Extrahepatic portal vein obstruction

肝外门静脉阻塞
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:儿童非肝硬化肝外门静脉阻塞(EHPVO)导致的门静脉高压主要通过Meso-Rex旁路术进行治疗,但只有少数病人有一个可行的雷克斯直肠,需要手术。本研究报告了一系列在门静脉再通(PVR)进行介入放射学尝试的患者,专注于技术方面和安全。
    方法:自2022年以来,在单个机构中连续对由于非肝硬化EHPVO引起的严重门静脉高压症患者进行了回顾性回顾,这些患者在PVR中进行了经皮尝试,已执行。技术和临床数据,包括透视时间,辐射暴露,技术和临床成功,记录并发症和随访情况.
    结果:11例患者(男6例,女5例;中位年龄7岁,范围1-14)接受了15次经皮肝穿(n=1),跨脾(n=11),或同时经肝/经脾(n=3)手术。雷克斯recesssus在4/11(36%)获得专利。荧光镜检查导致每个程序的123Gycm2(范围17-788Gycm2)的高中位总剂量面积乘积(DAP)。5/11例患者(45%)获得PVR,3/5与消除雷克斯衰退。发生2级和3级两个不良事件,无后遗症。血管成形术后,4/5患者需要支架置入以获得持续通畅,在中位随访6个月(范围6-14)后,所有PVR的彩色多普勒超声检查均显示。
    结论:我们的初步经验表明,45%的非肝硬化EHPVO患儿即使在雷克斯闭经时也能恢复门静脉血流。在非肝硬化EHPVO中,PVR可能是一种选择,如果Meso-Rex旁路不可行,尽管辐射暴露值得关注。
    结论:在不符合Meso-Rex搭桥手术条件的儿童中,创新的经皮手术可能是传统手术方法的替代选择。
    结论:传统上,儿童非肝硬化门静脉高压症通过Meso-Rex旁路手术治疗。经皮PVR可以恢复原生门静脉系统的通畅,即使在雷克斯直肠被切除和手术被排除的情况下也是如此。当Meso-Rex旁路术不可行时,介入放射技术可以在儿童EHPVO的复杂病例中提供微创解决方案。
    OBJECTIVE: Portal hypertension resulting from non-cirrhotic extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) in children has been primarily managed with the Meso-Rex bypass, but only a few patients have a viable Rex recessus, required by surgery. This study reports a preliminary series of patients who underwent interventional radiology attempts at portal vein recanalization (PVR), with a focus on technical aspects and safety.
    METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients with severe portal hypertension due to non-cirrhotic EHPVO at a single institution from 2022, who underwent percutaneous attempts at PVR, was performed. Technical and clinical data including fluoroscopy time, radiation exposure, technical and clinical success, complications and follow-up were recorded.
    RESULTS: Eleven patients (6 males and 5 females; median age 7 years, range 1-14) underwent 15 percutaneous transhepatic (n = 1), transplenic (n = 11), or simultaneous transhepatic/transplenic (n = 3) procedures. Rex recessus was patent in 4/11 (36%). Fluoroscopy resulted in a high median total dose area product (DAP) of 123 Gycm2 (range 17-788 Gycm2) per procedure. PVR was achieved in 5/11 patients (45%), 3/5 with obliterated Rex recessus. Two adverse events of grade 2 and grade 3 occurred without sequelae. After angioplasty, 4/5 patients required stenting to obtain sustained patency, as demonstrated by colour-Doppler ultrasound in all PVR after a median follow-up of 6 months (range 6-14).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary experience suggests that 45% of children with non-cirrhotic EHPVO can restore portal flow even with obliterated Rex recessus. In non-cirrhotic EHPVO, PVR may be an option, if a Meso-Rex bypass is not feasible, although the radiation exposure deserves attention.
    CONCLUSIONS: Innovative percutaneous procedures may have the potential to be an alternative option to the traditional surgical approach in the management of non-cirrhotic EHPVO and its complications in children not eligible for Meso-Rex bypass surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension in children has been traditionally managed by surgery with Meso-Rex bypass creation. Percutaneous PVR may restore the patency of the native portal system even when the Rex recessus is obliterated and surgery has been excluded. Interventional radiological techniques may offer a minimally invasive solution in complex cases of EHPVO in children when Meso-Rex bypass is not feasible.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝外门静脉阻塞(EHPVO)是一种罕见的疾病,以骨髓增殖性肿瘤(MPN)为最常见的原因。我们报告说,MPN可能会消除EHPVO的脾性血液学改变。通过使用EHPVO控制静脉曲张的脾切除术的经验,我们怀疑脾脏可能掩盖MPN诱导的血小板增多症,MPN可能对脾切除术后过度血小板增多有显著影响。为了阐明MPN和脾脏对血小板趋势的影响,我们进行了回顾性医院数据库分析,评估8例EHPVO患者的脾切除术(2例男性,6名女性;从17岁到64岁,平均38.3年)。8个中的3个(37.5%)被JAK2V617F突变诊断为MPN。术前无MPN的EHPVO患者围手术期血清血小板计数分别为10.5、35.4和36.6(x104/μL),1周和3周后,分别。EHPVO与MPN的血小板计数分别为34.2、86.4和137.0(x104/μL),分别。脾切除和MPN对血小板增加呈正交互作用,具有统计学意义。我们还检查了脾脏体积指数(SpVI:脾脏体积(cm3)/体表面积(m2)和术后血小板升高率(PER:术后3周血小板计数/术前血小板计数)。然而,无论有无MPN,SpVI和PER均无显着差异。组织学检查显示所有8例EHPVO患者的脾充血,3MPN中有2例脾髓外造血。在带有MPN的EHPVO中,脾功能亢进通过掩盖MPN诱导的血小板增多引起血小板计数正常;然而,脾切除术揭示了术后血小板增多。EHPVO伴MPN的脾脏也参与髓外造血。
    Extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) is a rare disease with myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) as the most common cause. We report that hypersplenic hematologic changes in EHPVO might be eliminated by MPN. Through experience with splenectomy for variceal control with EHPVO, we suspected that spleen might mask MPN-induced thrombocytosis, and that MPN might have a significant influence on excessive thrombocytosis after splenectomy. To clarify the influence of MPN and spleen on platelet trends, we conducted a retrospective hospital database analysis, evaluating 8 EHPVO patients with splenectomy (2 males, 6 females; from 17 years to 64 years, mean 38.3 years). Three (37.5%) of 8 were diagnosed as MPN by JAK2V617F mutation. The perioperative serum platelet counts in EHPVO without MPN were 10.5, 35.4, and 36.6 (x104/μL) preoperatively, after 1 week and 3 weeks, respectively. The platelet counts in EHPVO with MPN were 34.2, 86.4, and 137.0 (x104/μL), respectively. Splenectomy and MPN showed positive interaction on platelet increasing with statistical significance. We also examined the spleen volume index (SpVI: splenic volume (cm3) / body surface area (m2) and postoperative platelet elevations ratio (PER: 3-week postoperative platelet counts / preoperative platelet counts). However, both SpVI and PER showed no significant difference with or without MPN. Histological examination revealed splenic congestion in all 8 EHPVO cases, and splenic extramedullary hematopoiesis in 2 of 3 MPN. In EHPVO with MPN, hypersplenism causes feigned normalization of platelet count by masking MPN-induced thrombocytosis; however, splenectomy unveils postoperative thrombocytosis. Spleen in EHPVO with MPN also participates in extramedullary hematopoiesis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    肝外门静脉血栓形成(EHPVO)是门静脉高压症的罕见原因。从长远来看,患者可能发生门静脉海绵体瘤胆管病变(PCC).高达30%-40%的EHPVO患者可能没有可分流的静脉,并且通常难以手术管理。EHPVO患者已使用包括门静脉再通-经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(PVRecan-TIPS)在内的介入治疗。然而,PV重建-经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(PVRecon-TIPS)和门静脉支架置入术是管理此类具有不可分流静脉解剖结构的EHPVO患者的新技术。与PVRecan-TIPS相比,PV重建-TIPS(PVRecon-TIPS)通过肝内侧支进行。在这里,我们介绍了6例PCC,其表现为复发性急性静脉曲张破裂出血(AVB)和难治性胆道狭窄。他们没有任何可分流的静脉。对五名患者进行了PVRecon-TIPS,而对一名患者进行了PV支架置入术。在六个病人中,1人死于脓毒症,1名出现低钠血症和肝性脑病的患者通过保守治疗得到抢救.按照程序,他们开始抗凝。在所有其他患者中均记录了海绵状瘤的减压。40%的患者胆道改变完全改善。
    Extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis (EHPVO) is an uncommon cause of portal hypertension. In the long term, patients may develop portal cavernoma cholangiopathy (PCC). Up to 30%-40% of patients with EHPVO may not have shuntable veins and are often difficult to manage surgically. Interventional treatment including portal vein recanalisation-trans jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (PVRecan-TIPS) has been used for patients with EHPVO. However, PV reconstruction-trans jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (PVRecon-TIPS) and portal vein stenting are novel techniques for managing such patients with EHPVO with non-shuntable venous anatomy. In contrast to PVRecan-TIPS, PV reconstruction-TIPS (PVRecon-TIPS) is performed through intrahepatic collaterals. Here we present six cases of PCC who presented with recurrent acute variceal bleeding (AVB) and or refractory biliary stricture. They did not have any shuntable veins. PVRecon-TIPS was performed for five patients whilst PV stenting was done in one. Amongst the six patients, one died of sepsis whilst one who developed hyponatremia and hepatic encephalopathy was salvaged with conservative management. Following the procedure, they were started on anti-coagulation. Decompression of cavernoma was documented in all other patients. Biliary changes improved completely in 40% of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于缺乏合适的静脉,超过20%的肝外门静脉阻塞(EHPVO)患者可能被认为是不可回避的。在这种情况下,“临时分流”或“次要分流”的作用很重要。在这份报告中,作者分享了他们在儿童门静脉高压症管理中的临时分流术的经验,重点是解剖方面的考虑。症状的解决,手术后的结果,和分流通畅。
    在1983-2018年期间,在一名外科医生(VB)的护理下对138名门静脉高压症儿童进行了管理。其中,134是EHPVO。EHPVO患儿接受脾切除术和近端肾上腺分流术治疗(n=107),脾切除术和断流术(n=21),和临时分流(n=6)。临时分流包括(i)左右右胃上静脉(Rt-GEV)到左肾静脉(LRV)分流(n=1),(ii)使用螺旋隐静脉移植物(n=1)的肠系膜上静脉(SMV)到下腔静脉(IVC)分流,(iii)侧侧肠系膜下静脉(IMV)至LRV分流(n=2),(iv)侧向IMV至IVC分流(n=1),(v)端对侧IMV至IVC分流(n=1),和(vi)在交叉融合肾异位的情况下,侧对侧IMV至LRV分流(n=1)。
    在创建门体分流之后,所有6例患者均显示门静脉压力下降.包括呕血在内的症状消退,Melena,肛门直肠静脉曲张出血.没有患者表现出肝性脑病的特征。相关的门静脉海绵体瘤胆管病变(n=1)在Rt-GEV至LRV分流后也得以解决。在整个随访期间(1.5-4年),六名患者中有五名记录了分流通畅;第六名患者在6个月的随访中表现出分流阻滞,但没有症状复发。
    对于静脉不可分流的儿科患者,临时分流提供了标准门体分流的可行替代方案。这种分流器的选择是,然而,根据外科医生的喜好,必须根据局部解剖学进行个性化。
    UNASSIGNED: More than 20% of patients with extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) may be deemed as nonshuntable due to lack of a suitable vein. The role of \"makeshift shunts\" or \"lesser shunts\" assumes importance in such cases. In this report, the authors have shared their experience with the makeshift shunts in the management of portal hypertension in children with emphasis upon anatomic considerations, resolution of symptoms, outcomes after surgery, and shunt patency.
    UNASSIGNED: During the period 1983-2018, 138 children with portal hypertension were managed under the care of a single surgeon (VB). Of them, 134 were EHPVO. Children with EHPVO were treated with splenectomy and proximal lienorenal shunt (n = 107), splenectomy and devascularization (n = 21), and makeshift shunts (n = 6). Makeshift shunts comprised (i) side-to-side right gastroepiploic vein (Rt-GEV) to left renal vein (LRV) shunt (n = 1), (ii) superior mesenteric vein (SMV) to inferior vena cava (IVC) shunt using a spiral saphenous venous graft (n = 1), (iii) side-to-side inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) to LRV shunt (n = 2), (iv) side-to-side IMV to IVC shunt (n = 1), (v) end-to-side IMV to IVC shunt (n = 1), and (vi) side-to-side IMV to LRV shunt (n = 1) in a case of crossed fused renal ectopia.
    UNASSIGNED: Following the creation of portosystemic shunt, a decline in portal pressure was demonstrated in all six patients. There was resolution of symptoms including hematemesis, melena, and anorectal variceal bleed. None of the patients demonstrated the features of hepatic encephalopathy. The associated portal cavernoma cholangiopathy (n = 1) also resolved following Rt-GEV to LRV shunt. Shunt patency was documented for the entire duration of follow-up (1.5-4 years) in five of six patients; the sixth patient demonstrated shunt block at 6-month follow-up but without recurrence of symptoms.
    UNASSIGNED: Makeshift shunts offer a viable alternative to standard portosystemic shunting in pediatric patients with a nonshuntable vein. The selection of such shunts is, however, subject to surgeon\'s preferences and has to be individualized to local anatomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非肝硬化门静脉高压症(NCPH)是公认的临床病理实体,这与临床症状和体征有关,成像,和门脉高压症(PHT)的内镜特征,在没有肝硬化的情况下。在没有已知PHT或肝外门静脉血栓形成危险因素的NCPH患者中,这种情况被称为特发性非肝硬化门静脉高压症(INCPH)。有多种传染性,免疫相关的原因,全身性疾病,药物和毒素暴露,血液系统疾病,以及与INCPH相关的代谢危险因素。然而,其病因尚不清楚。血管肝脏疾病兴趣小组最近提出门窦血管疾病(PSVD)作为一种综合征实体,为NCPH的诊断提供了明确的组织病理学标准(表1)。PSVD特有的三种经典组织形态病变包括闭塞性门静脉病,结节性再生增生,和不完全的间隔纤维化。PSVD的定义包括门静脉血栓形成的患者,PVT,甚至那些没有PHT的人,从而扩大了诊断范围,包括可能早期出现的患者,在血液动力学变化与PHT一致之前。然而,这个新的诊断有利弊。缺点包括强制侵入性肝活检以评估所有NCPH患者的PSVD组织学三联征,亚洲患者的既往临床诊断。此外,无PHT的PSVD亚临床形式的自然史和发生PHT的线性进展尚不清楚.在这次审查中,我们讨论INCPH/PSVD的诊断和治疗,新旧模式的谬误和优势,这种疾病的病理学,和亚洲背景下的临床相关性。尽管标准化诊断标准的制定对于临床队列与INCPH/PSVD的比较是有用的,全球队列中的前瞻性临床验证对于避免肝脏血管疾病的错误分类是必要的.
    Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) is a well-recognized clinico-pathological entity, which is associated with clinical signs and symptoms, imaging, and endoscopic features of portal hypertension (PHT), in absence of cirrhosis. In patients with NCPH without known risk factors of PHT or extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis, the condition is called idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH). There are multiple infectious, immune related causes, systemic diseases, drug and toxin exposures, haematological disorders, and metabolic risk factors that have been associated with this INCPH. However, the causal pathogenesis is still unclear. The Vascular liver disorders interest group group recently proposed porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) as a syndromic entity, which provides definite histopathological criteria for diagnosis of NCPH (table 1). The three classical histo-morphological lesions specific for PSVD include obliterative portal venopathy, nodular regenerative hyperplasia, and incomplete septal fibrosis. The PSVD definition includes patients with portal vein thrombosis, PVT, and even those without PHT, thus broadening the scope of diagnosis to include patients who may have presented early, prior to haemodynamic changes consistent with PHT. However, this new diagnosis has pros and cons. The cons include mandating invasive liver biopsy to assess the PSVD histological triad in all patients with NCPH, an erstwhile clinical diagnosis in Asian patients. In addition, the natural history of the subclinical forms of PSVD without PHT and linear progression to develop PHT is unknown yet. In this review, we discuss the diagnosis and treatment of INCPH/PSVD, fallacies and strengths of the old and new schema, pathobiology of this disease, and clinical correlates in an Asian context. Although formulation of standardised diagnostic criteria is useful for comparison of clinical cohorts with INCPH/PSVD, prospective clinical validation in global cohorts is necessary to avoid misclassification of vascular disorders of the liver.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    本报告描述了正在研究的颞下颌关节强直(TMJA)和肝外门静脉阻塞(EHPVO)的共同发生,探索涉及高凝的共享途径。TMJA是一种关节表面融合的获得性病理学,导致张口受限和面部不对称。全球范围内,TMJA在1.5至5名患者/百万中普遍存在,在发展中国家发病率较高。虽然创伤和感染经常引起TMJA,许多病例的发病机制尚不清楚.最近的文献指出TMJA和EHPVO之间存在联系,引起儿童门静脉高压和上消化道出血的非肝硬化血管疾病。血栓性疾病如蛋白C和S缺乏可能导致EHPVO,反映TMJA与高凝状态的关联。这份报告的重点是一名被诊断患有TMJA的11岁女性,伴有耳部感染史和并发EHPVO。我们进一步介绍了临床观察,手术干预,以及结果以及文献综述,以了解EHPVO和TMJA之间可能的联系。
    This report describes the understudied co-occurrence of temporomandibular joint ankylosis (TMJA) and extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO), exploring a shared pathway involving hypercoagulability. TMJA is an acquired pathology where joint surfaces fuse, causing restricted mouth opening and facial asymmetry. Globally, TMJA is prevalent among 1.5 to 5 patients/million, with a higher incidence in developing countries. While trauma and infections often cause TMJA, the pathogenesis remains unclear in many cases. Recent literature notes a link between TMJA and EHPVO, a noncirrhotic vascular disorder causing portal hypertension and upper gastrointestinal bleeding in children. Prothrombotic disorders such as protein C and S deficiency may contribute to EHPVO, mirroring TMJA\'s association with hypercoagulability. This report focuses on an 11-year-old female diagnosed with TMJA, accompanied by a history of ear infection and concurrent EHPVO. We further presented clinical observations, surgical interventions, and outcomes alongside a literature review to understand the probable connection between EHPVO and TMJA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝外门静脉阻塞(EHPVO)是一种罕见疾病。大多数EHPVO患者通常因肠道出血和脾性血小板减少症而被转诊至胃肠病学家;然而,高凝疾病在这些患者中可能是隐匿性的,需要抗凝治疗。本研究的目的是阐明EHPVO的临床特征。我们对医院数据库进行了回顾性分析,评估15名患者的医疗记录(7名男性,8位女性,平均发病年龄42.0岁,范围5-74年)。15例EHPVO患者中有13例(86.7%)患有肠静脉曲张。其中包括10例食管(66.7%),12胃(80.0%),异位静脉曲张6例(40.0%)。15人中有9人(60.0%)有肠道出血史。关于合并症,15人中有5人(33.3%)患有血管疾病,包括急性心肌梗塞,脑梗塞,肺栓塞,布加综合征,和肠系膜静脉血栓形成.前3种血管商品在小于32岁时表现出来。4例患者(26.7%)的JAK2V617F突变被诊断为骨髓增殖性肿瘤(MPN)。72.3%无MPN的EHPVO患者出现血小板减少状态。无MPNEHPVO患者出现血栓-白细胞减少。白细胞和血小板计数升高,在EHPVO和MPN中观察到蛋白S的减少,与无MPN的EHPVO相比。EHPVO通常与潜在的高凝因素有关,导致血栓性并发症和门脉高压出血之间的两难选择。大多数EHPVO患者由于严重脾功能亢进而出现明显的血小板减少状态;然而,在MPN的EHPVO中消除了脾多症血液学变化。血栓白细胞减少阴性的EHPVO患者应怀疑MPN。
    Extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) is a rare disease. Most EHPVO patients are usually referred to a gastroenterologist for intestinal bleeding and hypersplenic thrombocytopenia; however, hypercoagulative diseases may be occult in these patients and require anticoagulation. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the clinical characteristics of EHPVO. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the hospital database, evaluating the medical records of 15 patients (7 males, 8 females, mean age of onset 42.0 years, range 5-74 years). Thirteen of 15 EHPVO patients (86.7%) had intestinal varices. These included 10 esophageal (66.7%), 12 gastric (80.0%), and 6 ectopic varices (40.0%). Nine (60.0%) of 15 had a history of intestinal bleeding. Regarding comorbidities, 5 of 15 (33.3%) suffered from vascular diseases, including acute myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, pulmonary embolism, Budd-Chiari syndrome, and mesenteric vein thrombosis. The former 3 vascular commodities manifested at less than 32 years of age. Four patients (26.7%) with JAK2V617F mutation were diagnosed as myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN). 72.3% of EHPVO patients without MPN experienced thrombocytopenic state. No EHPVO patients with MPN experienced thrombo-leukocytopenia. The elevation of white blood cell and platelet counts, and decrease of protein S were seen in EHPVO with MPN, compared with EHPVO without MPN. EHPVO is frequently associated with underlying hypercoagulative factors, causing a dilemma between thrombotic complications and portal hypertensive bleeding. Most EHPVO patients experience an evident thrombocytopenic state due to severe hypersplenism; however, hypersplenic hematologic changes are eliminated in EHPVO with MPN. MPN should be suspected in EHPVO patients negative for thrombo-leukocytopenia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:肝外门静脉阻塞是儿童门静脉高压症的最常见原因。然而,它的患病率很低。儿童门静脉高压导致的食管静脉曲张可导致上消化道出血反复发作,如果不及时诊断和治疗,可能会有一个险恶的结果。
    方法:一名7岁男性儿童出现上消化道出血反复发作3年。临床检查显示苍白和脾肿大。实验室检查显示脾功能亢进伴贫血的体征,白细胞减少症和血小板减少症,多普勒超声和CT腹部和骨盆显示脾静脉血栓形成伴脾肿大和门静脉海绵样变。该患者接受了脾切除术,脾肾分流术和食管胃静脉曲张断流术。
    结论:肝外门静脉阻塞是儿童非肝硬化门静脉高压症的最常见原因。它在儿科人群中的发生非常罕见。门静脉高压可导致静脉曲张破裂出血和脾肿大,这会对儿童的长期健康产生重大影响。由于其阴险的性质,它的诊断需要细致的检查,在儿科人群中治疗是困难的,缺乏专门针对儿科人群的适当治疗指南。
    结论:肝外门静脉梗阻在诊断和治疗困难的儿童中很少见。尽管有这些障碍,及时的干预可以减轻幼儿对其不利结局的负担,并大大提高这些患者的生活质量.
    BACKGROUND: Extrahepatic Portal Vein Obstruction is the most common cause of portal hypertension in children. However, it has a very low prevalence. Esophageal varices due to portal hypertension in children can lead to recurrent episodes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, which can have a sinister outcome if timely diagnosis and treatment are not initiated.
    METHODS: A 7-year-old male child presents with recurrent episodes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding for 3 years. Clinical examination reveals pallor and splenomegaly. Laboratory investigations revealed signs of hypersplenism with anemia, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia, and Doppler ultrasonography and CT abdomen and pelvis revealed splenic vein thrombosis with splenomegaly and cavernous transformation of the portal vein. The patient was managed operatively with splenectomy with splenorenal shunting and devascularization of esophagogastric varices.
    CONCLUSIONS: Extrahepatic Portal Vein obstruction is the most common cause of noncirrhotic portal hypertension in children. Its occurrence in the pediatric population is very rare. Portal hypertension can lead to variceal bleeding and splenomegaly, which can have a significant impact on a child\'s long-term health. Because of its insidious nature, a meticulous workup is required for its diagnosis, and treatment in the pediatric population is difficult, and appropriate guidelines for its management specifically targeting the pediatric population are lacking.
    CONCLUSIONS: Extrahepatic Portal Vein obstruction is rare in children with a difficult diagnosis and management. Despite these hindrances, timely intervention can lift a significant burden of its detrimental outcome off the young children and drastically uplift the quality of life of these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于妊娠合并非肝硬化门静脉高压症患者结局的相关研究有限。因此,我们对现有文献进行了系统评价和荟萃分析.
    从1999年至2021年12月进行了文献检索,以评估非肝硬化门脉高压患者的妊娠结局。
    12项研究纳入荟萃分析。静脉曲张破裂出血的合并率,需要输血的腹水和严重贫血占9.6%,2.3%,和14.9%,分别。合并的自然流产率,妊娠期高血压,剖宫产分娩,产后出血占11.9%,4.5%,36.7%,和4.7%,分别。合并死胎率为2.5%,在活产中,汇总早产率,低出生体重,重症监护室入院,新生儿死亡率为21.6%,18.7%,15.5%,和1.8%,分别。
    非肝硬化门静脉高压症患者的妊娠与母体和胎儿发病率增加相关,但死亡率仍然很低。
    UNASSIGNED: Concerned studies with respect to the outcome of pregnant patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension are limited. Thus, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature was conducted.
    UNASSIGNED: A literature search was conducted from 1999 to December 2021 for studies evaluating pregnancy outcomes in patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension.
    UNASSIGNED: Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled rate of variceal bleeding, ascites and severe anemia requiring blood transfusion were 9.6%, 2.3%, and 14.9%, respectively. The pooled rate of spontaneous miscarriage, gestational hypertension, delivery by cesarean section, and postpartum hemorrhage were 11.9%, 4.5%, 36.7%, and 4.7%, respectively. The pooled stillbirth rate was 2.5% and among the live births, the pooled rates of preterm birth, low birth weight, intensive care unit admission, and neonatal mortality were 21.6%, 18.7%, 15.5%, and 1.8%, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Pregnancy in patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension is associated with increased maternal & fetal morbidity but mortality remains low.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号