Face-to-face learning

面对面学习
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19大流行对学生的学业成绩产生了重大影响。大流行的影响在学生中有所不同,但是一些大趋势已经出现。大流行期间学生面临的主要挑战之一是他们学习习惯的破坏。习惯了在线学习程序的学生可能会发现在面对面的学习中表现良好更具挑战性。因此,评估与学生成绩低下相关的各种潜在危险因素及其预测对于早期干预很重要。由于学生的表现数据包含不同的行为,标准的机器学习方法发现很难获得有益的实际决策和早期干预的有用见解。因此,这项研究探索了正则化集成学习方法,以有效地分析学生的表现数据并得出有效的结论。为此,对随机森林方法实施了三种修剪策略。这些方法基于袋外取样,子采样和子装袋。修剪策略会丢弃受学生数据中异常模式不利影响的树木,从而形成准确而多样的树木森林。这些方法是在从目前以面对面的方式在校园学习的大学生中收集的示例数据中进行说明的,他在COVID-19大流行期间通过在线学习进行了研究。建议的方法优于本文考虑的所有其他方法,可以预测有学术失败风险的学生。此外,各种因素,如上课出勤率,学生互动,互联网连接,限制期间的先决条件课程,等。,被确定为最重要的特征。
    The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on students\' academic performance. The effects of the pandemic have varied among students, but some general trends have emerged. One of the primary challenges for students during the pandemic has been the disruption of their study habits. Students getting used to online learning routines might find it even more challenging to perform well in face to face learning. Therefore, assessing various potential risk factors associated with students low performance and its prediction is important for early intervention. As students\' performance data encompass diverse behaviors, standard machine learning methods find it hard to get useful insights for beneficial practical decision making and early interventions. Therefore, this research explores regularized ensemble learning methods for effectively analyzing students\' performance data and reaching valid conclusions. To this end, three pruning strategies are implemented for the random forest method. These methods are based on out-of-bag sampling, sub-sampling and sub-bagging. The pruning strategies discard trees that are adversely affected by the unusual patterns in the students data forming forests of accurate and diverse trees. The methods are illustrated on an example data collected from university students currently studying on campus in a face-to-face modality, who studied during the COVID-19 pandemic through online learning. The suggested methods outperform all the other methods considered in this paper for predicting students at the risk of academic failure. Moreover, various factors such as class attendance, students interaction, internet connectivity, pre-requisite course(s) during the restrictions, etc., are identified as the most significant features.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    外科临床教学的可变性和机会性是对医学生进行有效教学和培训的主要问题。整合在线媒体,包括讨论论坛,交互式视频/场景,静态页面,测验被称为混合学习(BL)。这项研究旨在比较参加混合学习的外科学生与参加面对面教学(f2f教学)的学生的内在动机。
    准实验,交叉研究在陶氏大学医院的外科单元I和外科单元II进行,卡拉奇,2014年3月至8月。共有31名学生参加并接受了两种不同的教学。前四周,A组发表在外科手术-I(f2f教学)中,B组发表在外科手术-II(BL)中。两组都以相同的时间表教授相同的内容。F2F组有临床暴露于真实患者,和小组讨论(SGD),而BL小组的学生接触到额外的在线学习部分。内在动机清单(IMI)在四周结束时进行,并进行小组交换。交换组再次以相同的时间表教导相同的内容,再持续四周,并给予IMI。
    58名学生完成了IMI;f2f组28名,BL组30名。两组之间的IMI的所有四个子量表均存在显着差异。在三个分量表中,与f2f相比,BL学生的积极性更高(p<0.01)。f2f中的学生比BL中的学生经历了更多的感知紧张(p<0.048)。
    这项研究得出的结论是,混合外科学习计划使医学生更有内在的学习动力。通过利用在线学习,可以培养学生优越的教育机会。它也可以提高教师的效率和效率。
    UNASSIGNED: The variability and opportunistic nature of surgical clinical education is the main problem for effective teaching and training of medical students. Incorporating online mediums including discussion forums, interactive videos/scenarios, static pages, and quizzes is known as blended learning (BL). This study aimed to compare the intrinsic motivation of surgical students enrolled in blended learning to those enrolled in face-to-face teaching (f2f teaching).
    UNASSIGNED: A quasi-experimental, cross-over study was conducted in Surgical Unit-I and Surgical Unit-II of Dow University Hospital, Karachi, from March to August 2014. A total of 31 students participated and were exposed to two different teachings. For the first four weeks, Group A was posted in Surgical-I (f2f teaching) and Group B in Surgical-II (BL). Both groups were taught the same contents with the same schedule. The F2F group had clinical exposure to real patients, and small group discussions (SGDs) while The BL group students were exposed to an additional online learning component. Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) was administered at the end of four weeks and groups were swapped. Exchanged groups were again taught the same contents with the same schedule for another four weeks and IMI was administered.
    UNASSIGNED: Fifty-eight students completed IMI; 28 in f2f and 30 in BL group. There was a significant difference in all four subscales of IMI between the two groups. In three subscales, students in BL were more motivated as compared to f2f (p<0.01). Students in f2f experienced more perceived tension than in BL (p<0.048).
    UNASSIGNED: This study concluded that blended surgical learning programs keep medical students more intrinsically motivated to learn. By utilizing online learning, superior educational opportunities for students can be cultivated. It can result in enhanced faculty effectiveness and efficiency as well.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行以来,电子学习(e-learning)已发展成为一种流行的教育方法。虽然这代表了教学的额外模式,传统的课堂学习促进了人际交往能力的发展,并使学生能够分享和讨论特定的主题。然而,这两种学习模式在牙科教育领域的比较已有研究不足。这项研究旨在评估牙科学生对电子和课堂学习的看法。
    方法:在2022年11月至2023年1月之间对沙特阿拉伯的牙科学生进行了基于横断面问卷调查的调查。之前,学生们被问及他们对电子学习和课堂学习的比较看法,during,在COVID-19大流行之后。问卷答复,包括人口统计数据,被收集并制成表格,采用电子数据管理软件。对表格数据进行了分析,以提供描述性统计数据,并将电子和课堂学习与人口统计变量以及以前的电子学习经验进行比较。
    结果:大多数受访者报告拥有平均信息技术(IT)技能和电子学习的经验。黑板学习管理系统(LMS)(Reston,VA:BlackboardInc.),Zoom(圣何塞,CA:ZoomVideoCommunicationsInc.),和微软团队(雷德蒙德,西澳:微软公司)是最常用和最有利的电子学习平台。虽然大多数参与者发现这两种方法都可以接受基于问题的学习课程和理论讲座,他们报告说,在临床和实践课程中,电子学习不如课堂学习有效。将电子学习视为优于课堂学习的首选方法,大多数回答是“中性”或“不确定”。“比较不同教学方法的序数响应的平均排名和作为首选方法的电子学习的名义响应,人口统计学特征没有观察到统计学上显著的相互作用,IT技能水平,或以前的电子学习经验。
    结论:尽管通过电子学习实现了性能和学习能力的提高,只有通过课堂学习才能实现个人互动的优势以及实际和临床牙科课程的可行性。
    BACKGROUND: Electronic learning (e-learning) has evolved into a popular educational approach since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. While this represents an additional model for teaching, traditional classroom learning fosters the development of interpersonal skills and enables students to share and discuss specific topics. However, existing research on the comparison of both these modes of learning in the field of dental education is inadequate. This study aimed to evaluate the perceptions of dental students towards both electronic and classroom learning.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was conducted between November 2022 and January 2023 among dental students in Saudi Arabia. Students were questioned on their comparative perceptions of e-learning and classroom learning before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Questionnaire responses, including demographic data, were collected and tabulated, using electronic data management software. The tabulated data were analyzed to provide descriptive statistics and compare electronic and classroom learning with demographic variables and previous experience with e-learning.
    RESULTS: Most respondents reported possessing average information technology (IT) skills and prior experience with e-learning. Blackboard Learning Management System (LMS) (Reston, VA: Blackboard Inc.), Zoom (San Jose, CA: Zoom Video Communications Inc.), and Microsoft Teams (Redmond, WA: Microsoft Corporation) were the most commonly used and advantageous e-learning platforms. While the majority of participants found both methods acceptable for problem-based learning sessions and theoretical lectures, they reported e-learning to be less effective than classroom learning for clinical and practical sessions. Regarding e-learning as a preferred method over classroom learning, most responses were \"neutral\" or \"uncertain.\" Comparing the mean ranks of the ordinal responses for the different teaching methodologies and the nominal responses for e-learning as the preferred method, no statistically significant interactions were observed for demographic characteristics, IT-skill levels, or prior experience with e-learning.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although enhanced performance and learning capacity are enabled through e-learning, the advantages of personal interactions and the feasibility of practical and clinical dental sessions are achieved only through classroom learning.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在评估学生对COVID-19检疫期间伊拉克药房课程在线学习的知识和看法。描述性的,在2020年10月至2021年6月之间进行了涉及278名药学专业学生的横断面研究。在药房课程中,约有42.44%的人更喜欢面对面讲师,而不是其他授课方式。大多数参与者更喜欢积极学习和面对面讲座。结果显示,72.66%的受访者选择留在家中作为电子学习的特权之一。然而,与电子学习相关的主要障碍是缺乏患者参与和一些关于IT设备的技术问题,(74.82%)和(62.23%),分别。电子学习被视为缺乏社会存在,更少的社会接触,和连接的同步。然而,电子学习无疑在几个方面有利于学生。在线学习是学生在危机时期实现学业的重要讲台。
    This study is designed to evaluate students\' knowledge and perceptions about the online learning of pharmacy curricula in Iraq during the COVID-19 quarantine. A descriptive, cross-sectional study involving 278 pharmacy students was done between October 2020 and June 2021. About 42.44% preferred face-face lecturers over other modes of delivery for lectures in the pharmacy curriculum. Most participants preferred both active learning and face-face lectures. The results show that 72.66% of responders chose to stay at home as one of the privileges of e-learning. However, the main barriers that associated with e-learning were lack of patient involvement and some technical issues regarding IT equipment, (74.82%) and (62.23%), respectively. E-learning is seen as a lack of social presence, less social contact, and synchronization of connections. However, e-learning undoubtedly benefits students in several ways. Online learning is an essential podium for students to achieve their studies in periods of crisis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于COVID-19大流行,阿拉伯海湾大学的医学教育被指示在大学的所有教学阶段应用在线教学,而不是面对面教学。第一阶段涉及向一年级学生提供的基础科学课程。我们进行了这项研究,以检测在线和面对面学习方式之间医学生的表现是否存在任何差异。此外,在COVID-19之前和期间,对男性和女性在科学课程中的表现进行了比较。
    参与者是2018年至2019年COVID-19之前和2020年至2021年COVID-19期间的一年级学生。该大学使用Moodle和Zoom作为在线教学方式。将学生在第一年(三学期)在线教学期间的表现与COVID-19之前的传统教学的三学期表现进行了比较。这是一项回顾性研究,试图阐明AGU在一年级(第一阶段)学生在线学习中的体验效率。这项研究评估了两者的结果,科学课程的在线和面对面考试。
    结果表明,除生物统计学课程外,在冠状病毒大流行期间,一年级医学生在所有基础科学课程(第一阶段)中的平均表现均大于大流行前的平均表现。按性别划分的结果表明,在冠状病毒之前的所有科学课程中,女性的平均表现都优于男性。此外,在COVID大流行期间,在所有基础科学课程中,女性的平均表现都优于男性。
    1年级学生在冠状病毒期间的科学课程表现似乎比COVID19时代之前更好。在这两个时期,女性的表现都优于男性;在COVID-19时期之前和期间。
    UNASSIGNED: As a result of COVID-19 pandemic, medical education at the Arabian Gulf University was instructed to apply online teaching instead of face-to-face for all phases of teaching at the University. Phase-1 is concerned with basic science courses delivered to year 1 students. We conducted this study to detect if there are any differences in the performance of medical students between online and face-to-face ways of learning. Also, a comparison between male and female performance in scientific courses was carried out in pre and during COVID-19 periods.
    UNASSIGNED: The participant were first year students for pre COVID-19 period from 2018 to 2019 and during COVID-19 period from 2020 to 2021. The university used Moodle and Zoom as an online way of teaching. The students\' performance in the year 1 (three-semester) -online period of teaching were compared with a three-semester-performance of conventional teaching prior to COVID-19. This is a retrospective study that attempts to shed some light on the efficiency of AGU experience in online learning for year 1 (Phase I) students. This study evaluates the outcome of both, online and face-to-face examinations for scientific courses.
    UNASSIGNED: The results showed that the mean performance of year one medical students in all basic scientific courses (Phase I) during the coronavirus pandemic was greater than the mean performance before the pandemic with the exception of the Biostatistics course. The results by gender showed that the mean performance of females was better than males across all scientific courses before coronavirus. Also, during the COVID pandemic, the mean performance of females was better than males in all basic science courses.
    UNASSIGNED: Year -1 students\' performance in science courses during the coronavirus period seems better than pre COVID19 era. Females\' performance was better than males\' in both periods; pre and during COVID -19 periods.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行颠覆了全球的教育系统。在这个充满挑战的时期,大学和学院寻找其他有效的替代学习方法,例如虚拟学习环境(VL)。此外,阿哈利亚大学已经针对COVID-19实施了电子学习。需要更多地关注室内设计和建筑项目与技术采用相关的挑战,超过60%的课程是实用的,尤其是设计工作室,构成课程的核心。根据相关文献的回顾,需要对室内设计和建筑中的混合学习进行更多的研究。为了加强室内设计与建筑专业的教学与学习,需要进一步的研究来结合尖端技术和技术。这项研究的目的是审查阿赫利亚大学室内设计工作室的课堂材料。方法:在2022年3月中旬完成INTD212,INTD216,INTD311和INTD404工作室后,进行了简短的Qualtrics调查,以评估电子学习的困难并提供潜在的后果。结果:尽管学生可以方便地在线上课程,没有像面对面模式那样的讨论和互动。设计工作室课程中的混合教学提供了许多好处。结果表明,随着学生知识的发展,混合设计工作室取得了教学效果。结论:根据调查结果,这项研究的结论是,教学和学习应该从面对面和在线学习转变为混合形式的最佳实践。
    Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic upended the educational system around the globe. During this challenging period, universities and colleges looked for other effective alternative methods of learning, such as Virtual Learning Environments (VL). Besides, Ahlia University has implemented E-learning in response to COVID-19. There needs to be more attention given to the challenges associated with technology adoption facing interior design and architecture programs, where over 60% of courses are practical, especially design studios, which form the core of the curriculum. According to a review of the relevant literature, there needs to be more research on blended learning in interior design and architecture. In order to enhance the teaching and learning of interior design and architecture, further research is required to combine cutting-edge techniques and technology. The aim of this study was to review the classroom materials for Ahlia University\'s interior design studio. Methods: After completing the INTD 212, INTD 216, INTD 311, and INTD 404 studios in mid-March 2022, a short Qualtrics poll was done to assess the difficulties of e-learning and offer potential consequences. Results: Though students were conveniently attending courses online, there was not much discussion and interaction like in the face-to-face model. Blended teaching in design studio courses offered many benefits. The results showed that blended design studios achieved pedagogical results as students developed their knowledge. Conclusions: Based on the findings, this research concludes that teaching and learning should be shifted from face-to-face and online learning to the best practice of a blended format.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:医学和牙科学生接受在线课程,特别是在2019年冠状病毒病危机期间,是实质性的,正如各种研究报告的那样。然而,还强调了学生在大流行期间不利的在线学习经历。随着教学过程回到“新常态”,“有必要确定在大流行危机期间实施的在线学习领域,这些领域可能会在未来的临床前课程中应用。
    方法:经过验证的学生在线学习准备度问卷评估了临床前学生的在线学习能力。将学生在大流行后面对面的学业成绩与大流行危机期间在在线环境中的表现进行了比较。使用自制的调查问卷评估学生对在线学习的满意度。描述性统计,t检验,和多元回归分析用于分析p值≤0.05的数据,这些数据被认为具有统计学意义.
    结果:除了与同学和同伴的社交技巧,其中47.5%的受访者表示不愿意,大多数学生都为在线学习做好了准备。理论上,在线学习者的表现优于传统学习者,但差别不大.相比之下,学生在面对面模式中的实践技能明显更高(p=0.029)。学生对在线学习的满意度在与教师和员工的互动方面较高,在与同学和小组伙伴的互动以及技能获取方面较低。
    结论:提供高质量的临床前在线教学是针对理论组成部分而不是实践技能获取实现的。学生与同龄人的社会参与是在线学习成功的关键因素之一。学术领导者和课程开发人员必须认识到潜在的差距,因为他们过渡到在线学习。
    BACKGROUND: The acceptance of online courses by medical and dental students, especially during the coronavirus disease 2019 crisis, is substantial, as reported in various studies. However, the unfavourable online learning experiences of the students during the pandemic were also highlighted. As the teaching-learning process is returning to the \"new normal,\" it is necessary to identify online learning domains implemented during the pandemic crisis that may be applied in pre-clinical courses in the future.
    METHODS: A validated Student Online Learning Readiness questionnaire assessed pre-clinical students\' online learning competence. Students\' academic performance in face-to-face post-pandemic was compared with their performance in online settings during the pandemic crisis. Students\' satisfaction with online learning was evaluated using a self-made survey questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, the t-test, and multiple regression analysis were used to analyze the data gathered with a p-value ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant.
    RESULTS: Except for social skills with classmates and groupmates, in which 47.5% of respondents indicated unreadiness, most students were prepared for online learning. Theory-wise, online learners outperformed traditional learners, but the difference was insignificant. In contrast, students\' practical skills in face-to-face modality are significantly higher (p = 0.029). Students rated their satisfaction with online learning higher for interactions with instructors and staff and lower for interactions with classmates and group mates and skill acquisition.
    CONCLUSIONS: Providing high-quality pre-clinical online teaching was achieved for theoretical components but not practical skills acquisition. Students\' social engagement with peers is one of the key elements crucial to online learning success. Academic leaders and curriculum developers must recognize potential gaps as they transition to online learning.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    SARS-CoV-2冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行正在不断演变,就像病毒一样,我们必须学会适应我们的本科教育和学习策略,使学生能够完成学业。这篇叙述性综述侧重于目前已知的在COVID-19大流行期间,在资源有限的环境中,本科医学生的面对面和电子学习策略。大多数研究,涉及健康专业学生,发生在2020年。很少有教育工作者参与。学生面临着向远程学习过渡的挑战,为此设计了几种干预措施。弥合远程学习的访问和利用方面的差距可能需要更多的时间,然而,COVID-19大流行加速了学习曲线和从面对面学习到在线学习的过渡。
    The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic is in constant evolution, much like the virus, and we must learn to adapt our undergraduate education and learning strategies to enable students to complete their studies. This narrative review focuses on what is currently known about the face-to-face and e-learning strategies of undergraduate medical students in resource-limited settings during the COVID-19 pandemic. The majority of studies, involving health professional students, took place in 2020. Few involved educators. Students have faced challenges with the transition to remote learning, for which a couple of interventions have been devised. Bridging the gap in access and utilisation of remote learning might have required more time, however, the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the learning curve and the transition from in-person to online learning.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们提出了一种超扫描研究设计,其中脑电图(EEG)数据是由讲师和学习者团队收集的。我们比较了频域内的神经生理测量(delta,theta,阿尔法,和β脑电图带)在两种情况下:面对面和远程设置。使用可穿戴EEG系统进行数据收集。对话分析以前用于检测可比的EEG时间块和语义主题。培训的数字化可以被认为是一个挑战,但也是组织的机会。然而,如果不小心处理,它可能构成一个关键。有限的研究探索了多么遥远,而不是面对面,训练影响认知,(如记忆和注意力),情感,和工作组中的社会进程。数据显示阿尔法去同步,相反,面对面条件的θ和β同步。此外,学员根据设置条件显示不同的β功率模式,在面对面的条件下,功率谱密度(PSD)显着增加。这些结果突出了神经生理学措施在测试电子学习过程中的相关性,关于情感上的参与,内存编码,注意处理。
    We propose a hyperscanning research design, where electroencephalographic (EEG) data were collected on an instructor and teams of learners. We compared neurophysiological measures within the frequency domain (delta, theta, alpha, and beta EEG bands) in the two conditions: face-to-face and remote settings. Data collection was carried out using wearable EEG systems. Conversational analysis was previously applied to detect comparable EEG time blocks and semantic topics. The digitalization of training can be considered a challenge but also a chance for organizations. However, if not carefully addressed, it might constitute a criticality. Limited research explored how remote, as opposed to face-to-face, training affects cognitive, (such as memory and attention), affective, and social processes in workgroups. Data showed an alpha desynchronization and, conversely, a theta and beta synchronization for the face-to-face condition. Moreover, trainees showed different patterns for beta power depending on the setting condition, with significantly increased power spectral density (PSD) in the face-to-face condition. These results highlight the relevance of neurophysiological measures in testing the e-learning process, in relation to the emotional engagement, memory encoding, and attentional processing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在COVID-19大流行期间实施的限制措施对正式的教学过程提出了显着挑战,因为必须对其进行调整以确保健康安全。应用于三种环境的主动学习计划(室内,户外,并在线)在一项学科内实验研究中对273名本科生进行了测试。每个学生被分配到两个室内和两个室外研讨会,一个子样本(n=30)也参加了响应大学封锁协议而实施的在线研讨会。通过六个维度对学习体验和学习条件进行评估:学习,评估影响,享乐体验,技术条件,环境条件,和健康安全。就学习经验而言,户外研讨会比室内研讨会更有效,享乐体验的差异更大,虽然室内研讨会在学习条件方面的评价高于室外研讨会,环境条件差异较大。在学习体验方面,在线和面对面环境之间没有发现差异,尽管在线环境在学习条件下取得了更好的成绩。显然,这种通过积极的方法适应户外和在线环境允许克服技术,环境,和教学限制,并改善健康安全,同时确保良好的学习体验和增加教学过程的灵活性。
    UNASSIGNED:在线版本包含补充材料,可在10.1007/s10984-023-09456-y获得。
    The restriction measures put in place during the COVID-19 pandemic posed notable challenges for formal teaching-learning processes because they had to be adapted to ensure health security. An active learning programme applied to three environments (indoors, outdoors, and online) was tested with 273 undergraduate university students in a within-subjects experimental study. Each student was assigned to two indoor and two outdoor seminars, with a subsample (n = 30) also participating in online seminars implemented in response to the university\'s lockdown protocols. The learning experience and learning conditions were evaluated through six dimensions: learning, evaluative impact, hedonic experience, technical conditions, environmental conditions, and health security. Outdoor seminars were more effective than indoor seminars in terms of the learning experience, with greater differences in hedonic experience, while the indoor seminars were rated more highly than the outdoor seminars in terms of learning conditions, with a larger difference in the environmental conditions. No differences were found between online and face-to-face environments in terms of the learning experience, even though the online environment yielded better scores in the learning conditions. Apparently, this adaptation to both outdoor and online contexts through active methodologies allows overcoming of technical, environmental, and teaching limitations and improves health security, while ensuring a good learning experience and added flexibility to teaching-learning processes.
    UNASSIGNED: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10984-023-09456-y.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号