow for reimaging and repositioning for excessive motion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:提供关于经会阴(TP)和经直肠(TR)方法相关的临床和技术并发症的更准确和明确的结论,我们对观察性研究和随机对照试验进行了全面综述.这项系统评价涵盖了所有符合条件的研究,以促进与两种基准标记物插入方法相关的并发症的彻底比较。TP和TR。
    方法:对文献进行了全面检索,包含诸如PubMed之类的数据库,Embase,还有Cochrane图书馆,到2023年7月7日。使用相对危险度和95%置信区间来评估诊断和并发症发生率。
    结果:方法学质量分析的最终选择包括13项利用TP和TR金基准插入方法的观察性研究。荟萃分析显示,TP方法可明显降低尿路感染(UTI)和直肠出血的风险。
    结论:使用TP和TR技术放置金种子基准标记已被证明是有效的,安全,和耐受性良好的方法用于前列腺癌患者的图像引导放射治疗。TP技术的一个重要优点是它能够避免直肠穿刺,从而降低UTI的风险。尽管与TR方法相关的UTI和直肠出血的发生率相对较低,这些并发症可能会破坏患者的健康,并可能导致治疗延误。
    OBJECTIVE: To provide more accurate and definitive conclusions regarding the clinical and technical complications associated with the transperineal (TP) and transrectal (TR) approaches, a comprehensive review of observational studies and randomized controlled trials was conducted. This systematic review covered all eligible studies to facilitate a thorough comparison of complications linked to the two fiducial marker insertion methods, TP and TR.
    METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted, encompassing databases such as PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, up to July 7, 2023. The relative risk and 95% confidence interval were utilized to evaluate the diagnosis and complication rates.
    RESULTS: The final selection for the methodological quality analysis included 13 observational studies that utilized TP and TR gold fiducial insertion approaches. The meta-analysis revealed significantly lower risks of urinary tract infections (UTI) and rectal bleeding with the TP approach.
    CONCLUSIONS: The use of both TP and TR techniques for placing gold seed fiducial markers has proven to be an effective, safe, and well-tolerated method for image-guided radiation therapy in prostate cancer patients. A significant benefit of the TP technique is its ability to avoid rectal puncture, thereby reducing the risk of UTIs. Although the incidence of UTIs and rectal bleeding associated with the TR method is relatively low, these complications can disrupt patient wellbeing and potentially cause delays in treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:实时门控质子治疗(RGPT)是日立粒子治疗系统特有的运动管理技术。它使用脉冲荧光透视来跟踪植入的基准标记。目前没有关于如何进行调试和质量保证的发布指南。在这项工作中,我们报告了我们中心的调试工作流程以及我们的每日和每月质量保证程序。
    方法:为RGPT设计了六种调试测量。测量包括成像质量,透视曝光,RGPT标记跟踪精度,时间门控延迟,基准标记跟踪保真度和端到端质子剂量测定测量。每日QA包括对标记定位精度的一次测量。提出了四个月的每日QA趋势。每月QA包括基于门控延迟的三个测量,使用RGPT进行门控操作的透视成像质量和剂量学验证。
    结果:RGPT在我们中心成功投入使用。空气角率与规格相差在15%以内,标记跟踪精度在0.245mm以内。打开和关闭质子束的门控延迟分别为119.5和50.0ms。0.4x10.0mm2GoldAnchorTM给出了最佳的跟踪结果,能见度高达30g/cm2。伽玛分析表明,移动和静态检测器的剂量分布在3%/3mm时的通过率超过95%。每日标记定位QA结果均小于0.2mm。
    结论:这项工作可以为其他有兴趣使用RGPT作为运动管理解决方案的日立粒子治疗中心提供很好的参考。
    BACKGROUND: Real-time gated proton therapy (RGPT) is a motion management technique unique to the Hitachi particle therapy system. It uses pulsed fluoroscopy to track an implanted fiducial marker. There are currently no published guidelines on how to conduct the commissioning and quality assurance. In this work we reported on our centre\'s commissioning workflow and our daily and monthly QA procedures.
    METHODS: Six commissioning measurements were designed for RGPT. The measurements include imaging qualities, fluoroscopic exposures, RGPT marker tracking accuracy, temporal gating latency, fiducial marker tracking fidelity and an end-to-end proton dosimetry measurement. Daily QA consists of one measurement on marker localization accuracy. Four months daily QA trends are presented. Monthly QA consists of three measurementson the gating latency, fluoroscopy imaging quality and dosimetry verification of gating operation with RGPT.
    RESULTS: The RGPT was successfully commissioned in our centre. The air kerma rates were within 15 % from specifications and the marker tracking accuracies were within 0.245 mm. The gating latencies for turning the proton beam on and off were 119.5 and 50.0 ms respectively. The 0.4x10.0 mm2 Gold AnchorTM gave the best tracking results with visibility up to 30 g/cm2. Gamma analysis showed that dose distribution of a moving and static detectors had a passing rate of more than 95 % at 3 %/3mm. The daily marker localization QA results were all less than 0.2 mm.
    CONCLUSIONS: This work could serve as a good reference for other upcoming Hitachi particle therapy centres who are interested to use RGPT as their motion management solution.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:放射治疗(RT)反应的临床前模型对于RT在癌症治疗中的持续成功和发展至关重要。小鼠模型中组织的辐照需要高水平的精度和准确性,以概括临床暴露并限制对动物福利的不利影响。过去十年来建立的临床前RT平台的技术进步已经满足了这一要求。小型动物RT系统使用机载计算机断层扫描(CT)成像来描绘目标体积,并具有显着的精细放射生物学实验,具有主要的3Rs影响。然而,CT成像受限于组织的差异衰减,导致软组织中的差的对比度。临床上,不透射线的基准标记(FM)用于在治疗计划期间建立解剖参考点,以确保精确的波束靶向,这种方法尚未转化为临床前模型.
    方法:我们报告了由NanoviA/S开发的新型液体FMBioXmark®的使用(KongensLyngby,丹麦),可用于改善光束靶向过程中软组织目标的可视化,并最大程度地减少对周围危险器官的剂量。我们提出了在实验雄性和雌性C57BL/6J小鼠模型中使用BioXmark®的描述性方案和方法。
    结果:这些指南概述了用于小鼠模型的BioXmark®摄取(18号)和注射(25号或26号)的最佳针头尺寸,以及推荐的注射体积(10-20μl),用于临床前锥形束CT(CBCT)扫描。注射技术包括皮下,腹膜内,肿瘤内和前列腺注射。
    结论:使用BioXmark®有助于标准化靶向方法,改善临床前图像引导的RT中的对准,并通过减少正常组织暴露于RT来显着改善实验动物的福利。
    BACKGROUND: Preclinical models of radiotherapy (RT) response are vital for the continued success and evolution of RT in the treatment of cancer. The irradiation of tissues in mouse models necessitates high levels of precision and accuracy to recapitulate clinical exposures and limit adverse effects on animal welfare. This requirement has been met by technological advances in preclinical RT platforms established over the past decade. Small animal RT systems use onboard computed tomography (CT) imaging to delineate target volumes and have significantly refined radiobiology experiments with major 3Rs impacts. However, the CT imaging is limited by the differential attenuation of tissues resulting in poor contrast in soft tissues. Clinically, radio-opaque fiducial markers (FMs) are used to establish anatomical reference points during treatment planning to ensure accuracy beam targeting, this approach is yet to translate back preclinical models.
    METHODS: We report on the use of a novel liquid FM BioXmark ® developed by Nanovi A/S (Kongens Lyngby, Denmark) that can be used to improve the visualisation of soft tissue targets during beam targeting and minimise dose to surrounding organs at risk. We present descriptive protocols and methods for the use of BioXmark ® in experimental male and female C57BL/6J mouse models.
    RESULTS: These guidelines outline the optimum needle size for uptake (18-gauge) and injection (25- or 26-gauge) of BioXmark ® for use in mouse models along with recommended injection volumes (10-20 µl) for visualisation on preclinical cone beam CT (CBCT) scans. Injection techniques include subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, intra-tumoral and prostate injections.
    CONCLUSIONS: The use of BioXmark ® can help to standardise targeting methods, improve alignment in preclinical image-guided RT and significantly improve the welfare of experimental animals with the reduction of normal tissue exposure to RT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在自上而下治疗的概念下,用于植入物放置的动态导航变得越来越流行。本研究的目的是验证动态导航系统用于植入物放置的准确性。
    方法:使用50个植入物固定装置对38名患者进行植入物放置。C组患者采用常规方法治疗,其中热塑性夹子固定在牙齿上,M组的患者使用固定在牙齿上的牙套上的热塑性夹子进行治疗。比较各组以验证是否存在准确性差异。使用牙科植入物的治疗计划支持计划将术后计算机断层扫描数据叠加到术前植入物设计数据上,以测量入口点,顶点,和角度偏差。
    结果:C组的进入点精度为1.36±0.51mm,1.30±0.59mm的顶点,角度偏差为3.20±0.74°。M组进入点的准确度为1.06±0.31mm,1.02±0.30mm的顶点,角度偏差为2.91±0.97°。两组之间在入口和顶点上观察到显着差异。
    结论:结果表明,M组的准确性优于C组,表明热塑性夹子的稳定性对于确保动态导航系统的准确性很重要。以前的研究没有验证这个系统的准确性使用咬嘴方法,和额外的数据是必要的,以确认其准确性的牙种植体放置。咬嘴方法提高了植入物放置的准确性,并且提供了比常规方法更安全的植入物治疗。
    背景:大学医院医学信息网络临床试验注册(UMIN-CTR),注册号:UMIN000051949,URL:https://center6。乌明。AC.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view_his。2023年8月21日的CGI。
    BACKGROUND: Dynamic navigation for implant placement is becoming popular under the concept of top-down treatment. The purpose of this study is to verify the accuracy of a dynamic navigation system for implant placement.
    METHODS: Implant placement was performed on 38 patients using 50 implant fixtures. Patients in group C were treated using a conventional method, in which thermoplastic clips were fixed to the teeth, and patients in group M were treated using thermoplastic clips fixed to a mouthpiece attached to the teeth. The groups were compared to verify whether an accuracy difference existed. A treatment planning support program for dental implants was used to superimpose the postoperative computed tomography data on the preoperative implant design data to measure the entry point, apex point, and angular deviation.
    RESULTS: The accuracy of group C was 1.36 ± 0.51 mm for entry point, 1.30 ± 0.59 mm for apex point, and 3.20 ± 0.74° for angular deviation. The accuracy of group M was 1.06 ± 0.31 mm for the entry point, 1.02 ± 0.30 mm for the apex point, and 2.91 ± 0.97° for angular deviation. Significant differences were observed in the entry and apex points between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that group M exhibited better accuracy than group C, indicating that the stability of the thermoplastic clip is important for ensuring the accuracy of the dynamic navigation system. No previous studies have verified the accuracy of this system using the mouthpiece method, and additional data is required to confirm its accuracy for dental implant placement. The mouthpiece method improves the accuracy of implant placement and provides a safer implant treatment than the conventional method.
    BACKGROUND: University hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), Registration Number: UMIN000051949, URL: https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view_his.cgi on August 21, 2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    使用定制的体模模型和模拟肝脏和肺部病变的动物模型,对用于肿瘤治疗中放射性碘-125种子植入(RISI)的机器人系统进行了实验验证。机器人系统,包括规划,导航,和植入模块,被用来将假放射性种子植入模型中。基准标记用于靶定位。在40个案例的幻影实验中,计划和实际种子位置之间的平均误差为0.98±1.05mm,1.14±0.62mm,x为0.90±1.05mm,y,和z方向,分别。x,y,z方向对应于左右方向,前-后,和上下解剖平面。与肝和肺体模相比,硅酮体模表现出显著更小的X轴误差(p<0.05)。模板辅助显着降低了所有轴的误差(p<0.05)。在诸如D90、V100和V150的参数中,在计划和植入后剂量之间没有观察到显著的剂量学偏差(p>0.05)。在23例肝脏和肺部病例的动物实验中,平均植入误差为1.28±0.77mm,1.66±0.69mm,x为1.86±0.93mm,y,和z方向,略高于幻影(p<0.05),肝和肺模型之间没有显着差异。剂量测定结果与计划值紧密匹配,确认RISI机器人系统的准确性,为临床肿瘤治疗提供了新的可能性。
    An experimental validation of a robotic system for radioactive iodine-125 seed implantation (RISI) in tumor treatment was conducted using customized phantom models and animal models simulating liver and lung lesions. The robotic system, consisting of planning, navigation, and implantation modules, was employed to implant dummy radioactive seeds into the models. Fiducial markers were used for target localization. In phantom experiments across 40 cases, the mean errors between planned and actual seed positions were 0.98 ± 1.05 mm, 1.14 ± 0.62 mm, and 0.90 ± 1.05 mm in the x, y, and z directions, respectively. The x, y, and z directions correspond to the left-right, anterior-posterior, and superior-inferior anatomical planes. Silicone phantoms exhibiting significantly smaller x-axis errors compared to liver and lung phantoms (p < 0.05). Template assistance significantly reduced errors in all axes (p < 0.05). No significant dosimetric deviations were observed in parameters such as D90, V100, and V150 between plans and post-implant doses (p > 0.05). In animal experiments across 23 liver and lung cases, the mean implantation errors were 1.28 ± 0.77 mm, 1.66 ± 0.69 mm, and 1.86 ± 0.93 mm in the x, y, and z directions, slightly higher than in phantoms (p < 0.05), with no significant differences between liver and lung models. The dosimetric results closely matched planned values, confirming the accuracy of the robotic system for RISI, offering new possibilities in clinical tumor treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在使用动态计算机辅助植入手术系统(dCAIS)比较放射标记配准(RMR)和无标记追踪配准(MTR)对植入物放置准确性的影响。此外,这项研究旨在评估手术时间以及植入物位置是否会影响两种配准方法的准确性。
    方法:将136种牙种植体随机分配到RMR或MTR组,并用dCAIS放置在树脂模型中。术前和术后锥形束计算机断层摄影(CBCT)进行叠加,并评估植入物的放置准确性。对数据进行描述性和多变量分析。
    结果:除角度偏差(RMR:4.30°(SD:4.37°);MTR:3.89°(SD:3.32°))外,所有精度变量均存在显着差异(P<0.001)。RMR的平均3D平台偏差为1.53mm(SD:0.98mm),平均顶点3D偏差为1.63mm(SD:1.05mm),而MTR的值较低(0.83mm(SD:0.67mm)和1.07mm(SD:0.86mm),分别)。在地铁组,种植体在前下颌骨的放置更为准确(p<0.05)。此外,与RMR相比,MTR并没有显着增加手术时间(P=0.489)。
    结论:与RMR方法相比,MTR似乎提高了使用dCAIS放置植入物的准确性,而不增加手术时间.手术区域似乎是相关的,可能会影响植入物的偏差。
    结论:考虑到这项体外研究的局限性,MTR似乎在使用dCAIS的植入物放置中提供了更高的准确性,而不会增加手术时间。此外,这种方法不需要影像学标记,并且允许在手术过程中重新配准.
    This study aimed to compare the effect the radiographic marker registration (RMR) and markerless tracing registration (MTR) on implant placement accuracy using a dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery system (dCAIS). Additionally, this study aimed to assess the surgical time and whether the implant location influences the accuracy of the two registration methods.
    136 dental implants were randomly allocated to the RMR or MTR group and were placed with a dCAIS in resin models. Preoperative and postoperative Cone Beam Computer Tomograms (CBCT) were overlaid and implant placement accuracy was assessed. Descriptive and multivariate analysis of the data was performed.
    Significant differences (P < 0.001) were found for all accuracy variables except angular deviation (RMR:4.30° (SD:4.37°); MTR:3.89° (SD:3.32°)). The RMR had a mean 3D platform deviation of 1.53 mm (SD:0.98 mm) and mean apex 3D deviation of 1.63 mm (SD:1.05 mm) while the MTR had lower values (0.83 mm (SD:0.67 mm) and 1.07 mm (SD:0.86 mm), respectively). In the MTR group, implant placement in the anterior mandible was more accurate (p < 0.05). Additionally, MTR did not significantly increase the surgical time compared with RMR (P = 0.489).
    MTR seems to increase the accuracy of implant placement using dCAIS in comparison with the RMR method, without increasing the surgical time. The operated area seems to be relevant and might influence the implant deviations.
    Considering the limitations of this in-vitro study, MTR seems to provide a higher accuracy in implant placement using dCAIS without increasing the surgical time. Furthermore, this method does not require radiographic markers and allows re-registration during surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在图像引导自适应放射治疗时代,临床靶体积(CTV)的定义是各种实体瘤的挑战,包括食管癌(EC)。许多肿瘤微环境因素,例如,肿瘤细胞增殖或癌症干细胞,假设参与微观肿瘤扩展(MTE)。因此,这项研究评估了FAK的表达,ILK,CD44,HIF-1α,新辅助放化疗后肿瘤切除(NRCHTR)的EC患者中Ki67,并将这些标志物与MTE相关联。
    方法:采用多重免疫荧光染色法对10例EC患者福尔马林固定石蜡包埋的肿瘤切除标本进行分析。由于在NRCHT+R之前,金基准标记已经通过内窥镜在近端和远端肿瘤边界植入,标记与MTE的相关性是可行的。
    结果:在EC患者的肿瘤切除标本中,FAK+的总百分比,CD44+,HIF-1α+,肿瘤巢中的Ki67+细胞高于肿瘤基质中的Ki67+细胞,Ki67+细胞的结果达到统计学意义(p<0.001)。相反,ILK+细胞在肿瘤间质中表达较高,尽管没有统计学意义。在三个病人中,发现了超出基准标记的MTE,达到31毫米。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,FAK的整体表达,HIF-1α,肿瘤巢中Ki67和CD44较高,而ILK在肿瘤间质中较高。未发现原始CTV中有残留肿瘤细胞的患者与没有肿瘤细胞的患者之间的TME差异。因此,没有足够的证据表明TME会影响患者个体所需的CTV切缘.
    BO-EK-148042017和BO-EK-177042022on20.06.2022,DRKS00011886,https://drks。去/搜索/去/审判/DRKS00011886。
    OBJECTIVE: In the era of image-guided adaptive radiotherapy, definition of the clinical target volume (CTV) is a challenge in various solid tumors, including esophageal cancer (EC). Many tumor microenvironmental factors, e.g., tumor cell proliferation or cancer stem cells, are hypothesized to be involved in microscopic tumor extension (MTE). Therefore, this study assessed the expression of FAK, ILK, CD44, HIF-1α, and Ki67 in EC patients after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by tumor resection (NRCHT+R) and correlated these markers with the MTE.
    METHODS: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor resection specimens of ten EC patients were analyzed using multiplex immunofluorescence staining. Since gold fiducial markers had been endoscopically implanted at the proximal and distal tumor borders prior to NRCHT+R, correlation of the markers with the MTE was feasible.
    RESULTS: In tumor resection specimens of EC patients, the overall percentages of FAK+, CD44+, HIF-1α+, and Ki67+ cells were higher in tumor nests than in the tumor stroma, with the outcome for Ki67+ cells reaching statistical significance (p < 0.001). Conversely, expression of ILK+ cells was higher in tumor stroma, albeit not statistically significantly. In three patients, MTE beyond the fiducial markers was found, reaching up to 31 mm.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the overall expression of FAK, HIF-1α, Ki67, and CD44 was higher in tumor nests, whereas that of ILK was higher in tumor stroma. Differences in the TME between patients with residual tumor cells in the original CTV compared to those without were not found. Thus, there is insufficient evidence that the TME influences the required CTV margin on an individual patient basis.
    UNASSIGNED: BO-EK-148042017 and BO-EK-177042022 on 20.06.2022, DRKS00011886, https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00011886 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号