Fármacos anticolinérgicos

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在三甲医院进行药物治疗随访时,在50岁以上的PLWH队列中确定DBI及其与多重用药和药物治疗复杂性(PC)的关系。
    方法:观察性和回顾性研究,包括在门诊药学服务中随访的50岁以上积极抗逆转录病毒治疗的PLWH。药物治疗复杂性通过药物治疗方案复杂性指数(MRCI)进行评估。收集的变量包括合并症,当前的处方及其根据抗胆碱能和镇静活性以及相关跌倒风险的分类。
    结果:研究人群包括251名患者(男性占85.7%;中位年龄:58岁,四分位数间距:54-61)。高DBI评分的患病率很高(49.2%)。高DBI与高PC显著相关,多药,精神病合并症和药物滥用(p<0.05)。在镇静药物中,处方最多的是抗焦虑药(N05B)(n=85),抗抑郁药(N06A)(n=41)和抗癫痫药(N03A)(n=29)。对于抗胆碱能药物,α-肾上腺素能拮抗剂药物(G04C)是处方最多的(n=18)。与跌倒风险相关的最常见药物是抗焦虑药(N05B)(n=85),血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(C09A)(n=61)和抗抑郁药(N06A)(n=41)。
    结论:老年PLWH的DBI评分较高,与PC有关,多药,精神疾病和药物滥用以及与跌倒有关的药物的流行。控制这些参数以及减少镇静剂和抗胆碱能负荷应包括在艾滋病毒感染者的药物护理工作中。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine DBI and its relationship with polypharmacy and pharmacotherapeutic complexity (PC) in a cohort of PLWH over 50 years of age at follow-up of pharmacotherapy in a tertiary hospital.
    METHODS: Observational and retrospective study that included PLWH in active antiretroviral treatment over 50 years of age who have been followed up in outpatient pharmacy services. Pharmacotherapeutic complexity was estimated through Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI). Collected variables included comorbidities, current prescriptions and its classification according to anticholinergic and sedative activity and associated risk of falls.
    RESULTS: Studied population included 251 patients (85.7% men; median age: 58 years, interquartile range: 54-61). There was a high prevalence of high DBI scores (49.2%). High DBI was significantly correlated with a high PC, polypharmacy, psychiatric comorbidity and substances abuse (p<0.05). Among sedative drugs, the most prescribed were anxiolytic drugs (N05B) (n=85), antidepressant drugs (N06A) (n=41) and antiepileptic drugs (N03A) (n=29). For anticholinergic drugs, alpha-adrenergic antagonist drugs (G04C) were the most prescribed (n=18). Most frequent drugs associated with risk of falls were anxiolytics (N05B) (n=85), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (C09A) (n=61) and antidepressants (N06A) (n=41).
    CONCLUSIONS: The DBI score in older PLWH is high and it is related to PC, polypharmacy, mental diseases and substance abuse as is the prevalence of fall-related drugs. Control of these parameters as well as the reduction of the sedative and anticholinergic load should be included in the lines of work in the pharmaceutical care of people living with HIV+.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: The use of anticholinergic drugs in the elderly has been associated to an increased frequency of delirium. There are different scales for estimating the anticholinergic burden, such as the Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS), Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS), and Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB). The aim of the study is to establish the relationship between anticholinergic burden measured by ADS, ARS, and ACB scales and incident or prevalent delirium.
    METHODS: An ambispective observational study was conducted for 76 days in the acute geriatric unit of a tertiary hospital. All patients over 80 years-old were included, except re-admissions or those subjected to palliative care. The data collected included sex, age, chronic medication and any recent changes, recent drugs prescribed prior to an episode of delirium, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, dementia, visual and auditory impairment, and their combination as sensory impairment, previous falls, stroke, brain tumour, and incident and prevalent delirium.
    RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were included. Incident delirium was detected in 8.1% of the patients, and prevalent delirium in 40.9%. A statistically significant association was established between anticholinergic drugs and the incident delirium measured by the ARS scale (P=.017). None of the scales was able to establish a significant association with prevalent delirium.
    CONCLUSIONS: The ARS scale was related to new episodes of delirium. All scales were insufficient when it came to establishing an association with prevalent delirium.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    抗胆碱能药物的使用在老年人中很常见,即使是有认知障碍的人。在PubMed(抗胆碱能作用,抗胆碱能和痴呆)来定义抗胆碱能药物在老年人中的作用。我们强调了使用模式的搜索,与AChEI的联合使用,血清抗胆碱能活性的测量,以及短期和长期的认知效应。结论:抗胆碱能药物在老年人中的使用较为普遍,甚至比阿尔茨海默病的AChEI的医疗处方更多。抗胆碱能药物的使用可能导致认知障碍。在长期使用中,它可能会导致认知功能恶化。它会导致轻度认知障碍或痴呆的错误诊断,它们也可以引发痴呆症的迹象。当存在先前的缺陷时,会出现更大的认知效果,但是抗胆碱能药物的认知作用在严重的痴呆症中消失了。当使用这些药物时,ApoE4的存在增加了认知障碍的脆弱性。
    The use of anticholinergic drugs is common in the elderly, even in people with cognitive impairment. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed (anticholinergic effects, anticholinergic and dementia) to define the effects of anticholinergic drugs in the elderly. We emphasized the search in patterns of use, the combined use with AChEIs, the measurement of the Serum Anticholinergic Activity, and the short-term and long-term cognitive effects. The conclusions are that the use of anticholinergic drugs is common in the elderly, even more so than the medical prescription of AChEIs in Alzheimer\'s disease. The use of anticholinergic drugs may result in cognitive impairment. In long-term use it may generate a worsening of cognitive functions. It can lead to a wrong diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or dementia, and they can also initiate signs of dementia. Greater cognitive effects appear when there is a previous deficit, but cognitive effects from anticholinergic drugs disappear in severe dementia. The presence of ApoEɛ4 increases the vulnerability for cognitive impairment when these drugs are employed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Delirium is a condition with a high prevalence in hospitalised patients (10%-30%), and it has important prognostic implications. There are few prospective studies of the incidence of delirium in Spain, and most of these were carried out in surgical wards or intensive care units. Our objective is to calculate the incidence of delirium in a neurological department and describe characteristics of affected patients.
    METHODS: Longitudinal descriptive study including all patients admitted to the neurology department in an 8-week period. The CAM score for diagnosing delirium was recorded on the first, second and fifth day of hospitalisation and we recorded demographic data, medical history, analytical data (including inflammatory markers), use of anticholinergic treatments, cognitive and functional state at admission, reason for admission, length of stay, and other events during hospitalisation.
    RESULTS: We studied 115 patients and found an incidence of delirium of 16.52%. There was a significant correlation between delirium and age, cognitive state at admission according to the Pfeiffer test, functional situation at admission according to the Canadian Neurological Scale, kidney failure, history of stroke, anticholinergic treatment, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein. These patients were also hospitalised for longer periods of time.
    CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm a high incidence of delirium in our geographical area. Although additional studies with larger samples are needed, we would like to emphasise the importance of several risk factors which may enable early detection of patients who are at risk for developing delirium during hospitalisation. This would permit preventive action and early treatment for these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号