FRN

FRN
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    金钱损失与痛苦之间的关系一直是最近的研究热点。先前的研究发现,金钱损失和痛苦的网络表示模式相似,尤其是社会痛苦。然而,缺乏神经水平的证据。为了解决这个问题,我们进行了一项ERP实验,以研究金钱损失对社交疼痛的神经活动是否存在重复抑制作用,旨在了解它们是否参与重叠的神经元群体。结果表明,FRN振幅显示出金钱损失对社交疼痛神经活动的重复抑制作用。我们的研究表明,金钱损失和社会痛苦有着共同的神经基础,表明它们可能涉及与认知冲突和情感评估相关的共享神经模块。
    The relationship between monetary loss and pain has been a recent research focus. Prior studies found similarities in the network representation patterns of monetary loss and pain, particularly social pain. However, the neural level evidence was lacking. To address this, we conducted an ERP experiment to investigate whether there is a repetitive suppression effect of monetary loss on the neural activity of social pain, aiming to understand if they engage overlapping neuronal populations. The results revealed that FRN amplitudes showed repetitive suppression effects of monetary loss on the neural activity of social pain. Our study suggests that monetary loss and social pain share common neural bases, indicating that they might involve shared neural modules related to cognitive conflict and affective appraisal.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    社会比较是我们日常生活中的普遍现象,人们通过它来了解自己,并在抑郁症中起重要作用。在这项研究中,事件相关电位(ERP)用于探索阈值下抑郁组社会比较处理的时间过程.在进行适应的点估计任务时,从30个亚阈值抑郁个体和31个健康个体获得了电生理记录。ERP结果显示,在社会比较过程中,反馈相关的负性(FRN)存在显着差异。尤其是在亚阈值抑郁症中,比某些情况更差的FRN振幅,比许多比较更好的是大于向上比较和向下比较。我们的结果表明,异常的奖励敏感性比一些人更糟糕,比许多比较更好的可能是阈下抑郁症的前驱症状。
    Social comparison is a common phenomenon in our daily life, through which people get to know themselves, and plays an important role in depression. In this study, event-related potential (ERP) was used to explore the temporal course of social comparison processing in the subthreshold depression group. Electrophysiological recordings were acquired from 30 subthreshold depressed individuals and 31 healthy individuals while they conducted the adapted dot estimation task. The ERP results revealed that there was a significant difference of feedback-related negativity (FRN) in the process of social comparison. Especially only in the subthreshold depression, the FRN amplitudes of worse off than some, better off than many comparisons were larger than those of upward comparisons and downward comparisons. Our results suggested that the abnormal reward sensitivity for worse off than some, better off than many comparisons might be prodromal symptoms in the subthreshold depression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,许多研究探索了社会支配地位的概念及其对行为科学和认知科学中领导能力的影响。本研究旨在通过调查社会支配的心理测量与领导者样本中的神经特征之间的关联来解决有关社会支配的神经相关性的差距。30名健康的男性志愿者从事货币赌博任务,同时记录了他们的静息状态和基于任务的脑电图数据。结果表明,社交优势与中央电极中的静息状态β振荡之间存在正相关。此外,在获得过程中,社会优势和基于任务的反应时间以及事件相关电位的反馈相关负分量的幅度之间观察到负相关,但不是损失条件。这些发现表明,社会优势与增强的奖励处理有关,这对社会和人际互动具有影响。
    Numerous studies have explored the concept of social dominance and its implications for leadership within the behavioral and cognitive sciences in recent years. The current study aims to address the gap regarding the neural correlates of social dominance by investigating the associations between psychological measures of social dominance and neural features among a sample of leaders. Thirty healthy male volunteers engaged in a monetary gambling task while their resting-state and task-based electroencephalography data were recorded. The results revealed a positive association between social dominance and resting-state beta oscillations in central electrodes. Furthermore, a negative association was observed between social dominance and task-based reaction time as well as the amplitude of the feedback-related negativity component of the event-related potentials during the gain, but not the loss condition. These findings suggest that social dominance is associated with enhanced reward processing which has implications for social and interpersonal interactions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    学习往往涉及到试错,即重复导致预期结果的行为,当结果不符合我们的预期,从而导致预测误差(PE)时,调整行为。PE已被证明反映在奖励积极性(RewP)中,行为反馈后200至350ms之间的事件相关电位(ERP)成分,该成分与纹状体处理相关,并通过脑电图(EEG)进行评估。在这里,我们表明,这也适用于延迟反馈处理,已经提出了海马体的关键作用。我们发现延迟反馈的RewP普遍降低,但是PE同样反映在RewP和后来的P300中,用于即时和延迟的正反馈,而负反馈没有发现效果。我们的研究结果表明,尽管即时反馈和延迟反馈之间的处理差异,积极的PE驱动反馈处理和学习,而不管延迟。
    Learning often involves trial-and-error, i.e. repeating behaviours that lead to desired outcomes, and adjusting behaviour when outcomes do not meet our expectations and thus lead to prediction errors (PEs). PEs have been shown to be reflected in the reward positivity (RewP), an event-related potential (ERP) component between 200 and 350 ms after performance feedback which is linked to striatal processing and assessed via electroencephalography (EEG). Here we show that this is also true for delayed feedback processing, for which a critical role of the hippocampus has been suggested. We found a general reduction of the RewP for delayed feedback, but the PE was similarly reflected in the RewP and the later P300 for immediate and delayed positive feedback, while no effect was found for negative feedback. Our results suggest that, despite processing differences between immediate and delayed feedback, positive PEs drive feedback processing and learning irrespective of delay.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:先前的研究发现,不同效价(正/负/中性)的附带情绪会影响风险决策。然而,它们对决策结果心理预期的影响机制尚不清楚.
    方法:我们探索了不同的附带情绪对行为的影响,心理,和个人在风险决策中通过金钱赌博任务使用单向(情感类型:积极,负,中性情绪)受试者间的实验设计。
    结果:在决策选择阶段,具有积极情绪的个体寻求风险率明显高于具有消极情绪的个体(p<.01)。在决策结果的反馈阶段,与中性反馈相比,个体在损益反馈下对决策环境的不确定性表现出更强的感知,如更正的P2分量(即,事件相关电位的第二个正成分)。积极情绪比中性情绪产生的结果偏差大于预期,如更负的FRN成分(即,与反馈相关的消极性成分)。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,积极的情绪会增加个体对决策结果的心理期望。本研究为理解偶然情绪对风险决策结果预期的影响提供了新的经验见解。
    BACKGROUND: Previous research has found that incidental emotions of different valences (positive/negative/neutral) influence risky decision-making. However, the mechanism of their influence on psychological expectations of decision outcomes remains unclear.
    METHODS: We explored the effects of different incidental emotions on the behavioral, psychological, and electrophysiological responses of individuals in risky decision-making through a money gambling task using a one-way (emotion type: positive, negative, neutral emotions) between-subjects experimental design.
    RESULTS: Individuals with positive emotions had significantly greater risk-seeking rates than those with negative emotions during the decision selection phase (p < .01). In the feedback stage of decision outcomes, individuals showed stronger perceptions of uncertainty in the decision environment under gain and loss feedback compared with neutral feedback, as evidenced by a more positive P2 component (i.e., the second positive component of an event-related potential). Positive emotions produced greater than expected outcome bias than neutral emotions, as evidenced by a more negative FRN component (i.e., the feedback-related negativity component).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that positive emotions increase individuals\' psychological expectations of decision outcomes. This study provides new empirical insights to understand the influence of incidental emotions on risky decision outcome expectations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    社会影响力在青少年时期起着至关重要的作用,青少年对同龄人表现出更高的敏感性。在这项研究中,我们研究来自不同来源的社会影响,特别是那些具有不同规范和信息意义的人,影响青少年的意见改变。此外,我们研究了潜在的神经动力学,以确定这两种行为相似的影响是否具有共同的神经机制。23名参与者(14-17岁)发表了关于面部刺激的意见,并收到了来自同行小组或专家组的反馈,同时使用脑磁图记录大脑反应。在第二次评级会议中,我们发现参与者的意见随着相互矛盾的反馈而改变,但只有当反馈低于他们最初的评估。在神经层面,在230-400ms时间窗口和右额颞部磁力计通道中,与同行的冲突比与专家的冲突引起更强的神经反应。然而,对同龄人没有更大的一致性。此外,与无冲突相比,冲突减少了右额叶和顶叶通道在β频率范围(20-26Hz)内的神经振荡。一起来看,我们的发现不支持青少年行为过于容易受到同伴规范影响的一般假设,尽管我们发现神经对同伴反馈的敏感性增强。
    Social influence plays a crucial role during the teen years, with adolescents supposedly exhibiting heightened sensitivity to their peers. In this study, we examine how social influence from different sources, particularly those with varying normative and informational significance, affect adolescents\' opinion change. Furthermore, we investigated the underlying neural dynamics to determine whether these two behaviorally similar influences share their neural mechanisms. Twenty-three participants (14-17 years old) gave their opinions about facial stimuli and received feedback from either a peer group or an expert group, while brain responses were recorded using concurrent magnetoencephalography. In a second rating session, we found that participants\' opinions changed in line with conflicting feedback, but only when the feedback was lower than their initial evaluation. On the neural level, conflict with peers evoked stronger neural responses than conflict with experts in the 230-400 ms time window and the right frontotemporal magnetometer channels. Nevertheless, there was no greater conformity toward peers. Moreover, conflict compared to no conflict decreased neural oscillations in the beta frequency range (20-26 Hz) at the right frontal and parietal channels. Taken together, our findings do not support the general assumption that adolescent behavior is excessively vulnerable to peer norms, although we found heightened neural sensitivity to peer feedback.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着30多年前错误引起的事件相关电位的发现,绩效监控研究的新途径,认知控制,决策出现了。从那以后,该领域迅速发展和扩大。在简要概述了性能监测的脑电图相关性之后,本文回顾了基于使用独立成分分析的单次试验分析的最新进展,多元回归,和多元模式分类。鉴于性能监控和强化学习之间的紧密联系,计算建模和基于模型的脑电分析产生了特别强烈的影响。审查的结果表明,与错误和反馈相关的EEG动力学代表变量,这些变量反映了如何对性能监控信号进行加权并将其转换为指导未来决策和行动的适应信号。基于模型的单次试验分析方法远远超出了事件相关电位的常规峰谷分析,并且能够测试性能监测的机械理论,认知控制,和决策。
    With the discovery of event-related potentials elicited by errors more than 30 years ago, a new avenue of research on performance monitoring, cognitive control, and decision making emerged. Since then, the field has developed and expanded fulminantly. After a brief overview on the EEG correlates of performance monitoring, this article reviews recent advancements based on single-trial analyses using independent component analysis, multiple regression, and multivariate pattern classification. Given the close interconnection between performance monitoring and reinforcement learning, computational modeling and model-based EEG analyses have made a particularly strong impact. The reviewed findings demonstrate that error- and feedback-related EEG dynamics represent variables reflecting how performance-monitoring signals are weighted and transformed into an adaptation signal that guides future decisions and actions. The model-based single-trial analysis approach goes far beyond conventional peak-and-trough analyses of event-related potentials and enables testing mechanistic theories of performance monitoring, cognitive control, and decision making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:多年来的研究已经探索了社会规范对运动行为的影响。然而,关于个人在他或她的社交网络中的角色(中央或外围)是否鲜为人知,这与社交技能有关,可能会改变他或她对锻炼行为的规范性影响的敏感性。为此,记录事件相关电位(ERP),以检查网络中心性对规范社会影响的潜在认知机制。
    方法:我们通过将参与者分配到运动支持小组来操纵网络中心性,小组成员是他们提名的朋友(高中心)或非提名的同学(低中心)。参与者被要求评估他们参与各种练习的意愿,在查看不同的组评级(同行影响)或不查看(无影响)之后。
    结果:同伴影响引起更大的负反馈相关负波(FRN),这与自动社会冲突检测有关,和一个更大的正向P3波,这与随后的合规行为变化有关。然而,对FRN的影响,不是P3,仅在高中心组中观察到。
    结论:我们的结果强调了网络中心性在编码自我群体运动态度差异中的重要作用,而不是在运动态度调整的决策中。应在更广泛的社会环境框架中考虑旨在促进运动行为的干预措施。
    The influence of social norms on exercise behaviors has been explored in studies over the years. However, little is known about whether an individual\'s role (central or peripheral) in his or her social network, which is associated with social skills, could shift his or her susceptibility to normative effects on exercise behaviors. To that end, event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded to examine the underlying cognitive mechanism of the effects of network centrality on normative social influence.
    We manipulated network centrality by assigning participants to exercise support groups, with group members who were their nominated friends (high centrality) or nonnominated classmates (low centrality). Participants were asked to evaluate their willingness to engage in various exercises, after viewing discrepant group ratings (peer influence) or not viewing (no-influence).
    Peer influence evoked a larger negative-going feedback-related negativity (FRN) wave, which was linked to automatic social conflict detection, and a larger positive-going P3 wave, which was linked to subsequent conformity behavioral changes. However, effects on the FRN, not the P3, were observed only in the high-centrality group.
    Our results highlight the important roles of network centrality in encoding self-group exercise attitude discrepancy rather than in decision-making regarding exercise attitude adjustments. Interventions aimed at promoting exercise behaviors should be considered in a broader social environmental framework.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管情绪和动机对认知的影响是有据可查的,这三个因素的相互作用很少被研究。这里,我们使用脑电图(EEG)检查了自主选择-作为内在动机和情绪刺激内容的实验性操作对任务准备和参与时间产生任务的影响.行为结果表明,时间处理的调节取决于选择和情绪内容。潜在的EEG信号揭示了在任务和反应准备过程中对偶然负变化(CNV)的选择以及后期正电位(LPP)上的情绪内容的差异调制,以响应时间产生过程中情绪画面的发作。此外,我们获得了选择和情感内容对LPP的交互影响的初步证据。响应于有关时间生产成功的信息的反馈相关的消极性(FRN)也受到选择和情感内容的相互作用的影响。这些发现表明,除了动机和情绪的单独影响外,任务参与过程中可能存在时间窗口,其中两个因素共同影响认知过程。这些结果被解释为注意力资源分配的动态调制。
    Even though effects of emotion and motivation on cognition are well documented, the interaction of all three factors is rarely investigated. Here, we used electroencephalography (EEG) to examine the effects of self-determined choice-as an experimental manipulation of intrinsic motivation - and emotional stimulus content on task preparation and engagement in a temporal production task. Behavioral results indicated a modulation of time processing depending on choice and emotional content. Underlying EEG signals revealed differential modulations by choice on the contingent negative variation (CNV) during task and response preparation and by emotional content on the late positive potential (LPP) in response to the onset of an emotional picture during temporal production. Also, we obtained preliminary evidence for interaction effects of choice and emotional content on the LPP. The feedback-related negativity (FRN) in response to information regarding temporal production success was also affected by interactions of choice and emotional content. These findings indicate that besides separate effects of motivation and emotion, there may be time windows during task engagement in which both factors jointly affect cognitive processing. These results are interpreted as dynamic modulations of attentional resource allocation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自我建构(SC)描述了人们如何看待自己与他人之间的关系,通常分为相互依赖和独立的类型。关于独立和相互依赖的SC人如何处理自己和他人的结果,已经进行了几项研究。然而,很少有研究在社会比较背景下调查SC对结果评估的影响。为了探索这个,我们将参与者随机分配到相互依赖和独立的SC启动组,并分析了他们与两名伪玩家进行赌博游戏时产生的影响和电生理反应.结果表明,自我赌博状态,SC,和社会比较相互作用,影响反馈相关的消极性(FRN)。在自赢的条件下,对于相互依存和独立的群体,与其他群体不同的表现引起的负FRN比均匀度更大。在自我丧失的情况下,这种效应仅在独立组中发现.这些结果表明,社会环境中的结果评估模式不是固定的,而是根据自我赌博状态和SC而有所不同。
    Self-construal (SC) describes how people perceive the relationship between themselves and others and is usually divided into interdependent and independent types. Several studies have been conducted on how people with independent and interdependent SC process their own and others\' outcomes. However, few studies have investigated the influence of SC on outcome evaluation in a social comparison context. To explore this, we randomly assigned participants to interdependent and independent SC priming groups and analyzed the affects and electrophysiological responses generated when they played gambling games with two pseudo-players. The results showed that self-gambling state, SC, and social comparison interacted to influence feedback-related negativity (FRN). In the self-win condition, performances that differed from others elicited more negative FRN than evenness for both the interdependent and independent groups. In the self-loss condition, this effect was only found in the independent group. These results suggest that the outcome evaluation patterns in social contexts are not fixed but vary according to self-gambling state and SC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号