UNASSIGNED: Postoperative assessment of surgical interventions for correcting femoral rotational deformities necessitates a comparative analysis of femoral rotation pre- and post-surgery. While 2D assessment methods are commonly employed, ongoing debate surrounds their accuracy and reliability. To address the limitations associated with 2D analysis, we introduced and validated a 3D model-based analysis method for quantifying the angular and rotational impact of corrective rotational osteotomy in the growing femur.
UNASSIGNED: The method is based on surface registration of the pre- and post-intervention 3D femoral models. To this end, 3D triangulated surface models were generated using CT images for the right femurs of 11 skeletally immature pigs, each scanned at two distinct time points with a 12-week interval between scans. In our validation procedures, femoral corrective rotational osteotomy of the post-12-week femur was simulated at varying angles of 5, 10, 15 and 20 degrees in three dimensions. Subsequently, a surface 3D/3D registration-based approach was applied to determine the 3D femoral angulation and rotation between the two models to assess the method\'s detection accuracy of the predefined twist angles as ground truth references.
UNASSIGNED: The results document the precision and accuracy of the registration-based method in evaluating rotation angles. Consistently high accuracy was observed across all angles, with an accuracy rate of 92.97% and a coefficient of variance of 8.14%.
UNASSIGNED: This study has showcased the potential for improving post-operative assessments with significant implications for experimental studies evaluating the effects of correcting rotational deformities in the growing femur.
UNASSIGNED: Not applicable.

The rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is considered an important factor, but it is still difficult to assess intraoperatively. This study was conducted to identify anatomical parameters for femoral rotational alignment. A total of 204 patients who underwent primary TKA between 2015 and 2019 were enrolled. The femoral lateral (FLAP) and femoral medial anteroposterior (FMAP) lengths were measured as the widest lengths in the anteroposterior (AP) axis after distal femoral resection. The difference between FLAP and FMAP was defined as dFAP. The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was assessed for agreement between the cTEA-PCA and the value of femoral rotation using the linear regression analysis equation. HKA, FLAP, FMAP, and dFAP were significantly associated with femoral rotational alignment. The prediction equation combining the novel intraoperative anatomical references showed improved association with rotational alignment. If dFAP was 6.0 mm, the femoral rotation angle was calculated as 4.9° using this univariate regression equation. The CCC was 0.483, indicating moderate agreement. The dFAP showed an association with distal femoral rotational alignment. A 6 mm dFAP could be a reference for around 5° of femoral rotation. The equation developed in this study may be a reliable tool for intraoperative distal femoral rotational alignment.

BACKGROUND: Anterior knee pain (AKP) is one of the reasons for dissatisfaction after total knee replacement (TKR). It may result from patellofemoral joint dysfunction, caused by improper rotation of implant components. The aim of this study was to analyze patella positioning in patients after standard measured resection TKR and TKR with a use of a dynamic tensioner, and to assess the frequency of AKP, range of motion (ROM), and patient-reported outcome measures 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively.
METHODS: The study consisted of 127 patients who underwent TKR. Eighty-nine of them treated with use of the dynamic tensioner FUZION formed the study group; the remainder formed the control group. All participants received cemented PERSONA MC without patella resurfacing. All patients had a standard anteroposterior, lateral weight-bearing, long-leg view X-ray and computed tomography examination in 30° of knee flexion following the procedure.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the study and the control groups regarding: posterior condylar axis (PCA)-patella angle, surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA)-patella angle, PCA-sTEA angle, deviation from 90° in PCA-patella, sTEA-patella and PCA-sTEA angles. No significant difference was found in a ratio of obtaining PCA-patella angle deviation of more than 3°. Regarding clinical parameters, statistically and questionablly clinically significant difference in favor of the Study Group was found in Forgotten Joint Score 6 weeks and 3 months post-operativley and ROM 6 weeks post-operatively. However, such difference was not found by analyzing ROM 3 months post-operatively, AKP and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the standard 3° of femoral component external rotation, use of a dynamic tensioner does not allow for more accurate restoration of the patellar facet position with reference to the PCA.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify factors related to the external rotation of the femur during knee flexion.
METHODS: Three-dimensional (3D) digital models of the femur and tibia were reconstructed from computed tomography images of 41 healthy Japanese subjects. Thirteen parameters related to femoral and tibial morphology and alignment of the lower extremities were evaluated, including the inclination angle of the posterior lateral and medial femoral condyles, the ratio of the medial and lateral posterior condyle radii approximated as spheres, the spherical condylar angle, the posterior condylar angle, the medial and lateral posterior tibial slope, the difference of medial and lateral posterior tibial slope, the tibiofemoral rotation angle, the 3D femorotibial angle, the 3D hip-knee-ankle angle, and the passing point of the weight-bearing line (medial-lateral and anterior-posterior). The rotation angle of the femur relative to the tibia during squatting was investigated using a 3D to 2D image matching technique and the relationships with the13 parameters were determined.
RESULTS: The femur externally rotated substantially up to 20° of knee flexion (9.2° ± 3.7°) and gently rotated after 20° of knee flexion (12.8° ± 6.2°). The external rotation angle at 20°-120° of knee flexion correlated with the spherical condylar angle, the tibiofemoral rotation angle and the inclination angle of the posterior medial condyles (correlation coefficient; 0.506, 0.364, 0.337, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The parameter that was most related to the external rotation of the femur during knee flexion was the spherical condylar angle.
METHODS: IV.

Introduction  A useful way to easily evaluate femoral rotation during surgery for trochanteric fractures is not known. Hence, this pilot study aimed to develop an intraoperative indicator to evaluate anteversion in femoral trochanteric fractures. Material and methods Prospectively, from June 2021 to January 2022, all patients with femoral trochanteric fractures (Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification: 31A1-3) treated using a cephalo-medullary nail with a lag-screw neck-shaft angle of 125° were included in this study. During surgery, lag-screw anteversion (LS-AV) was measured using the goniometer application in an iPhone with the fractured femur table-top-plane level with the traction table floor. Accuracy was analyzed by comparing axial-projected lag-screw anteversion (AxP-LS-AV) and three-dimensional computed tomography lag-screw anteversion (3DCT-LS-AV) measurements after surgery. Results Fifty patients (14 males and 36 females) were included in the study. The mean age was 87 (range; 69-98) years; the Orthopaedic Trauma Association classifications were A1 (28 patients), A2 (18 patients), and A3 (4 patients). The mean LS-AV was 10.7° ± 6.9°, the mean AxP-LS-AV was 12.8° ± 8.3°, and the mean 3DCT-LS-AV was 13.1° ± 8.6°. The median difference between AxP-LS-AV and 3DCT-LS-AV was 3.0° (range: 0°-12°), and 40 (80%) patients had differences of ≤5° (Bland-Altman plot: inside of limit of agreement = 86%, paired t-test p = 0.7, Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.817, p <0.001). Conclusion Femur malrotation is defined as a deformity of >15° relative to the normal contralateral limb. Intraoperative LS-AV iPhone measurement on table-top-plane standard had sufficient accuracy as an indicator of anteversion in femoral trochanteric fractures.

UNASSIGNED: Acetabular and femoral component positioning are important considerations in reducing adverse outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Previous assessments of femoral anteversion examined anatomic femoral anteversion (AFA) referenced to anatomic landmarks. However, this does not provide a functional understanding of the femur\'s relationship to the hip. We investigate a new measurement, functional femoral anteversion (FFA), and sought to measure its variability across a large sample of patients undergoing THA.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 1008 consecutive patients underwent THA surgery between September 2019 and July 2021. All patients were measured for supine and standing functional femoral rotation (FFR), AFA, and FFA.
UNASSIGNED: The mean standing FFA was 13.2° ± 12.2° (-27.8° to 52.3°). The mean change in FFR from supine to standing was -2.2° ± 11.8° (-43.0° to 41.9°). Of all, 161 (16%) patients had standing FFA version greater than 25°. Four hundred sixty (46%) patients had standing FFR (internal or external) greater than 10°. One hundred twenty-three (12%) patients exhibited an increase in external rotation from supine to standing of greater than 10°. A moderate, negative linear relationship was observed between AFA and standing external femoral rotation (P <<.001, R = -0.46), indicating people may externally rotate their femur as AFA decreases with age.
UNASSIGNED: Functional alignment of the femur in patients requiring THA is understudied. It is now understood that the femur, like the pelvis, can rotate substantially between functional positions. Enhancing our understanding of FFA and FFR may improve both acetabular and femoral component positioning.

OBJECTIVE: To establish and validate a novel method for aligning femoral rotation to accurately measure femoral offset for preoperative templating and component sizing, and to identify the physical location of two radiographic lines utilized in the described method.
METHODS: Cadaveric proximal femurs were skeletonized and mounted to a biaxial load frame. Two radiographic lines along the greater trochanter were identified fluoroscopically. The femurs were rotated, and images were taken when the lines appeared superimposed, then in 2-degree increments to 10° of internal and external rotation, and at 30°. Radiographic femoral offset was calculated at each angle, and the maximum and aligned offsets were compared. Bone was removed until the radiographic lines disappeared, then a metal wire was inserted in place of the bone to confirm that the lines reappeared.
RESULTS: The physical locations of the radiographic landmarks were on the anterior and posterior aspects of the greater trochanter. The mean true femoral offset was 38.2 mm (range, 30.5-46.3 mm). The mean aligned femoral offset was 37.3 mm (range, 29.3-46.3 mm), a 2.4% underestimation. The mean angle between aligned and true offset was 3.6° of external rotation (range, 10°ER-8°IR). Intra-rater intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.991.
CONCLUSIONS: Alignment of the radiographic lines created by the anterior and posterior aspects of the greater trochanter is a reliable and accurate rotational positioning method for measuring true femoral offset when using plain films or fluoroscopy, which can aid surgeons with preoperative templating and intraoperative component placement for total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Excessive external femoral rotation (FR) can functionally increase stem anteversion (SA) and is often observed at an early stage after surgery in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study was conducted to investigate the prevalence of external FR, identify the factors associated with external FR, and determine the association of FR and other factors with hip dislocation in revision THA.
METHODS: We enrolled 51 revision THA patients (55 hip cases). The patient background, angle of anatomical and functional SA, FR angle, sizes and densities of muscles around the hip joint, impingement distance, and consequence of postoperative hip dislocation were assessed by reviewing their medical history and imaging data that includes computed tomography (CT) scans before and after surgery.
RESULTS: Forty-five hip cases (81.8%) showed external FR (mean 13.0°). External FR was significantly correlated with anatomical SA (r =  - 0.54) and increase in functional SA (r = 0.36), which was significantly correlated with impingement distance (r = 0.46). The independent factors associated with external FR in multivariate analysis were the anatomical SA, CT densities of the psoas, gluteus medius and maximus muscles, and 2-stage revision (R2 = 0.559). During follow-up period, eight cases of revision THA showed hip dislocation. FR, functional SA, impingement distance, CT density of psoas and gluteus medius muscle, body mass index, number of past operation, and ratio of 2-stage revision THA were significantly different between cases with dislocation and non-dislocation. The odds ratio of FR and impingement distance for hip dislocation was identified as 1.061(95% confidence interval (CI): 1.011-1.114) and 0.901 (95% CI 0.820-0.991), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Revision THA frequently causes an external FR that functionally increases the SA and impingement risk, particularly in hips with 2-stage revision with psoas and gluteus medius muscle atrophy. Patients who have undergone revision THA and have an excessive external FR may require careful monitoring for possible hip dislocation due to hip joint instability and impingement.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of the current systematic review was to assess the impact of implant placement accuracy on outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
METHODS: A systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using the Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science databases in order to assess the impact of the patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) and implant placement accuracy on outcomes following TKA. Studies assessing the impact of implant alignment, rotation, size, overhang, or condylar offset were included. Study quality was assessed, evidence was graded (one-star: no evidence, two-star: limited evidence, three-star: moderate evidence, four-star: strong evidence), and recommendations were made based on the available evidence.
RESULTS: A total of 49 studies were identified for inclusion. With respect to PROMs, there was two-star evidence in support of mechanical axis alignment (MAA), femorotibial angle (FTA), femoral coronal angle (FCA), tibial coronal angle (TCA), femoral sagittal angle (FSA), femoral rotation, tibial and combined rotation/mismatch, and implant size/overhang or offset on PROMs, and one-star evidence in support of tibial sagittal angle (TSA), impacting PROMs. With respect to survival, there was three- to four-star evidence in support FTA, FCA, TCA, and TSA, moderate evidence in support of femoral rotation, tibial and combined rotation/mismatch, and limited evidence in support of MAA, FSA, and implant size/overhang or offset impacting survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there is limited evidence to suggest that PROMs are impacted by the accuracy of implant placement, and malalignment does not appear to be a significant driver of the observed high rates of patient dissatisfaction following TKA. However, FTA, FCA, TCA, TSA, and implant rotation demonstrate a moderate-strong relationship with implant survival. Efforts should be made to improve the accuracy of these parameters in order to improve TKA survival. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(9):1449-1456.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported the relationship between coronal alignment of the lower limbs and the rotational profile of the femur and tibia. However, the relationship between coronal alignment of the femur and tibia and their rotational profiles in patients with varus osteoarthritic knees is unclear.
METHODS: One hundred women with varus osteoarthritic knees (varus OA group) and 50 women with neutrally aligned lower limbs without osteoarthritis (non-OA group) were evaluated retrospectively. The coronal alignment and rotational profile of the femur and tibia were evaluated, and the correlation between coronal alignment and rotational profile was analyzed, respectively.
RESULTS: The femoral anteversion, posterior condylar angle of the distal femur, and tibial torsion were significantly smaller in the varus OA group than in the non-OA group. In the varus OA group, the femoral anteversion and rotational profile of the distal femur had significantly negative correlations with the degree of femoral varus, while tibial torsion was not related to the degree of tibial varus. In the non-OA group, there was no relationship between coronal alignment and rotational profiles of the femur and tibia in both the varus OA and non-OA groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Femoral anteversion and the rotational profile of the distal femur were negatively correlated with the degree of femoral varus in Asian women with varus osteoarthritic knees. This study enhanced the understanding of the relationship between changes in coronal alignment of the femur and tibia and their rotational profiles in patients with varus osteoarthritic lower limbs, although this study was limited by the small sample sizes and methodological quality.