UNASSIGNED: About 20% of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are unstable and/or markedly displaced and therefore require surgery. Locking plate fixation after anatomical reduction has become the current treatment of choice for these fractures in the active population. However, studies have shown complication rates up to 36%, such as loss of reduction and avascular necrosis. To date, data from literature are inconclusive on outcomes following the use of an intramedullary fibula allograft in PHFs, possibly due to the case mix. It is hypothesized that the use of a fibula allograft is beneficial to prevent secondary displacement of the fracture in cases where the medial hinge is markedly displaced and unstable, resulting in better clinical and patient reported outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: In this multicenter matched cohort study, patients with an unstable, displaced PHF, including anatomic neck fractures and significantly displaced surgical neck fractures, were included. Patients that were treated with a locking plate augmented with a fibula allograft were matched to patients who had undergone locking plate reconstruction without the allograft. The matches were made based on fracture characteristics, age, and performance status. Functional outcomes, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, complications, and radiographic results were compared.
UNASSIGNED: Twelve patients with fibula allograft augmented osteosyntheses were included and matched to 12 control patients. The mean age was 58 years in the fibula allograft group compared to 62 years in the control group. Minimum follow-up was 12 months. Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand score, Constant Shoulder score, abduction, and external rotation were significantly better in the fibula allograft group (17.4 ± 8.6 vs. 26.1 ± 19.2, P = .048; 16.5 ± 11.5 vs. 19.8 ± 16.5 P = .040; mean 127° ± 38° vs. mean 92° ± 49° P = -.045; 50° ± 21° vs. mean 26° ± 23°, P = .004). There was no statistically significant difference in the Oxford Shoulder score between groups (P = .105). The Visual Analog Scale was not significantly different between groups (3.1 ± 1.8 vs. 1.6 ± 1.9, P = .439). Radiographic union was reached in 11 patients of the fibula allograft group compared to 8 in the control group (P = .317). The complication rate was twice as high in the control group (3 vs. 7).
UNASSIGNED: Additional support of the medial hinge in unstable PHFs with a locking plate in combination with a fibula allograft appears to create a more stable construct without compromising the viability of the articular surface of the head. The use of a fibula allograft in selected complex cases could therefore result in better clinical outcomes with lower complication rates.

BACKGROUND: Despite being an effective treatment for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), hip preservation surgery with fibula allograft (HPS&FA) still experiences numerous failures. Developing a prediction model based on clinical and radiomics predictors holds promise for addressing this issue.
METHODS: This study included 112 ONFH patients who underwent HPS&FA and were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. Clinical data were collected, and clinically significant predictors were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses to develop a clinical prediction model (CPM). Simultaneously, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method was employed to select optimal radiomics features from preoperative hip computed tomography images, forming a radiomics prediction model (RPM). Furthermore, to enhance prediction accuracy, a clinical-radiomics prediction model (CRPM) was constructed by integrating all predictors. The predictive performance of the models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), area under the curve (AUC), DeLong test, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis.
RESULTS: Age, Japanese Investigation Committee classification, postoperative use of glucocorticoids or alcohol, and non-weightbearing time were identified as clinical predictors. The AUC of the ROC curve for the CPM was 0.847 in the training cohort and 0.762 in the validation cohort. After incorporating radiomics features, the CRPM showed improved AUC values of 0.875 in the training cohort and 0.918 in the validation cohort. Decision curves demonstrated that the CRPM yielded greater medical benefit across most risk thresholds.
CONCLUSIONS: The CRPM serves as an efficient prediction model for assessing HPS&FA efficacy and holds potential as a personalized perioperative intervention tool to enhance HPS&FA success rates.

UNASSIGNED: A traumatically shattered lumbosacral junction/pelvis may be difficult to repair. Here the authors offer a pelvic fixation technique utilizing routine pedicle screws, interbody lumbar fusions, bilateral iliac screws/ rods/crosslinks, and bilateral fibular strut allografts from the lumbar spine to the sacrum.
UNASSIGNED: A middle aged male sustained a multiple storey fall resulting in a left sacral fracture, and right sacroiliac joint (SI) dislocation. The patient had previously undergone attempted decompressions with routine pedicle screw L4-S1 fusions at outside institutions; these failed twice. When the patient was finally seen, he exhibited, on CT reconstructed images, MR, and X-rays, a left sacral fracture nonunion, and a right sacroiliac joint dislocation.
UNASSIGNED: The patient underwent a bilateral pelvic reconstruction utilizing right L4, L5, S1 and left L4, L5 pedicle screws plus interbody fusions (L4-L5, and L5, S1), performed from the left. Unique to this fusion construct was the placement of bilateral double iliac screws plus the application of bilateral fibula allografts from L4-sacrum filled with bone morphogenetic protein (BMP). After rod/screw/connectors were applied, bone graft was placed over the fusion construct, including the decorticated edges of the left sacral fractures, and right SI joint dislocation. We additionally reviewed other pelvic fusion reconstruction methods.
UNASSIGNED: Here, we utilized a unique pelvic reconstruction technique utilizing pedicle screws/rods, double iliac screws/rods, and bilateral fibula strut grafts extending from the L4-sacrum filled with BMP.

BACKGROUND: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) causes severe hip dysfunction. Left untreated, 80% of patients experience femoral head collapse, and 65-70% of patients require total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore, effective treatment is very important for ONFH.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of fibula allografting for the treatment of early-stage ONFH METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases using \"avascular necrosis\" or \"ischemic necrosis\" or \"osteonecrosis\" and \"femoral head\" and \"fibula*,\" and checking the references of primary articles and reviews. Two independent authors completed the study selection separately. We extracted the following details from each article: characteristics of the patients, clinical efficacy evaluation (Harris hip score [HSS], radiographic outcomes, the rate of conversation to total hip arthroplasty [THA], and adverse effects).
RESULTS: A total of 213 articles were selected from PubMed (n = 45), EMBASE (n = 77), Web of Science (n = 203), and other sources (n = 10). After checking the articles, five articles were included in the final analysis. The average age of patients involved in this review was 34.48 years. The studies investigated fibula allografts to treat ONFH in 394 hips with a mean follow-up of 49.06 months. HHS was improved from 62.73 to 86.94. Radiographic progression was found in 33.66% of hips. The failure rate of head-saving surgery by THA was 14.5%. No patients had serious postoperative complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The number of articles included in the study was small, and all studies were single-center studies. Most studies were retrospective with a low level of evidence. Surgical procedures were not identical with different follow-up times.
CONCLUSIONS: Although there are some limitations to our approach, this systematic review supports fibula allografting as a simple, effective treatment for early-stage ONFH, which presents less postoperative complications, and has a satisfactory clinical effect. We consider it to be worthy of promotion as a therapy for ONFH.

Although the use of fibular strut allografts in proximal humerus fractures has gained popularity, their use in other types of fractures is less well described. Fibular allografts have recently been used in the repair of complex periarticular fractures of the proximal tibia and distal femur. Fibular allografts can be inserted in a variety of manners to achieve goals specific to each individual fracture pattern. In the proximal tibia, insertion through a fracture line or cortical window facilitates joint surface elevation, prevents subsidence and enhances overall construct stability. In distal femoral fractures, including complex periarticular fractures, insertion through the fracture or cortical window permits indirect reduction of the medial cortex and provides necessary medial column support. An additional option in distal femur fractures includes fibula insertion as an intramedullary nail, allowing enhanced fixation in short distal fracture segments. In all cases, the use of a fibular allograft augments poor bone stock and provides improved screw purchase and construct stability when combined with conventional plating methods. Here we present a series of cases at our institution illustrating an array of novel techniques utilizing endosteal fibular allografts in the fixation of complex periarticular fractures about the knee.