Family history

家族史
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:意识到作为腹主动脉瘤患者的一级亲属发生腹主动脉瘤的风险增加的心理后果迄今尚未被研究。这项研究调查了与对照组相比,腹主动脉瘤患者的男性和女性成年后代对遗传性和焦虑的认识。将主动脉病理参与者与正常主动脉直径参与者的健康相关生活质量进行比较。
    方法:这是一项横断面患病率研究,基于在一级亲属中检测腹主动脉瘤试验中检查的参与者(DAAAD;752成年后代,756个匹配的控件),2020-2022年。在主动脉超声检查之前,收集了有关健康相关生活质量的问卷调查以及有关遗传度意识的特定研究问题。
    结果:与对照组相比,有遗传的个体的出勤率更高(67%vs.52%,p<0.001)。在检查的1508个成年后代中,65%的人报告与腹主动脉瘤有近亲(对照组为6%)。成年雌性后代报告的遗传力意识高于对照组(38%vs.12%,p<0.001),男性也是如此(32%vs.8%,p<0.001)。略大多数有意识的参与者报告了焦虑(54%的女性后代;51%的男性)。当使用标准的健康相关生活质量工具时,两组之间的健康相关生活质量没有测量差异。
    结论:具有遗传性意识和对此类风险的焦虑的成年后代比例高于预期,这表明我们未能通过医疗保健系统内当前的信息渠道适当地向该群体传达风险。这需要制定专门的策略,以改善腹主动脉瘤风险与患者及其近亲的沟通。
    OBJECTIVE: The psychological consequences of being aware of an increased risk of developing abdominal aortic aneurysm as a first-degree relative of a person with abdominal aortic aneurysm are hitherto unexplored. This study investigates the awareness of heritability and anxiety in male and female adult offspring of abdominal aortic aneurysm patients compared to controls. Health-related quality of life among participants with aortic pathology was compared to participants with normal aortic diameters.
    METHODS: This was a cross-sectional point prevalence study based on the participants examined in the Detecting Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in First Degree Relatives Trial (DAAAD; 752 adult offspring, 756 matched controls), 2020-2022. Questionnaires about health-related quality of life and study-specific questions regarding awareness of heritability were collected prior to the aortic ultrasound.
    RESULTS: Attendance rate was higher among individuals with heredity compared to controls (67% vs. 52%, p < 0.001). Of 1508 adult offspring examined, 65% reported having a close relative with abdominal aortic aneurysm (6% in controls). Female adult offspring reported higher awareness of heritability than controls (38% vs. 12%, p < 0.001), as did males (32% vs. 8%, p < 0.001). A slight majority of participants with awareness reported anxiety (54% of female offspring; 51% of male). There were no measured differences in health-related quality of life between the groups when standard health-related quality of life instruments were used.
    CONCLUSIONS: The higher-than-expected proportion of adult offspring with awareness of heritability and anxiety about such risk indicates that we fail to communicate risk to this group appropriately via the current channels of information within the healthcare system. This calls for the development of dedicated strategies for improved communication of abdominal aortic aneurysm risk to patients and their next of kin.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在亚洲,阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的数量急剧增加。
    目的:更新8个亚洲国家的AD患者的人口统计学特征及其信息,并与12年前进行比较。
    方法:统一数据集(UDS)的A1-A3组件,3.0版,在台湾管理,北京,香港,韩国,Japan,菲律宾,泰国,和印度尼西亚。在同一地区,使用2010-2014年UDS1.0版与首次注册的AD患者进行了数据比较。
    结果:从2022年到2024年共招募了1885名AD患者及其线人,并与十年前招募的2042名患者进行了比较。每个国家都有自己独特的特征,在两个时代之间发生了变化。患者和举报人的平均年龄为79.8±8.2岁和56.5±12.1岁,分别。与第一次注册相比,患者年龄较大(79.8vs79.0,p=0.002),整体功能较差(平均CDR-SB评分6.1vs5.8,p<0.001);更多的信息是儿童(56%vs.48%,p<0.001),如果不住在一起,他们的面对面访问频率显着增加。总共11%,4.5%,11%,0.4%的患者有母亲的认知障碍史,父亲们,兄弟姐妹,和孩子们,分别;所有百分比,除了孩子,在过去十年中大幅增加。
    结论:本研究报告了亚洲国家AD患者及其受检者的异质性特征,以及过去十年的明显变化。发展中国家和发达国家在痴呆症评估和护理方面的差异值得进一步调查。
    BACKGROUND: The number of patients with Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) has increased dramatically in Asia.
    OBJECTIVE: To update the demographic characteristics of patients with AD and their informants in eight Asian countries and compare them from 12 years prior.
    METHODS: The A1-A3 components of the Uniform Dataset (UDS), version 3.0, were administered in Taiwan, Beijing, Hong Kong, Korea, Japan, Philippines, Thailand, and Indonesia. Data were compared with patients with AD in the first registration using the UDS version 1.0 from 2010-2014 in the same regions.
    RESULTS: A total of 1885 patients with AD and their informants were recruited from 2022 to 2024 and were compared with 2042 patients recruited a decade prior. Each country had its own unique characteristics that changed between both eras. The mean age of the patients and informants was 79.8±8.2 years and 56.5±12.1 years, respectively. Compared with the first registration, the patients were older (79.8 vs 79.0, p=0.002) and had worse global function (mean CDR-SB scores 6.1 vs 5.8, p<0.001); more informants were children (56 % vs. 48 %, p<0.001), and their frequency of in-person visits increased significantly if not living together. A total of 11 %, 4.5 %, 11 %, and 0.4 % of the patients had a reported history of cognitive impairment in their mothers, fathers, siblings, and children, respectively; all percentages, except children, increased significantly over the past decade.
    CONCLUSIONS: The present study reports the heterogeneous characteristics of patients with AD and their informants in Asian countries, and the distinct changes in the past decade. The differences in dementia evaluation and care between developing and developed countries warrant further investigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:来自患有克罗恩病的两个或两个以上受影响FDR的家庭的未受影响的一级亲属(FDR)(CD,多元化家庭)开发CD的风险很高,尽管驱动这种风险的潜在机制知之甚少。我们的目的是确定来自多重家庭和单纯性家庭的FDRs之间的生物标志物的差异,并调查未来CD发病的风险,解释潜在的混杂因素。
    方法:我们评估了克罗恩病和结肠炎加拿大遗传环境微生物(CCC-GEM)对CD患者健康FDR的队列。全基因组CD-多基因风险评分(CD-PRS),乳果糖与甘露醇比率(LMR)的尿排泄分数,粪便钙卫蛋白(FCP),在招募时测量粪便16S核糖体RNA微生物组。使用广义估计方程模型确定CD多重状态与基线生物标志物之间的关联。Cox模型用于评估未来CD发作的风险。
    结果:有4051名来自单纯形家庭的参与者和334名来自CD多重家庭的参与者。CD多重状态与较高的基线FCP(p=0.026)显着相关,但与基线CD-PRS或LMR无关。发现两组之间的三个细菌属差异丰富。招募时的CD多重状态与发生CD的风险增加独立相关(调整后的风险比3.65,95%置信区间2.18-6.11,p<0.001)。
    结论:在CD患者的FDR中,来自多重家庭的参与者患CD的风险增加了3倍,更高的FCP,和改变的细菌组成,但不是遗传负担或肠道通透性改变。这些结果表明,推定的环境因素可能在多重家庭的FDR中富集。
    OBJECTIVE: Unaffected first-degree relatives (FDRs) from families with two or more affected FDRs with Crohn\'s disease (CD, multiplex families) have a high risk of developing CD, although the underlying mechanisms driving this risk are poorly understood. We aimed to identify differences in biomarkers between FDRs from multiplex versus simplex families and to investigate the risk of future CD onset accounting for potential confounders.
    METHODS: We assessed the Crohn\'s and Colitis Canada Genetic Environmental Microbial (CCC-GEM) cohort of healthy FDRs of patients with CD. Genome-wide CD-polygenic risk scores (CD-PRS), urinary fractional excretion of lactulose-to-mannitol ratio (LMR), fecal calprotectin (FCP), and fecal 16S ribosomal RNA microbiome were measured at recruitment. Associations between CD multiplex status and baseline biomarkers were determined using generalized estimating equations models. Cox models were used to assess the risk of future CD onset.
    RESULTS: There were 4051 participants from simplex families and 334 from CD multiplex families. CD multiplex status was significantly associated with higher baseline FCP (p=0.026) but not with baseline CD-PRS or LMR. Three bacterial genera were found to be differentially abundant between both groups. CD multiplex status at recruitment was independently associated with an increased risk of developing CD (adjusted hazard ratio 3.65, 95% confidence interval 2.18 - 6.11, p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Within FDRs of patients with CD, participants from multiplex families had a 3-fold increased risk of CD onset, a higher FCP, and an altered bacterial composition, but not genetic burden or altered gut permeability. These results suggest that putative environmental factors might be enriched in FDRs from multiplex families.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    牛皮癣,慢性炎症性皮肤病,被认为受遗传和环境因素的影响。尽管有这样的理解,有家族病史的银屑病患者的临床流行病学状况仍不确定.
    在这项研究中,我们参与了一项多中心观察性流行病学研究,该研究涉及1,000多家医院,共纳入5,927例银屑病患者.根据是否存在牛皮癣家族史,将这些患者分为两组:家族史病例(896例)和散发性病例(5,031例)。通过临床分型对两组患者的临床表现进行分析,合并症,治疗反应,以及其他相关因素。
    我们的研究结果表明,有银屑病家族史的个体与偶发性的个体相比,银屑病关节炎的患病率明显升高。此外,有银屑病家族史的患者对苏金单抗的疗效更快,更有效.此外,与轻度牛皮癣患者相比,中度至重度牛皮癣患者患心血管和肝脏疾病的风险更高,家族史对合并症的可能性没有明显影响。
    我们的研究确定了具有家族性银屑病倾向的个体的临床特征,为患有这种疾病的患者提供管理和治疗方法的新见解。
    UNASSIGNED: Psoriasis, a chronic inflammatory skin disease, is believed to be influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. Despite this understanding, the clinical epidemiological status of psoriasis patients with a family history of the disease remains uncertain.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, we participated in a multicenter observational epidemiological study involved over 1,000 hospitals and enrolled a total of 5,927 psoriasis patients. These patients were categorized into two groups based on the presence or absence of a family history of psoriasis: family history cases (896) and sporadic cases (5,031). The clinical manifestations of these two groups were analyzed through clinical classification, comorbidities, treatment response, and other relevant factors.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings of our study indicate that individuals with a family history of psoriasis predisposition exhibit a notably elevated prevalence of psoriatic arthritis compared to those with sporadic occurrences. Moreover, patients with a family history of psoriasis display a more rapid and efficacious response to secukinumab. Additionally, individuals with moderate to severe psoriasis are at a heightened risk of developing cardiovascular and liver diseases in comparison to those with mild psoriasis, with no discernible impact of familial history on the likelihood of comorbidities.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study identified the clinical characteristics of individuals with a familial predisposition to psoriasis, offering novel insights into the management and therapeutic approaches for patients with this condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们评估了在没有遗传性CRC的个体中家族性结肠直肠癌(FCRC)监测是否可以优化方法:ASCCA-FCRC模型模拟了具有CRC家族史的个体的CRC发展,与普通人群相比,CRC风险增加了2倍和4倍。我们模拟了一个没有监视的策略,目前的荷兰指南(45-75岁之间的5年一次结肠镜检查),和三套替代策略;结肠镜检查监测,结合结肠镜检查和粪便免疫化学测试(FIT)和基于FIT的监测。每组都包括一系列年龄范围和测试间隔不同的策略。最优策略被定义为具有最高质量调整寿命年(QALYs)的策略,满足所有标准:1)在成本效益前沿的(近)效率区域,与目前的监测相比,2)非低劣的有效性,3)结肠镜检查负担没有实质性增加,(4)不贵。
    结果:最佳策略是在40岁至80岁的结肠镜检查之间进行10年一次结肠镜检查,2年一次FIT,CRC风险增加2倍和4倍。在2倍的风险下,这一策略防止了0.8例更多的CRC死亡,与目前的监测相比,结肠镜检查减少了731次,增加了15.8个QALY,并在1,000个人的一生中节省了9.8万欧元。在4倍的风险下,数字是防止了2.1更多的CRC死亡,更多的QALY增加了37.0,结肠镜检查减少了567例,成本降低了127万欧元。目前的监测效率不高。
    结论:FIT可能在FCRC监测中发挥重要作用。与目前的FCRC监测相比,年龄从40岁到80岁的结肠镜检查进行10年一次的结肠镜检查和2年一次的FIT监测会增加QALY并降低结肠镜检查负担和成本。
    BACKGROUND: We assessed whether familial colorectal cancer (FCRC) surveillance in individuals without hereditary CRC can be optimized METHODS: The ASCCA-FCRC model simulates CRC development in individuals with a family history of CRC at 2-fold and 4-fold increased CRC risk compared to the general population. We simulated a strategy without surveillance, the current Dutch guideline (5-yearly colonoscopy between 45-75), and three sets of alternative strategies; colonoscopy surveillance, surveillance combining colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and FIT-based surveillance. Each set included a range of strategies differing in age range and test interval. The optimal strategy was defined as the strategy with highest quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) satisfying all criteria: 1) in the (near-)efficiency area of the cost-effectiveness frontier, and compared to current surveillance 2) non-inferior effectiveness, 3) no substantial increase in colonoscopy burden and, 4) not more expensive.
    RESULTS: The optimal strategy was 10-yearly colonoscopy with 2-yearly FIT between colonoscopies from age 40 to 80 for both 2- and 4-fold increased CRC risk. At 2-fold risk, this strategy prevented 0.8 more CRC deaths, gained 15.8 more QALYs at 731 fewer colonoscopies and saved €98k over the lifetime of 1,000 individuals compared to current surveillance. At 4-fold risk, figures were 2.1 more CRC deaths prevented, 37.0 more QALYs gained at 567 fewer colonoscopies and €127k lower costs. Current surveillance was not (near-)efficient.
    CONCLUSIONS: FIT could play an important role in FCRC surveillance. Surveillance with 10-yearly colonoscopy and 2-yearly FIT between colonoscopies from age 40 to 80 increases QALYs and reduces colonoscopy burden and costs compared to current FCRC surveillance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:早发心血管疾病家族史是个体心血管风险的强预测因子。然而,家族史并不总是可用的,也不总是可靠的。大约80%的健康结果不是受遗传风险的影响,而是受社会因素的影响。包括不良的健康行为和环境。此外,在目前的基因检测时代,实验室评估,和成像,一个关键问题仍然存在:家族史筛查在青年心血管疾病管理中的当代意义是什么?
    结果:了解个体家族史不仅可以帮助临床医生识别遗传风险,还可以识别导致青年心血管疾病风险增加的不健康行为和环境逆境的家族聚集性。对于那些风险最大的人,预防策略可以更快、更保守地应用。将家族史纳入临床实践对于心血管风险评估和优化预后至关重要。但是,在某些情况下,更能反映社会因素。
    OBJECTIVE: Family history of premature cardiovascular disease is a strong predictor of individual cardiovascular risk. However, family history is not always available and not always reliable. Roughly 80% of health outcomes are influenced not by genetic risk but by societal factors, including adverse health behaviors and environment. Furthermore, in the present age of genetic testing, laboratory evaluations, and imaging, a key question remains: What is the contemporary relevance of family history screening in the management of cardiovascular disease in youth?
    RESULTS: Knowledge of an individual\'s family history can help clinicians identify not only inherited risk but also familial clustering of unhealthy behaviors and environmental adversity contributing to enhanced cardiovascular disease risk in youth. For those at greatest risk, prevention strategies can be applied sooner and more conservatively. Integrating family history into clinical practice is crucial for cardiovascular risk assessment and for optimizing outcomes, but, in some cases, is more reflective of social factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管精神疾病家族史通常被认为可能有助于了解患者的临床表现,尚不清楚积极的赌博家族史对有赌博障碍的人意味着什么。我们试图了解在患有赌博障碍的成年人样本中,一级亲属患有赌博障碍的临床影响。
    来自455名参与者(年龄18-65岁)的数据参与了先前的药物和心理治疗性赌博障碍的临床试验,并进行了二次分析。比较了人口统计学和临床变量,这些人与没有一个或多个一级亲属的赌博障碍。此外,我们检查了赌博障碍家族史是否与治疗结局相关.
    223(49.0%)参与者至少有一名一级家庭成员患有赌博障碍。就临床变量而言,赌博障碍的家族史与女性显着相关,赌博年龄较早,未经治疗的赌博疾病持续时间较长,更有可能发展仅次于赌博的法律问题,家庭成员中酒精使用障碍的比率更高。赌博障碍的家族史也与药物治疗带来的赌博症状改善有关。
    这些结果表明,患有赌博障碍的一级家庭成员的赌徒可能具有独特的临床表现和对治疗干预的更好反应。
    UNASSIGNED: Although family history of psychiatric disorders has often been considered potentially useful in understanding clinical presentations in patients, it is less clear what a positive gambling family history means for people with gambling disorder. We sought to understand the clinical impact of having a first-degree relative with gambling disorder in a sample of adults with gambling disorder.
    UNASSIGNED: Data from 455 participants (aged 18-65 years) who had participated in previous pharmacological and psychotherapeutic clinical trials for gambling disorder were pooled in a secondary analysis. Demographic and clinical variables were compared between those who did versus did not have one or more first-degree relative(s) with gambling disorder. Additionally, we examined whether a family history of gambling disorder was associated with treatment outcome.
    UNASSIGNED: 223 (49.0%) participants had at least one first-degree family member(s) with gambling disorder. In terms of clinical variables, family history of gambling disorder was significantly associated with being female, having an earlier age of gambling onset, longer duration of untreated gambling illness, a greater likelihood of developing legal problems secondary to gambling, and higher rates of alcohol use disorder in family members. Family history of gambling disorder was also associated with a greater gambling symptom improvement from pharmacotherapy.
    UNASSIGNED: These results indicate that gamblers with a first-degree family member with a gambling disorder may have a unique clinical presentation and better response to treatment interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:肺癌(LC)是一种多因素疾病,遗传易感性的作用越来越重要。我们的目的是使用人工智能(AI)根据癌症家族史(FHC)分析LC患者之间的差异。
    方法:从2016年8月至2020年6月,从胸部肿瘤登记处(TTR)获得临床信息,由西班牙肺癌组织赞助的全国性数据库。除了描述性统计分析,进行了AI辅助分析.德国技术信息库支持合并电子病历和TTR数据库中的数据。人工智能辅助分析的结果是使用知识图谱报告的,统一架构以及描述性和预测性分析。
    结果:分析分两个阶段进行:常规统计分析,包括5,806例FHC中的11,684例患者。FHC患者的全球中位总生存期(OS)为23个月(CI95%:21.39-24.61),而非FHC(NFHC)患者为21个月(CI95%:19.53-22.48),p<0.001。第二次AI辅助分析包括939例FHC患者中的5,788例。58.48%的FHC女性患有LC。9.53%的患者有EGFR或HER2突变或ALK易位,至少有一名患者患有癌症。LC家族史与吸烟相关LC的风险增加有关。具有LC家族史的非吸烟者更可能在NSCLC中具有EGFR突变。在贝叶斯网络分析中,55%有LC家族史和从不吸烟者的患者有EGFR突变。
    结论:在我们的人群中,FHC患者中LC的发生率在女性和年轻患者中较高.FHC是LC发展的危险因素和预测因子,尤其是在≤50岁的人群中。这些结果得到了常规统计和AI辅助分析的证实。
    OBJECTIVE: Lung Cancer (LC) is a multifactorial disease for which the role of genetic susceptibility has become increasingly relevant. Our aim was to use artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze differences between patients with LC based on family history of cancer (FHC).
    METHODS: From August 2016 to June 2020 clinical information was obtained from Thoracic Tumors Registry (TTR), a nationwide database sponsored by the Spanish Lung Cancer Group. In addition to descriptive statistical analysis, an AI-assisted analysis was performed. The German Technical Information Library supported the merging of data from the electronic medical records and database of the TTR. The results of the AI-assisted analysis were reported using Knowledge Graph, Unified Schema and descriptive and predictive analyses.
    RESULTS: Analyses were performed in two phases: first, conventional statistical analysis including 11,684 patients of those 5,806 had FHC. Median overall survival (OS) for the global population was 23 months (CI 95 %: 21.39-24.61) in patients with FHC versus 21 months (CI 95 %: 19.53-22.48) in patients without FHC (NFHC), p < 0.001. The second AI-assisted analysis included 5,788 patients of those 939 had FHC. 58.48 % of women with FHC had LC. 9.53 % of patients had an EGFR or HER2 mutation or ALK translocation and at least one relative with cancer. A family history of LC was associated with an increased risk of smoking-related LC. Non-smokers with a family history of LC were more likely to have an EGFR mutation in NSCLC. In Bayesian network analysis, 55 % of patients with a family history of LC and never-smokers had an EGFR mutation.
    CONCLUSIONS: In our population, the incidence of LC in patients with a FHC is higher in women and younger patients. FHC is a risk factor and predictor of LC development, especially in people ≤ 50 years. These results were confirmed by conventional statistics and AI-assisted analysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管有道德和历史上的论点认为要从临床算法中消除种族,移除的后果仍不清楚。这里,在这场辩论中,我们强调了一个基本上没有讨论过的考虑因素:不同种族组的输入特征的数据质量各不相同。例如,癌症家族史是癌症风险预测算法中的重要预测因子,但对于Black参与者而言,其可靠性较低,因此对癌症结局的预测能力可能较低.利用南方社区队列研究的数据,我们评估了种族调整是否可以允许风险预测模型按种族捕获不同的数据质量,关注结直肠癌风险预测。我们分析了基线时没有结直肠癌病史的77,836名成年人。白人参与者自我报告的家族史的预测价值大于黑人参与者。我们比较了两种癌症风险预测算法-一种种族盲算法,其中包括标准的结直肠癌风险因素,但不包括种族,和种族调整算法,其中还包括种族。相对于种族盲算法,种族调整算法提高了预测性能,通过似然比检验中的拟合优度(P值:<0.001)和Black参与者的接受操作特征曲线下面积(P值:0.006)来衡量。因为种族盲算法低估了黑人参与者的风险,种族调整算法增加了预测高危人群中黑人参与者的比例,有可能增加筛查的机会。更广泛地说,这项研究表明,当临床算法中的关键预测因子的数据质量因种族组而不同时,种族调整可能是有益的.
    Despite ethical and historical arguments for removing race from clinical algorithms, the consequences of removal remain unclear. Here, we highlight a largely undiscussed consideration in this debate: varying data quality of input features across race groups. For example, family history of cancer is an essential predictor in cancer risk prediction algorithms but is less reliably documented for Black participants and may therefore be less predictive of cancer outcomes. Using data from the Southern Community Cohort Study, we assessed whether race adjustments could allow risk prediction models to capture varying data quality by race, focusing on colorectal cancer risk prediction. We analyzed 77,836 adults with no history of colorectal cancer at baseline. The predictive value of self-reported family history was greater for White participants than for Black participants. We compared two cancer risk prediction algorithms-a race-blind algorithm which included standard colorectal cancer risk factors but not race, and a race-adjusted algorithm which additionally included race. Relative to the race-blind algorithm, the race-adjusted algorithm improved predictive performance, as measured by goodness of fit in a likelihood ratio test (P-value: <0.001) and area under the receiving operating characteristic curve among Black participants (P-value: 0.006). Because the race-blind algorithm underpredicted risk for Black participants, the race-adjusted algorithm increased the fraction of Black participants among the predicted high-risk group, potentially increasing access to screening. More broadly, this study shows that race adjustments may be beneficial when the data quality of key predictors in clinical algorithms differs by race group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胰腺癌(PC)患者的生殖系乳腺癌易感基因(gBRCA)突变在临床实践中并不常见。因此,有效显示gBRCA突变的因素和奥拉帕尼维持治疗的真实世界结局尚未完全确定.在本研究中,我们明确了有效检测gBRCA突变的指标以及奥拉帕尼作为维持治疗的有效性和安全性.
    方法:我们回顾性分析了84例接受gBRCA测试的PC患者(BRACAnalysis,无数遗传学,盐湖城,UT,美国)在2021年1月至2022年3月期间在我们的研究所工作。对于每个病人来说,从病历中提取临床数据.
    结果:患者年龄中位数为64岁(29-85岁),41例(48.8%)为男性。在10例(11.9%)患者中发现了gBRCA突变;2例患者有BRCA1突变,8例患者有BRCA2突变。所有gBRCA突变的患者都有任何癌症的家族史,其中8人有遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌综合征(HBOC)相关癌症的家族史。与具有其他癌症家族史且无癌症家族史的PC患者相比,具有HBOC相关癌症家族史的PC患者的gBRCA突变率更高(22.9%vs.4.1%;P=0.014)。在我们的研究中,10例gBRCA阳性PC患者中有8例在铂类化疗后接受奥拉帕尼治疗.对基于铂的化疗的最佳反应包括一名患者的完全反应(12.5%)和七名患者的部分反应(87.5%)。以铂类为基础的化疗联合奥拉帕尼治疗的中位持续时间为17.5个月(8-87个月),奥拉帕尼维持治疗时间为11个月(1-30个月)。在奥拉帕尼维持治疗期间,3例患者未出现疾病进展.这三名患者中的一名在接受奥拉帕尼治疗12个月后接受了转换手术。
    结论:应积极考虑gBRCA测试,特别是在有HBOC相关癌症家族史的PC患者中。
    BACKGROUND: Germline breast cancer susceptibility gene (gBRCA) mutation in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) is not common in clinical practice. Therefore, factors that efficiently show gBRCA mutations and the real-world outcomes of olaparib maintenance therapy have not been fully established. In the present study, we clarified the indicators for the effective detection of gBRCA mutation and the efficacy and safety of olaparib as maintenance therapy.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 84 patients with PC who underwent gBRCA testing (BRACAnalysis, Myriad Genetics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) at our institute between January 2021 and March 2022. For each patient, clinical data were extracted from medical records.
    RESULTS: The median patient age was 64 y (29-85 y), and 41 patients (48.8%) were male. The gBRCA mutations were identified in 10 (11.9%) patients; two patients had BRCA1 mutation and eight had BRCA2 mutation. All patients with gBRCA mutation had a family history of any cancer, and eight of them had a family history of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome (HBOC)-related cancer. The gBRCA mutation rate was higher for patients with PC with a family history of HBOC-related cancer compared to that in patients with PC having a family history of other cancers and no family history of cancer (22.9% vs. 4.1%; P = 0.014). In our study, eight out of 10 patients with gBRCA-positive PC received olaparib after platinum-based chemotherapy. The best responses to platinum-based chemotherapy included a complete response in one patient (12.5%) and a partial response in seven patients (87.5%). The median duration of treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy plus olaparib was 17.5 months (8-87 months), and the duration of treatment with olaparib maintenance therapy was 11 months (1-30 months). During olaparib maintenance therapy, three patients showed no disease progression. One of these three patients underwent conversion surgery after receiving olaparib for 12 months.
    CONCLUSIONS: The gBRCA testing should be considered proactively, especially in patients with PC with a family history of HBOC-related cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号