FAR

FAR
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脂肪酰基辅酶A还原酶(FAR)是一种重要的NADPH依赖性酶,可以从脂肪酰基辅酶A或脂肪酰基载体蛋白作为底物产生伯醇。它在植物生长中起着举足轻重的作用,发展,和抗压力。在这里,我们使用生物信息学方法对水稻中的FAR成员进行了全基因组鉴定和表达分析.共鉴定出8个OsFAR基因,并对OsFAR进行了系统发育关系的综合分析,重复事件,蛋白质基序,等。预计OsFAR的顺式元素会对生长和发育做出反应,光,荷尔蒙,和非生物胁迫。基因本体注释分析表明,OsFAR蛋白在脂质代谢过程中作为脂酰辅酶A还原酶参与生物学过程。许多microRNA靶位点存在于OsFARsmRNA中。表达分析表明,OsFAR在不同的发育时期和不同的组织中表达水平不同。此外,OsFAR的表达水平在非生物胁迫下发生了变化,表明FAR可能参与了水稻的非生物胁迫耐受性。这里提出的发现为进一步探索OsFAR的功能奠定了坚实的基础。
    Fatty acyl-CoA reductase (FAR) is an important NADPH-dependent enzyme that can produce primary alcohol from fatty acyl-CoA or fatty acyl-carrier proteins as substrates. It plays a pivotal role in plant growth, development, and stress resistance. Herein, we performed genome-wide identification and expression analysis of FAR members in rice using bioinformatics methods. A total of eight OsFAR genes were identified, and the OsFARs were comprehensively analyzed in terms of phylogenetic relationships, duplication events, protein motifs, etc. The cis-elements of the OsFARs were predicted to respond to growth and development, light, hormones, and abiotic stresses. Gene ontology annotation analysis revealed that OsFAR proteins participate in biological processes as fatty acyl-CoA reductase during lipid metabolism. Numerous microRNA target sites were present in OsFARs mRNAs. The expression analysis showed that OsFARs were expressed at different levels during different developmental periods and in various tissues. Furthermore, the expression levels of OsFARs were altered under abiotic stresses, suggesting that FARs may be involved in abiotic stress tolerance in rice. The findings presented here serve as a solid basis for further exploring the functions of OsFARs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    缺血再灌注(I/R)损伤是影响脑卒中预后的关键因素。炎症反应,氧化应激,神经元凋亡是影响I/R损伤进展的主要因素。Farrarrol(FAR)是一种天然化合物,可以有效抑制炎症反应和氧化应激。然而,FAR在脑I/R损伤中的作用尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们发现FAR可以降低I/R损伤后的脑损伤和神经元活力。同时,FAR的给药也降低了脑损伤后小胶质细胞的炎症反应。机械上,FAR治疗通过增强cAMP反应元件结合蛋白(CREB)的激活来增加下游神经营养因子和抗凋亡基因的表达,从而直接减少氧糖剥夺/复氧(OGD/R)后的神经元死亡。此外,FAR降低核因子κB(NF-κB)和丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)信号通路的激活,抑制小胶质细胞激活,并减少OGD/R处理或LPS刺激后小胶质细胞中炎性细胞因子的产生。FAR受损的炎症反应直接促进OGD/R后神经元的存活。总之,FAR通过上调CREB表达和减轻神经炎症直接减少神经元死亡,对脑I/R损伤具有保护作用。因此,FAR可能是治疗脑I/R损伤的潜在有效药物。
    Ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury is a key influencing factor in the outcome of stroke. Inflammatory response, oxidative stress, and neuronal apoptosis are among the main factors that affect the progression of I/R injury. Farrerol (FAR) is a natural compound that can effectively inhibit the inflammatory response and oxidative stress. However, the role of FAR in cerebral I/R injury remains unknown. In this study, we found that FAR reduced brain injury and neuronal viability after cerebral I/R injury. Meanwhile, administration of FAR also reduced the inflammatory response of microglia after brain injury. Mechanistically, FAR treatment directly reduced neuronal death after oxygen glucose deprivation/re-oxygenation (OGD/R) through enhancing cAMP-response element binding protein (CREB) activation to increase the expression of downstream neurotrophic factors and anti-apoptotic genes. Moreover, FAR decreased the activation of nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways, inhibited microglia activation, and reduced the production of inflammatory cytokines in microglia after OGD/R treatment or LPS stimulation. The compromised inflammatory response by FAR directly promoted the survival of neurons after OGD/R. In conclusion, FAR exerted a protective effect on cerebral I/R injury by directly decreasing neuronal death through upregulating CREB expression and attenuating neuroinflammation. Therefore, FAR could be a potentially effective drug for the treatment of cerebral I/R injury.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    长链和极长链脂肪醇由其相应的酰基辅酶A通过脂肪酰还原酶(FAR)的活性产生。脂肪醇是保护植物器官的角质层的重要成分,它们是向日葵(Helianthusannuus)种子壳中蜡酯合成的代谢中间体。使用BLAST鉴定编码4种不同FAR的基因(命名为HaFAR2、HaFAR3、HaFAR4和HaFAR5),研究表明,其中四个基因在种子壳中表达。在这项研究中,确定了向日葵FAR蛋白的结构和位置。它们还在酿酒酵母中外源表达,以基于转化酵母合成的脂肪醇评估其底物特异性。所测试的四种酶中的三种在酵母中显示出活性。HaFAR3产生C18、C20和C22饱和醇,而HaFAR4和HaFAR5产生C24和C26饱和醇。通过考虑获得的结果,解决了这些基因在向日葵种子蜡酯合成中的参与。
    Long and very long chain fatty alcohols are produced from their corresponding acyl-CoAs through the activity of fatty acyl reductases (FARs). Fatty alcohols are important components of the cuticle that protects aerial plant organs, and they are metabolic intermediates in the synthesis of the wax esters in the hull of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) seeds. Genes encoding 4 different FARs (named HaFAR2, HaFAR3, HaFAR4 and HaFAR5) were identified using BLAST, and studies showed that four of the genes were expressed in seed hulls. In this study, the structure and location of sunflower FAR proteins were determined. They were also expressed exogenously in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to evaluate their substrate specificity based on the fatty alcohols synthesized by the transformed yeasts. Three of the four enzymes tested showed activity in yeast. HaFAR3 produced C18, C20 and C22 saturated alcohols, whereas HaFAR4 and HaFAR5 produced C24 and C26 saturated alcohols. The involvement of these genes in the synthesis of sunflower seed wax esters was addressed by considering the results obtained.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:铁蛋白与白蛋白(FAR)的比值已被认为是COVID-19的一种新的预后指标。然而,FAR在预测脓毒症患者全因死亡率方面的作用尚未得到评估.因此,本研究的目的是阐明FAR与脓毒症患者28日全因死亡率之间的相关性.
    方法:本研究使用来自医疗信息集市重症监护IV数据库(v2.0)的数据进行回顾性队列分析。该研究的重点是入住重症监护病房的成人败血症患者。主要目的是评估FAR在确定脓毒症患者28天全因死亡率方面的预测能力。
    结果:该研究共涉及1553例脓毒症患者。根据脓毒症患者28天内的生存状况,他们被分为两组:一个由973名患者组成的存活组,和由580名患者组成的死亡组。结果显示,脓毒症患者的28天死亡率为37.35%。多变量Cox回归分析显示,FAR是脓毒症患者28天全因死亡率的独立预测因子(风险比[HR]:1.17-1.19;95%置信区间1.11-1.26;P<0.001)。FAR显示出较高的曲线下面积(AUC)为61.01%(95%置信区间58.07-63.96%),与血清铁蛋白(60.48%)相比,血清白蛋白(55.56%),和SOFA评分(56.97%)。接收器工作特征曲线(ROC)分析确定FAR的最佳截止值为364.2215。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,FAR≥364.2215患者与FAR<364.2215患者28天全因死亡率差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。此外,亚组分析显示FAR与各亚组之间无显著交互作用.
    结论:本研究揭示了脓毒症患者FAR与28天死亡率之间的显著相关性。较高的FAR值与28天内死亡率增加密切相关。
    OBJECTIVE: The ratio of ferritin to albumin (FAR) has been proposed as a novel prognostic indicator for COVID-19. However, the role of FAR in predicting the all-cause mortality rate in patients with sepsis has not been evaluated. Therefore, the aim of this study is to elucidate the correlation between FAR and the 28-day all-cause mortality rate in patients with sepsis.
    METHODS: This study used data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database (v2.0) for a retrospective cohort analysis. The study focused on adult patients with sepsis who were admitted to the intensive care unit. The primary objective was to assess the predictive capability of FAR in determining the 28-day all-cause mortality rate among patients with sepsis.
    RESULTS: The study involved 1553 sepsis patients in total. Based on the survival status of sepsis patients within 28 days, they were divided into two groups: a survival group consisting of 973 patients, and a death group consisting of 580 patients. The results revealed a 28-day mortality rate of 37.35% among sepsis patients. The multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that FAR was an independent predictor of the 28-day all-cause mortality rate in patients with sepsis (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.17-1.19; 95% confidence interval 1.11-1.26; P < 0.001). The FAR demonstrated a higher area under the curve (AUC) of 61.01% (95% confidence interval 58.07-63.96%), compared to serum ferritin (60.48%), serum albumin (55.56%), and SOFA score (56.97%). Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis determined the optimal cutoff value for FAR as 364.2215. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant difference in the 28-day all-cause mortality rate between patients with FAR ≥ 364.2215 and those with FAR < 364.2215 (P < 0.001). Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed no significant interaction between FAR and each subgroup.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a significant correlation between FAR and the 28-day mortality rate in patients with sepsis. Higher FAR values were strongly associated with increased mortality rates within 28 days.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们旨在评估纤维蛋白原与白蛋白比值(FAR)与冠状动脉疾病(CAD)临床结局的相关性。本研究中评估的所有14,944例CAD患者均来自2016年12月至2021年10月在新疆医科大学第一附属医院收治的15,250例患者的前瞻性队列。选择全因死亡率(ACM)和心脏死亡率(CM)作为主要终点。次要终点是主要不良心血管事件(MACEs),主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCEs),和非致死性心肌梗死(NFMI)。通过使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析来确定最佳FAR截止值。使用0.1作为截止值,将所有患者分为两组:低FAR组(FAR<0.1,n=10,076)和高FAR组(FAR≥0.1,n=4918)。比较两组的结局发生率。高FAR组的ACM发生率较高(5.3%vs.1.9%),CM(3.9%与1.4%),MACE(9.8%与6.7%),MACCE(10.4%与7.6%),和NFMI(2.3%与1.3%)比低FAR组。为了调整混杂因素,多因素Cox回归分析显示,高FAR组的ACM风险增加了2.182倍(HR=2.182,95%CI:1.761〜2.704,P<0.001)。CM为2.116倍(HR=2.116,95%CI:1.761~2.704,P<0.001),MACEs为1.327倍(HR=1.327,95%CI:1.166~1.510,P<0.001),MACCE为1.280倍(HR=1.280,95%CI:1.131~1.448,P<0.001),NFMI为1.791倍(HR=1.791,95%CI:1.331~2.411,P<0.001),与低FAR组相比。本研究表明,高FAR组是CAD患者不良结局的独立且有力的预测因子。
    We aimed to evaluate the association of the fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR) with the clinical outcomes of coronary artery disease (CAD). All 14,944 patients with CAD evaluated in the present study were from a prospective cohort that recruited 15,250 patients admitted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University between December 2016 and October 2021. The all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiac mortality (CM) were selected as the primary endpoints. The secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), and non-fatal myocardial infarction (NFMI). The optimal FAR cutoff value was determined by using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Using 0.1 as the cutoff value, all the patients were divided into two groups: a low-FAR group (FAR < 0.1, n = 10,076) and a high-FAR group (FAR ≥ 0.1, n = 4918). The incidence of outcomes between the two groups was compared. The high-FAR group exhibited a higher incidence of ACM (5.3% vs. 1.9%), CM (3.9% vs. 1.4%), MACEs (9.8% vs. 6.7%), MACCEs (10.4% vs. 7.6%), and NFMI (2.3% vs. 1.3%) than the low-FAR group. To adjust the confounders, multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that the risk in the high-FAR group was increased 2.182 fold in ACM (HR = 2.182, 95% CI: 1.761 ~ 2.704, P < 0.001), 2.116 fold in CM (HR = 2.116, 95% CI: 1.761 ~ 2.704, P < 0.001), 1.327 fold in MACEs (HR = 1.327, 95% CI: 1.166 ~ 1.510, P < 0.001), 1.280 fold in MACCEs (HR = 1.280, 95% CI: 1.131 ~ 1.448, P < 0.001), and 1.791 fold in NFMI (HR = 1.791, 95% CI:1.331 ~ 2.411, P < 0.001), compared to the low-FAR group. The present study suggested that the high-FAR group was an independent and powerful predictor of adverse outcomes in CAD patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:由于缺乏敏感的液体活检方法和有效的生物标志物,胰腺癌(PC)的早期诊断极其困难。我们试图评估循环炎症标志物是否可以补充CA199以检测早期PC。
    方法:我们招募了430例早期PC患者,287例其他胰腺肿瘤(OPT),和401个健康对照(HC)。将患者和HC随机分为训练集(n=872)和两个测试集(n1=218,n2=28)。研究受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线以评估循环炎症标志物比率的诊断性能,CA199,以及训练集中标记比率的组合,然后将在两个测试集中进行验证。
    结果:循环纤维蛋白原,中性粒细胞,和单核细胞在PC患者中明显更高,而循环白蛋白,前白蛋白,淋巴细胞,与HC和OPT相比,PC患者的血小板明显降低(均P<0.05)。纤维蛋白原至白蛋白(FAR),纤维蛋白原-前白蛋白(FPR),中性粒细胞对淋巴细胞(NLR),血小板淋巴细胞(PLR),单核细胞对淋巴细胞(MLR),与HC和OPT患者相比,PC患者的纤维蛋白原与淋巴细胞(FLR)比率明显更高,而预后营养指数值(PNI)则更低(均P<0.05)。结合FAR,FPR,CA199和FLR在区分早期PC患者和HC患者方面表现出最佳诊断价值,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.964,在训练集中区分早期PC患者和OPT患者的AUC为0.924。在测试集中,与HC相比,当比较PC与OPT时,组合标志物对PC具有强大的效率,AUC为0.947和AUC0.942.CA199、FAR、FPR,和FLR用于区分胰头癌(PHC)和其他胰头肿瘤(OPHT)患者,和0.894用于区分胰腺体尾癌(PBTC)和其他胰腺体尾癌(OPBTT)患者。
    结论:FAR的组合,FPR,FLR,CA199可以作为一种潜在的非侵入性生物标志物,用于区分早期PC与HC和OPT,尤其是早期PHC.
    BACKGROUND: An early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (PC) is extremely difficult because of the lack of sensitive liquid biopsy methods and effective biomarkers. We attempted to evaluate whether circulating inflammatory marker could complement CA199 for the detection of early-stage PC.
    METHODS: We enrolled 430 patients with early-stage PC, 287 patients with other pancreatic tumors (OPT), and 401 healthy controls (HC). The patients and HC were randomly divided into a training set (n = 872) and two testing sets (n1 = 218, n2 = 28). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were investigated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of circulating inflammatory markers ratios, CA199, and combinations of the markers ratios in the training set, which would then be validated in the two testing sets.
    RESULTS: Circulating fibrinogen, neutrophils, and monocytes in patients with PC were significantly higher while circulating albumin, prealbumin, lymphocytes, and platelets of patients with PC were significantly lower compared to those of HC and OPT (all P < 0.05). The fibrinogen-to-albumin (FAR), fibrinogen-to-prealbumin (FPR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte (MLR), and fibrinogen-to-lymphocyte (FLR) ratios were significantly higher while the prognostic nutrition index values (PNI) were lower in patients with PC than in HC and OPT (all P < 0.05). Combining the FAR, FPR, and FLR with CA199 exhibited the best diagnostic value for distinguishing patients with early-stage PC from HC with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.964, and for distinguishing patients with early-stage PC from OPT with an AUC of 0.924 in the training sets. In the testing set, compared with HC, the combination markers had powerful efficiency for PC with an AUC 0.947 and AUC 0.942 when comparing PC with OPT. The AUC was 0.915 for the combination of CA199, FAR, FPR, and FLR for differentiating between patients with pancreatic head cancer (PHC) and other pancreatic head tumors (OPHT), and 0.894 for differentiating between patients with pancreatic body and tail cancer (PBTC) and other pancreatic body and tail tumors (OPBTT).
    CONCLUSIONS: A combination of FAR, FPR, FLR, and CA199 may serve as a potential non-invasive biomarker for differentiating early-stage PC from HC and OPT, especially early-stage PHC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    COVID-19仍然徘徊,威胁着许多高危患者的生命,一个有效的,快,并且需要廉价的预后方法。很少有研究表明纤维蛋白原与白蛋白之比(FAR)和C反应蛋白与白蛋白之比(CAR)有望作为COVID-19疾病的预后标志物。然而,其含义尚不清楚。这项荟萃分析旨在阐明FAR和CAR在COVID-19疾病中的预后作用。使用PubMed和Embase进行了系统的文献检索,直到2022年4月。使用随机效应模型计算逆方差标准化平均差(SMD)以报告总体效应大小。通用逆方差随机效应方法用于汇集曲线下面积(AUC)值。所有统计分析均在Revman和MedCalc软件上进行。共纳入23项研究。非COVID-19幸存者入院时的CAR高于幸存者(SMD=1.79[1.04,2.55];p<0.00001;I2=97%),重度COVID-19感染患者入院时的CAR高于非重度患者(SMD=1.21[0.54,1.89];p=0.0004;I2=97%)。同样,入院时更高的平均FAR值与COVID-19死亡率显著相关(SMD=0.55[0.32,0.78];p<0.00001;I2=82%).然而,入院时平均FAR与COVID-19严重程度无显著关联(SMD=0.54[-0.09,1.18];p=0.09;I2=91%).汇总的AUC值发现,CAR对预测COVID-19的严重程度(AUC=0.81[0.75,0.86];p<0.00001;I2=80%)和死亡率(AUC=0.81[0.74,0.87];p<0.00001;I2=86%)具有良好的判别力。FAR对预测COVID-19严重程度具有公平的判别能力(AUC=0.73[0.64,0.82];p<0.00001;I2=89%)。总的来说,CAR是与COVID-19感染相关的严重程度和死亡率的良好预测指标。同样,FAR是COVID-19死亡率的令人满意的预测因子,但不是严重程度。
    With COVID-19 still hovering around and threatening the lives of many at-risk patients, an effective, quick, and inexpensive prognostic method is required. Few studies have shown fibrinogen to albumin ratio (FAR) and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) to be promising as prognostic markers for COVID-19 disease. However, their implications remain unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to elucidate the prognostic role of FAR and CAR in COVID-19 disease. A systematic literature search was undertaken using PubMed and Embase till April 2022. Inverse variance standardised mean difference (SMD) was calculated to report the overall effect size using random effect models. The generic inverse variance random-effects method was used to pool the area under the curve (AUC) values. All statistical analyses were performed on Revman and MedCalc Software. A total of 23 studies were included. COVID-19 non-survivors had a higher CAR on admission compared with survivors (SMD = 1.79 [1.04, 2.55]; p < 0.00001; I2  = 97%) and patients with a severe COVID-19 infection had a higher CAR on admission than non-severe patients (SMD = 1.21 [0.54, 1.89]; p = 0.0004; I2  = 97%). Similarly, higher mean FAR values on admission were significantly associated with COVID-19 mortality (SMD = 0.55 [0.32, 0.78]; p < 0.00001; I2  = 82%). However, no significant association was found between mean FAR on admission and COVID-19 severity (SMD = 0.54 [-0.09, 1.18]; p = 0.09; I2  = 91%). The pooled AUC values found that CAR had a good discriminatory-power to predict COVID-19 severity (AUC = 0.81 [0.75, 0.86]; p < 0.00001; I2  = 80%) and mortality (AUC = 0.81 [0.74, 0.87]; p < 0.00001; I2  = 86%). FAR had a fair discriminatory-power to predict COVID-19 severity (AUC = 0.73 [0.64, 0.82]; p < 0.00001; I2  = 89%). Overall, CAR was a good predictor of both severity and mortality associated with COVID-19 infection. Similarly, FAR was a satisfactory predictor of COVID-19 mortality but not severity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    生物识别是测量人类特征的术语。如果该术语分为两部分,生物意味着生命,公制意味着测量。通过不同的计算方法对人类进行测量是为了授权一个人。该测量可以经由单个生物特征或通过使用不同生物特征的组合来执行。多个生物特征的组合被称为生物特征融合。它以更高的精度提供了对人的可靠和安全的认证。它已在印度(AADHAR:农村发展与健康行动协会)和不同国家的UIDIA框架中引入,以确定哪些生物特征足以验证人类身份。生物识别框架的融合,尤其是FKP(指关节纹)和虹膜,被证明是一个可靠的多式联运框架。所提出的方法展示了一个熟练和强大的多模式生物识别框架,利用FKP和虹膜作为生物识别模式进行认证,利用尺度不变特征变换(SIFT)和加速鲁棒特征(SURF)。利用LogGabor小波来提取虹膜特征集。从提取的区域,使用主成分分析(PCA)计算特征。两种生物识别模式,FKP和虹膜,在比赛得分级别组合。使用神经模糊神经网络分类器来执行匹配。在开放数据库Poly-U上测试了所提出框架的执行和准确性,卡西亚,达到99.68%的精度。与单个生物特征相比,准确性更高。与其他分类器相比,还测试了神经模糊方法,准确率为98%。因此,与其他分类器相比,使用神经模糊分类器实现的融合机制提供了最好的准确性。该框架在MATLAB7.10中实现。
    Biometrics is the term for measuring human characteristics. If the term is divided into two parts, bio means life, and metric means measurement. The measurement of humans through different computational methods is performed to authorize a person. This measurement can be performed via a single biometric or by using a combination of different biometric traits. The combination of multiple biometrics is termed biometric fusion. It provides a reliable and secure authentication of a person at a higher accuracy. It has been introduced in the UIDIA framework in India (AADHAR: Association for Development and Health Action in Rural) and in different nations to figure out which biometric characteristics are suitable enough to authenticate the human identity. Fusion in biometric frameworks, especially FKP (finger-knuckle print) and iris, demonstrated to be a solid multimodal as a secure framework. The proposed approach demonstrates a proficient and strong multimodal biometric framework that utilizes FKP and iris as biometric modalities for authentication, utilizing scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) and speeded up robust features (SURF). Log Gabor wavelet is utilized to extricate the iris feature set. From the extracted region, features are computed using principal component analysis (PCA). Both biometric modalities, FKP and iris, are combined at the match score level. The matching is performed using a neuro-fuzzy neural network classifier. The execution and accuracy of the proposed framework are tested on the open database Poly-U, CASIA, and an accuracy of 99.68% is achieved. The accuracy is higher compared to a single biometric. The neuro-fuzzy approach is also tested in comparison to other classifiers, and the accuracy is 98%. Therefore, the fusion mechanism implemented using a neuro-fuzzy classifier provides the best accuracy compared to other classifiers. The framework is implemented in MATLAB 7.10.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在全球范围内,寄生虫感染会导致人类和家畜严重衰弱,有时甚至致命的疾病。无法从头合成自己的脂肪酸和固醇,蠕虫寄生虫(线虫,吸虫,cestodes)依靠它们的宿主来供应。这些生物产生和分泌广泛的脂质结合蛋白,在大多数情况下,在结构上与宿主中发现的不同,将它们作为可能的新治疗靶点。在这个意义上,已经为确定这些蛋白质的结构做出了很多努力,但是它们的确切功能仍然未知。在这次审查中,我们的目的是提供有关寄生蠕虫中LBP功能的最新知识,以及这种高度异质的蛋白质组中的新成员。
    Infections with parasitic helminths cause severe debilitating and sometimes lethal diseases in humans and domestic animals on a global scale. Unable to synthesize de novo their own fatty acids and sterols, helminth parasites (nematodes, trematodes, cestodes) rely on their hosts for their supply. These organisms produce and secrete a wide range of lipid binding proteins that are, in most cases, structurally different from the ones found in their hosts, placing them as possible novel therapeutic targets. In this sense, a lot of effort has been made towards the structure determination of these proteins, but their precise function is still unknown. In this review, we aim to present the current knowledge on the functions of LBPs present in parasitic helminths as well as novel members of this highly heterogeneous group of proteins.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Aim: This study aims to determine the prognostic value of the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and fibrinogen to albumin ratio (FAR) in patients with COVID-19.Methods: Electronic database records of 400 patients with COVID-19 were retrospectively analyzed and the initial levels of CRP, albumin, fibrinogen values were recorded. The ground-glass opacities (GGO) and consolidations were evaluated on thorax CT. Hospital mortality and the need for intensive care unit (ICU) transfer were determined as adverse outcomes.Results: It was determined that 345 patients (86.25%) were discharged while 31 patients (7.75%) were transferred to ICU in addition to 24 patients who died (6%). The rates of deaths and transfers to ICU were significantly increased in GPS 2 group compared to both GPS 0 and 1 groups. Additionally, increased FAR was observed in patients who died and transferred to ICU compared to the discharged patients. The FAR was significantly increased in patients with diffuse GGO. Logistic regression analysis indicated that FAR ≥144.59 and the presence of GPS 2 were independent predictors of the adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients.Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that the GPS and FAR could possess a predictive value for adverse outcomes in patients with COVID-19.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号