Facilities and Services Utilization

设施和服务利用
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是一个公共卫生问题。在西班牙,尽管移民妇女的IPV患病率高于西班牙出生的妇女,移民妇女获得服务的程度似乎较小。这项研究旨在探索和比较西班牙出生和移民女性IPV幸存者对寻求正式帮助的障碍和策略的看法。一项定性研究是基于三个焦点小组与西班牙妇女(n=9),罗马尼亚(n=4),和拉丁美洲(n=4)起源。专题分析得到了Atlas的支持。ti.确定了三个类别和12个子类别:求助行为的一般特征(例如,儿童作为主要激励因素),障碍(例如,移民身份,对肇事者的恐惧),和访问服务的策略(例如,增加教育)。发现两组之间寻求帮助的行为存在差异。为专业人员提供相关信息,以改善妇女获得IPV支持服务的机会。
    Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a public health problem. In Spain, although the prevalence of IPV is greater in immigrant women than in Spanish-born women, immigrant women seem to access services to a lesser extent. This study aimed to explore and compare perceptions of barriers to and strategies for seeking formal help among Spanish-born and immigrant women IPV survivors. A qualitative study was conducted based on three focus groups with women of Spanish (n = 9), Romanian (n = 4), and Latin American (n = 4) origin. The thematic analysis was supported by Atlas.ti. Three categories and 12 subcategories were identified: general characteristics of help-seeking behavior (e.g., children as the main motivating factor), barriers (e.g., immigrant status, fear of the perpetrator), and strategies for accessing services (e.g., increasing education). Differences in help-seeking behavior were found between groups. Relevant information for professionals to improve women\'s access to IPV support services is provided.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于ICD-10的方法通常为回顾性估计潜在的姑息治疗需求提供基础。应用基于ICD-10的Murtagh等人。2014年的分类(穆尔塔格分类),使用死亡率数据开发,行政索赔数据导致姑息治疗需求估计不一致。该研究的目的是完善癌症和非癌症诊断死亡患者姑息治疗需求估计的分类。
    一项基于人群的回顾性研究,使用门诊和住院索赔数据,将Murtagh分类与基于ICD-10的新分类(经专家意见修订)进行了比较,包括姑息治疗的账单代码。对诊断组的姑息治疗需求进行了估计,并与生命最后一年的姑息治疗使用率进行了对比。我们的数据集包括在2016-2019年死亡的417,405人的记录。
    在2019年死亡的个人中(n=117,436),81.4%的人从新的分类中至少有一个诊断,而97.0%的人至少有一项诊断来自Murtagh分类。因此,分类修订确定了更少的个体可能需要姑息治疗。在癌症患者中,70.7%(与55.7%通过Murtagh分类)接受姑息治疗。在非癌症亚组中,利用率相当低,最高为36.7%(与33.7%通过穆尔塔格分类)在2019年。其他年份也观察到类似的结果。
    与基于ICD10的Murtagh分类相比,修订后的基于ICD-10的分类能够在无法获得死因的情况下进行更现实的估计,并揭示更高的姑息治疗覆盖率和差异,尤其是在癌症与非癌症疾病中.德国临床试验注册(DRKS00024133)。
    UNASSIGNED: ICD-10-based approaches often provide the basis for retrospective estimation of potential palliative care need. Applying the ICD-10-based Murtagh et al. classification from 2014 (Murtagh classification), developed using mortality data, to administrative claims data leads to inconsistencies in estimating palliative care need. The aim of the study was to refine the classification for palliative care need estimation in deceased individuals with cancer and non-cancer diagnosis.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective population-based study comparing Murtagh classification to a new ICD-10-based classification (revised by expert opinion) was conducted using outpatient and inpatient claims data, including billing codes for palliative care. Palliative care need was estimated for diagnoses groups and was contrasted with palliative care utilization rates in the last year of life. Our dataset included records of 417,405 individuals who deceased in 2016-2019.
    UNASSIGNED: Out of individuals deceased in 2019 (n = 117,436), 81.4% had at least one diagnosis from the new classification, while 97.0% had at least one diagnosis from the Murtagh classification. Classification revision thus identified fewer individuals as potentially in need of palliative care. Among individuals with cancer, 70.7% (vs. 55.7% via Murtagh classification) received palliative care. In non-cancer subgroups, the utilization rate was considerably lower, with a maximum of 36.7% (vs. 33.7% via Murtagh classification) in 2019. Similar results were observed for the other years.
    UNASSIGNED: Compared to the ICD10-based Murtagh classification, the revised ICD-10-based classification enables more realistic estimations if the cause of death is unavailable and reveals higher rates of palliative care coverage and differences especially in cancer versus non-cancer diseases. German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00024133).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:物质滥用构成了重大的公共卫生挑战,以过早的发病率和死亡率为特征,提高医疗保健利用率。虽然研究表明,以前的住院和急诊就诊与药物滥用患者的死亡率增加有关,在该人群中,先前使用急诊医疗服务(EMS)是否与不良结局类似相关尚不清楚.这项研究的目的是确定住院或急诊科就诊前30天内的EMS利用率与药物滥用患者的住院结局之间的关系。
    方法:我们在物质滥用数据共享范围内对2017年至2021年成人急诊科就诊和住院(称为医院遭遇)进行了回顾性分析。它保存了在威斯康星大学两家医院看到的药物滥用患者的电子健康记录,与国家机构有联系,索赔,和社会经济数据集。使用回归模型,我们检查了EMS使用与院内死亡结果之间的关系,住院时间,重症监护病房(ICU)入院,和危重疾病事件,定义为有创机械通气或血管活性药物给药。模型根据年龄进行了调整,合并症,最初的疾病严重程度,物质误用类型,和社会经济地位。
    结果:在19,402次相遇中,与之前未使用过EMS的患者相比,在医院治疗后30天内至少发生过一次EMS事件的患者发生院内死亡的可能性更高(OR1.52,95%CI[1.05-2.14]),在对混杂因素进行调整后。在相遇前30天使用EMS与住院时间略有增加有关,但与ICU入院或危重疾病事件无关。
    结论:在住院前一个月内使用过EMS的药物滥用者,其院内死亡风险增加。增强对该人群中EMS用户的监测可以改善总体患者预后。
    BACKGROUND: Substance misuse poses a significant public health challenge, characterized by premature morbidity and mortality, and heightened healthcare utilization. While studies have demonstrated that previous hospitalizations and emergency department visits are associated with increased mortality in patients with substance misuse, it is unknown whether prior utilization of emergency medical service (EMS) is similarly associated with poor outcomes among this population. The objective of this study is to determine the association between EMS utilization in the 30 days before a hospitalization or emergency department visit and in-hospital outcomes among patients with substance misuse.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult emergency department visits and hospitalizations (referred to as a hospital encounter) between 2017 and 2021 within the Substance Misuse Data Commons, which maintains electronic health records from substance misuse patients seen at two University of Wisconsin hospitals, linked with state agency, claims, and socioeconomic datasets. Using regression models, we examined the association between EMS use and the outcomes of in-hospital death, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and critical illness events, defined by invasive mechanical ventilation or vasoactive drug administration. Models were adjusted for age, comorbidities, initial severity of illness, substance misuse type, and socioeconomic status.
    RESULTS: Among 19,402 encounters, individuals with substance misuse who had at least one EMS incident within 30 days of a hospital encounter experienced a higher likelihood of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.52, 95% CI [1.05 - 2.14]) compared to those without prior EMS use, after adjusting for confounders. Using EMS in the 30 days prior to an encounter was associated with a small increase in hospital length of stay but was not associated with ICU admission or critical illness events.
    CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with substance misuse who have used EMS in the month preceding a hospital encounter are at an increased risk of in-hospital mortality. Enhanced monitoring of EMS users in this population could improve overall patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:长COVID可能会增加医疗保健利用率和成本。然而,它对NHS的影响还有待确定。
    方法:本研究旨在评估长期COVID患者的医疗保健利用率。在NHS英格兰的批准下,我们通过OpenSAFELY使用初级和二级护理数据进行了一项匹配的队列研究,一个分析匿名电子健康记录的平台。长期接触COVID组,由诊断代码定义,在2020年11月至2023年1月之间,与五个没有长COVID的比较器进行了匹配。我们比较了他们在全科医生咨询中的总医疗保健利用率,处方,入院,A&E访问,和门诊预约。使用两部分模型对协变量进行调整来评估医疗保健利用率和成本。使用差异模型,我们还将长期COVID后的医疗保健利用率与大流行前的记录进行了比较。
    结果:我们确定了52,988名患有长期COVID诊断的个体,与264,867个没有诊断的比较器匹配。在诊断后的12个月里,有强有力的证据表明,患有长期COVID的人更有可能使用医疗资源(OR:8.29,95%CI:7.74-8.87),医疗保健利用率提高49%(RR:1.49,95%CI:1.48-1.51)。我们的模型估计,长期COVID组每年有30次医疗就诊(预测平均值:29.23,95%CI:28.58-29.92),与对照组的16例相比(预测平均访视:16.04,95%CI:15.73-16.36)。长期COVID的个人更有可能出现非零医疗支出(OR=7.66,95%CI=7.20-8.15),成本比对照组高44%(成本比=1.44,95%CI:1.39-1.50)。长期的COVID小组每人每年的费用约为2500英镑(预测平均费用:2562.50英镑,95%CI:2335.60英镑至2819.22英镑),比较组的成本为1500英镑(预测平均成本:1527.43英镑,95%CI:1404.33-1664.45英镑)。历史上,患有长期COVID的人更频繁地利用医疗资源,但在被诊断为长型COVID后,他们的平均医疗保健利用率增加了更多,与比较器组进行比较。
    结论:LongCOVID增加了医疗保健利用率和成本。公共卫生政策应分配更多资源用于预防,治疗,并支持患有长期COVID的个人。
    BACKGROUND: Long COVID potentially increases healthcare utilisation and costs. However, its impact on the NHS remains to be determined.
    METHODS: This study aims to assess the healthcare utilisation of individuals with long COVID. With the approval of NHS England, we conducted a matched cohort study using primary and secondary care data via OpenSAFELY, a platform for analysing anonymous electronic health records. The long COVID exposure group, defined by diagnostic codes, was matched with five comparators without long COVID between Nov 2020 and Jan 2023. We compared their total healthcare utilisation from GP consultations, prescriptions, hospital admissions, A&E visits, and outpatient appointments. Healthcare utilisation and costs were evaluated using a two-part model adjusting for covariates. Using a difference-in-difference model, we also compared healthcare utilisation after long COVID with pre-pandemic records.
    RESULTS: We identified 52,988 individuals with a long COVID diagnosis, matched to 264,867 comparators without a diagnosis. In the 12 months post-diagnosis, there was strong evidence that those with long COVID were more likely to use healthcare resources (OR: 8.29, 95% CI: 7.74-8.87), and have 49% more healthcare utilisation (RR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.48-1.51). Our model estimated that the long COVID group had 30 healthcare visits per year (predicted mean: 29.23, 95% CI: 28.58-29.92), compared to 16 in the comparator group (predicted mean visits: 16.04, 95% CI: 15.73-16.36). Individuals with long COVID were more likely to have non-zero healthcare expenditures (OR = 7.66, 95% CI = 7.20-8.15), with costs being 44% higher than the comparator group (cost ratio = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.39-1.50). The long COVID group costs approximately £2500 per person per year (predicted mean cost: £2562.50, 95% CI: £2335.60-£2819.22), and the comparator group costs £1500 (predicted mean cost: £1527.43, 95% CI: £1404.33-1664.45). Historically, individuals with long COVID utilised healthcare resources more frequently, but their average healthcare utilisation increased more after being diagnosed with long COVID, compared to the comparator group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Long COVID increases healthcare utilisation and costs. Public health policies should allocate more resources towards preventing, treating, and supporting individuals with long COVID.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:许多患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或哮喘的人没有得到诊断,所以他们的呼吸道症状基本上没有得到治疗。
    方法:我们使用病例发现方法来识别社区中有呼吸道症状但未诊断为肺部疾病的成年人。在肺活量测定中被发现患有未确诊的COPD或哮喘的参与者被纳入多中心,随机化,对照试验,以确定早期诊断和治疗是否会降低呼吸系统疾病的医疗保健利用率并改善健康结局。参与者被分配接受干预(由肺科医师和哮喘-COPD教育者进行评估,他们被指示开始基于指南的护理)或由其初级保健医生进行常规护理。主要结果是参与者发起的呼吸系统疾病的医疗保健利用率。次要结局包括疾病特异性生活质量从基线到1年的变化,根据圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ;分数范围从0到100,分数较低表明健康状况较好);症状负担,根据COPD评估测试(CAT;评分范围为0~40分,评分越低表示健康状况越好)和1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)进行评估。
    结果:在接受采访的38,353人中,595例被发现患有未诊断的COPD或哮喘,508例被随机分组:253例被分配到干预组,255例被分配到常规护理组。干预组的主要结局事件的年化发生率低于常规护理组(0.53vs.1.12事件/人年;发生率比,0.48;95%置信区间[CI],0.36至0.63;P<0.001)。12个月时,干预组SGRQ评分低于基线评分10.2分,常规护理组低于基线评分6.8分(差异,-3.5点;95%CI,-6.0至-0.9),CAT评分分别比基线评分低3.8分和2.6分,分别(差异,-1.3点;95%CI,-2.4至-0.1)。FEV1在干预组中增加了119ml,在常规护理组中增加了22ml(差异,94ml;95%CI,50~138)。试验组的不良事件发生率相似。
    结论:在这项试验中,一项策略被用于识别社区中患有未确诊哮喘或COPD的成年人,与接受常规治疗的患者相比,接受肺科医师指导治疗的患者随后对呼吸系统疾病的医疗保健利用率较低.(由加拿大卫生研究院资助;UCAPClinicalTrials.gov编号,NCT03148210。).
    BACKGROUND: Many persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma have not received a diagnosis, so their respiratory symptoms remain largely untreated.
    METHODS: We used a case-finding method to identify adults in the community with respiratory symptoms without diagnosed lung disease. Participants who were found to have undiagnosed COPD or asthma on spirometry were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to determine whether early diagnosis and treatment reduces health care utilization for respiratory illness and improves health outcomes. Participants were assigned to receive the intervention (evaluation by a pulmonologist and an asthma-COPD educator who were instructed to initiate guideline-based care) or usual care by their primary care practitioner. The primary outcome was the annualized rate of participant-initiated health care utilization for respiratory illness. Secondary outcomes included changes from baseline to 1 year in disease-specific quality of life, as assessed with the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ; scores range from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating better health status); symptom burden, as assessed with the COPD Assessment Test (CAT; scores range from 0 to 40, with lower scores indicating better health status); and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1).
    RESULTS: Of 38,353 persons interviewed, 595 were found to have undiagnosed COPD or asthma and 508 underwent randomization: 253 were assigned to the intervention group and 255 to the usual-care group. The annualized rate of a primary-outcome event was lower in the intervention group than in the usual-care group (0.53 vs. 1.12 events per person-year; incidence rate ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36 to 0.63; P<0.001). At 12 months, the SGRQ score was lower than the baseline score by 10.2 points in the intervention group and by 6.8 points in the usual-care group (difference, -3.5 points; 95% CI, -6.0 to -0.9), and the CAT score was lower than the baseline score by 3.8 points and 2.6 points, respectively (difference, -1.3 points; 95% CI, -2.4 to -0.1). The FEV1 increased by 119 ml in the intervention group and by 22 ml in the usual-care group (difference, 94 ml; 95% CI, 50 to 138). The incidence of adverse events was similar in the trial groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this trial in which a strategy was used to identify adults in the community with undiagnosed asthma or COPD, those who received pulmonologist-directed treatment had less subsequent health care utilization for respiratory illness than those who received usual care. (Funded by Canadian Institutes of Health Research; UCAP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03148210.).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    了解初级卫生服务的利用模式可以帮助改善服务的提供和利用,从而减少社区中常见的发病率。该研究旨在评估外展医疗中心提供的服务的利用模式。
    对居住在外展中心野外实践区的家庭进行了为期一年多的社区调查。使用对年龄>18岁的成年人进行的问卷调查收集数据。将收集的数据输入到社会科学版16.0的统计软件包中并进行分析。
    大约65.1%的受访者年龄在31-59岁之间,67.4%为女性。在被调查的126户家庭中,50.7%的人使用外展中心的服务。64个家庭的利用促进者包括其居住地附近(90.6%)和优质服务的可用性(40.6%)。最常见的障碍包括缺乏意识(30.9%)和医疗中心的时间安排不便(18.2%)。年龄<18岁(比值比[OR]=7.64;95%置信区间[CI]=4.37-13.37)和>45岁(OR=2.65;95%CI=1.57-4.47)的受访者使用服务的几率高于18-45岁的受访者。女性受访者(OR=2.89;95%CI=1.86-4.51)比男性受访者更有可能使用服务。
    提高对外展医疗中心的认识,并根据观察到的社区需求设计服务,可以进一步提高医疗中心提供服务的利用率。
    UNASSIGNED: Understanding the patterns of utilisation of primary health services can help to improve service delivery and utilisation, thereby reducing common morbidities in the community. The study aimed to assess the patterns of utilisation of services provided at an outreach healthcare centre.
    UNASSIGNED: A community-based survey was conducted among families residing in the field practice area of an outreach centre for more than a year. Data were collected using a questionnaire administered to adults aged >18 years. Collected data were entered into and analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 16.0.
    UNASSIGNED: Approximately 65.1% of the respondents were aged 31-59 years, and 67.4% were women. Among 126 surveyed households, 50.7% had utilised services from the outreach centre. The facilitators of utilisation among 64 households included proximity to their area of residence (90.6%) and availability of good-quality services (40.6%). The most common barriers included a lack of awareness (30.9%) and inconvenient timings (18.2%) of the healthcare centre. The respondents aged <18 years (odds ratio [OR]=7.64; 95% confidence interval [CI]=4.37-13.37) and >45 years (OR=2.65; 95% CI=1.57-4.47) had higher odds of utilising services than those aged 18-45 years. The female respondents (OR=2.89; 95% CI=1.86-4.51) were more likely to utilise services than the male respondents.
    UNASSIGNED: Creating awareness regarding the outreach healthcare centre and designing services based on the observed needs of the community can further improve the utilisation of services provided at the healthcare centre.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:伊朗的行为疾病咨询中心(BDCC)和弱势妇女咨询中心(VWCC)是提供教育的主要外围中心,咨询,诊断,预防性,分别向感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病或感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病风险高的个人和女性性工作者提供治疗和保护服务。由于伊朗围绕艾滋病毒的社会耻辱,本研究旨在确定可能阻碍或鼓励HIV/AIDS患者和有危险性行为的女性前往这些中心的因素.
    方法:这项定性研究于2023年进行,涉及访问伊朗两个西部省份的BDCC和VWCC的个人,伊兰和克尔曼沙。研究参与者包括在BDCC和VWCC工作的21名卫生工作人员,以及20名艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者和有不安全性行为的弱势妇女,这些妇女涉及这些中心。Purposive,采用滚雪球和最大变异抽样技术采访参与者。面试是在1月5日至5月21日之间进行的,2023年,使用半结构准则。采用MAXQDA20软件对访谈进行转录和内容分析法进行数据分析。
    结果:根据调查结果,访问艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者和弱势妇女专门中心的障碍和促进者分为三大类,10个子类别和35个子类别,包括:医疗和操作过程(4个子类别和12个子类别),人员与来访者(感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病并有感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病风险的人)之间的相互互动(3个子类别和13个子类别),以及中心的物理特征(3个子类别和10个子类别)。
    结论:为了提高BDCC和VWCC的性能,并鼓励感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病的人定期访问这些中心,卫生政策制定者应该考虑修改临床流程,物理特征,受访者提出的人员行为和访客关注的问题以及本研究中确定的问题。
    BACKGROUND: Behavioral Diseases Counseling Centers (BDCCs) and Vulnerable Women\'s Counseling Centers (VWCCs) in Iran are the main peripheral centers that offer educational, counseling, diagnostic, preventive, curative and protective services to individuals living with or at high risk of contracting HIV/AIDS and female sex workers respectively. Due to the social stigma surrounding HIV in Iran, this study aims to identify the factors that may hinder or encourage HIV/AIDS patients and women with risky sexual behaviors from visiting these centers.
    METHODS: Conducted in 2023, this qualitative study involved individuals visiting BDCCs and VWCCs in two western provinces of Iran, Ilam and Kermanshah. The study participants included 21 health staff members working in BDCCs and VWCCs and 20 HIV/AIDS patients and vulnerable women with unsafe sexual behaviors referring to these centers. Purposive, snowball and maximum variation sampling techniques were applied to interview the participants. Interviews were conducted between January 5th and May 21st, 2023, using a semi-structure guideline. Interviews were transcribed and content analysis approach was applied to analyze data using MAXQDA20 software.
    RESULTS: According to the findings, the barriers and facilitators of visiting specialized centers for HIV/AIDS patients and vulnerable women were categorized into three main categories, 10 subcategories and 35 sub-subcategories including: Medical and operational processes (4 subcategories and 12 sub-subcategories), mutual interactions between the personnel and visitors (people living with and at the risk of getting HIV/AIDS) (3 subcategory and 13 sub-subcategories), and physical characteristics of the centers (3 subcategories and 10 sub-subcategories).
    CONCLUSIONS: To improve the performance of BDCCs and VWCCs and encourage people living with and at the risk of contracting HIV/AIDS to visit these centers regularly, health policy makers should consider modifying clinical processes, physical features, personnel behaviors and visitors\' concerns raised by the interviewees and the issues identified in this study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定利比亚患者与牙医沟通的影响因素及其对患者满意度和信任度的影响。我们从患者的角度探讨了这些相互作用对后续利用牙科保健服务的影响。
    方法:对来自利比亚Janzour市口腔健康中心18岁以上患者的有目的样本进行定性描述性研究。在线进行了16次半结构化访谈(30-90分钟)。
    结果:信任是患者最关心的问题。其他因素也对沟通和患者满意度产生积极影响,包括信息交互,积极参与,道德支持,关于过程的解释和牙医对病人感觉的理解。在线访谈揭示了反映患者与牙医沟通阶段的四个关键主题领域:1)欢迎并建立良好的人际关系阶段;2)信息共享阶段;3)治疗决策阶段,4)满意度自我评价阶段。
    结论:这些数据强调了软技能的重要性,特别有效的沟通,在牙科实践中。调查结果强调了牙科专业人员的个人价值观和人际交往能力的重要性,因为这些因素在塑造牙科保健服务的成功中起着关键作用。
    OBJECTIVE: To identify the factors influencing communication between patients and dentists in Libya and their effects on patient satisfaction and trust. We explored the impact of these interactions on the subsequent utilisation of dental health services from the patient\'s perspective.
    METHODS: Qualitative descriptive study in a purposive sample of patients from oral health centres in Janzour city in Libya who were over eighteen years old. Sixteen semi-structured interviews (30-90 minutes) were conducted online.
    RESULTS: Trust was the prime concern among patients. Other factors also positively impacting communication and patient satisfaction included information interaction, active participation, moral support, explanation about processes and the dentists\' comprehension of how a patient feels. The online interviews revealed four key thematic areas that reflected the patient-dentist communication phases: 1) Welcoming and establishing a good interpersonal rapport phase; 2) the Information-sharing phase; 3) Treatment decision-making phase, and 4) Satisfaction self-evaluation phase.
    CONCLUSIONS: These data emphasise the significance of soft skills, particularly effective communication, in the context of dental practice. The findings underscore the importance of personal values and interpersonal skills among dental professionals, as these factors play a pivotal role in shaping the success of dental healthcare provision.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在埃塞俄比亚,社区卫生信息系统(CHIS)在卫生站(hp)级别实施,旨在改善服务的提供和使用。我们对CHIS的利用进行了国家一级的评估,并探讨了CHIS利用与产前护理(ANC)的关联。产后护理(PNC),埃塞俄比亚农村地区的机构交付和儿童免疫接种。
    我们于2019年3月至5月进行了一项横断面研究,测量了基于社区的医疗服务使用和基于HP的CHIS评估。数据是从过去五年中分娩的343名HP和2,864名妇女中收集的,多阶段抽样用于选择研究对象。我们使用了CHIS实施和服务利用的描述性统计以及多水平逻辑回归,以调查CHIS实施与母婴保健服务使用的关联。
    55%的惠普正在实施CHIS。这些惠普正在使用一种名为家庭文件夹(FF)的纸质家庭数据收集工具。在惠普中,三分之一实施了基于批次质量保证抽样(LQAS)的数据质量检查,60.4%记录并遵循决策执行。总的来说,在符合条件的妇女中,40%使用ANC,近50%的已婚妇女使用非国大服务;28%的高财富指数类别的妇女在分娩后48小时内使用PNC;86.1%的妇女至少在医疗机构接受过高中教育。实施CHIS和家庭文件夹利用率以及在HP中进行基于LQAS的数据质量检查与ANC的几率增加显着相关,delivery,和疫苗接种服务使用。
    我们发现,更好地实施CHIS与更好的母婴健康服务使用有关,这意味着在HP中增加CHIS的使用将改善母婴健康服务的使用。
    UNASSIGNED: In Ethiopia, the community health information system (CHIS) is implemented at the health post (hp) level with the aim of improving service delivery and use. We conducted a national level assessment of CHIS utilization and explored the associations of CHIS utilization with use of antenatal care (ANC), postnatal care (PNC), institutional delivery and child immunization in rural Ethiopia.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a cross-sectional study measuring community-based health service use and HP based CHIS assessment from March to May 2019. Data were collected from 343 HPs and 2,864 women who delivered in the last five years, and multistage sampling was used to select the study subjects. We used descriptive statistics for CHIS implementation and service utilization and multilevel logistic regression to investigate the association of CHIS implementation with maternal and child health care services use.
    UNASSIGNED: Fifty five percent of the HPs were implementing CHIS. These HPs were using a paper-based household data collection tool called family folder (FF). Of the HPs, one third implemented lot quality assurance sampling (LQAS) based data quality check and 60.4% documented and followed execution of decisions. Overall, among the eligible women, 40% used ANC, close to 50% of currently married women used ANC services; 28% of women that fall in the high wealth index category used PNC within 48 hours after delivery; and 86.1% of women who had at least a high school education delivered at a health facility. Implementation of CHIS and family folder utilization and conducting LQAS based data quality check in the HPs were significantly associated with increased odds of ANC, delivery, and vaccination services use.
    UNASSIGNED: We found that better implementation of CHIS was associated with better maternal and child health service use which implies that increasing utilization of CHIS at HPs will improve mother and child health service use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号