Eating disorders can significantly impact the psychosocial functioning and physical health of adolescents. Early and effective treatment is crucial to prevent long-lasting and potentially devastating adverse effects. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has recommended cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for eating disorders in adolescents when family therapy is unacceptable, contraindicated, or ineffective. This recommendation was primarily based on the review of promising results from the enhanced version of CBT (CBT-E) adapted for adolescents with eating disorders aged between 12 and 19 years. A non-randomized effectiveness trial has also shown that CBT-E achieved a similar outcome to family-based treatment (FBT) at 6- and 12-months. CBT-E has several advantages. It is acceptable to young people, and its collaborative nature suits ambivalent young patients who may be particularly concerned about control issues. The transdiagnostic scope of the treatment is an advantage as it can treat the full range of disorders that occur in adolescent patients. It is an individual one-on-one treatment that does not necessitate the full involvement of the family. This approach is particularly beneficial for families that can only provide limited support. Future challenges include clarifying the relative efficacy of CBT-E and family therapy for the treatment of adolescent patients with eating disorders in a randomized control trial and increasing its effectiveness, identifying the reasons for the lack of response, and modifying the treatment accordingly.

Genetics can influence obesity, and when it affects both parents and children, there is a high risk of developing cardiometabolic diseases. Studies have indicated that family-based treatment (FBT) is a cost-effective and successful option for achieving significant weight changes in both children and parents. While specialized clinics offer FBT, primary care settings, where most pediatric care takes place, may not have the necessary resources or expertise to provide intensive behavioral interventions for childhood obesity. Based on early findings, FBT could potentially have a positive impact on siblings as well, as when treated children and parents experience behavioral changes, it can also have a beneficial effect on their untreated siblings. Parents play a crucial role in shaping their children\'s behavior, and siblings often have a stronger influence on them than their parents or friends. For our meta-analysis, we utilized three graphical models created using RevMan 5.4, based on the selected articles. To develop our systematic review, we thoroughly analyzed a total of 10 articles. The subgroup analysis within these studies assessed the effectiveness of FBT for overweight children, revealing no significant differences between groups (p=0.77). This suggests that based on their BMI, FBT may not have a statistically significant impact on weight loss in overweight children. However, each study reviewed showed statistical significance (p<0.05). The findings of our meta-analysis underscore the need for more robust evidence and larger randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to enhance our understanding of FBT\'s benefits in pediatric obesity. This will be crucial for reducing the rising prevalence of obesity and maintaining lower incidence rates.

BACKGROUND: The leading evidence-based treatment for anorexia nervosa (AN) in adolescents is Family-based Treatment (FBT). However, due to the intensive training requirements and lack of practitioners, it is often difficult for families to access FBT. Thus, innovations that improve access to care are needed. A pilot randomized study of a guided self-help version of Family-based Treatment (GSH-FBT) that utilized approximately 1/4 the amount of therapist time compared to FBT found that the approach was acceptable and appeared to achieve similar outcomes. The study protocol detailed in this manuscript compares the efficiency (clinician time) of GSH-FBT to Family-based Treatment via Videoconferencing (FBT-V) in a fully powered study in achieving clinical outcomes through a multi-site randomized clinical trial across the US and Ontario, Canada.
METHODS: This study will randomize the families of adolescents ages 12-18 (n = 200) who meet DSM-5 criteria for AN to receive either GSH-FBT or FBT-V. Participants will be randomized to 15 sixty-minute sessions of FBT-V or to 10 twenty-minute sessions of online GSH-FBT. Major assessments will be conducted by a masked assessor at baseline, within treatment, at the end of treatment (EOT), and 6 and 12 months after the end of treatment (EOT). The primary outcomes of this study are changes to body weight and eating disorder cognitions relative to clinician time used (relative efficiency of treatment modality).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study may help increase access to care by providing a time efficient, affordable, more scalable intervention for adolescent AN compared to standard FBT.

Family-based behavioral treatment (FBT) is one of the most effective treatments for childhood obesity. These programs include behavior change strategies and basic parenting training to help parents make healthy diet and physical activity changes for their children. While effective, not all families respond to this program. Additional training on how to effectively deliver these behavior change strategies may improve outcomes. The authoritative parenting style is associated with many positive academic and socio-emotional outcomes in children, and is characterized by displays of warmth and support while also being consistent with setting limits and boundaries. This parenting style has also been associated with normal weight status. Furthermore, parenting training programs that promote this parenting style for children with behavioral issues have shown unintended effects on decreasing child weight status. Therefore, our goal was to examine the effect of adding more intensive parenting training to FBT on child weight status. We randomized 140 children and their parent to either FBT or FBT + Parenting Training (FBT + PT). Assessments were conducted at baseline, mid-treatment (month 3), post-treatment (month 6), 6-month follow-up (month 12), and 12-month follow-up (month 18). Primary outcome was change in child weight status. Secondary outcomes were rates of drop-out, treatment adherence, and acceptability. If effective, this program may provide another alternative for families to help improve outcomes in childhood obesity management.

Children with mental illness commonly live with caregivers who suffer from mental illness. Integrated mental-health-treatment approaches can provide more convenient and comprehensive care for families. This case report describes family-based treatment (FBT) for one parent/child dyad. The parent was a 37-year-old female with a history of anxiety and major depressive disorder and concern for symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The child was an 8-year-old female with generalized anxiety disorder and concern for ADHD and behavioral problems. The parent received individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and parent management training. The child received CBT. Both also received medication management. The FBT team met regularly for coordinated treatment planning. Self-reported assessments via the Child Behavior Checklist showed meaningful improvement; anxiety decreased to nonclinical range week 12 and depression decreased to nonclinical range week 8. Clinician assessments showed improvement for both patients. Though more time intensive, FBT can yield significant improvement, particularly for children. Pragmatic approaches to treatment planning are important to minimize barriers to FBT.

OBJECTIVE: Family-based treatment (FBT) has contributed significantly to the treatment of anorexia nervosa (AN) in young people (YP). However, parents are concerned that FBT and the active role of parents in the task of refeeding may have a negative impact on family relations. The aim of the review is to assess whether families engaged in FBT for AN are more or less impacted in their family wellbeing and caregiver burden, compared to families with a YP diagnosed with AN, who are not undergoing treatment with FBT.
METHODS: Computerized searches across six databases complemented by a manual search resulted in 30 papers being included in the scoping review.
RESULTS: The review identified 19 longitudinal studies on change in family wellbeing in families in FBT-like treatments, and 11 longitudinal studies on change in family wellbeing in treatment where parents are not in charge of refeeding. Only three randomized controlled studies directly compare FBT to treatment without parent-led refeeding.
CONCLUSIONS: The available research suggests no difference between intervention types regarding impact on family wellbeing. Approximately half of the studies find improvements in family wellbeing in both treatment with and without parent-led refeeding, while the same proportion find neither improvement nor deterioration. As parents play a pivotal role in FBT, there is a need for good quality studies to elucidate the impact of FBT on family wellbeing. Level of evidence Level V: Opinions of authorities, based on descriptive studies, narrative reviews, clinical experience, or reports of expert committees.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient family-based treatment (FBT) is effective in treating restrictive eating disorders among adolescents. However, little is known about whether FBT reduces higher level of care (HLOC) utilization or if utilization of HLOC is associated with patient characteristics. This study examined associations between utilization of eating disorder related care (HLOC and outpatient treatment) and reported adherence to FBT and patient characteristics in a large integrated health system.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined 4101 adolescents who received care for restrictive eating disorders at Kaiser Permanente Northern California. A survey was sent to each medical center to identify treatment teams as high FBT adherence (hFBT) and low FBT adherence (lFBT). Outpatient medical and psychiatry encounters and HLOC, including medical hospitalizations and higher-level psychiatric care as well as patient characteristics were extracted from the EHR and examined over 12 months post-index.
RESULTS: 2111 and 1990 adolescents were treated in the hFBT and lFBT, respectively. After adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, initial percent median BMI, and comorbid mental health diagnoses, there were no differences in HLOC or outpatient utilization between hFBT and lFBT. Females had higher odds of any utilization compared with males. Compared to White adolescents, Latinos/Hispanics had lower odds of HLOC utilization. Asian, Black, and Latino/Hispanic adolescents had lower odds of psychiatric outpatient care than Whites.
CONCLUSIONS: Reported FBT adherence was not associated with HLOC utilization in this sample. However, significant disparities across patient characteristics were found in the utilization of psychiatric care for eating disorders. More efforts are needed to understand treatment pathways that are accessible and effective for all populations with eating disorders.
Adolescents with restrictive eating treated by Family-Based Treatment (FBT) teams had better early weight gain but no differences in the use of intensive outpatient, residential, partial hospital programs or inpatient psychiatry care when compared to those treated by teams with a low adherence to the FBT approach. Factors such as sex, race, ethnicity, mood disorders, and suicidality were associated with the use of psychiatric services. These findings are consistent with previously documented systematic disparities in accessing psychiatric services across patient demographics and should be used to inform the development of proposed care models that are more inclusive and accessible to all patients.

Existing descriptions of the treatment of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) at higher levels of care (HLOC) for eating disorders are limited, despite HLOC settings frequently serving patients with ARFID. The purpose of this commentary is to expand on the preliminary literature that describes pediatric ARFID treatment at HLOC by describing two specific components of our approach to treating pediatric ARFID that may not yet have traction in the current literature. Specifically, we highlight the utility of (1) treatment accommodations that appropriately account for patients\' neurodevelopmental needs (e.g., executive functioning, sensory processing) and (2) the adjunctive use of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) elements within family-based pediatric ARFID treatment. We also describe necessary future directions for research in these domains to clarify if incorporating these considerations and approaches into pediatric ARFID treatment at HLOC does indeed improve treatment outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Eating disorders are characterized by disturbances in nutritional intake and abnormal mealtime behaviors. Laboratory eating paradigms offer a unique opportunity to accurately measure dietary intake and eating behaviors, however, these studies have predominantly occurred in adults. This paper describes the development and preliminary psychometric examination of the Buffet Challenge, a laboratory-based meal task for youths with an eating disorder.
METHODS: We recruited and assessed 56 participants as part of a randomized controlled trial of Family-Based Treatment for adolescents with anorexia nervosa. Adolescents completed the Buffet Challenge at baseline, midway through treatment (~ week 16 of a 6 months course), and end of treatment. Participants and their parents also reported eating disorder symptomatology and treatment related variables of interest were recorded.
RESULTS: All adolescents were willing to complete the Buffet Challenge at all time points, although one refused to give up their cellphone, and there were no significant adverse events recorded. Preliminary results are presented.
CONCLUSIONS: Our initial pilot of this task in adolescents with anorexia nervosa demonstrates its acceptability, although investigation of our hypotheses was hindered by significant missing data due to COVID-related research shutdowns. Future studies should replicate procedures in a larger sample to ensure analyses are adequately powered.

OBJECTIVE: Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a serious psychiatric disorder with high morbidity and mortality. The current evidence supports the use of family-based treatment (FBT), but recovery rates are only about 40%. Improving treatment outcomes among adolescents with AN will save lives, improve health, and prevent chronicity. This study examined the relative efficacy of adding intensive parental coaching (IPC) to standard FBT for patients who do not respond by weight gain of 2.4 kg by session 4, a clinical predictor of outcome at the end of treatment, to improve remission rates (>94% of expected mean body mass index).
METHODS: The study recruited 107 participants and their families from across the United States; 69 participants failed to respond early and were randomly assigned to continue with standard FBT or to receive 3 sessions of IPC. Participants were adolescents (ages 12-18) meeting DSM-5 criteria for AN; 6.5% were male, and 11% were Hispanic.
RESULTS: Main outcomes were mean body mass index >94% expected for age, height, and sex. Secondary outcomes included change in eating-related cognitions. Adding IPC to early nonresponders did not improve outcomes except for participants whose parents demonstrated low parental self-efficacy at baseline (moderator). Early weight gain of 2.4 kg by session 4 was replicated as a predictor of end of treatment remission.
CONCLUSIONS: Parental self-efficacy moderates IPC as an adaptive treatment for adolescents with AN. Baseline parental self-efficacy assessment can be used to identify families most likely to benefit from adding IPC to FBT. Future studies should consider earlier interventions to improve early response rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Anorexia nervosa is a serious psychiatric disorder. While family-based treatment (FBT) has the largest evidence base for adolescents with anorexia, recovery rates are only about 40%. This study investigated the addition of 3 sessions of intensive parental coaching intervention (IPC) to FBT among youth with anorexia who did not gain adequate weight early in treatment, a predictor of recovery by the end of treatment. Youth with inadequate weight gain were randomized to either receive FBT with IPC or FBT as usual. Overall, adding IPC did not improve outcomes among youth with anorexia. However among those whose parents demonstrated low parental self-efficacy at baseline, youth who received FBT with IPC had higher remission rates than youth who received FBT alone.
UNASSIGNED: Intensive parental coaching shows promise for improving outcomes among youth with anorexia whose parents report low parental self-efficacy.
BACKGROUND: Adaptive Treatment for Adolescent Anorexia Nervosa; https://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT03097874.