FGFR alteration

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胰腺癌是一种高度致命的疾病,经常被诊断为晚期,5年总生存率约为10%。目前的治疗效果有限,强调需要新的治疗选择。本综述旨在确定和总结FGFR(成纤维细胞生长因子受体)抑制剂的临床前和临床研究,包括酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)和FGFR特异性抑制剂,在FGFR改变的胰腺癌中。我们纳入了分析疗效的研究,安全,和不同人群的生存结果。对主要数据库的全面搜索确定了73项相关研究:32项临床前研究,16临床,和25来自灰色文学。临床试验主要集中在疗效(20项研究)和安全性(14项研究),解决生存结果的研究较少。FGFR1是研究最多的改变,其次是FGFR2和FGFR4。尽管FGFR改变在胰腺癌中相对罕见,现有数据,包括有希望的现实生活结果,提示FGFR抑制剂的巨大潜力。然而,需要更广泛的研究来确定正确的遗传驱动因素并收集可靠的生存数据。正在进行和未来的试验有望提供更全面的见解,可能导致改善FGFR改变的胰腺癌患者的靶向治疗。
    Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal disease, often diagnosed at advanced stages, with a 5-year overall survival rate of around 10%. Current treatments have limited effectiveness, underscoring the need for new therapeutic options. This scoping review aims to identify and summarize preclinical and clinical studies on FGFR (Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor) inhibitors, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and FGFR-specific inhibitors, in pancreatic cancer with FGFR alterations. We included studies analyzing efficacy, safety, and survival outcomes in various populations. A comprehensive search across major databases identified 73 relevant studies: 32 preclinical, 16 clinical, and 25 from gray literature. The clinical trials focused primarily on efficacy (20 studies) and safety (14 studies), with fewer studies addressing survival outcomes. FGFR1 was the most studied alteration, followed by FGFR2 and FGFR4. Although FGFR alterations are relatively rare in pancreatic cancer, the available data, including promising real-life outcomes, suggest significant potential for FGFR inhibitors. However, more extensive research is needed to identify the correct genetic drivers and gather robust survival data. Ongoing and future trials are expected to provide more comprehensive insights, potentially leading to improved targeted therapies for pancreatic cancer patients with FGFR alterations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌(mUC)和成纤维细胞生长因子受体改变(FGFRa)患者的抗程序性死亡(配体)1(抗PD-[L]1)治疗的临床结果尚不清楚;最近的研究报告说,与没有FGFR改变(FGFRa-)的患者相比,预后相当或较差。
    UNASSIGNED:分析接受抗PD-(L)1治疗的mUC和任何FGFRa(突变或融合)患者的结局。
    未经批准:在此非介入治疗中,回顾性,多中心研究,临床实践数据收集自2018年5月至2019年7月之前接受过免疫治疗的FGFRa+/-患者.
    未经评估:研究者确定的总反应率(ORR),疾病控制率(DCR),在多变量和未校正分析中评估总生存期(OS).
    未经评估:94名患者(66%为男性;中位年龄,包括63年)的mUC和已知的FGFR状态;38(40%)为FGFRa+,56(60%)为FGFRa-。在接受任何抗PD-(L)1治疗的FGFRa与FGFRa患者中(n=92),ORR,DCR,OS分别为16%和26%,29%对52%(相对风险:1.14[95%置信区间{CI},0.92-1.40];p=0.3),和8.57对13.2mo(危险比[HR]:1.33[95%CI,0.77-2.30];p=0.3),分别。多变量分析提供了一些证据支持FGFRa+与FGFRa-相比OS较短(任何抗PD-L[1]治疗方案;HR:1.81[95%CI,0.99-3.31];p=0.054)。局限性包括本研究的回顾性性质和小样本量的潜在选择偏差。
    UNASSIGNED:在FGFRa+患者中观察到抗PD-(L)1治疗后反应率降低和OS缩短的一些证据。3期THOR研究(NCT03390504)将前瞻性比较接受erdafitinib与pembrolizumab治疗的FGFRa+晚期mUC患者。
    UNASSIGNED:患有转移性尿路上皮癌和预先指定的成纤维细胞生长因子受体改变(FGFRa)的患者在接受抗PD-(L)1治疗时,可能比没有FGFRa的患者具有更差的临床结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Clinical outcomes of anti-programmed death‑(ligand) 1 (anti-PD-[L]1) therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) and fibroblast growth factor receptor alterations (FGFRa+) remain unclear; recent studies have reported either comparable or poorer outcomes versus patients without FGFR alterations (FGFRa-).
    UNASSIGNED: To analyze the outcomes of patients with mUC and any FGFRa (mutations or fusions) who received anti-PD-(L)1 therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: In this noninterventional, retrospective, multicenter study, clinical practice data were collected from FGFRa+/- patients who received prior immunotherapy between May 2018 and July 2019.
    UNASSIGNED: Investigator‑determined overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and overall survival (OS) were assessed in multivariate and unadjusted analyses.
    UNASSIGNED: Ninety-four patients (66% men; median age, 63 yr) with mUC and known FGFR status were included; 38 (40%) were FGFRa+ and 56 (60%) were FGFRa-. In FGFRa+ versus FGFRa- patients who received any line of anti-PD-(L)1 therapy (n = 92), ORR, DCR, and OS were 16% versus 26%, 29% versus 52% (relative risk: 1.14 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.92-1.40]; p = 0.3), and 8.57 versus 13.2 mo (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.33 [95% CI, 0.77-2.30]; p = 0.3), respectively. A multivariate analysis provided some evidence supporting shorter OS in FGFRa+ versus FGFRa- (any line of anti-PD-L[1] therapy; HR: 1.81 [95% CI, 0.99-3.31]; p = 0.054). Limitations include this study\'s retrospective nature and a potential selection bias from small sample size.
    UNASSIGNED: Some evidence of lower response rates and shortened OS following anti-PD-(L)1 therapy was observed in FGFRa+ patients. The phase 3 THOR study (NCT03390504) will prospectively compare FGFRa+ patients with advanced mUC treated with erdafitinib versus pembrolizumab.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma and prespecified fibroblast growth factor receptor alterations (FGFRa) potentially have worse clinical outcomes when treated with anti-PD-(L)1 therapy than those without FGFRa.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Activation of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) family through fusion with various partners has been described in multiple cancer types, including NSCLC. FGFR inhibitors are currently being evaluated clinically for patients whose tumors harbor these fusions.
    Hybrid capture-based comprehensive genomic profiling was performed on 26,054 consecutive formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens of NSCLC.
    FGFR fusions retaining the kinase domain were identified in 0.2% of NSCLC cases; they included 37 fibroblast growth factor receptor gene 3 (FGFR3)-transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 3 gene (TACC3) fusion-positive cases, two fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2)-shootin 1 gene (KIAA1598 [also known as SHTN1]) fusion-positive cases, one BCL2 associated athanogene 4 gene (BAG4)-fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 gene (FGFR1) fusion-positive case, and 12 novel FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3, and fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 gene (FGFR4) fusion-positive cases. Co-occurring EGFR or MNNG HOS Transforming gene (MET) alterations were observed in 8% of cases (four of 52), KRAS mutation was observed in three additional cases, and FGFR1 or FGFR3 amplification was observed in 10% of cases. The two patients with co-occurring EGFR mutations were previously treated with EGFR inhibitors. One patient with a novel FGFR2-leucine zipper transcription factor like 1 gene (LZTFL1) fusion had a partial response to the pan-FGFR inhibitor JNJ-42756493 and remained progression-free for 11 months.
    FGFR fusions were detected by using comprehensive genomic profiling in 0.2% of NSCLCs; they occurred primarily in the absence of other known driver alterations, or in a subset of cases, as likely mechanisms of acquired resistance. One patient with a novel FGFR2 fusion had clinical benefit from an investigational FGFR inhibitor, suggesting that these alterations may predict response to targeted therapies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号