BACKGROUND: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a major component of gastrointestinal cancer treatments. In multidrug regimens such as FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, and FOLFIRINOX, 5-FU is commonly administered as a bolus followed by an infusion. However, the pharmacologic rationale for incorporating the 5-FU bolus in these regimens is unclear, and there are other effective regimens for gastrointestinal cancers that do not include the bolus. The purpose of this study was to determine whether omission of the 5-FU bolus was associated with a difference in survival and toxicity.
METHODS: A real-world database from Flatiron Health was queried for patients with advanced colorectal, gastroesophageal, and pancreatic cancers who received first-line FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, and FOLFIRINOX regimens. Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to compare survival outcomes between patients who received the 5-FU bolus and those who did not. Inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) analysis was performed to adjust for treatment selection bias.
RESULTS: This study included 11,765 patients with advanced colorectal (n=8,670), gastroesophageal (n=1,481), and pancreatic (n=1,614) cancers. Among all first-line 5-FU multidrug regimens, 10,148 (86.3%) patients received a 5-FU bolus and 1,617 (13.7%) did not. After IPTW analysis, we found that omitting the bolus was not associated with a decrease in overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.91-1.07; P=.74). However, omitting the bolus was associated with reductions in neutropenia (10.7% vs 22.7%; P<.01), thrombocytopenia (11.2% vs 16.1%; P<.01), and use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors after treatment (19.6% vs 29.1%; P<.01).
CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for baseline clinical factors, we found that omission of the 5-FU bolus from FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, and FOLFIRINOX regimens was not associated with decreased survival, but resulted in decreased toxicity and possible health care savings.

UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to provide a review of the clinical evidence for use of ramucirumab (RAM) plus folinic acid (leucovorin), fluorouracil (5-FU), and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) or irinotecan as second-line treatment in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA).
UNASSIGNED: A systematic and comprehensive search of PubMed was performed to identify phase 2 clinical trials or retrospective studies using RAM plus FOLFIRI or irinotecan in GEA, including abstracts from major congresses, in addition to published manuscripts. An aggregated review and meta-analysis was performed to assess the effectiveness (overall response rate [ORR] as primary outcome) and safety data of RAM plus FOLFIRI or irinotecan. ORR for each study was calculated with 95% confidence interval estimated from normal approximation. To generate the combined ORR with 95% confidence interval, random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize response data from available studies.
UNASSIGNED: Six studies were identified with non-overlapping populations, 3 phase 2 clinical trials and 3 retrospective studies. Across these studies the ORR ranged from 22% to 38%, and pooled ORR was 25.4%. Two of the 3 studies reported better ORR in patients pretreated with taxanes followed by RAM plus FOLFIRI. Treatment with RAM plus FOLFIRI or irinotecan was well tolerated. Neutropenia and diarrhea were the most common adverse events reported across studies.
UNASSIGNED: The studies examined in this review suggest that RAM plus FOLFIRI or irinotecan have activity in previously treated GEA irrespective of prior-taxane use. Overall, RAM plus FOLFIRI or irinotecan was well tolerated with no new safety concerns identified beyond established profiles for these regimens.

Aflibercept (AFL) plus FOLFIRI prolongs overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, there is limited evidence on the efficacy and safety of AFL plus FOLFIRI previously treated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) agents. Therefore, we conducted a prospective open-label phase II trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of AFL plus FOLFIRI in Japanese patients with mCRC failing a prior oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy plus an anti-EGFR agent. AFL (4 mg/kg iv) followed by FOLFIRI (irinotecan 180 mg/m2, leucovorin 200 mg/m2 iv, bolus 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] 400 mg/m2, and infusional 5-FU 2400 mg/m2/46 h) was given every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicities. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months. Forty three patients were enrolled between November 2019 and October 2022. The primary endpoint was met: 6-month PFS rate was 58.8% (90% confidence interval [CI], 45.7%-72.0%). Median PFS and OS were 7.3 months (95% CI, 5.5-11.0 months) and 18.8 months (95% CI, 12.9-26.6 months), respectively. The overall response rate was 20.9% (95% CI, 10.0-36.0%) and disease control rate was 88.4% (95% CI, 74.9-96.1%). The main grade ≥3 adverse events included hypertension (62.8%), neutropenia (55.8%), leukopenia (25.6%), febrile neutropenia (11.6%), fatigue (9.3%), anorexia (9.3%), proteinuria (9.3%), and diarrhea (7.0%). No deaths and no new safety signals with a causal relation to the study treatment were observed. This study suggests that AFL plus FOLFIRI shows a high response rate and a manageable safety profile in Japanese patients with mCRC who failed prior oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy plus an anti-EGFR agent.

UNASSIGNED: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of maintenance regimens based on cetuximab, we conducted a real-world, single-arm, retrospective study at a single center.
UNASSIGNED: In Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who received cetuximab-based maintenance therapy between December 2020 and December 2021 were included. All patients had RAS and BRAF wild-type. The maintenance regimen consisted of 6-12 cycles of cetuximab plus irinotecan (Phase 1) and cetuximab (Phase 2). Patients could receive reintroduction therapy in case of disease progression during Phase 2. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety data were collected.
UNASSIGNED: According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study, a total of 108 subjects who received maintenance therapy were included- 51 experienced disease progression during Phase 1, with PFS (1) of 7.3 months. Among the 52 patients who entered Phase 2, 17 were still in this phase at the end of follow-up, with PFS (2) of 10.1 months. In Phase 2, 35 patients experienced disease progression, of whom 24 received reintroduction therapy, with PFS (3) of 6.7 months. The overall PFS (total) during the maintenance period was 11.9 months, and the OS was 39.2 months. Grade III or higher adverse events were 4.6% during Phase 1 and 0% during Phase 2.
UNASSIGNED: Innovative cetuximab-based maintenance therapy showed a trend toward improving the prognosis of mCRC patients with RAS and BRAF wild-type, while the toxic side effects of maintenance therapy were manageable.
UNASSIGNED: https://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2000040940.

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine Carcinomas (NECs) prognosis is poor.No standard second-line therapy is currently recognized after failure of platinum-based first-line treatment. FOLFIRI and CAPTEM regimens have shown promising activity in preliminary studies. We aimed to evaluate these regimens in metastatic NEC patients.
METHODS: This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized non-comparative phase II trial to evaluate the activity and safety of FOLFIRI or CAPTEM in metastatic NEC patients. Primary endpoints were the 12 weeks-Disease Control Rate (12w-DCR) by investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1 and safety per CTCAE v5.0. Additional endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients\' serum samples were subject to NGS miRNome profiling in comparison with healthy donors to reveal differentially expressed miRNAs as candidate circulating biomarkers.
RESULTS: The study was halted for futility at interim analysis, as the minimum 12w-DCR threshold of 10 out of 25 patients required for the first step was not reached. From 06/03/2017 to 18/01/2021, 53 out of 112 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 22.6 months (range: 1.4-60.4). The 12w-DCR was 39.1 % in the FOLFIRI arm and 28.0 % in the CAPTEM arm. In the FOLFIRI subgroup the 12-months OS rate was 28.4 % (95 % CI: 12.7-46.5) while in the CAPTEM subgroup it was 32.4 % (95 % CI: 14.9-51.3). The most common G3-G4 side effects were neutropenia (n = 5, 18.5 %) and anemia (n = 2, 7.4 %) for FOLFIRI and G3-G4 thrombocytopenia (n = 2, 8.0 %), G4 nausea/vomiting (n = 1, 4.0 %) for CAPTEM. Three microRNAs emerged as NEC independent predictors. High expression values were found to be significantly associated with decreased PFS and OS.
CONCLUSIONS: The safety profile of FOLFIRI and CAPTEM was manageable. FOLFIRI and CAPTEM chemotherapy showed comparable activity in the second-line setting after progression on etoposide/platinum.
RESULTS:
UNASSIGNED: NCT03387592.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) beyond second line is still questioned. Besides the standard of care agents (regorafenib, REG, or trifluridine/tipiracil, FTD/TPI), chemotherapy rechallenge or reintroduction (CTr/r) are commonly considered in clinical practice, despite weak supporting evidence. The prognostic performance of CTr/r, REG and FTD/TPI in this setting are herein evaluated.
METHODS: PROSERpYNa is a multicenter, observational, retrospective study, in which patients with refractory mCRC, progressing after at least 2 lines of CT, treated with CTr/r, REG or FTD/TPI, are considered eligible and were enrolled in 2 independent data sets (exploratory and validation). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (RR) and safety. A propensity score adjustment was accomplished for survival analyses.
RESULTS: Data referring to patients treated between Jan-10 and Jan-19 from 3 Italian institutions were gathered (341 and 181 treatments for exploratory and validation data sets respectively). In the exploratory cohort, median OS (18.5 vs. 6.5 months), PFS (6.1 vs. 3.5 months) and RR (28.6% vs. 1.4%) were significantly longer for CTr/r compared to REG/FTD/TPI. Survival benefits were retained at the propensity score analysis, adjusted for independent prognostic factors identified at multivariate analysis. Moreover, these results were confirmed within the validation cohort analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the retrospective fashion, CTr/r proved to be a valuable option in this setting in a real-world context, providing superior outcomes compared to standard of care agents at the price of a moderate toxicity.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, after failure of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, this trial compares the efficacy of second-line therapy with FOLFIRI vs. OFF (1:1 randomisation) with cross-over to the vice-versa regimen as third-line therapy.
METHODS: The primary endpoint was PFS (progression-free survival: time from randomization until progression or death) of second-line therapy. The trial aimed to demonstrate non-inferiority of FOLFIRI vs OFF (non-inferiority margin of a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.5, power of 80% and a significance level of 5%, 196 events needed). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival of third-line therapy and safety. The trial is registered with EudraCT Nr. 2016-004640-11.
RESULTS: The trial was terminated with 60 evaluable (37 with FOLFIRI, 23 with OFF) patients due to insufficient recruitment. PFS of second-line therapy was 2.4 (95% CI 2.3-2.6) months with FOLFIRI vs 2.4 (95% CI 2.2-2.7) months with OFF (HR: 0.80, 95% CI 0.45-1.42, P = 0.43). OS was comparable between the arms (HR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.54-1.66), P = 0.84). Only 4 out of 28 (14%) patients receiving third-line therapy achieved a disease control (partial remission or stable disease). Both second-line regimens were well tolerated without new or unexpected safety signals being observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The exploratory analysis of this early terminated trial suggests that FOLFIRI and OFF have similar efficacy ant toxicity as second-line therapy of PDAC after failure of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Third-line therapy regardless of regimen does not provide satisfactory efficacy in this sequential treatment algorithm.

BACKGROUND: Biliary tract carcinomas are cancers that, despite a lower prevalence compared with other gastrointestinal cancers, represent a significant public health burden due to their aggressiveness. The metastatic stage of the disease is highly lethal and difficult to treat. Options of systemic therapies, especially beyond the first line are few and less well established.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review of literature databases to identify studies of the combination of irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) based chemotherapy as treatment of metastatic biliary tract carcinomas in second line, after first line treatment with platinum/gemcitabine chemotherapy. Both prospective and retrospective designs were admissible. A meta-analysis of identified studies to determine summary estimates for overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was also performed.
RESULTS: The search was performed in PubMed/Medline and in Embase databases and identified a total of 339 articles. Manual review resulted in 8 articles that were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Second line irinotecan/5-FU based combinations produced an ORR of 9.1% (95% CI, 5.5%-12.6%) and DCR of 43.3% (95% CI, 15.8%-70.8%). Summary PFS and OS were 2.7 months (95% CI, 2.3-3.1 months) and 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.6-8.0 months), respectively. Treatments appeared to be feasible with adverse effect profiles as expected from the combination.
CONCLUSIONS: A moderate activity of second line irinotecan/5-FU based chemotherapy was observed in this meta-analysis. The combination is an option for patients progressing on platinum/gemcitabine chemotherapy, who maintain a sufficient general status to receive active therapy. This combination may also serve as the control arm of second line trials with new targeted agents.

BACKGROUND: This was an observational study prospectively evaluating the effectiveness and safety of aflibercept/FOLFIRI administered in second-line mCRC per the reimbursement criteria in Poland.
METHODS: Consecutive mCRC patients who progressed with first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy received aflibercept (4 mg/kg IV) followed by FOLFIRI every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS) and safety were the secondary endpoints.
RESULTS: A total of 93 patients were treated at 17 Polish sites. A median of 10 cycles was administered. Over a median treatment duration of 5.3 months, median PFS and median OS were 8.4 months [95% CI, 6.9-9.9] and 27.0 months [95% CI, 23.9-30.1], respectively. There was no significant impact of primary tumor location, metastatic site, or KRAS status on PFS and OS. Main grade ≥ 3 adverse events were neutropenia (16%), hypertension (8%), diarrhea (4%), and stomatitis (4%).
CONCLUSIONS: The benefits/risks of Aflibercept plus FOLFIRI administered per the Polish reimbursement criteria in second-line treatment of mCRC after failure of a prior oxaliplatin-based regimen is confirmed.

UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI and paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) who were previously treated with first-line modified docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (mDCF), or 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, docetaxel (FLOT).
UNASSIGNED: Patients who received a triplet regimen in the first line setting and were treated with FOLFIRI or paclitaxel in the second-line treatment were included.
UNASSIGNED: The study included 198 patients, with 115 receiving FOLFIRI and 83 receiving paclitaxel. The median age was 58 (range = 24-69). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 5.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.4-5.5] months in the FOLFIRI arm, and 4.1 (95% CI = 3.3-4.6) months in the paclitaxel arm (p = .007). The median overall survival (mOS) was 9.4 (95% CI = 7.4-10.5) months in the FOLFIRI arm and 7.2 (95% CI = 5.6-8.3) months in the paclitaxel arm (p = .008). Grade 3-4 neuropathy was higher in patients receiving paclitaxel compared to those receiving FOLFIRI (p = .04). Grade 3-4 diarrhea was 8% in the FOLFIRI arm and 2.4% in the paclitaxel arm (p = .02).
UNASSIGNED: Beyond progression with docetaxel-based triplet chemotherapy, FOLFIRI may be preferred as a second-line treatment over paclitaxel due to its longer mPFS and mOS.