Eye Movement Measurements

眼动测量
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    众所周知,注意力是由显著对象或事件捕获的。视觉领域中存在的显著信息吸引注意力的概念也是许多有影响力的注意力模型的核心。这些模型通常假定显著性的层次结构,这表明注意力从视野中最突出的项目发展到最不突出的项目。然而,尽管这种说法在各种模型中具有重要意义,对眼球运动的研究挑战了搜索严格遵循这种显著性层次的想法。相反,眼动追踪研究表明,显著性信息具有短暂的影响,只会影响到最突出物体的初始扫视,并且仅在显示开始后迅速执行。虽然这些关于明显眼球运动的发现很重要,它们没有解决在扫视开始之前发生的秘密注意过程。在目前的一系列实验中,我们探讨了是否存在二次捕获的证据-在初次捕获发作后是否可以通过另一个显著项目捕获注意力.为了探索这个,我们利用具有不同显著性水平的多个干扰物的显示。我们的主要问题是,两个具有不同显着性水平的干扰因素是否会比单个干扰干扰搜索更多,高度突出的分心者。在三个实验中,有明确的证据表明,两个干扰物对搜索的干扰比单个干扰物的干扰更大。这一观察表明,在最初捕获之后,发生了下一个最突出的干扰物的二次捕获。这些发现共同支持了隐蔽注意力贯穿显著性层次的观点。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2024APA,保留所有权利)。
    It is well known that attention is captured by salient objects or events. The notion that attention is attracted by salience information present in the visual field is also at the heart of many influential models of attention. These models typically posit a hierarchy of saliency, suggesting that attention progresses from the most to the least salient item in the visual field. However, despite the significance of this claim in various models, research on eye movements challenges the idea that search strictly follows this saliency hierarchy. Instead, eye-tracking studies have suggested that saliency information has a transient impact, only influencing the initial saccade toward the most salient object, and only if executed swiftly after display onset. While these findings on overt eye movements are important, they do not address covert attentional processes occurring before a saccade is initiated. In the current series of experiments, we explored whether there was evidence for secondary capture-whether attention could be captured by another salient item after the initial capture episode. To explore this, we utilized displays with multiple distractors of varying levels of saliency. Our primary question was whether two distractors with different saliency levels would disrupt search more than a single, highly salient distractor. Across three experiments, clear evidence emerged indicating that two distractors interfered more with search than a single salient distractor. This observation suggests that following initial capture, secondary capture by the next most salient distractor occurred. These findings collectively support the idea that covert attention traverses the saliency hierarchy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    负面模板基于干扰因素特征的预知,可以在组级别实现更有效的视觉搜索。然而,负线索诱导的利益大小存在很大的个体差异。这些个体差异背后的认知因素仍然未知。先前的研究表明,与积极模板相比,积极控制消极模板的参与度更高。因此,我们假设主动控制效率的个体差异可以解释负面线索收益的巨大变异性。重新分析了由两项先前发表的研究数据组成的大型数据集(N=139),记录了36名参与者的眼球运动。通过反应时间(RT)变异性测量个体主动控制效率。具有较高主动控制效率的参与者在两个关键指标中的负面提示后表现出更大的益处:与中性提示相比,具有较高主动控制的个体在负面提示后表现出更大的RT益处;类似地,主动控制较高的个体表现出较低的首次扫视提示干扰物。对于阳性线索没有观察到这种关系。我们的结果证实了负面注意模板引起的收益存在很大的个体差异。严重的,我们表明,主动控制驱动这些个体间差异的负模板使用。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2024APA,保留所有权利)。
    Negative templates are based on foreknowledge of distractor features and can lead to more efficient visual search at the group level. However, large individual differences exist in the size of benefits induced by negative cues. The cognitive factors underlying these interindividual differences remain unknown. Previous research has suggested higher engagement of proactive control for negative templates compared to positive templates. We thus hypothesized that interindividual differences in proactive control efficiency may explain the large variability in negative cue benefits. A large data set made up of data from two previously published studies was reanalyzed (N = 139), with eye movements recorded in 36 participants. Individual proactive control efficiency was measured through reaction time (RT) variability. Participants with higher proactive control efficiency exhibited larger benefits after negative cues across two critical measures: Individuals with higher proactive control showed larger RT benefits following negative compared to neutral cues; similarly, individuals with higher proactive control exhibited lower first saccades to cued distractor items. No such relationship was observed for positive cues. Our results confirmed the existence of large interindividual differences in the benefits induced by negative attentional templates. Critically, we show that proactive control drives these interindividual differences in negative template use. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人们经常阅读不同格式和出版商的多行文本,国际上,必须决定如何呈现文本,使阅读最有效和高效。相对而言,很少有研究检查多行阅读,更少的中文多行阅读。这里,我们检查了文本是单列还是双列,左对齐或完全对齐影响中文阅读。文本格式对整体阅读时间的影响很小;但是,它显著影响返回扫描(大扫视移动眼睛从一行文本的结尾到下一行的开头)。返回扫描已启动,并远离边缘,并且以单列比双列格式进行了更多的纠正扫视。对于左-与完全合理的格式相比,回归扫描已经启动,并更接近利润率。还发生了更多的纠正扫视。我们的结果表明,完全比左对齐文本更有效的返回扫描行为。此外,有明显的权衡效应,使得需要更多数量的较短返回扫描的格式产生更准确的目标和减少数量的纠正固定,而需要减少更长的回扫次数的格式导致靶向不太准确和矫正固定率增加。总的来说,我们的结果表明,文本格式在不影响效率和有效性的情况下,在中文阅读过程中显著影响回扫眼球运动行为。也就是说,阅读和理解文本所需的总时间。
    People regularly read multi-line texts in different formats and publishers, internationally, must decide how to present text to make reading most effective and efficient. Relatively few studies have examined multi-line reading, and fewer still Chinese multi-line reading. Here, we examined whether texts presented in single or double columns, and either left-justified or fully-justified affect Chinese reading. Text format had minimal influence on overall reading time; however, it significantly impacted return-sweeps (large saccades moving the eyes from the end of one line of text to the beginning of the next). Return-sweeps were launched and landed further away from margins and involved more corrective saccades in single- than double-column format. For left- compared to fully-justified format, return-sweeps were launched and landed closer to margins. More corrective saccades also occurred. Our results showed more efficient return-sweep behavior for fully- than left-justified text. Moreover, there were clear trade-off effects such that formats requiring increased numbers of shorter return-sweeps produced more accurate targeting and reduced numbers of corrective fixations, whereas formats requiring reduced numbers of longer return-sweeps caused less accurate targeting and an increased rate of corrective fixations. Overall, our results demonstrate that text formats substantially affect return-sweep eye movement behavior during Chinese reading without affecting efficiency and effectiveness, that is, the overall time it takes to read and understand the text.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:精神分裂症是一种复杂的精神障碍,其特征是明显的认知和神经生物学改变。已知认知功能和眼球运动的损害是精神分裂症的有希望的生物标志物。然而,认知评估方法需要专业知识。迄今为止,缺乏用于评估精神分裂症患者认知功能和眼球运动的简化测量工具的数据.
    目的:本研究旨在评估一种新型的基于平板电脑的平台,该平台结合了认知和眼动措施对精神分裂症进行分类的功效。
    方法:44例精神分裂症患者,67个健康对照,来自日本10个研究中心的41名患有其他精神病的患者参与了这项研究.在12.9英寸的iPadPro中,使用了一个可自由观看的眼动任务和2个认知评估工具(来自THINC集成工具和CognitiveFunctionTest应用程序的Codebreaker任务)进行评估。我们进行了比较组和逻辑回归分析,以评估3种感兴趣的措施的诊断功效。
    结果:精神分裂症患者和健康对照组的认知和眼球运动测量值存在显著差异(所有3项测量值;P<.001)。Codebreaker任务在区分精神分裂症方面显示出最高的分类效果,接受者工作特征曲线下的面积为0.90。将认知和眼动测量相结合,进一步提高了准确性,接收器工作特性曲线下的最大面积为0.94。认知测量在区分精神分裂症患者和健康对照组方面更有效,而眼球运动测量精神分裂症与其他精神疾病的区别更好。
    结论:这项多中心研究证明了基于平板电脑的应用程序用于评估精神分裂症患者的认知功能和眼球运动的可行性和有效性。我们的结果表明,基于平板电脑的认知功能和眼球运动评估作为简单和可访问的评估工具的潜力。这可能对未来的临床实施有用。
    BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia is a complex mental disorder characterized by significant cognitive and neurobiological alterations. Impairments in cognitive function and eye movement have been known to be promising biomarkers for schizophrenia. However, cognitive assessment methods require specialized expertise. To date, data on simplified measurement tools for assessing both cognitive function and eye movement in patients with schizophrenia are lacking.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the efficacy of a novel tablet-based platform combining cognitive and eye movement measures for classifying schizophrenia.
    METHODS: Forty-four patients with schizophrenia, 67 healthy controls, and 41 patients with other psychiatric diagnoses participated in this study from 10 sites across Japan. A free-viewing eye movement task and 2 cognitive assessment tools (Codebreaker task from the THINC-integrated tool and the CognitiveFunctionTest app) were used for conducting assessments in a 12.9-inch iPad Pro. We performed comparative group and logistic regression analyses for evaluating the diagnostic efficacy of the 3 measures of interest.
    RESULTS: Cognitive and eye movement measures differed significantly between patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls (all 3 measures; P<.001). The Codebreaker task showed the highest classification effectiveness in distinguishing schizophrenia with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90. Combining cognitive and eye movement measures further improved accuracy with a maximum area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.94. Cognitive measures were more effective in differentiating patients with schizophrenia from healthy controls, whereas eye movement measures better differentiated schizophrenia from other psychiatric conditions.
    CONCLUSIONS: This multisite study demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of a tablet-based app for assessing cognitive functioning and eye movements in patients with schizophrenia. Our results suggest the potential of tablet-based assessments of cognitive function and eye movement as simple and accessible evaluation tools, which may be useful for future clinical implementation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:恒河猴在视觉研究中的使用至关重要,因为它们的视觉系统与人类相似。虽然侵入性技术已经成为常态,已经转向非侵入性方法,如面罩和头模,以提高动物福利和解决伦理问题。
    方法:我们提出了一种非侵入性,带有红外传感器的3D打印chinrest,改编自犬类研究,允许准确的眼动测量和动物自愿参与实验。
    结果:chinrest方法显示,猴子1和猴子2的平均试验数量分别增加了16%和28%,与传统的顶岗方法相比。订婚程度很高,猴子每个疗程进行500多次试验,并在平均试验间隔约1秒后开始新的试验。猴子1在最低状态下的命中率提高了约10%,和固定精度,用凝视位置的标准偏差来衡量,在中国大陆的情况下明显更好,猴子1在X轴上的固定不精确性从0.26°降低到0.17°。
    方法:chinrest方法显示,由于固定断裂,试验参与度和中止试验的减少显着改善,表明与以前的非侵入性方法相比,压力更小,数据质量可能得到改善。
    结论:chinrest方法通过允许精确的数据收集,同时解决动物福利问题,在灵长类动物认知测试中取得了重大进展。可能导致更好的科学成果和灵长类动物研究方法的范式转变。
    BACKGROUND: The use of Rhesus macaques in vision research is crucial due to their visual system\'s similarity to humans. While invasive techniques have been the norm, there has been a shift towards non-invasive methods, such as facemasks and head molds, to enhance animal welfare and address ethical concerns.
    METHODS: We present a non-invasive, 3D-printed chinrest with infrared sensors, adapted from canine research, allowing for accurate eye movement measurements and voluntary animal participation in experiments.
    RESULTS: The chinrest method showed a 16% and 28% increase in average trial numbers for Monkey 1 and Monkey 2, respectively, compared to the traditional headpost method. The engagement was high, with monkeys performing over 500 trials per session and initiating a new trial after an average intertrial interval of approximately 1 second. The hit rate improved by about 10% for Monkey 1 in the chinrest condition, and the fixation precision, measured by the standard deviation of gaze positions, was significantly better in the chinrest condition, with Monkey 1 showing a reduction in fixation imprecision from 0.26° to 0.17° in the X-axis.
    METHODS: The chinrest approach showed significant improvements in trial engagement and reduction in aborted trials due to fixation breaks, indicating less stress and potentially improved data quality compared to previous non-invasive methods.
    CONCLUSIONS: The chinrest method offers a significant advancement in primate cognitive testing by allowing for precise data collection while addressing animal welfare concerns, possibly leading to better scientific outcomes and a paradigm shift in primate research methodologies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对第一语言(L1)阅读的研究早已建立了读者熟练程度与其眼球运动控制效率之间的联系。更熟练的读者进行更长的扫视,并更接近单词的中心,这是一个词的最佳观看位置,减少固定。到目前为止,对第二语言(L2)阅读的眼动追踪研究在这方面几乎没有证据。本研究分析了多语种眼动语料库中的空间动眼测量,其中包含来自代表12个不同L1的543名参与者的英语文本阅读及其组成技能的数据。我们的分析确立了英语水平的强大作用,适用于L1和L2英语读者。虽然大多数效应复制了L1阅读中观察到的效应,我们还发现,更熟练的英语读者在定位最佳观看位置时不那么准确。我们将这一发现与Fitts的目标运动控制定律联系起来。本文讨论了新发现对阅读研究的理论意义。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2024APA,保留所有权利)。
    Research on first language (L1) reading has long since established the link between the proficiency of the reader and their efficiency in oculomotor control. More proficient readers make longer saccades and land closer to the word\'s center, which is a word\'s optimal viewing position, and make fewer refixations. Eye-tracking studies of second language (L2) reading have so far provided little evidence in this regard. This study analyzes spatial oculomotor measures in the Multilingual Eye-movement Corpus, which contains data on English text reading and its component skills from 543 participants representing 12 different L1s. Our analyses establish a strong role of proficiency in English, both for L1 and L2 readers of English. While most effects replicated ones observed in L1 reading, we also found that more proficient readers of English were less accurate in targeting optimal viewing positions. We link this finding to Fitts\' law of motor control for aimed movements. This article discusses the theoretical implications of the novel findings for reading research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    握手是社会互动的基本形式。当前的研究在大学毕业典礼上使用高清摄像机来检查眼神交流和握手的时间顺序。分析表明,相互凝视总是先于握手。后续调查在握手时操纵凝视,发现当伸出的手先于眼神接触时,参与者需要更长的时间来接受握手。这些发现表明,一个人的凝视和他们握手的时机对于如何解释他们的行为至关重要。
    Shaking hands is a fundamental form of social interaction. The current study used high-definition cameras during a university graduation ceremony to examine the temporal sequencing of eye contact and shaking hands. Analyses revealed that mutual gaze always preceded shaking hands. A follow up investigation manipulated gaze when shaking hands, and found that participants take significantly longer to accept a handshake when an outstretched hand precedes eye contact. These findings demonstrate that the timing between a person\'s gaze and their offer to shake hands is critical to how their action is interpreted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前需要完全致力于评估眼部运动异常的临床量表。我们研究了最近开发的共济失调眼运动障碍量表(SODA)在多系统萎缩(MSA)患者中的实用性。我们在韩国大学医学中心前瞻性评估了2021年8月至2023年8月期间MSA连续患者的SODA。将基于临床检查的SODA的结果与使用视频眼图(VOG引导的SODA)测量的结果进行了比较。我们还将这些发现与其他针对MSA患者的既定临床量表进行了比较,包括统一多系统萎缩评定量表(UMSARS)I-II,运动障碍协会-统一帕金森病评定量表运动部分(UPDRS-III),共济失调评估量表(SARA)复合自主神经症状评分-31(COMPASS-31),和综合自主严重程度评分(CASS)。我们的研究纳入了20例患者(17例小脑型MSA和3例帕金森型MSA)。得分范围从1到14(中位数[四分位距(IQR)]=8[5-10])。在分量表中,扫视的中位数为2.5分(IQR=1-3),其次是眼睛追求(1[0-1]),眼球震颤(1[0-2]),扫射侵入体(1[0-1]),前庭眼反射(VOR)(0.5[0-1]),眼睛对齐(0[0-1]),和VOR消除(1[0-1])。基于临床检查的SODA(p=0.020)和VOG指导的SODA(p=0.034)与疾病持续时间呈正相关。在基于临床检查的SODA和其他量表之间没有发现相关性。偏斜偏差,凝视诱发的眼球震颤,VOR取消,平稳的追求在物品中精度最高。眼球错位,自发性和位置性眼震通常是假阳性,并且在基于临床检查的SODA中很少发现。重复评估的6例患者得分较高,以及其他临床量表记录的恶化。SODA可以可靠地预测神经变性,作为MSA的额外临床替代。
    A clinical scale fully dedicated to evaluating ocular motor abnormalities is required for now. We investigated the utility of a recently developed Scale for Ocular motor Disorders in Ataxia (SODA) in patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA). We prospectively assessed SODA in consecutive patients with MSA between August 2021 and August 2023 at the Korea University Medical Center. The results of the clinical exam-based SODA were compared with those measured using video-oculography (VOG-guided SODA). We also compared the findings with other established clinical scales targeting patients with MSA, including the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) I-II, Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson\'s Disease Rating Scale motor part (UPDRS-III), Scale for Assessment of Rating of Ataxia (SARA), Composite Autonomic Symptom Score-31 (COMPASS-31), and Composite Autonomic Severity Score (CASS). Twenty patients were enrolled in our study (17 with cerebellar-type MSA and three with Parkinson-type MSA). Scores ranged from 1 to 14 (median [interquartile range (IQR)] = 8 [5-10]). Among the subscales, saccades had a median score of 2.5 (IQR = 1-3), followed by ocular pursuit (1 [0-1]), nystagmus (1 [0-2]), saccadic intrusions (1 [0-1]), vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) (0.5 [0-1]), ocular alignment (0 [0-1]), and VOR cancellation (1 [0-1]). The clinical-exam-based SODA (p = 0.020) and VOG-guided SODA (p = 0.034) positively correlated with disease duration. No correlation was found between clinical exam-based SODA and other scales. Skew deviation, gaze-evoked nystagmus, VOR cancellation, and smooth pursuit had the highest precision among the items. Ocular misalignment and spontaneous and positional nystagmus were frequently false positive and were poorly detected with clinical exam-based SODA. Six patients with repeated evaluation exhibited higher scores, along with deterioration documented on other clinical scales. The SODA can reliably predict neurodegeneration as an additional clinical surrogate in MSA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Marginal reflex distance1 (MRD1) is a crucial clinical tool used to evaluate the position of the eyelid margin in relation to the cornea. Traditionally, this assessment has been conducted manually by plastic surgeons, ophthalmologists, or trained technicians. However, with the advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technology, there is a growing interest in the development of automated systems capable of accurately measuring MRD1. In this context, we introduce novel MRD1 measurement methods based on deep learning algorithms that can simultaneously capture images and compute the results. This prospective observational study involved 154 eyes of 77 patients aged over 18 years who visited Chungnam National University Hospital between 1 January 2023 and 29 July 2023. We collected four different MRD1 datasets from patients using three distinct measurement methods, each tailored to the individual patient. The mean MRD1 values, measured through the manual method using a penlight, the deep learning method, ImageJ analysis from RGB eye images, and ImageJ analysis from IR eye images in 56 eyes of 28 patients, were 2.64 ± 1.04 mm, 2.85 ± 1.07 mm, 2.78 ± 1.08 mm, and 3.07 ± 0.95 mm, respectively. Notably, the strongest agreement was observed between MRD1_deep learning (DL) and MRD1_IR (0.822, p < 0.01). In a Bland-Altman plot, the smallest difference was observed between MRD1_DL and MRD1_IR ImageJ, with a mean difference of 0.0611 and ΔLOA (limits of agreement) of 2.5162, which was the smallest among all of the groups. In conclusion, this novel MRD1 measurement method, based on an IR camera and deep learning, demonstrates statistical significance and can be readily applied in clinical settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    动态视敏度(DVA)对于运动物体的感知至关重要。虽然传统的DVA评估工具主要关注水平运动,垂直DVA的评估仍未标准化.因此,垂直和水平DVA之间的差异尚未得到彻底调查。因此,我们设计了一个能够进行多向DVA测试和眼动测量的系统。在实验过程中,参与者确定了Landolt-C环水平或垂直移动的间隙方向。当高速红外摄像机以500fps捕获左眼的瞳孔运动时,运动速度从最大值开始减速。我们对15名健康大学生(年龄[公式:见正文]年)进行了测试,并分别测量了5次垂直和水平DVA。DVA是从具有精确间隙方向响应的Landolt-C环速度推导出的。并且基于总的注视运动距离评估眼球运动.结果显示,与垂直方向相比,在水平方向上的DVA和眼睛运动更好([公式:见正文])。这突出了DVA和眼球运动的各向异性特征。所提出的系统具有在临床场景中进行多向动态视觉评估和训练的潜力。
    Dynamic visual acuity (DVA) is crucial for the perception of moving objects. While traditional DVA assessment tools predominantly focus on horizontal movements, the evaluation of vertical DVA remains unstandardized. Consequently, the disparities between vertical and horizontal DVAs are yet to be thoroughly investigated. Therefore, we designed a system capable of conducting multidirectional DVA tests and eye movement measurements. During the experiments, the participants identified the gap direction of the Landolt-C ring moving either horizontally or vertically. The speed of movement decelerated from its maximum as a high-speed infrared camera captured the pupil movements of the left eye at 500 fps. We conducted tests on 15 healthy university students (aged [Formula: see text] years) and measured vertical and horizontal DVAs five times each. DVA was deduced from the Landolt-C ring speed with accurate gap direction responses, and eye movement was assessed based on the total gaze movement distance. The results revealed superior DVA and eye movement in the horizontal direction compared with the vertical direction ([Formula: see text]). This highlights the anisotropic characteristics of DVA and eye movement. The proposed system has the potential for multidirectional dynamic vision evaluation and training in clinical scenarios.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号